Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Thyroid Hacks Part 2 with Dr. Ruben Valdes: Rational Wellness Podcast 158
Loading
/

Dr. Ruben Valdes talks about Improving Thyroid Health in Thyroid Hacks Part 2 with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/weitzchiro/]

 

Podcast Highlights

6:17   Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is an autoimmune condition and it is the main cause of hyothyroidism in the US today.  We do not know if Hashimoto’s patients fare any worse or better than other people if they contract COVID-19.  But patients with diabetes tend to fare less well since many of them are in an immunosuppressed state, since blood sugar spikes tend to cause glycation of white blood cells.  Gycation is when the sugar in the bloodstream sticks to proteins in the retina, to nerves, in the brain, to hemoglobin in red blood cells (HemoglobinA1C), and to white blood cells.  Diabetic patients have more trouble fighting off an infection and diabetes is associated with a worse outcome with COVID-19 infection. 

13:00  At this point we don’t really have much data as to whether patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis will fare better or worse with COVID-19 infection, but it’s interesting that some of the key nutrients for thyroid health–zinc, selenium, vitamin D, and iodine if they are low will increase your risk of a worse outcome with COVID-19.  Patients with autoimmune disease will likely fare worse with COVID-19 and viruses like the SARS-COV-2 virus tend to trigger the formation of autoimmune diseases. Viruses can lead to autoimmunity through 3 mechanisms: 1. Molecular mimicry, 2. Bystander activation, and 3. Epitope activation.  1. What molecular mimicry means is that viruses can hide from the immune system by expressing a protein that is very similar to self. It could be similar to thyroid, the brain, the lungs, depending upon the area that the virus is going to infect. This allows the virus to hide from the immune system. Then, when the immune system goes after the virus, it can inadvertently attack yourself.  2. With bystander activation the virus begins to break down the cells it’s infecting, and those cells die and break open, there’s going to be self-antigens that are released as that cell dies, and that’s going to now create a self-attack. The immune system’s going to identify these intracellular antibodies and begin to go after those tissues because they contain that antigen.  3. With epitope activation, which is very similar just to a much larger scale to bystander activation when there’s very diffused tissue breakdown, and when we see things like what happens with coronavirus, this cytokine storm, this huge wave of inflammation to a specific tissue.  So it would not be surprising if one of the sequelae of this COVID-19 is an increase in autoimmune diseases.

19:17  There are various triggers for Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, including viruses. Hormonal surges, such as of insulin or cortisol, can be activating to the immune system.  Cortisol is secreted by the adrenal glands when we are stressed, when we’re in the fight-or-flight, and we know that cortisol initially has an immuno activating effect.  Longer term, cortisol ends up becoming immunosuppressive, which is why cortisone is sometimes used to treat autoimmune diseases.  Stress and cortisol can  shut down some of the areas of our innate immunity and start overactivating our acquired or antibody-based immunity, thus serving as a trigger for the development of autoimmune disease and for the relapse of autoimmune disease.

25:32  If you have an autoimmune patient, such as one with Hashimoto’s, the first thing you should do is metabolic clearing. This involves using an elimination food plan where the foods that are inflammatory for most people, like gluten, dairy, soy, grains, sugar, are removed, combined with a liver detoxification program, which is essentially the 4R program taught to many of us years ago by the father of Functional Medicine, Dr. Jeffrey Bland.  We increase hydration and support the liver detoxification process with the right nutritional supplements. Then if we are dealing with excess cortisol, we will use adaptogenic herbs to support adrenal balance.  Having a diet high in carbohydrate and sugar and eating to excess can lead to recurrent insulin surges and this can also be a trigger for autoimmune disease.  Surges in estrogen, as occurs during the menstrual cycle, in women with PCOS, and each day when women take the birth control pill, increases the risk for Hashimoto’s. Dr. Valdes suggests that a copper IUD might be a better birth control device than the pill.  Even women during perimenopause and the transition to menopause will experience periods of estrogen surges.  This fact that estrogen surges can serve as a trigger for autoimmune disease is one reason why at least 75% of those with autoimmune diseases are women.  And then we also have toxic forms of estrogen (xenoestrogens) from the environment like pesticides, bisphenol A and phthalates, etc. This is also why we are seeing girls in the US beginning to develop adult female characteristics, breast tissue, pubic hair at or around the age of eight or nine, which is unheard of, as compared to our European counterparts, where most of their girls begin to develop their adult female characteristics around 12, 13, 14, even 15, which is normal.  The estrogenic load on both men and women in our society is very high.

34:49  One of the other triggers for autoimmune diseases like Hashimoto’s is heavy metal toxicity, like mercury.  Other common metal toxicities are cadmium, aluminum, and lead. For mercury, we have two forms, methyl mercury and inorganic mercury.  Inorganic mercury we get from primarily amalgams in our mouth, whereas organic, methyl mercury, which we get primarily from fish.  Cadmium comes mainly from cigarette and other tobacco smoke.  Aluminum is everywhere in our society. And even copper, which is an essential nutrient, if levels are too high is dangerous, comes often from copper piping leaching into the water. This is similar to the situation with lead.  Dr. Valdes likes to use heavy metal testing from Quicksilver Scientific, including the Tri-Mercury test, which measures hair, urine, and blood for both organic and inorganic mercury.  He likes the protocols developed by Dr. Christopher Shade, who is the founder of Quicksilver.  To detoxify heavy metals, Dr. Valdes recommends using EDTA for the metals other than mercury and using tons of glutathione and NAC because glutathione has this wrapping effect when the metal is pulled from the tissue, it’ll wrap it, and it’ll make it less damaging for cellular tissue as you detoxify it.   You also want vitamin C, which is going to be immunomodulating. As you clear it, you want to have a lot of zinc. You also probably want to do remineralization because as you’re pulling metals, you’re also pulling minerals, which you want to replenish. What else is pretty important? You want to increase liver detoxification. So, you want to increase your intake of cofactors and milk thistle and all of the things that help the liver push stuff out. So, yeah, you really need a good comprehensive toolkit.  For binders, Dr. Vlades tends to recommend activated charcoal and chitosan and he likes IMD from Quicksilver, which is a proprietary, highly purified silica with covalently attached thiolic (sulfur) metal-binding groups, allowing it to bind metals in the intestines. Dr. Valdes also like to use a liposomal form of EDTA, which helps to chelate our metals and it is also a really good emulsifier and helps to break down biofilms. 

43:53  The next possible trigger for Hashimoto’s could be leaky gut and/or gut dysbiosis. If patients have leaky gut or increased intestinal permeability, undigested food particles and lipopolysaccharides will get absorbed into the blood stream. We need to rebalance the gut by clearing out pathogenic bacteria and rebuilding the microbiome. Antimicrobials and probiotics can be helpful. Fasting for 3, 5, 7, or 11 days and taking bone broth can be a very helpful tool. 

50:13  Biotoxins, like mold toxins and Lyme Disease, can also be a triggers for Hashimoto’s.  22% of the population are carriers of a susceptibility in a gene called HLA-DR/DQ, and for people that are susceptible, what that means is that their immune system cannot identify or create antibodies or transport and present the biotoxin itself. This tends to drive autoimmune disease. The more people are staying inside their homes, often without good air circulation, they are more likely to get exposed to mold and mycotoxins.  When it comes to mycotoxins, the first thing is mold removal from the home, which includes vacuuming, cleaning, and using an Air Oasis air purifier can all help. Formula 409 kills mold and also viruses.  The best binders for mycotoxins are the prescription ones: cholestyramine and Welchol. Dr. Valdes recommends the Richie Shoemaker protocol that focuses on normalizing various immune markers, including the C4A, the TGFB-1, the MMP-9. There’s different steps for each one of those, and ultimately, there’s an intranasal spray called VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide. That will repair the tissues of the sinuses and of the gut to finalize the whole process.

              



Dr. Ruben Valdes is a Doctor of Chiropractic and an expert in Functional Medicine. He is the Chief Content and Marketing Officer of Novis Health Systems, a Functional Medicine franchise. He wrote 3 books, including The Chiropractic Entrepeneur, From Diabetic to Non-Diabetic, and The Thyroid Hack. Dr. Valdes can be contacted through Novis-Health.com.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations, including remote consults via video or phone, specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111 or go to www.drweitz.com. Phone or video consulting with Dr. Weitz is available.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey. This is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting-edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates, and to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast. Hello Rational Wellness Podcasters. Thank you so much for joining me again today. Please give us some readings and review on Apple Podcasts. If you’d like to see a video version, you can go to my YouTube page, Weitz Chiro, and if you go to my website, drweitz.com, you can find detailed show notes and a complete transcript.

                                Today, our topic is a functional medicine approach to thyroid health with Dr. Ruben Valdes, and this is part two of our interview. In part one in the interview, Dr. Valdes and I spoke about thyroid health, what makes a thyroid misfunction, how to a test for it.  A lot of focus was on diagnostics, but we really didn’t have much time to get into the particular triggers and how to treat them, and with the overwhelming majority of patients in the U.S. having autoimmune hypothyroid, nor did we get to talk about secondary hypothyroidism or how to treat it.

Dr. Valdes:          That’s a mouthful, yep.

Dr. Weitz:            Yes, yes, yes, and I’d also like to remark that at the time of this recording, we’re in the midst of the coronavirus, COVID-19 pandemic. So, that’s providing a background into what’s going on, so I’d also like to ask Dr. Valdes a few questions about that particular topic.  Dr. Ruben Valdes is a doctor of chiropractic and an expert in functional medicine.  He’s the Chief Content and Marketing Officer of Novus Health Systems, a Functional Medicine franchise. He’s written three books including The Chiropractic Entrepreneur, From Diabetic to Non-diabetic, and The Thyroid Hack. Dr. Valdes, thank you so much for joining me again today.

Dr. Valdes:          Thank you for having me, Dr. Weitz. It’s always a pleasure.

Dr. Weitz:            So, how is this coronavirus pandemic affecting you and your practice and how have you been able to pivot?

Dr. Valdes:          Well, I mean, just like everybody, we’re being profoundly affected. Almost overnight, our entire practice has been flipped upside down. Initially, we got a communication from the board saying, “You guys are an essential service. You’re working with high-risk patients, diabetics.” Then the state said, “All non-essential medical services meaning immediate response to COVID-19 needs to shut down.” Then we got another communication from the Department of Homeland Security saying, “Yes, you guys need to stay open.” So, what we’ve done, we were fortunate enough to be partially set up for virtual consultations, virtual appointments, and we just bulked up that side of our practice. So, all of our current patients are being taken care of virtually just like we are doing right now.  This type of Zoom call, we’re providing support. We’re being able to drop-ship their test kits, their supplementation, and that’s really been quite the blessing. I think I’ve been busier the last four or five days than I have been in the last three or four months. So, I feel really fortunate right now that we are in a position where we can help a lot of these patients.

Dr. Weitz:            So, currently, your practice is pretty much focused on the functional nutrition component, correct?

Dr. Valdes:          That’s correct, yes. Yeah, we’re 100% functional medicine right now.

Dr. Weitz:            So, you find Zoom. Is that a good HIPAA-compliant platform? Is that working for you?

Dr. Valdes:          It’s not perfect, but we’re very fortunate that HIPAA laws have become very flexible right now for this very reason, and there was a declaration on this really at the beginning of COVID-19 arriving stateside. There was really a lot of stimulus for doctors to go virtual to be able to take care of their patients this way. So, right now, Zoom’s not a perfect tool. There’s some better, like Spruce is a lot more HIPAA compliant, but the laws around this stuff are pretty flexible right now in order for us doctors to be able to deliver care to our patients.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. I know a number of other people in the functional medicine space who’ve tried to find ways to make sure that they were compliant with all the rules related to, “Is it okay to treat somebody in another state where you’re not licensed and how does all that work?”

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, I mean, there’s definitely a lot of laws that go deep into that. Our franchise has worked with probably the best legal firm in the country. They’re out in California, and normally, these things are very, very strict. If it’s somebody from another state, you have to have a physical examination to establish a doctor-patient relationship, and sometimes you have to have a local there, perform the exam, send it to you. Right now, I can’t really speak into that very much because I don’t have anybody at the time that would be outside of my state. So, I do have a few patients from Florida, from the Charlotte practice, and we’ve already had the establishment of a doctor-patient relationship in the past. So, right now, now we believe that we’re pretty much in compliance within our state laws.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. So, with respect to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, Hashimoto’s being a cause of overwhelming majority of patients with hypothyroid in the United States is an autoimmune condition, and how does this impact the potential if they contract coronavirus? Are they more or less likely to have a worse response or is it not related at all? We know that patients who have a compromised immune system are more likely to have a worse response. What about somebody with an autoimmune condition like Hashimoto’s?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, that’s a great question, and I appreciate you throwing me into the hot water of controversy right out the gate.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s what we’re here for-

Dr. Valdes:          Good. I love it.

Dr. Weitz:            … to solve some of these controversies or at least bring a little bit of light where there is otherwise darkness.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so here’s my position in what I’ve read. I really can’t say… On the side of susceptibility to the viral infection, I don’t feel comfortable enough to have a well-formed opinion yet because number one, this is a completely new virus. It means that none of us have preformed antibodies. So, at the end of the day, that really leaves all of us in a place where we can contract the virus.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, I would assume that we’re all probably, if we get the right exposure to the virus, are probably equally likely to become infected. Let’s just assume that. The question is, “Who’s going to have relatively mild symptoms and who’s going to need hospitalization?” Then you hear some patients just have a horrible response and within a day or two, it just overwhelms your body and takes over.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so first, I’m going to talk to you about what I’ve seen, and then I’ll talk about the research around this topic. So, I haven’t seen any of my Hashimoto’s patients contract the coronavirus yet. I have seen some of my diabetic patients already having contracted the coronavirus and for them, it’s very, very ugly. Like every diabetic, we know and we consider them to be immunosuppressed because with spikes in blood sugar, there’s glycation of white blood. So, most of them walk around in a deep or relatively deep immunosuppressed state.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, okay. I want to stop you there for a second because I don’t think that’s a point that is generally talked about or even considered is we generally think a type one diabetes as an autoimmune condition. Type two diabetes, we generally think of it as a condition related to diet and lifestyle, and we don’t think of it as having an autoimmune component, but can you explain that again? How is type two diabetes impact the immune system?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so it has a huge impact. High blood sugar, when there’s excess sugar in blood, there’s a process called advanced glycation. So, the sugar molecules begin to stick to proteins, to cells, and it really decreases their function. So, whenever a diabetic goes into the emergency room, immediately right off the bat, the attending emergency room physician is going to check them off as immunosuppressed.  They’re going to be treated as an immunosuppressed patient because this advanced glycation affects the function of white blood cells by sugar sticking to the proteins in the white blood cell.  So, for many of them, when their blood sugar is high, we’re talking above 120 and maybe even lower than that. They have a lot of difficulty fighting off infection. Now, the problem-

Dr. Weitz:            So, let me just clarify a little bit for patients or for anybody who’s listening, doctors, et cetera, who aren’t familiar with advanced glycation end products. These are AGEs, and these are components of the sugar molecules that combine with proteins in the body, and when you measure the hemoglobin A1C, you’re measuring one of these advanced glycation end products, which is where the sugar molecules combine with the hemoglobin.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, 100%, and think about it like-

Dr. Weitz:            So, that’s a red blood cell, but now you’re seeing the same process also occurs in white blood cells.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, it occurs everywhere. When there’s high blood sugar, think about the blood becoming syrupy, full of sugar. So, that’ll stick to the proteins in the retina. In the nerve endings of the retina, there’s proteins there. In the brain, in the peripheral nerves, it’ll stick in joint tissue and in renal tissue. That’s why diabetes is so diffused in its complications because these proteins are being damaged everywhere. So, the immune system is no exception to that process of advanced glycation. So, I’ve seen it already in them. The infection lasts a long time for them. It doesn’t go away. It progresses very rapidly.  In addition to that, we know that people that have diabetes or high blood sugar, when they contract an infection, their blood sugar shoots up and it goes higher because now, there’s inflammation. There’s more insulin resistance. If they’re in a hospital setting, and they were just a controlled metformin-based diabetic, a lot of times in the hospital, the standard is to start injecting them with insulin to bring their blood sugar down. Once they go on insulin, then they’re put on insulin forever. So, it just becomes a very rapidly progressing scenario for them.   So, I can speak on that side with a lot of confidence on Hashimoto’s.  I still don’t have first-hand experience of my patients contracting the illness, but I do have very, very strong suspicions as to what it’s going to look and how they’re going to evolve if they contract the infection.

Dr. Weitz:            It’s interesting just thinking about it. It just so happens that some of the key nutrients necessary for thyroid health, zinc and selenium and vitamin D, which are talked about a lot are also if any of these are low or less than optimal, increase your susceptibility to viral infection.

Dr. Valdes:          That’s right, and to complications from viral infections, and I know that zero patients that have ever walked in through my door coming from a conventional model of care where all that’s done for them is taking Synthroid or levothyroxine, right? None of them come in with high levels of selenium or high levels of zinc. So, the majority of these patients are straight out of the gate just because of nutritional status in a situation where they are at risk for complications or progression of the virus if they were to become infected.  So, in addition to that, if we go into the topic of autoimmunity, then that really opens up the conversation because I think that it’s not about the prevention of the infection, but what’s going to happen to so many of these patients that already having a pre-existing autoimmunity whether Hashimoto’s or lupus, sclerodermis, psoriasis, MS, whichever one of these conditions. We know that viral infections are huge, huge triggers of autoimmunity, hands down, rarely any exception to that rule.

Dr. Weitz:            Interesting because I think that there’s perhaps somewhat misconception that autoimmunity is simply an immune system that’s overactive, which would mean that would be a good thing if you had a viral infection, right?

Dr. Valdes:          You would wish but not really. So, there’s really three main mechanisms to autoimmunity in connection with viruses. One of them is called molecular mimicry. What that means is viruses are very, very sneaky, very sophisticated types of infections, and the way that they hide from the immune system is by expressing a protein, an antigen that is very, very similar to self. It could be similar to the thyroid. It can be similar to the brain. It can be similar to the lungs depending on the area that the virus is going to infect, or it has a preference for infecting.  So, many times when the immune system creates a response to that virus, if the response is very aggressive, like you were saying, very overactive. Then it’s going to go after the tissue. Also, it’s going to go after self because they look very, very similar to the immune system. There’s also something called bystander activation where the immune system whereas the virus begins to break down the cells that it’s infecting, and those cells die and break open, there’s going to be self-antigens that are released as that cell dies, and that’s going to now create a self-attack. The immune systems going to identify these intracellular antibodies and begin to go after those tissues because they contain that antigen. Then there’s another one called epitope activation, which is very similar just to a much larger scale to bystander activation when there’s very diffused tissue breakdown, and when we see things like what happens with coronavirus, this cytokine storm, this huge wave of inflammation to a specific tissue.

                                So, we know that viruses especially when they take hold, they are very immuno activating, and there can be a lot of overlap between virus antigens and self-antigens, and that’s why I’m really, really worried for autoimmune patients, Hashimoto’s patients because we know that if they were to contract the virus, viruses, especially very pathogenic viruses are a huge source of immune activation, and that can mean on the least a relapse of the condition, a reactivation, but on the worst, development of now new autoimmune diseases moving forward, and I think some of the people that are out there talking about this are maybe trying to bring down the tone and create less worry, less concern, less stress but in reality when you really look at the mechanisms of autoimmunity, this becomes very alarming for the population moving forward, not just for what’s going on right now.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, the things you’re talking about, how speculative are they? I could just see the editors from New England Journal of Medicine saying, “Well, there’s really no human scientific randomized trials to show that any of this is truthful.”

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, well, they’re really not very speculative, and they’re not too far-fetched. They are speculative for this virus in particular because it’s a novel virus. We don’t have enough data. We don’t have enough knowledge, but when you look, and I’ve looked at a lot of reviews of the literature linking viral disease and the development for autoimmunity, and we have class one data. We have the best available studies that have shown over and over that viral infections can be very strong triggers for autoimmunity. So, we know that enteric viruses and children are deeply linked to the development of type one diabetes. We know that viruses like Epstein-Barr and cytomegalovirus are deeply linked to auto immunities of the thyroid and of the brain. Those are well, well documented facts.  It wouldn’t be a surprise to me that with the type of infectivity and pathogenicity that COVID-19 has to the respiratory tract. I would be surprised that we don’t see long-term autoimmune consequences from this infection.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, cool. Good way to start. Let’s pivot to where we left off in the last discussion, and that’s talking about the triggers of Hashimoto’s and what to do about these.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so Hashimoto’s really like any other autoimmune disease has a pretty extensive number of triggers. We can talk about hormonal surges. If hormones like insulin or cortisol or estrogen are surging, that means spiking day after day. These high levels of hormonal surge can be immuno activating. They can signal the immune system and say, “Hey, there’s too much hormone. What’s going on? Is there a tumor in a tissue? Do we need to go clear it?” So, hormonal surges are big activators.

Dr. Weitz:            So, let’s go into that a little bit. Let’s talk about some of those hormonal surges. So, why don’t we start with cortisol, say?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so one of the biggest known autoimmune activators. Cortisol is secreted by the adrenal glands when we are stressed, when we’re in the fight-or-flight, and we know that cortisol has initially an immuno activating effect, but long-term, unimpressive effect. When cortisol is detoxified or in the liver, it becomes cortisone, and which has a very immunosuppressive effect. When this stuff starts compounding, it can begin to shut down some of the areas of our innate immunity and start overactivating or driving domains of acquired or antibody-based immunity. So, we know that stress is one of the biggest triggers for the development of autoimmune disease and for the relapse of autoimmune disease.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, what about cortisol having lower levels because a lot of us who do like the salivary cortisol testing find that a lot of patients especially with long-term stress just have lower cortisol levels.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, and for me personally, clinically, that’s just an indicator that at some point, they had very, very high cortisol levels. Now, I’m not very clear on the mechanisms between the immune system and having low cortisol as clear as I am when cortisol is surging, but yeah, to me, that’s usually an indicator that at some point, this person had very high levels of cortisol and now, they’re shutting down their production or slowing down their production.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, I can’t help but make another comment about coronavirus, because unfortunately, it seems to be on everybody’s mind including my mind, like 23 out of 24 hours a day as much as I try not to, but some of the data seems to indicate that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory is actually worse than your response, and corticosteroids seem to be potentially somewhat beneficial, and there are some articles showing that glycyrrhizic acid, which is contained in licorice, which helps your adrenal glands to produce more cortisol may actually be beneficial.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, very interesting and super confusing too because we know that a chronic stress response reduces your… Sorry about that. Reduces your ability to fight off infection. That’s common knowledge, and right now, the thing that I worry about is people stuck in their house, stressed out of their minds, eating all this crap. If they were to contract the infection, in my mind, it really creates a negative scenario. So, it is confusing to see that there would be benefit from-

Dr. Weitz:            Well, it’s probably about the timing. In other words, if you were to have a surge in cortisol before or at the beginning, that might make it… I’m only speculating here based on some of the stuff I’ve read. But perhaps once you’ve got the virus that’s starting to create this inflammatory situation in the lungs, that can lead to that big cytokine storm that’s creating all this damage to the lung, scarring, et cetera, that sometimes can be fatal. Maybe at that point, using cortisone can help to lower that inflammatory response. So, it’s not always about the exact substance but the timing as well.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Well put. Well put. Yeah, I mean, that makes sense, absolutely, and in the hospital, right now, I know that what they’re doing for most people, I know a lot of the doctors are not very comfortable yet with the hydroxychloroquine and the Z-pack. Apparently, it’s a pretty aggressive combo, especially for heart. So, I know that for the most part what they’re doing is albuterol to the lung, which is just an anti-inflammatory cortical steroid. So, it makes sense. If at that point, probably the main thing is driving down inflammation in the respiratory tract.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, so anyway, so cortisol surges that will… How does that affect Hashimoto’s now?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so we know that-

Dr. Weitz:            Sorry to get you off track, doc.

Dr. Valdes:          No, all good. So, we know that when cortisol is surging, it’s activating, it’s spiking, it can be immunoactivating. It seems that whenever there’s a preponderance of hormone over time or repeatedly over time, it can signal the immune system to activate. We suspect it’s probably part of just innate immunity, the way that the immune system would clear tumors. Probably when there’s continuous urgings of specific hormones, there seems to be signaling to the immune system that there’s a problem with this tissue.

Dr. Weitz:            So, if you have a patient with high cortisol levels that seems to be triggering their Hashimoto’s, how would you treat that?

Dr. Valdes:          Great question. So, it’ll depend a little bit. Really, we like to go three pronged with it. Classically, we’ll use adaptogens. Whenever we have someone that’s autoimmune after we’ve done metabolic clearing, which we like to do with almost every autoimmune patient-

Dr. Weitz:            What is metabolic clearing?

Dr. Valdes:          So, metabolic clearing is a combination of an elimination food plan where we remove most of the foods that we know are problematic for the immune system in most people.

Dr. Weitz:            Which would be what?

Dr. Valdes:          So, it would be things like gluten, dairy, soy, grains, sugar obviously, some of the key things we know to be very inflammatory and immunoactive.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Valdes:          We combine that with liver detoxification. We improve nutritional status. We clean out the gut a little bit, and that’s what we mean by metabolic clearing. We increase hydration significantly to be able to eliminate metabolites, xenobiotics, all of the things that-

Dr. Weitz:            So, essentially, you’re talking about one of the pillars of functional medicine approach as originally taught to us by the father of functional medicine, Dr. Jeffrey Bland, using a 4R or the 5R program.

Dr. Valdes:          That’s correct, yeah. So, we really liken and find a lot of value in initiating every autoimmune or almost every… There’s some patients that won’t tolerate it, and we can talk about that, but almost every patient that we take on, we to start them on there because it’s such a broad… It covers so many pieces, and one of the things that it does, it helps people eliminate excess hormones during that period of time. So, if one of the things is they’re having surges of insulin or of cortisol or estradiol, their overall hormonal levels are going to decrease by detoxification. So, that’s one thing. Another thing is we want to induce things that can have a direct effect.

Dr. Weitz:            Well, I’ll tell you what. Let me stop you there because we went into the cortisol. Why don’t we talk about the surges of insulin and what we can do about that?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so those are probably the easiest to talk about because most of the time, those are 100%… I don’t know why this keeps going off.

Dr. Weitz:            What happened?

Dr. Valdes:          Can you hear those notifications or am I the only one hearing them?

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, I don’t think I’m hearing them, doc.

Dr. Valdes:          Okay, sorry about that. So, insulin is 100% connected to dietary intake for the most part. So, people that have a diet that’s very high in carbohydrates, people that have a diet that’s high in starches and sugar, people that just eat in excess and eat way more than they should be eating are going to be experiencing recurrent insulin surges. Now, if on top of that the patient has mechanisms of insulin resistance, if they’re secreting excess glucagon, if they’re having high cortisol, which will also drive high blood sugar, then those things can worsen the insulin spikes. So, initially, we want to also in the elimination diet make sure that we’re keeping their carbohydrate levels and their sugar intake as low as possible, and then in other stages of the treatment, we’re going to go into some of the mechanisms for the insulin surges themselves. Is that clear?

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, sounds good, and then estrogen surges. Why would somebody have estrogen surges?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so two specific times of life. One of them is women that are on the pill for-

Dr. Weitz:            Birth control.

Dr. Valdes:          … birth control. Whenever they consume their birth control pill, they’re going to have an estrogen surge, and they’re going to detoxify it, eliminate… Their estrogen level’s going to drop. The next day, what do they do? They take it again. So, it resurges, and it’s interesting because we tend to see… When you see younger adult females in their 20s or 30s, almost always there seems to be a connection too with birth control. So, that’s a common place where you’ll see estrogen surges. Also in-

Dr. Weitz:            Hold on a second. So, are you saying there’s a connection between birth control and Hashimoto’s?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, yeah, and there’s a lot of research on that. Just a search in PubMed will show you that it’s been linked historically with birth control therapy.

Dr. Weitz:            So, if you have a patient with Hashimoto’s, what is your advice if they’re on birth control and you detect it. They’re having an estrogen surge.

Dr. Valdes:          Well, that’s going to depend. I mean, if they are wanting to-

Dr. Weitz:            In consultation with their gynecologist.

Dr. Valdes:          In consultation with their gynecologist. Most of the time, like an IUD might be a better. An IUD, copper primarily now-

Dr. Weitz:            Because there’s been a lot of problems with some of these IUDs.

Dr. Valdes:          Correct. There are, and there’s really problems with most forms of birth control then. Some women might be having really big issues with their menstrual cycle. They might have PCOS. They might have all these issues, and they have a lot of bleeding and sometimes, there’s a consideration for an IUD with estradiol to offset that. So, in conjunction with their OBGYN provider, I would probably recommend a copper IUD as a preferred method, but I know that’s… I mean, you’re putting me super in the hot water today. It’s an extremely controversial topic, but that would probably be a preferred route. Now, do understand that a lot of people go on birth control, and not everybody develops autoimmunity. So, there’s other factors.

Dr. Weitz:            Of course.

Dr. Valdes:          There has to be other potential immune triggers. Sometimes, there’s genetics that are predisposing. So, it’s not a general rule of thumb, but if we were to speak generally, we know that this causes estrogen surges, and estrogen surges are known to be potentiators of autoimmunity and then to add to that, perimenopause and menopausal females also experience estrogen surges during that period. So, there also can be, and there is a surge in the demographic information of people that develop autoimmunities later in life. There seems to be a prevalence, and really, one of the reasons why I think that this is also so much more common in females than it is in males.

Dr. Weitz:            Right, and this is often referred to as estrogen dominance.

Dr. Valdes:          Correct.

Dr. Weitz:            Then of course we have the toxic forms of estrogen from the environment like pesticides and bisphenol A and phthalates and on and on and on.

Dr. Valdes:          Oh, yeah. I mean, we can spend an entire day there, and it’s really crazy. From even the stuff that’s put in food, like estrogen is directly and purposely placed on food. We are seeing here in the U.S., girls that are beginning to develop adult female characteristics, breast tissue, pubic hair at or around the age of eight or nine, which is unheard of, and we look at our European counterparts. Most of their girls begin to develop their adult female characteristics around 12, 13, 14, even 15, which is actually normal. So, the estrogenic load on our population both female and male is incredible. It’s incredible.   So, yeah, from toxic forms from nutritional forms, and the worst part about it is our body could potentially get rid of some of this stuff, but when you throw in all the other chemicals over 700,000 toxic chemicals every day to each and every one of us, the toxic burden is so high that if we’re not doing things very purposely, very actively for our detoxification pathways, most of us are vulnerable to this estrogenic bombardment.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, good. So, let’s move on to some of other triggers for Hashimoto’s.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so I mean, there’s so many I can mention off, and then we can go into whichever ones, but there’s toxins like mercury, one of the biggest ones, permeability issues in the gut, food sensitivities, viral infections, which we spoke about.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, so why don’t we start with toxins?

Dr. Valdes:          Okay.

Dr. Weitz:            So, we’ve got heavy metals, mercury. Are there other heavy metals or is mercury the main one that you-

Dr. Valdes:          No. There’s definitely more. Cadmium, aluminum, lead really tend to be the biggest ones. I’m sure there’s more, but those are the ones that I tend to see more frequently. Mercury, two forms, methyl mercury and inorganic mercury. One, we get from primarily amalgams in our mouth unless you were a kid playing with the stuff that was inside of your thermometer, which I unfortunately did, and-

Dr. Weitz:            Same here unfortunately.

Dr. Valdes:          And then methyl mercury, which we are getting primarily from fish. Then cadmium, the main source in humans is cigarette smoke and tobacco smoke, and aluminum… I mean, it’s everywhere from cans-

Dr. Weitz:            Ubiquitous.

Dr. Valdes:          It’s ubiquitous. There’s also a form that’s rarely talked about, which is copper, and copper is an essential nutrient but at the degree and amount that we’re being exposed to it, it’s actually very toxic to both us and our environment.

Dr. Weitz:            Especially since we’ve switched over to copper piping for a lot of our plumbing.

Dr. Valdes:          Correct, yeah.

Dr. Weitz:            We went from lead, which obviously is problematic to copper.

Dr. Valdes:          Which is slightly less problematic but still problematic, and when we look at the world of cognitive disorders, it’s a big, big player in that, and then aluminum, cadmium, lead, mercury. Yeah, I think those are the main ones that we tend to really pay a lot of attention to.

Dr. Weitz:            So, the preferred testing, you use serum. Is it provoked urine? Is it hair?

Dr. Valdes:          We like to use just for practicality and for accuracy as far as what we’ve seen, we like to use Quicksilver Tri-Mercury with blood metal. So, we run blood metals, but then mercury because of its… It really behaves in a way that it’s very unique in its differences between methyl and organic or inorganic mercury. We like to have the Tri test, which will check hair, urine and blood for mercury.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, is the Quicksilver metals test, is it simply a serum test? Is there some reason why doing the Quicksilver metals test is better than just running serum metals through LabCorp or doing it NutrEval, which includes serum metals?

Dr. Valdes:          Well, I mean, one of the things that we like is that it’s very comprehensive, so it includes a lot of different metals together with essential minerals, which are also metals. Things like zinc and copper and all those will also be. So, we do it primarily because of convenience. I don’t know. In that side, in the blood metal side, I can speak in to the mercury side, and there’s definitely huge benefits to run-

Dr. Weitz:            No, I can see the benefit of doing that Tri metals test.

Dr. Valdes:          Right, yeah, but as far as the blood metals, nothing really that would stand for me. As a preference, it’s just the convenience of having all of those metals tested together.

Dr. Weitz:            Sure, good, and then when you find the metals, what do you do? Let’s say you have an elevation of whatever, mercury or cadmium or specific protocols for each one. Is there a general metals detox program you do?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, I mean, again, we do like the protocols that have been created by Dr. Shade who is the founder of Quicksilver, and there’s differences. A lot of the metals that are non-mercury metals are going to require on top of everything else, they require EDTA to be able to emulsify them and bring them out. Now, if you do EDTA with mercury, you actually push it further into the tissue. So, you make the patient worse. There’s definitely a lot of different specific things. You always want to have a binder that will catch the metal in the gut. You always want to have tons of glutathione and NAC because glutathione has this wrapping effect when the metal is pulled from the tissue, it’ll wrap it, and it’ll make it less damaging for cellular tissue as you detoxify it.   You also want vitamin C, which is going to be immunomodulating. As you clear it, you want to have a lot of zinc. You also probably want to do remineralization because as you’re pulling metals, you’re also pulling minerals, which you want to replenish. What else is pretty important? You want to increase liver detoxification. So, you want to increase your intake of cofactors and milk thistle and all of the things that help the liver push stuff out. So, yeah, you really need a good comprehensive toolkit.

Dr. Weitz:            So, for binders, do you do a combination binder? There’s a number of things that are on the market or do you use specific binders for specific metals?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, I mean, most of the time, I activated charcoal, and I like chitosan. Those are my two really big ones. There are some combination ones out there. If they’re in stock, hey, it’s convenient. I’ll use them. Also, IMD, which is a very specific gut binder can also be beneficial especially when dealing with mercury.

Dr. Weitz:            What is IMD?

Dr. Valdes:          I’m not sure what the letter stands for, but it’s just a binder. That’s why it’s called IMD, and it’s just a little bit more specific for toxins that bind to the lining of the gut.

Dr. Weitz:            And then sodium EDTA, what form is that in? Are you talking about a nutritional supplement or intravenous or-

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, well, we use nutritional supplements. We use it in an oral liposomal liquid, but intravenous can be very, very beneficial, and actually, I found a tremendous amount of benefits for EDTA, and we can talk about breaking down biofilms in infections, breaking down and emulsifying viruses in the respiratory tract, which is an interesting application to talk about right now, but EDTA is a really good emulsifier. So, when things are sticking, it works like a soap to release things. A liposomal form is very absorbable, so we tend to like it.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, interesting. Yeah, I think what you’re referring to is that some infections, bacteria, viruses that get into your system may form a biofilm, a protective coating that protects them, and it’s more difficult for your body to get rid of it, but viruses… I know bacteria do this, but viruses do this as well?

Dr. Valdes:          No. Viruses don’t form biofilms, but viruses can be… This comes from some of the studies around Monolaurin and laurisidin. EDTA has no research that I’ve seen on application, but things that have an emulsifying effect have the potential of removing viral load or lessening viral load. So, that’s why I think it’s very interesting. It could be an interesting application to play around, and don’t take this as a medical recommendation. This is just a curious mind because seeing we do use it clinically for a lot of sinus infections, we’ll put it up there with it as a nasal spray with things like MARCoNS or very aggressive bacterial infections, and it works at emulsifying the biofilm. So, my suspicion, my clinical interest is that EDTA could have a very similar effect with viral infections also.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, so let’s move on to the next trigger for Hashimoto’s. So, we already covered to some extent food sensitivities, insulin, cortisol, estrogen surges, dysregulation, and we talked a little bit about heavy metals. What would be another common one?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so a huge one, and this is the thing that everyone talks about obviously is the gut and increased membrane permeability issues in the gut.

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, sorry to keep interjecting, but non-stop, I have this coronavirus thing on my mind, but I just recently read an article that it turns out that more than a reasonable percentage of patients… I forgot exactly the number that the infection will actually start with gut symptoms. So, it seems to actually get into the gut to begin with, and then obviously somebody who has a leaky gut would potentially be an easier route into the rest of the system.

Dr. Valdes:          Absolutely, yeah, absolutely, and out of the COVID-19 prevention and treatment manual, they showed that for some of the patients that were presenting gut symptoms, they showed the value of a high-caliber probiotics, something like VSL#3 and high levels of acidophilus specifically is what they talked about in the publication. So, absolutely, absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:            Would you mind sending me a copy of that that I put in the show notes?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, absolutely. I posted the whole manual on my LinkedIn page. So, if you just go to Dr. Ruben… I’m happy to send it anyways, but that’s a quick way of getting it.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, sounds good.

Dr. Valdes:          So, yeah, absolutely. There’s a mechanism there. For those that are not familiar with leaky gut, in 2020, you should, but leaky gut, medically, that’s not a medical term. When we talk to a gastroenterologist or whatever, they call it increased membrane permeability, and it is a thing. It is a diagnosis. Our gut is the only tissue in our body that is one-cell layer thick. So, it’s very thin. It’s designed for absorption and filtration, and those cells are held together by proteins that gates, have a gating mechanism for specific things that are larger that can be absorbed to be, let’s say, decided upon like the Panama Canal, and things can go up to a certain stage and then permeate through, or they can be rejected and go back into stool, into the bolus.   So, people that have increased gut permeability will absorb things that shouldn’t be absorbed. It can be undigested food particles, which are a problem because just like viruses, some of the surface antigens in food can create molecular mimicry. It can create confusion for the immune system. Lipopolysaccharides, which are these proteins that are produced by bacterias, which are very, very inflammatory, they can absorb viruses. They can absorb a lot of things that are not supposed to go into the bloodstream creating this chronic activation of the immune system, driving some of the autoimmune pathways.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, cool. So, what do we do about problems with… How do we identify problems with gut health and then what do we do about them?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so there’s a lot of things that drive gut permeability. One of them, and I rarely hear people talking about this, but it’s just the amount of food that we eat and the frequency with what we eat. It’s crazy. In America, we eat a lot, a lot, and all the time, and what happens is every time there’s food going through this one-cell layer of tissue, it’s damaging. It’s creating some abrasion. So, something that’s incredibly effective for leaky gut is fasting. Stopping eating. We preach this stuff all the time. The body has the ability to heal, to repair itself. So, going on a fast 3, 5, 7 days, or 11 days, and something that makes that easier is having something that’s densely nutritious, something that has a lot of collagen. Something like bone broth can be a very, very useful tool for a fast in repairing the gut. So, that’s one of my preferred.  There’s also people that need specialty stuff. So, if we test, and we find that there’s a nasty infection like Klebsiella, Clostridium, an overgrowth, an imbalance. We need to go in there and begin rebalancing that microbiome, get rid of the stuff that might be driving inflammation, that might be driving some of the breakdown of the cell tissue.

Dr. Weitz:            So, how would you handle that? Are you talking about using anti-microbials?

Dr. Valdes:          Yep. We would use anti-microbials that would be specific to the sensitivity of the pathogen or the dysbiotic fungus or bacteria that we would find. If there is a suspicion of an enterovirus, which most of the time we don’t really have a test for, for viruses in the gut, but a lot of people have viruses in the gut. Here’s a place where your lurasidone and potentially your oral EDTA would also have a great benefit in helping get rid or decreasing the viral load in the gut. So, just another little tool.

Dr. Weitz:            I know some of the PCR stool tests now include some viruses, a limited number.

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, some do. I’m still interested in seeing a little bit more data on PCR, but I think there’s a ton of promise there for sure.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, yeah, we pretty much switched over to using the GI-MAP from Diagnostic Solutions-

Dr. Valdes:          Nice. Very cool. Very cool.

Dr. Weitz:            … which is a PCR-based stool test. So, next trigger for Hashimoto’s, what would be the next thing? So, we did heavy metals. We did food sensitivities. We did insulin, cortisol, estrogen. What would be the next one?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so we can talk briefly about one that’s very common, but rarely spoken about, and we got into this a little bit the last time, but biotoxin illness. We know that 22% of the people, the population are carriers of a susceptibility in a gene called HLA-DR/DQ, and for people that are susceptible, what that means is that their immune system cannot identify or create antibodies or transport and present the biotoxin itself. So, a domain of their immune system becomes chronically active.  Now, if you ask the developer of all of this stuff, Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, he will tell you there’s not enough data yet to confirm that this is a driver of autoimmune disease. Possibly, I don’t know. I haven’t spoken to him in a long time, so I don’t know where he’s standing right now on this, but clinically, we see an immense amount of people that have these susceptibilities that move on to develop autoimmunity, and when they are autoimmune, these tend to be big triggers.

Dr. Weitz:            So, by biotoxins, the main one you’re talking about is mold mycotoxins?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, mold mycotoxins is the most prevalent one, but there’s also Lyme disease, which is becoming more and more prevalent.

Dr. Weitz:            Most people put that in the infection category.

Dr. Valdes:          Well, it is both infectious and biotoxin because initially, when you’re bitten by a tick, you get a Borrelia infection, but the Borrelia is a biotoxin-producing organism just like mold or just like specific types of blooms or just like MARCoNS. Microorganism, some of them can produce these nasty biotoxins. So, some people that are non-susceptible do a great job at getting rid of the infection and getting rid of the biotoxin. Some people that are susceptible can get the infection, and they might be treated for the infection, but the biotoxin illness will linger on and stay around. So, it falls into both categories and right now, actually, this is a pretty interesting and controversial subject.

                                I interviewed somebody yesterday about this because all of us are being forced to stay indoors and for a lot of people, they’re now indoors with their other enemy, which is mold, and they don’t know about it, and for a lot of people, potentially about 20% of our population, they’re going to begin to become sicker and sicker from being indoors. Buildings, structures are not built the way that they once were in the past. There was a lot of focus on air circulation on being able to move the air from the outside-in, and that’s one of the things that really can get rid of these biotoxins.  Sunlight gets rid of molds, and now, people are living in homes being in building structures that have poor air circulation. So, the longer that we are indoors, the sicker a lot of our population and the people that you and I see are going to be coming back outdoors.

Dr. Weitz:            Which is interesting because actually part of it has to do with the construction, trying to make your home more waterproof ends up reducing the air circulation.

Dr. Valdes:          Correct.

Dr. Weitz:            Then you end up with moisture that builds up within the walls that can contribute to the mold.

Dr. Valdes:          Absolutely, yeah. Yeah, I mean, there’s so many little things to that, from the way that your windows are flashed to the angle of the roofing. If one little nail goes in the wrong place, it’s like crawl spaces are a problem. Basements are a problem. Sump pumps are a problem. There’s so many things that can really contribute. Even in the best-built home, this is a problem that can really affect any and all of us.

Dr. Weitz:            So, I think this is going to have to be our last point.

Dr. Valdes:          No problem.

Dr. Weitz:            Once again, we’re running up against the time clock because I do have a patient coming up. So, your preferred method of getting rid of mycotoxins and Lyme?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so mycotoxins or first thing is removal. So, remove the person from the environment that is making them sick or change the environment. Remediate the environment.

Dr. Weitz:            Which right now is really hard when you’re supposed to stay in your house.

Dr. Valdes:          Right, absolutely. It’s incredibly hard. So, for when that can’t be the case, there is a protocol. I’ll send it to you. There’s two things that have been shown effective in killing mold. Formula 409 is fantastic. Nothing else can kill the stuff. So, using that stuff on your house, which is toxic, so I don’t know. Go to the backyard for a little bit. Vacuuming, cleaning, all that becomes important. There’s also something called Air Oasis, which can actually kill the biotoxins. It’s also effective for killing viruses in the environment too.

Dr. Weitz:            I just had somebody show me an air filtration system that also puts out hydrogen peroxide and then claim that that helps get rid of mycotoxins.

Dr. Valdes:          Absolutely, yeah, absolutely. I mean, they’re not hard to kill. So, for the time being, that would be the best strategy for Lyme, which you mentioned the only way of removing the exposure really is if you have the active infection is doxycycline or an antibiotic that will get rid of the infection. I’m not very familiar with natural methods that can get rid of Borrelia. For the toxin, unfortunately, the only binders that we have documented success with are cholestyramine and Welchol, which are both prescription binders.

Dr. Weitz:            These are for the mold?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah. This is once the toxin is in the body.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, the mycotoxins.

Dr. Valdes:          Then you bind it. You bind it with a binder in the gut to get rid of those.

Dr. Weitz:            Those are both prescription meds?

Dr. Valdes:          Those are both prescription. There is some promise around okra seed and chitosan has the shape where it would bind the toxin, but unfortunately, most of the chitosan out there is not enterically coated, so by the time it reaches the gut, it denatures, and it doesn’t make it to the bile where is where we would bind the toxin. So, for the time being, cholestyramine and Welchol are really the only thing, and I research this all the time. There’s some people out there saying that they have a binder that would do this or that but in reality, they are ineffective. So, that would be the main thing and from there, it’s a very streamlined protocol where you begin to normalize each one of the immune markers, the C4A, the TGFB-1, the MMP-9. There’s different steps for each one of those, and ultimately, there’s an intranasal spray called VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide. That will repair the tissues of the sinuses and of the gut to finalize the whole process.

Dr. Weitz:            Those are basically part of the Ritchie Shoemaker protocol?

Dr. Valdes:          Yes, correct.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. Excellent, Dr. Valdes. Tons of interesting information. Once again, we could have gone on for another hour, but I think this’ll give everybody a lot of things to think about. So, for the listeners and viewers, how can they contact you and find out about seeing you or visiting one of your offices, real or virtual?

Dr. Valdes:          Yeah, so the best way right now is www.novis, which is N-O-V-I-S.health. So, no .com, just .health. Novis.health. That’s our main site. We’ve actually have bulked it up. We’re releasing a new site on Wednesday. So, we’re very excited about that. People will be able to book their virtual consultations right on the site.

Dr. Weitz:            Awesome. Thank you so much.

Dr. Valdes:          Thanks, doc. Have a great day, and thanks for all your awesome work.

Dr. Weitz:            Thank you.

 

Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Testing for COVID-19 with Dr. David Brady: Rational Wellness Podcast 157
Loading
/

Dr. David Brady discusses Testing For COVID-19 with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/weitzchiro/]

 

Podcast Highlights

8:13  People with chronic diseases like obesity, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and a host of chronic conditions fare more poorly with COVID-19.  And in the US we have a lot of people with one or more of these chronic conditions and it would be good if we took this opportunity as a wake up call and to turn our public health policy and our health care system to focus on reducing obesity, diabetes, hypertension and other chronic diseases.

10:50  This virus seems to have a big cardiovascular component that distinguishes it from the seasonal flu.  We are seeing endothelial inflammation, changes in hemoglobin structure, changes in the ability to perfuse tissues with oxygen while still being able to get rid of CO2, the happy hypoxia thing, the COVID toes, and the micro-coagulations. Some of the emergency rooms are prescribing blood thinners routinely to cut down on the clotting that we are seeing in patients with COVID-19.  Functional Medicine practitioners are putting many patients on fish oil, nattokinase, and lumbrokinase prophylactically.

12:45  There is some amazing data on the benefits of some natural agents like vitamin D and zinc helping with COVID-19.  Dr. Brady has gotten calls from doctors at ICUs in major hospitals in New York and Massachusetts about the best procedure to a high dose IV vitamin C drip and about blood ozone and UV treatments. And the vitamin D level has turned out to be the best predictor of who has a very bad outcome and who does okay when exposed to SARS-COV-2.  When there are no effective drugs, doctors and patients have turned to natural agents like vitamin D and botanicals that help to strengthen the immune system. The most effective drug for COVID-19 at this time is Remdesivir, which did not reduce mortality, but reduced the length of the hospital stay by 2-3 days, while zinc when added to hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin reduced mortality by 49%!  And Remdesivir costs around $5000 per month, while zinc will cost you about $20.  We know that nutrients like quercetin, resveratrol, and ECGC from green tea can block viral docking and penetration into the cell. We know that zinc, vitamin D, high dose vitamin C, and botanicals like elderberry, astragalus, and andrographis have antiviral properties. And melatonin can reduce the potential for having a cytokine storm.

18:53  Testing for the SARS-COV-2 virus, which is what causes COVID-19, includes the nasopharygeal swab which is stuck all the way in the back of the nose and then twisted around, which is then analyzed through pcr testing, which amplifies the DNA, which is the gold standard. A number of labs are offering this test, including Diagnostic Solutions, which Dr. Brady works with. There are rapid tests using the np swab and then placing the swabs into an expensive machine from Abbott or several other pharmaceutical companies, which then gives results in 15 minutes, these do not use pcr, so they are less accurate. There are also tests using an oral swab or saliva, including some at-home tests, but these tests are not as good at getting enough viral load and therefore are not as accurate.  The original CDC test didn’t work very well because it only targeted two end proteins on the virus. Diagnostic Solutions Lab (DSL) developed a pcr test that used these two end proteins along with the spike protein and an envelope protein that has now become the standard. The literature coming out of China indicated that you can find the virus in the GI tract for up to 6 weeks after recovering, so DSL has developed a stool test for the virus, which has advantages in that the patients can do it at home and mail it in, so you don’t need a healthcare worker in PPE to get the sample.  In fact, DSL has been running the nasopharyngeal swab tests for the virus, stool tests for the virus, and IgG and IgM antibody testing and they have been correlating these tests to better internally validate their tests and to understand this disease.

30:25  When it comes to the accuracy of testing for the virus, doctors often ask about the sensitivity and the specificity of the testing.  PCR molecular targeting methods used in such testing has virtually 100% sensitivity and specificity, but the limiting factor is getting the proper sample to test as well as the progression of the disease and the level of the virus in the tissue being sampled.  If the person performing the nasal swab doesn’t do it optimally, you may not have virus in the sample. And it depends where the patient is in their disease process. The viral load is highest on symptomatic people in the first five days of symptoms, and then it starts trailing off.  So it depends when during their condition that you perform the test. The test may have 100% analytical validity, but the clinical validity may be lower for the reasons just mentioned.

36:06  The difference between the rapid testing and the PCR testing for the virus is that the rapid testing is not amplifying the DNA, so you need a lot more viral load in the sample to see it.  If a rapid test is positive, you can trust it, but there may be a lot of false negatives. These rapid tests are meant for point of care diagnosis, like in an ER or an ICU.  Such tests won’t be a good way to say screen NBA players before games because if they are infected but not symptomatic and don’t have a high viral load, you won’t be able to catch most of these cases. And such tests won’t work that well for screening patients coming into work because the machine for testing is expensive, there are few available to buy and you can only load one sample at a time.  And it takes 15 minutes to get results and then you have to wait 5 minutes for the machine to reset before putting another sample in.  This makes it impossible to test 100s of employees in less than many hours, such as at a meat packing plant, or even 10 employees at a restaurant, since even that would take a few hours. If they are not symptomatic and are infected but have a relatively low viral load and they are likely to be a false negative.  Here is a paper discussing PCR vs rapid testing for the virus, as well as the proper technique for performing the nasopharyngeal swab: Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19: Current Issues and Challenges

40:04  Antibody testing also has this mix of blood spot, quick tests as compared with a blood draw and using a quality ELISSA antibody kit.  The rapid antibody tests are lateral flow tests and they are almost like a pregnancy test for HCG where you pee on it an it turns a color. It has poor sensitivity and requires a high level of antibodies.  When it comes to antibody testing, there is also a possible issue of cross-reactivity with antibodies formed to other coronaviruses, such as SARS and MERS, and 229E and OC43, which are two of the coronaviruses responsible for the common cold.  On the other hand, the original SARS from 2003 and MERS  are not around any more so you are not likely to see a lot of false positives to them.  The serum PCR molecular testing for antibodies is much more targeted and exact by nature, so it will be more accurate than the rapid testing.  On the other hand, we are still studying this new virus, SARS-COVID-2, and trying to determine what exact level of IgM means that you have an active infection, what exact level of IgG antibodies confer immunity, how long these IgG antibodies will stick around for, etc.  We have pretty good evidence that infection with SARS-COVID-2 does result in antibodies in most patients: Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019.  

47:01  After an infection with SARS-COVID-2 or any virus, IgM antibodies are the first to form usually after the first week of infection, while IgG antibodies will typically form about 2-4 weeks after infection.  The serum or plasma antibody tests are more accurate than the rapid tests using blood spot.  Here’s an article discussing this: Antibody Tests in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Meta-Analysis.  This article from the Journal Of Infection shows the peak of IgM antibodies after 3 weeks and then fading with IgG antibodies peaking after 4 weeks and continuing: Profile of specific antibodies to SARS-CoV-2: The first report.Here is another article showing when IgM and IgG antibodies form after SARS-COV-2 infection: Serological and molecular findings during SARS-CoV-2 infection: the first case study in Finland, January to February 2020.   

                             



Dr. David Brady can be contacted at his website https://drdavidbrady.com/ You can check out the website for The Fibrofix book that he wrote at https://www.fibrofix.com/ You can get information on the swab, antibody, and stool tests for COVID-19 from Diagnostic Solutions at https://www.diagnosticsolutionslab.com/tests/covid-19-sars-cov-2

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations, including remote consults via video or phone, specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111 or go to www.drweitz.com. Phone or video consulting with Dr. Weitz is available.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. To learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.  Hello, Rational Wellness Podcasters, Dr. Ben Weitz here again today. Thank you so much for joining me.

So today we will be discussing some of the controversies and confusion about testing for COVID-19 with our special guest, Dr. David Brady. So when we talk about testing, we’re referring to both testing for the virus and testing for antibodies to the virus that causes COVID-19, the SARS-COVID-2 virus. There seems to be quite a bit of controversy over how necessary testing is, how accurate it is, what type of testing is most helpful.  And when it comes to antibody testing, whether it’s valuable or not, do antibodies provide protection, how accurate is it, I’ve asked one of the brightest people in the functional medicine world and someone who is involved with developing some of these tests, including I think the only company that has a stool test for the virus, Dr. David Brady. Dr. David Brady is an internationally known speaker, doctor of chiropractic, naturopathic physician.  He’s also a professor at the University of Bridgeport. He’s the chief medical officer for Designs for Health, and also for Diagnostic Solutions Lab. Dr. Brady’s a prolific writer, having published a number of scientific papers. He’s contributed chapters to numerous textbooks. He’s written a number of books, including his latest is the Fibro Fix published in 2016. Dr. Brady, thank you so much for joining me today. 

Dr. Brady:            Hey Ben. Thanks for having me on again. And I think you’ve been trying to lasso me to do this for about four… I don’t know, at least four weeks, maybe six. But with COVID craziness, it’s just been difficult, but here we are.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. Good. And by the way, the information on testing seems to be developing by the day. But before we get into our discussion about testing, you have another title. You are the chief myth buster about bogus concepts circulating through social media related the COVID-19 in the functional medicine world. And you’ve recently spoken out about a number of myths including whether immune-strengthening herbs like elderberry can increase the risk of cytokine storm. Are there any myths that you’d like to comment about now, because there are quite a number?

Dr. Brady:            Oh, it’s quite a minefield, as you know, Ben. And I don’t know if I’m the chief myth buster but at some point I’ve-

Dr. Weitz:            I’ve given you that title.

Dr. Brady:            Yeah, thank you. I’ve had enough sometimes and I’ve used a graphic a couple of times with some blog posts I put out there, or some social media posts with some guy pulling his hair out, just because I couldn’t take it anymore, and I couldn’t answer the same question via email 200 times in a day. So I put something out. Yeah. A lot of it started with that, “Stop your elderberry, and vitamin D, and vitamin A. It’ll cause a cytokine storm,” thing. And then, “Don’t take ibuprofen, but this is fine.”   Then the latest thing I kind of flipped out about a little bit was everyone just comparing it to the flu, and the lethality numbers, without contextualization on a whole lot of other ramification and factors of what’s going on with SARS-COV-2 as compares to seasonal influenza. It’s just staggering to me that even healthcare providers, practitioners who supposedly have had some schooling in epidemiology, and infectious disease, and laboratory diagnosis go off on some of the tangents that they go.  But I know these are strange times and it’s a very charged subject, and there’s a lot of raw emotions. And it’s something none of us have ever lived through before. So we’re all going down our little rabbit holes sometimes.

Dr. Weitz:            It is true and it’s amazing how even discussions about health seem to break down along partisan line, which you wouldn’t think that that would be the one topic which partisanship would have no role to play. 

Dr. Brady:            No, these days nothing’s off the table when it comes to that, unfortunately.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. And when you talk about the numbers, you’re hearing recently all the numbers are inflated, and people who really have died of some other cause are being labeled as dying of COVID. And we’re doing that to purposely inflate the numbers. And why would we want-

Dr. Brady:            That goes back to the way Medicare constructed the billing and things like that. But a lot of that is taken out of context. And I don’t know if any of that’s going on. But I’ll tell you one thing, Ben. I live in a small town in Connecticut. We have 80 dead people in my town. They’re not statistics, they’re not made up COVID deaths. I don’t remember the last time 80 people in my little town in Connecticut died in six weeks. Okay? Not through seasonal flu, not through calling the diagnosis something it’s not. I’ll tell you what doesn’t lie. Body bags, they don’t lie. So I’ll just leave it at that. 

Dr. Weitz:            I’d also like to make a comment, which is that it’s easy to say, “Okay, this person who now is being labeled as dying of COVID-19, really died because they had heart attack, or really died of complications related to some other disease, usually a chronic disease.” But it’s never the case that when someone dies, they die of one thing. There’s always complicating factors. And when someone dies, we don’t say, “Well, this person died 40% from coronary artery disease, and 30% from diabetes, and 20% from hypertension.” We give it a diagnosis, the one that makes the most sense. And that’s what’s being done here. And I don’t think there’s anything sinister going on.  I’d also like to say it’s not the case that Bill Gates is not the evil genius along with a number of other well known people in the epidemiological world, who are trying to force us into mandatory vaccines and a bunch of other- 

Dr. Brady:            Well, listen. I don’t pretend to know every potential sinister plan out there because all kinds of organizations with power, regardless of what side of the political spectrum they come from, what their agendas may be, the ones that have been around a long time and are successful probably all follow the same adage, which is never let any crisis go to waste. So I’m sure they’re all trying to further various agendas. But that’s sort of above my pay grade. I just look at the science, I look at the data we have, I look at what’s happening in front of my face, and try not to go off on conspiracy theories, agendas, political bents.  Hey, I’m not saying anybody who has various opinions along those lines are wrong. I’m not saying public authorities have handled this all correctly. We can have reasonable debate on how to respond to a pandemic like this. There’s different approaches, different opinions, but there’s some core things that are reality, and that is that this is a serious condition. There’s lots of dead people. And it’s not the seasonal flu. It’s not the same. It’s not impacting society and the healthcare system in the same way. Who knows about all those other things. We’ll probably know a lot more in retrospect down the line. And then there’s a bunch of stuff that we’ll never hear about because we don’t get told everything. 

Dr. Weitz:            Right. Well, one thing we do know is that people with chronic conditions, like patients who have hypertension, who are overweight, who have diabetes, who have coronary artery disease, who have a whole host of chronic conditions fare much more poorly with this disease. And I think it would be nice if we put some real focus on doing something about our society that has all these chronic diseases, because if we had a healthier society, whatever condition we could frank, whether it be this particular virus or any other situation, we’d be a lot better off if we had a much lower chronic disease burden. And so, I think that that’s something-

Dr. Brady:            Yeah, there’s no doubt about that. And those are some lessons that we better learn from this. I mean, as a modern culture, we tend to have very short memories. But there are some big lessons that come out of this, and I hope it’s not just the functional integrative kind of healthcare providers that have this imprinted or maybe solidified in their mind, because they’ve kind of been in this camp to begin with. But I hope more conventional people, more people with regulatory responsibility, public health care policy and so forth, realized this is a wake up call.  It doesn’t matter what pandemic comes next or what have you, we better get a healthier population. And the obesity and the dysglycemia, and the diabetes, and the hypertension, and the cardiovascular disease. By and large, most people, talking to my colleagues now. I’m not on the front lines in the ICU in critical care medicine, but I have a lot of friends who are, and most of the people… Now, there’s definitely exceptions to this, but most of the people that ended up on ventilators are in those categories I just named. Although there are some that were perfectly healthy athletes who are 30 years old who are now not breathing anymore and they’re dead.

                                Right now we’re trying to mind those genes, find those different constellations of different patterns of snips, and metabolome issues and things like that to try to, in the future at least, be better at predicting who are those odd docs that if they get exposed to SARS-COVID-2 or even a related virus that’s got some of the sinister characteristics of it, are likely to go down that slippery slope and down into a severe immune overreaction, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cytokine storm, and what have you, and be really susceptible of dying of this, because there are certainly those people. We know some of those genes and snips already. We know some general patterns, but there’s a lot more to be harvested and learned.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, no, this virus definitely seems to have a cardiovascular component that’s quite different than the seasonal flu.

Dr. Brady:            Oh yeah. I mean it’s not just the respiratory virus. In fact, it has the ability to get into all kinds of cells, and not just cells with ACE-2 receptors. Because of the furin cleavage sites on the spike protein it can get into almost any tissue. It has an affinity for a highly or densely populated ACE-2 receptor tissues in GI mucosa, cardiovascular tissue. But you’re seeing now, the vascular biologists are having a field day with this trying to figure out what’s going on with all this endothelial inflammatory function changes, changes in hemoglobin structure, changes in the ability to perfuse tissues with oxygen while still being able to get rid of CO2, the happy hypoxia thing, the COVID toes, the micro coagulations. I mean, it’s a really nasty player. 

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. No, blood clotting seems to be a major factor. And I’ve talked to a couple of docs who are working in the emergency rooms, and I know in Los Angeles, and I’m sure in some other areas, they’re using blood thinners as just a normal part of the usual treatment. 

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. Sure. We’re using them as well. We have lots of patients on fish oil, nattokinase, lumbrokinase, baby aspirin a day. I mean, we’re looking at all those things as well, for sure. 

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. It’d be nice to see if nattokinase or one of the other natural blood thinners could have the beneficial role if used prophylactically. 

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. I don’t think it’s going to hurt. A lot of us with all of these therapies, even the front line therapies, by and large, we’re going on a rational hypothesis, known mechanism of action, what we know about the pathogen, and throwing stuff at it and seeing what happens.

Dr. Weitz:            Certainly we’re seeing some amazing data already on vitamin D and zinc among other nutrients. 

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. And you know what, Ben, I never thought I’d live to see some of the stuff I’ve seen in the last couple of months. And I think we all can say that. But I never thought I’d have doctors from ICUs in New York, major hospitals, calling me, tracking me down on my cell phone to ask me what I thought about the best procedure to do in a high-dose IV vitamin C drip. I have a hospital from Massachusetts call me about learning more about blood ozone and UV treatments, The stuff in the media and all over the place with vitamin D and zinc and elderberry and all this.  It’s kind of interesting, when the proverbial stool matter hit the fan in society, I think people amazingly queued up pretty quickly. Hey, there’s no magic bullet pharma agent to save me here. And they saw the richest country in the world’s healthcare system basically be reduced to, “If you get sick with respiratory symptoms, don’t come here. Don’t come to your doctor’s office. We can’t see you. We’re not going to see you. We may talk to you on the telephone, but you need to stay home and basically live or die. And if you get really bad, call 911 and they’ll bring you to the emergency room. You’ll probably end up in an ICU and die there.”  So they figured out, hey, I’m on my own. We’re back to the old days. I need to figure out how to help myself. And what did they turn to? They turn to all the stuff that supposedly doesn’t really work. Well, you know what? It turns out the data’s showing it does work, okay? So you see this stuff, like you said, in the biggest, most solid predictor we have right now to determine who goes to a very bad outcome and who does okay when they’re exposed to SARS-COVID-2 is their vitamin D level. Imagine that, right?

Dr. Weitz:            Yes.

Dr. Brady:            People I went to high school with, I’ve never heard from since, are emailing me, “Should I stop my elderberry? Might I have a cytokine storm? And what is this thing about zinc ionophores?” I’m like, “Do I live in bizarro land here?” But there’s such an opportunity here for folks like us in the tribe that your podcast goes out to. I think it’s changed people’s perception for the long term. Not everybody. But I think a much larger segment of the US population now is thinking, “You know what? I’d better proactively take care of myself a little bit better, and maybe there is something to taking vitamin D, and maybe there is something to supporting my immune system. Maybe some of these natural agents and botanicals and things like that, which we were told that’s not real serious therapy, maybe they are.” Right?

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. No, it’s amazing. Couple of days ago I read that study coming out of New York City where they had two groups of patients where they got hydroxychloroquine and z-pack, and one group got 50 milligrams of zinc taken twice a day. And-

Dr. Brady:            Major difference in the outcome.

Dr. Weitz:            49% reduction in mortality. 49% reduction in mortality.

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. Hydrochloroquine and chloroquine, of course, big function is as a zinc ionophore. It transports zinc into the cell, and zinc is very toxic- 

Dr. Weitz:            Without the zinc, they didn’t get that outcome.

Dr. Brady:            Exactly.

Dr. Weitz:            You’re talking about a supplement that’s going to cost you 20 bucks. And in contrast, we have an antiviral drug like remdesivir, which is supposedly the most effective drug we have so far, and its effects for like $5,000 a month are that the hospital stay will be reduced by two or three days, and no improvement in mortality. And we have a natural substance like zinc that’s reducing mortality by almost 50%. That’s pretty amazing.

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. Admittedly, we don’t have great retrospective long term outcome studies on any of the drugs. I mean-

Dr. Weitz:            Sure. Yeah. No, there was no placebo control group, but-

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. But we do have lessons learned from SARS in 2003 from MERS. We have lessons learned from other Corona viruses, like various influenza viruses. And there’s really good data out there. There’s animal data, but there’s human outcome data on things like quercetin and resveratrol, and EGCG on blocking, viral docking, and penetration into the cell on zinc, on vitamin D, on high-dose vitamin C, and right on down the line, on botanicals like elderberry, astragalus, and so forth.  So we are using these things. We’re not saying, “Hey, they’re a cure for COVID-19.” We’re not. But the more we can look at what we know about this virus, what we know in lessons learned from related viruses, and we can use different types of mechanisms of action on top of one another. Some block the virus from docking to the cells. Some block it from penetrating the cells. Some block RNA replication. Some change the pH in the exosomes where the viruses hang out.   Some things up-regulate the immune system with better NK cell function, or change cytokine patterns. Or something like melatonin. Who would have thought? Everyone thinks of it as a sleep thing. In functional medicine, we know at higher dose and things, it’s been used as an immune modulator. But even at the low doses, people use it for sleep. It directly targets NLRP3, which is that first domino that falls in cytokine storms.  I have most of my patient base on melatonin at night right now, just like a three milligram dose even if they don’t have sleep problems. Just in case they get exposed to SARS-COVID-2, we’re lessening the likelihood, it appears, that they would have that cascade effect into cytokine storm. So it’s interesting times. 

Dr. Weitz:            Yep. Let’s get into virus testing.

Dr. Brady:            Sure.

Dr. Weitz:            Some of the tests that are available, we have this nasal swab that you have to stick all the way into the back of the nose, and then it’s sent for DNA reverse transcription, polymerase chain reaction testing. We have some rapid tests that require getting a machine from Abbott or a few other companies that can return results in as little as five minutes. And that’s the test being used daily at the White House. We have a new saliva test developed by Rutgers University, that doesn’t require using a swab at all. We have a new home test from LabCorp.  Diagnostic Solutions, which you work with, has a stool test. How accurate are all these tests? What are the relative benefits of one test over the other? 

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. Well, I wrote a pretty detailed article that’s about to publish in the next edition of Townsend Letter, and it will also run an NDNR, Naturopathic Doctor News and Review, where I kind of go through exactly those things you just asked because there’s a lot of details and there’s a lot of nuances. And unfortunately, when a lot of this stuff gets reported in the media, they like to reduce things to 32nd sound bytes that the average lay person can digest. And unfortunately, it’s hard to reduce the very complicated and nuanced subject with immunology, laboratory medicine. I mean, these are not just easy things. So yeah.

                                I mean, the way the tests break down, they break down into two major categories generally. One is diagnostic testing for COVID-19. And to start off, a lot of mixing of terms in the media, COVID-19, a lot of people call it the COVID-19 virus. The virus is in COVID-19. The virus is SARS-COV-2, novel Corona virus 2, whatever you want to call it. But it’s not COVID-19. COVID-19 is the clinical presentation and syndrome, which is a respiratory dominant disorder, that you see that’s killing people, okay? So-

Dr. Weitz:            COVID-19 is the name of the disease, not the name of the virus.

Dr. Brady:            Exactly. So SARS-COV-2 could cause, in some people who are exposed to it, COVID-19 but not all. So the first testing bucket we’ll create here is to diagnose COVID-19. These are tests that are generally done in reserve for people who are symptomatic or there’s some clinical suspicion on the part of a healthcare provider that they may have COVID-19, okay? These are samples that are done generally, and according to FDA, the only laboratory diagnostic tests for COVID-19 is on a respiratory sample. So these are generally taken from the respiratory tract somewhere.   The data’s kind of emerging, shifting, and things, but from what we know, the most convenient sample that has the best sensitivity, and reproducibility, and capture viral load is called an NP swab, a nasal pharyngeal swab, which is those really long kind of Q-tips that you have to stick along the septum, nasal floor, all the way back to where it hits the pharynx and twist it around a little bit. So, from the side, you’re going back all the way to about where the ear is.  Patients don’t love it. It kind of feels like someone’s sticking a big Q-tip in your brain. You can’t collect them by yourself because you just won’t let yourself do that, okay? But they are definitely, at least what the literature shows so far, superior to trying to collect and get a viral load on an oral pharyngeal swab through the mouth to the back of the throat and brushing the tonsils, or just an oral swab, or saliva, or a nasal swab. So these at-home tests are not nearly as good because the sample is just not as good at getting enough viral load to be detected in the laboratory.  But these are done on a respiratory sample, and generally, most of them, the very good ones are not the rapid test. These involve PCR, so polymerase chain reaction. So it’s an amplification of the DNA. The limiting factor in these tests is really the collection, is getting enough viral load on the swab, or sometimes if there’s people in ICUs on ventilators… We’re actually doing testing on bronchial alveolar washings, and sputum, and different things like that, direct sampling from the lungs. You get the biological sample. You do a PCR process to greatly amplify the DNA that’s in there, to have a better chance of finding the virus. So it greatly increases the sensitivity on the test. And this is done through genomic sequencing and just normal PCR molecular method.

                                The original CDC tests that had a lot of controversy about it, that didn’t work very well, at least in the initial iteration, the CDC decided not to use the World Health Organization’s developed tests. They developed their own. This test molecularly targeted two nuclear capsid or end proteins on the virus. For whatever reason, it turned out it wasn’t very good at targeting those. I’m not sure where exactly it was in the process. But then, the FDA released a emergency use authorization appealing to the private sector to start developing some tests.   At DSL, we pivoted to this very, very early in the game because we’re a molecular shop. We’re a quantitative molecular. We have a whole really highly skilled team that does just this kind of work. We’ve applied our molecular skills to things like GI map and other types of testing that we do. But we pivoted and we developed a PCR quantitative real-time PCR based test on respiratory samples, to hit four different targets on the novel Coronavirus. So two end proteins, the same as the CDC test, but also a spike protein and an envelope protein.  Many other people followed that line, but there were remarkably few labs in the US that were able to do that very quickly. You had some major US academic medical centers of excellent pathology labs that were able to do it. And then your Quest and LabCorp, and some of the really, really big biotech firms. DSL was in that first group of 30 in the country that got the FDA EUA validations in and cleared to do the testing. So we’ve been doing it from very early for major hospital systems, a lot of the drive through centers for different states and municipalities. So we have a lot of data collected on doing that kind of testing.

                                We very early also applied that to testing stool because we were looking at the literature coming out of China and out of other countries showing that you can actually find the virus through molecular methods in the GI tract, generally before you can find it in the respiratory tract. And if someone does get respiratory COVID-19 and they recover, we can find the virus in the stool for up to six weeks after they’ve recovered and are asymptomatic. So that brings up the idea, are they shedding it intact in the stool and could they be a fecal oral transmitter of this?  So everyone was sort of obsessed with the nasal droplets and the aerosolization and all of that, which they should be in respiratory sick people. But what about these people who never got respiratory symptoms or who have recovered from respiratory symptoms? If they’re shedding it in the fecal matter, we still have a transmission problem with them. So we pivoted, we started doing that, and we were very successful at applying the same quad target to it. And we talked to FDA about it and they were really intrigued by it for community surveillance.  Now, they don’t consider it a diagnostic test for COVID-19 because it’s not on a respiratory sample. But some of the advantages are you don’t need a healthcare provider all garbed up in PPE trying to get a respiratory sample on a symptomatic patient. You can dropship a kit, let’s say, to people, have them collect it without exposing anyone else, to get the data on it. So then we started looking at things and other researchers where.  Is this just viral RNA shedding in the stool? Is it intact virus? Can you do viral cultures on it? Can you actually transmit the virus this way? So really interesting.  Then down the line now, what we’re doing, we’re the only lab in the country, that we know of at least, doing this on stool. So FDA has been actually referring a lot of the groups and units and academic centers doing fecal microbial transplants to us to screen their transplant material before they introduce it into a patient because they don’t want to be introducing SARS-COVID-2 through a fecal microbial transplant. So we’re doing a lot of that, and we’re doing a lot of…    Now that the medical centers are opening back up for elective tests, there are elective procedures and surgeries and things like that, we’re doing a lot of pre-screening of patients that are going in for other surgical procedures, for colonoscopies, and things like that, using stool and using respiratory samples when necessary, and combining with antibody testing because the other bucket of testing is not looking for the virus per se through molecular targeting, but looking for antibodies that the immune system, in someone who has been exposed, has developed to the SARS-COV-2. 

                                So, as far as I know, we’re the only lab that are doing the molecular PCR diagnostic testing on respiratory samples, plus the antibody testing, plus the stool testing. So we’ve been trying to correlate all this data with clinical information because that’s what’s important in the long term to better understand the testing. And not only the analytical validity, but the clinical validity. So we early on were doing a lot of antibody testing before we even commercialized it, before we released it for doctors to be able to order.  We were very early in diagnostic testing, very earlier, the first in stool. We were not the earliest ones in the game in antibody testing, even though we’d probably been doing it as long as anybody, because we were waiting to get really rock solid validations in data. We were testing antibodies very early on, on hospital staff, medical staff, in these large hospital systems to help the hospital determine who in our medical staff may have been exposed, have developed immunity, who may have active infection, even if they’re not symptomatic, even if they’re negative on swabbing. If they have really spiked high IGMs, we need to maybe pull them off of the service lines.  So we were able to get clinical data, NP swab data, antibody data, and in some cases stool data all on the same subject, to be able to try to at least internally validate some of those things, which has been interesting. We’re continuing to do that, because it’s going to take a lot longer to fully understand, particularly the antibody patterns. 

Dr. Weitz:            Maybe you could speak for a minute about the accuracy of the testing for the virus, and then we’ll get into the antibody testing afterwards.

Dr. Brady:            Sure.

Dr. Weitz:            When it comes to accuracy, people are concerned about, it’s often broken down into sensitivity and specificity. And then, the other way to understand it is, do you have false negatives or false positives? Maybe you could just explain those. And then, what level of accuracy do we have with these tests? 

Dr. Brady:            Well, most PCR, molecular based testing, they’re using now usually two, three, or in our case, four targets. If there’s viral load on the sample, the NP swab, the OP swab, the lung washings, whatever, if you have enough viral load that’s above the lower limit of detection, for whatever the lab process is, those PCR molecular targeting methods are almost bulletproof. They’re 100% virtually on sensitivity and specificity. You can trust a positive call on them, and you can trust a negative call from the standpoint of, there wasn’t viable virus above the lower level of detection in the sample.  The problem though is more difficult than that. The analytical validity is extremely high, but the limiting factor is the collection of the sample, and the progression of the disease. We have a lot of people out there now, because a lot of healthcare providers were thrown into action in things they’re not used to doing. Like someone said, if you think SARS-COVID-2 is a problem, Wait till you get to the ICU and you get intubated by a gynecologist.  So a lot of people are doing stuff they’re not used to doing, including trying to collect these samples when they’re not really good at it. And it’s variable when the virus is in different places in different people. For instance, we know on classic nasal pharyngeal swabbing, the viral load is highest on symptomatic people in the first five days of symptoms, then it starts trailing off. So if you’re doing the NP swab at day three of symptoms, you’re much more likely to get a good viral load on that swab, on the same subject, than if you did it on day 10. So that’s a variable.   Are you getting enough virus on the sample? Because the lab can be 100%, but if the sample doesn’t come in with enough virus, then you have a problem. You can’t find what’s not there, or what is below the lower limit of detection. So it’s a difficult thing to answer, and a lot of doctors immediately we’re throwing out, “What’s the sensitivity and specificity?” I’m not sure they really understood what they were asking, particularly when it comes to antibody testing, because there’s two different answers to that always in any laboratory process. There’s analytical validity and there’s clinical validity.   The analytical validity, like sensitivity and specificity, is if something is there in the sample, what is your likelihood of finding it? Or when you flip it around to specificity, what is your likelihood of not finding it if it’s not there, or what’s your likelihood of identifying it inappropriately? Right? Well, even in antibody testing, which is way more loosey goosey than the PCR molecular testing, most of these different kits that labs are using, the analytical validity of specificity and sensitivity is up in the mid 90s to virtually 100%.

                                So if the antibody that you’re targeting is there, they’ll find it, and if it’s not, they won’t. And if you didn’t have it that way, you would never be able to sell an ELISA kit. It’s just that’s the way they roll. What most practitioners really want to know is clinical validity. What is the likelihood, if the person has what I think they might have, that the test shows positive? And what is the likelihood, if they have it, that it shows negative? Or you can flip it around, that they don’t have it and it shows positive, what have you.  That’s a whole different kettle of fish, with antibody testing in particular, because this is a novel virus. This is a new pathogen. Nobody has studied this out retrospectively. With antibody testing, you really want to know, tightly, in a controlled study, what is the clinical history of each subject? Do they have all the clinical manifestations, let’s say, of COVID 19? It would be nice to know, do they have a positive PCR on a respiratory sample or not? And then, you need to do antibodies, IgG, IgM at different stages, at two days, at seven days, at two weeks, at eight weeks, at six weeks, and do those. Nobody’s had time to do those studies.   Some people are trying to patch that together, but there’s been organized studies that have been able to be done yet to really report true clinical validity numbers. So everyone’s throwing analytical validity at you, and they’re 100%, or they’re 95%. It sounds impressive, but it’s not really that impressive because it’s the only thing it could be if you’re in a CLIA-certified lab, using an ELISA kit that’s valid, and particularly one that has IVD status with FDA. So the clinical, the analytical, very, very different, and the media has no idea what that all means. And then-

Dr. Weitz:            Now, on the virus testing, what about the quick test versus the PCR test?

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. I was just going to get into that.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Brady:            Let’s take the PCR diagnostic testing first.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Brady:            We talk about the rapid testing. Rapid testing, by its very nature, and design, and intention, one of the reasons it’s rapid is because it doesn’t involve the PCR step. It doesn’t involve amplification. So since you’re not amplifying the DNA, you need a lot more viral load in the sample to make it pop on the radar of the test. So rapid tests are good, and they have their place, but they’re really meant for point of care diagnosis, like in an ICU or in an emergency room with something very symptomatic, high viral load. You do this rapid test, put it in the machine. And if it tells you it’s positive, you can trust the positive. The problem is there’s a lot of false negatives because if you don’t have enough viral load, it will be negative. The other downside of this test-

Dr. Weitz:            Right now, the way they want to use it is, “Hey, how can we screen these people as they go into work, into the meat-packing plant, into the White House, before they play their NBA game?”

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. Well, if you’re talking about like NBA players and stuff, they’re still subject to false negatives because if they don’t have a high viral load, they’re not very symptomatic, but they’re a carrier. You’re not going to catch them on those tests, likely. But it’s not good for population-wide surveillance for a couple of reasons. One is you need the high viral load. So it doesn’t have the sensitivity of the PCR-based molecular test.  The other downside is the throughput is terrible. You’ve got to put like one sample in at a time, and they say, “Oh, results in 15 minutes.” It’s one sample at a time on the machine, and then you’ve got to wait like five minutes on a reset to put in another sample. So you’re doing one sample every 20 minutes. When we’re doing our PCR tests on these arrays and multiplexers, we’re doing hundreds of tests at a time, same time. So the throughput is just not realistic for now-

Dr. Weitz:            So you’re saying it’s not practical, say, for a meat-packing plant, or even a restaurant with five or 10 employees to test everybody on one of those before they come to work every day.

Dr. Brady:            No, they’re really point of care with really clinically sick people to confirm a diagnosis type of test. And they’re very good for that. But they’re not good for what they’re not good for. The other thing is you need the right piece… You alluded to this before, you need the right piece of equipment with the right kit. So it’s almost like having the right laser jet or the right inkjet printer and have the right cartridge. The wrong cartridge doesn’t play nice in the other person’s machine. So it’s very proprietarized. So you’re in Apple world or you’re in Mac World. You’re an Abbott land, you’re in Roche world, whatever.   And if you don’t have that machinery already, first of all, it’s very expensive, and it’s hard to get your hands on if you don’t already have it because of what’s going on. So there’s a lot of limitations. No one ever talks about this in the media. Same thing with that saliva test. And, hey, listen, I’m a Rutgers guy, alma mater. So [crosstalk 00:39:15]-

Dr. Weitz:            I saw one of the doctors from Rutgers and he said there were more viruses in the saliva than there were in the nasal discharge.

Dr. Brady:            Yeah, I mean, there’s definitely more persistence of it in the GI mucosal cells. I’m not sure about the saliva, but we know inherently in the lab, saliva’s harder to work with and concentrate and target things like viruses than a swab. But that is a useful test.  But again, I think it falls into the same bucket as these rapid tests.  You really need a higher viral load.  I’m not sure of the exact throughput capabilities on that saliva test because it’s a onesy. It was just developed in an academic lab. It’s not really been commercialized in a scaleable way.  Same thing in those antibody tests.  You have different kind of variations and stripes.  A lot of the testing, like where you’re from, remember when they tested LA and they said it was like 4% of the population was IgG

Dr. Weitz:            Yes.

Dr. Brady:            … and New York was 20%, they were using these rapid antibody tests that were basically what are called lateral flow tests. They’re almost like a pregnancy test for HCG where you pee on it and it turns a color. It’s like a reagent test. They have very bad sensitivity. They need high viral load or high antibody load in that. So high viral load translates to high antibody load, particularly early on in the phase with IgM, and then later after seroconversion and IgG. But then IgGs fall as well. So they’re really also these sort of point of care. It will not be a diagnostic test for COVID, but it can help confirm a diagnosis. Let’s say you’re in an ICU-

Dr. Weitz:            These are the tests where you prick your finger, you get blood spot.

Dr. Brady:            Those are blood spot. Those are different. So the blood spot tests are kind of the next stage. And they also suffer from lack of sensitivity. You need much more antibody load for those to be viable.

Dr. Weitz:            Aren’t the blood spot the lateral flow or not?

Dr. Brady:            It depends what methodology they’re using with the blood spot.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, I see. I see.

Dr. Brady:            They can take a blood spot, solubilize it, and then try to do an ELISA process on it, or they can a lateral flow [crosstalk 00:41:31]-

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, okay. I see.

Dr. Brady:            But just think about it, it’s kind of intuitive. If you poke your finger and put blood on a blotter paper and it dries, the lab’s got to get it back, solubilize it, get enough of that sample, be able to viably test it. You don’t have the pristineness of the sample and the sensitivity that you would if you did traditional phlebotomy into an SST tube, spun it down, separated the serum, and sent it to the lab.   Now we’re doing our antibody tests. You don’t even have to do the spin down. You can pull it into a lavender tube and just do it on plasma. It’s equally as good. But they’re definitely better than the blood spot ones. But I understand why people want the convenience of a finger stick. It’s just, there’s a yin and yang. There’s a price to pay, and that’s sensitivity. So-

Dr. Weitz:            Do we know what the sensitivity accuracy of the blood spot, the rapid flow tests are?

Dr. Brady:            Once again, we’re talking analytical validity versus [crosstalk 00:42:33]-

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. Okay.

Dr. Brady:            So it’s hard to say at this point.

Dr. Weitz:            I’ve heard 50 to 70% thrown around, but-

Dr. Brady:            Well, yeah, but that’s analytical validity. When you’re talking about an ELISA done on a quality kit with a quality kit, with a good internal laboratory validation, you’re talking 95 to 100%-

Dr. Weitz:            I see.

Dr. Brady:            … on those. So it’s different. And then, there’s issues of cross-reactivity with other Corona viruses, other SARS viruses. Let’s say, when ELISA antibody testing, what did they build the kit to find antibodies to? Now, most of the ELISA kits are meant to find antibodies that are made by the human immune system to nuclear cuspid or end proteins on the virus. The reason they build it to that is because that has the most surface presence on the virus. So if you’re targeting something where the virus has more of it on the surface, your sensitivity goes up.  But one of the things that happens on sort of a ubiquitous thing on the surfaces, your sensitivity goes up, but your specificity can go down a little bit. So there is some potential, theoretically, for cross-reactivity on those tests to other common Corona viruses. Well, I shouldn’t say common, relatively common. They’re still not very common, like 229E and I think it’s OC43. I wrote it down here. But when they’ve looked at that, they really haven’t seen that. So most of the published studies, and I pulled some of them here, show a very high specificity using pre COVID blood samples.  We tried to use samples as controls that were available that were collected before we knew SARS-COVID-2 was around, and we’re not getting cross reactivity. Some of the other ELISA kits are built to the spike protein. They have the ability to cross react a little bit more with original SARS from 2003. But we don’t think that’s around. So it’s kind of moot. So I think you’re not going to get a lot of false positives from cross-reactivity to common influenza viruses or the original SARS on the antibody test. But the antibody tests are a little bit dicier in that there’s not as much uniform quality control for a couple of reasons. One, PCR molecular-

Dr. Weitz:            Keep talking. I just have to turn the music down that popped on.

Dr. Brady:            Sure. 

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. Go ahead.

Dr. Brady:            PCR molecular is just by nature much more honed in and targeted, and exact in its nature. Think about testing, in immunology testing, it’s a little more fuzzy around the edges. And individuals have a great deal of variability in how they react to a pathogen, how much antibody they produce, how much IgM, and when they convert to IgG, how much IgG they maintain around for lengths of time, what their viral load was to begin with.  Ben, if you get exposed once to SARS-COVID-2 and you harbor it in some way, whether you go on to become clinically symptomatic or not, you’ll develop a certain amount of antibody titer to it. But if you’re a healthcare provider in the hospital every day, and you’re getting exposed to this virus repetitively, you’re going to develop a much higher viral load, whether you’re symptomatic or not, and therefore a much higher antibody titer. So to try to answer questions on what exact level of IgG confers immunity, what exact level of IgM means you have an active infection, there’s different kits, there’s different methods, there’s different individuals, there’s different viral loads. It’s impossible.  So, over time, as the methodology coalesces to a gold standard, and then they can follow people over many subjects over many time intervals after exposure, then you can learn these cut points and dial them in like we know about Epstein-BARR virus. This is a brand new virus. So doctors are asking the same questions that they would ask with a virus that we’ve been studying for decades and have all kinds of retrospective data on to a brand new virus. When in many cases labs, immunologists, everybody’s kind of shooting in the dark, doing the best they can, but they haven’t had the benefit of time to answer the kind of questions that the doctors think you should have. I don’t know-

Dr. Weitz:            Generally speaking, what do we know about… IgM are the first antibodies that form, and then they fade away and we get these IgG antibodies, which are generally considered to be the longer term protective ones. So how long after infection, on average, do the IgM antibodies form with SARS-COVID-2 virus? And then, how long did they last for, and when did the IgG antibodies form?

Dr. Brady:            Well, I mean, once again, they’re still trying to dial a lot of this in, but fundamentally-

Dr. Weitz:            Right. But what do we know so far?

Dr. Brady:            Fundamentally, Corona viruses aren’t new, okay? This is a particularly nasty one because of some novel properties of it. But it’s a-

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, 20% of colds are caused by Corona viruses.

Dr. Brady:            Exactly. So we know how Corona viruses operate. We know how our immune systems react to them. We have the benefit of lessons learned from SARS and MERS and things like that. So there’s no reason to think that there will be some really atypical, bizarre reaction of the human immune system that defies what we know about immunology. So basically, if you’re exposed to the virus, and you have a viable viral load, and whether or not you develop overt symptoms or not, you will start to rapidly develop IgM antibodies.  And depending on your level of exposure, your level of viral load, your IGMs will come up to a point that will be easily detectable through any of these type of laboratory methods. Now, over time, over a couple of weeks, you will get serial conversion of IgM to IgG. So your IgM spike first, then they will come down. The IgG titers will go up, and they’ll be much higher in the beginning, and then they’ll gradually trail off. Then they’ll stay at a lower level on a persistent basis, and that’s your learned long-term immunity.  Let’s say the rapid tests or the lateral flow tests, they’re pretty good at finding that initial high IgM spike, and they are probably still pretty decent detecting that initial high IgG after seroconversion is early. But then as you lower down that IgG titer, you need more resolution or sensitivity in the test to find the low levels of elevated IgGs that are characteristic of a long-term sticky immunity, if you will. And that’s what most clinicians want to do. They want to test someone who isn’t sick right now, who thinks they may have been exposed in January, or had a family member exposed. Do I have protection?  You want to find that relatively or comparatively low level of IgG elevation, which the rapid, linear flow, and all those tests, blood spot tests are not nearly as good at finding as the ones that are done on conventional phlebotomy, either plasma or serum, using a really good quality ELISA kit. So it really depends what you’re looking for. I’ve done a million media interviews on news, national news, local news, regional news, all that, particularly when we were…

                                We were one of the first companies in the United States to do broad-based employee testing on the workforce at Designs For Health because we’ve had to keep all of our manufacturing plants running 24/7 during this because we can’t make enough stuff. It just gets ripped through. So we needed a very healthy workforce, and so we turned to DSL to do all the antibody testing. It generated a lot of media, so I was on a lot of interviews about this. And even if you try to explain some of these nuances, they don’t have time for it, and they don’t want to know. It was like, “No, I don’t want to know. We just want easy answers here.” How do you take something that is complex and has all these nuances, and make it like a binary answer and something really simplistic? It’s hard. 

Dr. Weitz:            But essentially, part of what you just said to me was, you hear in the news, “Well, we don’t really know if you develop antibodies. We don’t really know if you do develop antibodies, will you be protective?” Essentially, what you said to me is, and correct me if I’m wrong, that our immune systems generally work similar to the way they do with other viruses. One of the main ways that we fight viruses is to produce antibodies over time. Depends on the person, depends on the infection and everything else. But generally speaking, we develop antibodies, and generally speaking, these antibodies are protective over time. 

Dr. Brady:            There’s no reason to think, when someone has IgG titers to SARS-COVID-2, that they would not have some significant amount of immunity. They would highly be unlikely to be infected again anytime soon with it. We have not seen that. You saw some reports out, like South Korea, something about reinfection. It turns out, in peer review, it was not really the case. We don’t have evidence of that. I can’t tell you a hundred percent that won’t emerge. But we don’t think so. And even with lower levels of persistent IgG to SARS-COVID-2, it’s likely you would have a persistent immunity to it for at least the near future.  This is an RNA virus. By nature, they kind of change around a lot. But this has a very complex large genome, and it has a sinister property of a lot of self reparative mechanisms to the genome of the virus, which means, over time, it doesn’t mutate as much and lose virulence. So that’s the bad news. It’s likely to maintain the characteristics it has now. It’s not likely to be burned out by the heat. All those things.

                                On the other hand, if you develop immunity to it, that really means that we’re more likely to have that immunity persist. But we don’t know if a year from now it’s changed enough. Like influenza, even with the vaccine talk, I don’t think… Honestly, I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think there’s a magic vaccine coming to cure us, because this is an RNA virus. And if they develop a viable vaccine to this that sticks, that’s the same over time, it will be the first time they’ve done it in history.  They don’t have a vaccine for AIDS. The vaccine for influenza is not like polio or MM…You have to get it every year because they’re guessing what new variant may come, and they get it wrong sometimes and get it right sometimes. But this is not easy. When they tried to develop a vaccine for SARS1, I’ve talked to some of the researchers. Every time there was several different efforts, highly funded, every one of them failed. And the ones I know of that I talked to people involved in it, every time they gave the vaccine to animals, it killed them all. So they basically stopped trying.  Now maybe they know more now. There’s brilliant people. Hopefully they can develop one that’s safe. Who knows? But I’m not holding my breath, honestly. I think it’s a lifesaver that they throw out to the public to feed them. But I’m not sure that it’s really all that viable, at least in the near term. And I don’t think there’s a magic drug coming along that’s just going to eradicate the virus because we’re not good with antiviral drugs to begin with.

Dr. Weitz:            We were talking about the antibodies, and another piece of evidence that the antibodies are protective, is we’ve been using convalescent plasma therapy, which is taking antibodies from patients who were infected, and using it on patients who are sick. And they’ve been getting some pretty good results with that. So that’s more evidence that antibodies are protective. And then, the only problem with that, it’s not really scalable if you take antibodies from one person and give them to one person. You can’t help a lot of people. But they’re trying to develop those antibodies in a lab and- 

Dr. Brady:            That may be helpful. They can have a form of immune modulatory or immune therapy based on this. And, boy, that whole area has progressed so much. That may be the answer, but who knows? But it’s interesting, when I was doing media too, an interesting phenomena, you had a lot of public health authorities, governors, even all the way up to the top saying, “Oh, antibodies are our ticket to understanding this, to knowing what the penetrance is in the population, and to getting people back to work safely.” and all that.  Then all of a sudden, it started having it spin. Oh, we don’t know about this antibody stuff. Oh, a lot of the tests aren’t any good.  And I’m like, “What flipped the public narrative?” And I really do think that public health and regulatory authorities came to grips with the reality. As people started getting antibody testing done, they realized that they were developing two segments of the population, those with IgG antibodies and those without. So what were they to do with the partition population? One set of rules for the people with antibodies and another set of rules for the people without?  What about the people that found out they have IgG antibody titers to SARS-COVID-2? Did they start telling the public health officials, “We’re not following your social distance stuff. We’re not wearing masks, because we have immunity”? Basically, what do you do with the population where… Do you give them immunity cards, non- immunity? I don’t think they even wanted to deal with that complexity. And they started messaging, “Well, we’re not sure we can trust antibody tests.”

                                Listen, we’ve been using antibody testing in medicine forever. This isn’t new. So there’s ways to figure this out. With antibody testing, it was different than PCR, because PCR molecular testing, you had to have a lab with really good molecular talent, really high level of scientific complexity, and you had to be able to take in samples that had a pathogen that’s infectious. So you had to have a BSL-3 lab. Now most of these labs aren’t BSL three labs. They don’t do molecular work, particularly in the integrative functional space. So they were just sitting on the sidelines.  Meanwhile, all their normal testing dried up. At least for a month, nobody was doing all salivary cortisols, and stool tests, and organic acids. No one was doing that. So then when the antibody opportunity came around and they said, “Hey, well maybe we can get back in the testing game and get some revenue coming in. Let’s do SARS-COVID-2 antibodies because, you know what, you didn’t have to develop that in your lab from scratch with the methodology. You just had to buy a kit and follow the instructions.

                                Now, I oversimplify that because when you get the kit, you still have to follow the instructions right. You have to prepare the samples right. You have to have consistency. So you should do your own internal validations on how you work the kit. But the heavy lifting was done by the big biotech firms that make the kits, submit the validations on the kits to FDA, and do that work for you. So, basically, a lot more people can get in the antibody testing game in PCR kit. So that’s where you saw all this explosion of antibody testing.  If a lab didn’t have a lot of experience in antibody testing or immunology testing, didn’t have supply lines created or supply chains to get the good kits, the only kits they were able to get are were the cheap, less quality kits, mainly out of Asian countries. And the labs that were higher complexity, had these other supply chains, were getting the American and German kits, and they’re a little bit different in their quality.  So I understand the argument, “Hey, we’ve got to worry about the antibody quality throughout the labs.” I get that. It’s definitely more of a question than the PCR testing, but I think there wasn’t really much of a choice. They had to turn to the public sector to just turn on the engine to get the testing capacity to be able to really do enough tests to really get an idea of what’s going on in the population.

Dr. Weitz:            I’ve got one more speculative question. We know that this cytokine storm, it happens when things go bad with patients who are infected. Is there any screening test that can give us any idea about the likelihood that somebody is going to have a cytokine storm? And I’m thinking, are there inflammatory markers, tests of antioxidant status, or even measuring cytokines, that can tell us whether we’re more likely to have an inflammatory situation, oxidant storm, a cytokine storm?

Dr. Brady:            No. I get the question. And we thought about that immediately because we have a cytokine test called cytoDX. And it looks at inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. But we never positioned it as a screening in that way because we are not sure that the ranges in the sensitivities or the normal ranges of the inflammatory cytokines are set in a way that would somehow screen someone to have an event that didn’t occur yet. Like is there just a mildly elevated pattern of some of these inflammatory cytokines, or the ratio of inflammatory to anti-inflammatory cytokines that would be somewhat predictive of who’s going to go down that pathway?  It may be, but we have no way to really test it because we don’t know who’s going to go there. And then once they go there, we don’t have the data on them before they went there. So it’s a really cool thing. The ranges and the normalities were never established or set with that kind of mindset. So when they go into a cytokine storm or when it starts, if you did a cytoDX, the inflammatory cytokines would be off the chart. But we can’t accurately say that before that ever happened or before they were exposed to SARS-COVID-2, that their anti inflammatory cytokines would be above the normal range. So those are things to be worked out.

                                What we’re mining now, we’re trying to get buccal swabs of people that we know in the ICUs went down into respiratory distress syndrome, and through our genomic insights platform in OPUS23, and all the AI and machine learning, we’re trying to pick apart what is the exact pattern in constellation of snips. And we’re looking at ACE-2 receptor snips. We’re looking at cytokine snips. We’re looking at a whole bunch of different snips to find out what is the golden pattern. And maybe it’s not just snips, it’s snips plus metabolome markers.  So we’re looking at some of that stuff, but once again, we don’t have the time and the number of samples in the right sequence with the clinical histories. It’s really hard to put together, but we’re looking at that. I’m having a little bit of brain freeze on his name, but there’s a researcher, I believe he was at Duke or one of the California institutions, that is the go-to expert on cytokine storm, even before COVID happened, right. People tended to go into a cytokine storm, particularly people with certain auto immune disorders and so forth.  His most accurate predictor of cytokine storm are people that have elevated ferritins, like up in the 4, 5, 600s. And we know it’s an acute phase reactant, early reactant. And it’s not really indicative necessarily of their iron status. It’s sort of a lab artifact as an acute phase reactant. But I read some of his work. Even advising some of the ICU physicians to do just a serum ferritin. And if the serum ferritin was really high, really watch this patient and maybe even use TNF alphas or immune modulating medications on them to stop them from going into that.

                                But it’s a very good question, Ben. And I don’t know. I think our life raft here, beyond vaccines and beyond some direct therapeutics, is to get better at predictive using omics, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, what have you, to be able to find those canaries in the coal mine. Who are the ones that might go down the cytokine storm pathway, and to be more aggressive with them? And on the flip side, just have better understandings of standards of care when they do get there, because there’s a lot of speculation now that they were treating the COVID-19 like any other viral pneumonia and what they knew how to treat it. And it turns out it’s very different, with the happy hypoxia and the CO2 going off, but the oxygen not profusing, they were getting really silly kind of reactions from patients, and they were very, very quick to ventilate them, and now they’re thinking that was a mistake, that they created more lung damage and worse outcomes by putting people early on ventilators when they shouldn’t have.  So maybe they learn more, I’m sure they will. And then drug combos, whether it’s azithromycin and chloroquine, or whether it’s these antiviral cocktails combined with this and that. We’ll see. I’m sure they’re going to figure out better ways to treat it even if it’s not curative.

Dr. Weitz:            Excellent. Thank you so much, David.

Dr. Brady:            Okay. Thanks, Ben. Appreciate the time.

Dr. Weitz:            Any final words? How can people get a hold of, I guess, the practitioners, can find out about the Diagnostic Solutions Lab testing?

Dr. Brady:            Yeah. They can just go to DiagnosticSolutionsLab.com and then click on COVID testing, and you get all the different options, whether it’s stool antibodies and what we’re doing with the NP swabs and the diagnostic testing. And then, I put that link on for you to share in your resources for this podcast interview, but I put a link to some other really good resources like the FDA site on serum antibody testing, and the different kits that have been approved, and their different sensitivity and specificity, and coefficients of confidence intervals and all of that if you want to look at it.  I put something up about, everyone’s talking about different strains of COVID or of SARS-COV-2. There’s no different strains of SARS-COV-2. There’s different isolates, different isovariants, but there’s yet to be a different strain of SARS-COV-2. A different strain means there’s something enough different about the virus and its structure that it behaves different functionally. They haven’t had that. We’ve seen variants or differences in some of the genomics, but that’s really an isoform or an isolate, not a strain. So that’s bad nomenclature. So that’s unlikely to affect antibodies, PCR targeting, anything like that. Then I just put a couple of other resources that people may like to see on false positives, false negatives, why they may occur, why they may not. 

Dr. Weitz:            Excellent. And those will be in the show notes, if you go to drweitz.com. Also, if you’d like to see a video version of this podcast, go to my YouTube page. And if you enjoy this podcast, if you could go to Apple podcasts and give us positive ratings and review, I would certainly appreciate that. Thank you, Dr. Brady.

Dr. Brady:            Okay. Thanks. Appreciate it.

 

Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Cardiologist's Perspective on COVID-19 with Dr. Howard Elkin: Rational Wellness Podcast 156
Loading
/

Dr. Howard Elkin provides his Integrative Cardiologist’s perspective on COVID-19 with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/weitzchiro/]

 

Podcast Highlights

7:25  While many of us think of COVID-19 as a respiratory infection, it tends to have a significant effect on the heart, the blood vessels, the kidneys, and on blood clotting and this is part of why it’s so lethal and distinguishes COVID-19 from other respiratory tract infections, like the seasonal flu.  At least 20-30% of patients with COVID-19 tend to have an elevation of troponin, which is an enzyme that indicates injury to the myocardium of the heart, such as when patients have a heart attack.

8:48  A lot of patients with COVID-19 have elevations of D-dimer, which is related to the fact that they have increased blood clotting. Normal levels of D-dimer are zero and we’re seeing levels as high as 3,4, or 5000, levels that are unfathomable.  This is leading to blood clots being formed rapidly and we are even seeing reports of patients in their 30s and 40s dying of strokes from blood clots.  The actor, Nick Cordero, age 41 had to be hospitalized for two months, ventilated, placed into a medically induced coma and have his leg amputated from COVID-19 and is still having some complications. Doctors and researchers are still trying to understand what is going on in these cases of COVID-19. When patients are in the ICU, intubated, in end stage disease, they can develop DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulopathy) where you get fibrin split products that cause small thrombosis throughout the body in the legs, the kidneys, etc.  DIC typically occurs when patients have sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome.  But it is highly unusual to see such clotting in patients in their 30s and 40s.

11:50  Some patients with COVID-19 end up with low oxygen levels and for some patients what is happening is that the iron is being liberated from the heme group in the bloodstream. This free iron ends up feeding the normally inactive bacteria that we all have in our bloodstream and these bacteria grow and secrete toxins which leads to sepsis and this hypercoagulable state.  What’s not clear is what is causing what.  We’ve learned that these patients don’t respond the way that other patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that can result from more typical bacterial or viral pneumonias.  More typical cases of ARDS usually respond to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) which involves using a ventilator to force more oxygen around the body, but patients with COVID-19 often don’t do as well with PEEP and may do better with a C-pap machine or just oxygen or being placed on a prone position.

15:04  What can we do from a natural prospective to prevent blood clots?  We should make sure to include fish oil in our daily supplements and it would be a good idea to combine some vitamin E in the form of mixed tocopherols or tocotrienols can help to protect the omega 3 oils from oxidation, both of which have a mild blood thinning effect.  Also omega 3 is a natural anti-inflammatory and we want to reduce the likelihood of having a cytokine storm if we do get infected with coronavirus.  Garlic and ginger are also natural blood thinner and can also be helpful. On the other hand, we might not want to thin the blood out too much in case we need to do surgery on these patients. 

18:00  Patients with existing hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes have an increased risk of being hospitalized or of dying from COVID-19.  If you have pre-existing heart disease or diabetes you have 2-3 times the risk of dying from COVID-19. Patients with kidney failure are twice as likely to die if they contract COVID-19. Obesity is also a risk factor for a worse prognosis and unfortunately, 40% of Americans are obese and 70% are overweight, so Americans are particularly vulnerable to a poor prognosis. Patients with hypertension are vulnerable to a worse prognosis and in the US we have 80 or 90 million people with hypertension and most of them do not even know it. Most of them are not adequately treated to the current standards. Blood pressure of 131/81 is considered hypertension and it should be 120 over 70 no matter if they are 20 or 80 years of age.  Diet and exercise are the most impactful lifestyle changes.  When it comes to hypertension, the first thing to look at is whether or not you are a salt retainer. Unfortunately, there is no test for this, but if you tend to collect edema, swelling of the ankles or if you’re African American or Mexican American, then you may be a salt retainer and you should try reducing your sodium intake. But sodium is essential for nerve and muscle function and sodium should not be vilified the way it has been as the cause of all hypertension. Dr. Elkin prefers not to prescribe diuretics, which help you get rid of sodium.  In fact, we should be more concerned about sugar for the heart than salt. And sugar competes with vitamin C and it weakens immune function.  Unfortunately, many people who have been forced to stay home because of this COVID-19 pandemic are finding that they’re baking cookies and eating more candy and other desserts to deal with the stress.

26:31  Certain nutritional supplements can be beneficial for patients with hypertension, including potassium, magnesium, fish oil, CoQ10, and quercetin, which can also be beneficial for fighting COVID-19, since it is a zinc transporter. 

28:19  Since patients with chronic disease and who are obese have a worse outcome with COVID-19, it would be nice if as a nation we used this moment to create a focus in our public health programs or policies or with our health care system to focus on using diet and lifestyle to reduce obesity and reverse this chronic disease burden.  This would lower our healthcare costs and make people more productive.

32:22  We have seen a number of disappointing studies with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, but yet some folks are posting on social media that it is the cure-all, it has been touted by President Trump, and some on social media are alleging that there is some sort of conspiracy to keep doctors from using it.  Dr. Elkin noted that he has had patients asking for a prescription for these two drugs in case they get sick with COVID-19.  There was one study in New York City that used hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin along with 50 mg zinc twice per day that did get excellent results but this showed more about the benefits of zinc than of hydroxychloroquine.  Hydroxychloroquine is a drug for malaria that has also been used in certain autoimmune disorders.  But it has some potential cardiovascular side effects, including arrhythmia in about 20% of patients. It can prolong the QT interval, which is something that is measured on an EKG. Azithromycin also prolongs the QT interval, so combined you are looking at 30-40% of patients potentially getting arrhythmia from taking this drug combination, and this arrhythmia can lead to sudden death.

39:27  Does taking certain commonly used blood pressure medications–ACE receptor blocking agents or ARBs (angiotensin receptor blocking drugs) (such as Losartan) make COVID-19 better or worse?  We know that the coronavirus attaches to cells and gains entry through the ACE2 receptors.  This has led some to speculate that taking such medications might make the infection worse.  There are ACE-2 receptors in the lungs, the heart, the kidneys, etc. which is why these drugs work so well.  But ACE inhibitors and ARBs are the most commonly used agents for hypertension because you can take them once per day, they work well, and they have few side effects.  They also have utility in heart failure, kidney disease, and in diabetes, so we use them a lot. To take all these patients off without any real evidence that they’re bad, could really make matters worse, because what we don’t want is more heart disease, or kidney disease. So, the American College of Cardiology, and the American Heart Association, have both come out with statements saying, there’s no real evidence that it does make it worse, despite the theoretical information that we have, and they may even be beneficial.  And the worst thing you want is out of control hypertension, heart failure, or kidney disease and then get infected, and have to deal with more problems.

 



Dr. Howard Elkin is an Integrative Cardiologist and he is the director of HeartWise Fitness and Longevity Center with offices in both Whittier and Santa Monica, California. He has been in practice since 1986. While Dr. Elkin does utilize medications and he performs angioplasty and stent placement and other surgical procedures, his focus in his practice is employing natural strategies for helping patients, including recommendations for exercise, diet, and lifestyle changes to improve their condition. He also utilizes non-invasive procedures like External Enhanced Counter Pulsation (EECP) as an alternative to angioplasty and by-pass surgery for the treatment of heart disease.  Dr. Elkin has written a book, From Both Sides of the Table: When Doctor Becomes Patient, that will soon be published. He can be contacted at 562-945-3753 or through his website, HeartWise.com.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts, and researchers in the field, to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me, and let’s jump into the podcast.  Hello Rational Wellness podcasters, Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you so much for joining me again today.

Our topic for today, is to take a look at the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of an integrative cardiologist, Dr. Howard Elkin. Especially since we know that COVID-19 affects the cardiovascular system in a significant percentage of patients, we’ve seen numerous reports that patients with existing hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart disease tend to fare more poorly with COVID-19.  But we’ve also heard about patients with COVID-19, who end up with damage to their heart, including myocarditis, and cardiomyopathy. And these are often in patients who never had any heart disease, and we’ve even seen reports of younger patients in their 30s, and 40s, with blood clots, and even dying of strokes. We’ve also heard of some of the drugs being utilized, like hydroxychloroquine, causing arrhythmia.

Dr. Howard Elkin is an integrative cardiologist, with offices in Whittier, and Santa Monica, California, and he’s been in practice since 1986. Dr. Elkin does utilize medications, and performs standard angioplasty, and stent replacement, and other surgical procedures, but his real focus in his practice is to employ natural strategies for helping patients, including recommendations for exercise, diet, lifestyle changes to improve their condition.  He also utilizes other creative, non-invasive procedures like external enhanced counterpulsation, as a non-invasive alternative to angioplasty, and bypass surgery for the treatment of heart disease. Dr. Elkin has written a book, From Both Sides of the Table: When Doctor Becomes Patient, that will soon be published. Dr. Elkin, thank you so much for joining me today.

Dr. Elkin:              Thank you. I’m delighted as always to be here with you, Dr. Weitz.

Dr. Weitz:            And I’m sporting my pandemic beard here.  And as we’re filming this, since the topic is talking about patients with COVID-19, I wanted to start off by asking you a personal question. How has this pandemic affected you, and your practice?

Dr. Elkin:              Well, I think it affects everyone. As far as it’s affected me, clearly my outpatient business is down a little bit.  Maybe about 20, 25%, which is better than most.  I’ve made a real effort to keep us running, because so many patients, while I’m a cardiologist, these are the patients with higher morbidity, and mortality. So my emphasis has been to keep these patients healthy, and build their immune system so they don’t end up being a statistic.  So, it’s changed the volume that I see. But it’s also given me a chance to really focus on my own health, and basically, slowing down and smelling the roses kind of thing, so it’s actually been uplifting in a way.

Dr. Weitz:            Good. Excellent. One more question before we get into the COVID patients is, I’ve heard reports that there are a drastically decreased number of patients coming into the hospital with heart attacks, and other cardiovascular issues, and this may be partially because patients are afraid to come into the hospitals, because they’ve been told that they should stay away, or they’re afraid they’re going to come into contact with patients with COVID-19. What have you seen in that regard?

Dr. Elkin:              You’re absolutely correct on this. In fact, studies have shown in France, and also Spain. And we don’t have quite the data yet on New York, but heart people presenting with what we call a STEMI, which stands for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. It’s a term used for a particular type of heart attack, that basically, it’s a total blockage, or occlusion of a vessel. And we need to get in there right away to intervene, in order to save a life, and to also minimize the size of a heart attack.  Now, the number, it’s been reported by the Cardiology Society, is that the number of STEMIs has decreased, anywhere from 60% to 80% in the last couple of months. That’s huge. I still take call about two to three times a month, and I’m in charge of the STEMIs when I’m on call, and the first week we had a lockdown, I had three cases. It was very, very busy. And that was at the very beginning of March.  Since then, I get almost no calls at all. And that’s just, I think, an exemplary of what we’re talking about. People are staying home, they’re afraid to come in, which of course, is not a good thing.  So we’ve been warned, from the American College of Cardiology, that we’re going to have an onslaught of cardiac cases in a few weeks, because people can’t stay home for so long, right?  I mean, this is a heart attack.  But I think it’s fear, people not wanting to leave their home.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, I know that unfortunately, some of these patients who might have come in with less severe disease now, might come in closer to end stage disease.

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely. That’s my fear, and why I’ve blogged about it, I’ve written about it, I’ve been vocal about it on social media. It’s like, we’re open, we want to remain open. We want to be there for you as a source, so that we don’t have to deal with end stage disease.

Dr. Weitz:            And in California, where we practice, even though LA has had more in cases in some of the rural parts of the state, our hospital capacity has been not even close to being challenged. So, our hospitals now are starting to, I believe they’re going to start welcoming in patients for elective procedures. So hopefully that will help in that regard.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Our hospital has just released that, in the last week or so. I actually did an elective angiogram on a patient. It wasn’t elective, he actually needed to have it done.

Dr. Weitz:            Right. A lot of people don’t realize, I talked to people about elective surgery, and they go, “Oh, you mean plastic surgery?” No. We’re talking about a huge number of important, medically necessary procedures, but they’re just not being done, because the priority has been to keep the ICUs open for COVID patients.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. I walked into my hospital’s lobby yesterday because I had a patient, I was doing a cardioversion, which is when you actually shock a patient’s rhythm back into normal, and the lobby is like nobody’s there. It’s so quiet. I’ve never seen a hospital so quiet. It’s surreal. It’s really surreal.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. So, while many people think about COVID-19 as a respiratory infection, it tends to have a fairly significant effect on the cardiovascular system. And in fact, its effect on the heart, the blood vessels, the kidneys, and on blood clotting, is often what leads to its lethality. And this distinguishes the coronavirus from other respiratory infections, such as the seasonal flu, doesn’t it?

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely. And, this is so evolving. A few weeks ago, we thought… I didn’t really think about it as a cardiac problem. But, in the last few weeks, we’re seeing it really is quite a bit of cardiac involvement. In fact, at least 20% to 30% of patients, depending on what you read, tend to have an elevation in troponin, which is an enzyme that we look for, to detect injury to the myocardium of the heart. And that’s what we measure when people come in with a heart attack. And we follow that, we trend it. So we’re seeing a lot of these patients are having elevated enzymes, which does portend a bad prognosis. In fact, the mortality of people with elevated troponin levels, regardless of whether they end up having a heart attack, it just adds insult to injury. So if you see elevated troponin, it’s not a good sign.

Dr. Weitz:            I understand a lot of these patients have elevations of D-dimer, which is related to the fact that they have increased clotting. And I’ve talked to some physicians who are working in emergency rooms, and they’re telling me, I don’t know if this is done everywhere, but they’re starting to routinely put patients on blood thinners when they are admitted for COVID-19.

Dr. Elkin:              Yes, our hospital is doing the same. So D-dimer is a chemical test, and what it detects is basically venous thrombosis clots. And, a normal level zero, right? We’re talking levels as high as three, four and 5,000, which is unfathomable. You’d never see that before, even in someone that’s had a vein clot, or pulmonary embolism. So the numbers are astronomical, and then, doctor interventionalists that are intervening with people with strokes, they’re saying that the clot is being formed as they’re intervening.

Dr. Weitz:            Wow.

Dr. Elkin:              Actually seeing more clot being laid down, which, I can’t imagine that.

Dr. Weitz:            And I guess that’s what’s explaining why we’ve seen reports of patients in their 30s, and 40s, dying of strokes from blood clots. And then we heard about that actor, Nick Cordero, who had several strokes, had to have his leg amputated, and is still having some serious problems after being in the ICU for a considerable period of time. What is going on with this clotting, and what’s going on in the blood vessels?

Dr. Elkin:              We’re not quite sure, what the chicken, and what’s the egg in this case. First of all, a lot of people with end stage disease, they’re intubated, they’re in ICU, they’re not doing well. They develop this entity called DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. And so, what happens, you have these, and the end product is something called fibrin split products, and they cause all these little small thrombosis everywhere. Kidneys, legs, everywhere. But that’s just part of the problem. That’s end stage. When you see DIC, usually I’ve seen it in people that have sepsis, or acute respiratory distress syndrome, which of course, is common in these patients.

But now we’re seeing young people, like you say, with strokes, or these thromboses, and part of the problem is, we’re not quite sure why is happening. But we know that these people kept saying to themselves, “This can’t be a stroke, I’m only 30 years old.” Right? And so, they are not seeking immediate, or prompt attention, which is really bad. Because this is something that’s treatable. Just like what I do, as an interventional cardiologist, I intervene, I go in there, and I do a thrombectomy, and then put a stent in. The same thing can be done and a stroke center, which, my hospital is one of them. So, these patients should not be staying home if they have any sign, or symptom of a stroke, at any age.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, there’s been some discussion in the literature, how this actually ties in with the breathing problems patients are having, which was originally thought to be typical, to acute respiratory syndrome, and now they’re realizing it has more to do with low oxygen levels. And some of the data is showing that what’s happening, is that iron is being liberated, free iron is is being liberated from… The heme isn’t able to hold the oxygen, and the iron group is dislodged from the heme group, and is floating free in the bloodstream, and I heard one discussion about this.  So, if you have more iron in the bloodstream, it turns out our blood, which most people think is sterile, is really not sterile. There’s a lot of bacteria floating around in there, but the bacteria are not really active. Partially because they need iron to actually grow, and reproduce, and flourish. And now there’s free iron is leading to these pathogens in the blood growing, and creating toxins, and that this might be part of the process that’s leading to sepsis, and some of these other coagulable situations.

Dr. Elkin:              I agree on that. And this is new information. We’re just really reading about it. Again, it’s the chicken, and the egg thing. what’s happening first? And when I think of sepsis, having been around ICUs for many, many years in my training, and also as a practitioner, I think about, usually bacterial infections of any matter, or form, and then the end result is sepsis. But you do see it, and viremia, and it seems to be common in this virus, in which it’s overwhelming.  The body is breaking down, okay? The body is breaking down, and like you say, the heme is being stripped from the red blood cells, with the lack of oxygen. We’re learning so many things, and people need to understand this virus, it’s fickle. It can mutate, it can do all kinds of strange things. We don’t have a handle on it. And so, like, for example, ARDS, we’ve known about that. We’ve treated it for years, acute respiratory distress syndrome. We see it in any type of bacterial, and/or viral pneumonias.  But, usually it responds favorably to this thing called PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure. Okay, but now we have found that these people with COVID-19 are not a homogeneous group. And some really don’t do well with high levels of PEEP.  Actually it can lead to oxygen toxicity, and other problems.  And that some of them behave more like high altitude sickness.  And some of them may need a C-pap machine, or different treatments. A lot of them are being put in a prone position, on their stomach, right? Because they can aerate more lungs. We’re just tip of the iceberg here. That’s why it really is learning process.

Dr. Weitz:            So from a natural perspective, if patients are being given blood thinners when they get into the hospital, if I wanted to do what I can, from a natural perspective, to decrease my chances of having a poor outcome if I do get infected, does it make sense for me to consider taking a natural blood thinner, like natto kinase, or maybe increasing my normal intake of fish oil, or garlic, or vitamin E, which may mildly thin the blood out?

Dr. Elkin:              Well, that’s a great question. So what do we do? Can we do anything prophylactically? First of all-

Dr. Weitz:            And preventatively, yeah.

Dr. Elkin:              Preventatively, right. You know the study that came out about a year and a half ago, that’s saying, “Low dose aspirin in the general population of over age 50, really isn’t something we recommend.”

Dr. Weitz:            But that’s because it might cause more bleeding.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. And I’ve adhered to that principle, even before the study came out. So now we have a different thing. I would say, yeah, first of all, I definitely am a firm believer of… What’s some things you mentioned? Like garlic…

Dr. Weitz:            Fish oil.

Dr. Elkin:              To me, anybody over the age of 40, and maybe even younger now, deserves to be on fish oil. That’s my number one go to supplement.

Dr. Weitz:            And see, fish oil is a natural anti-inflammatory, and we know part of the acute respiratory distress syndrome, where you get this cytokine storm in the lungs, you get a lot of inflammation. Fish oil probably could be beneficial in that regard, too. So maybe a simple solution is just up the normal amount of fish oil you’re taking.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Ginger, garlic, they’re also natural blood thinners. Vitamin E. I usually like mixed tocopherols. These are all things that we can be doing. I haven’t recommend… I mean, my big thing is fish oil.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah.

Dr. Elkin:              That’s a great question, because we don’t have the answer. We don’t want to thin it out too much, because what if you have to do surgery on these patients, or an intervention? Then we’ve got other issues on our hands.

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Elkin:              But, these are the questions that really need to be answered.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. And yeah, I’ve increased my fish oil, and added one of those supplements that has the extracts from the fish oil that decreases inflammation, the inflammatory response modifiers. And, anytime I take fish oil, I always throw in some vitamin E, and the preferred source I’ve been using the last six months is the tocotrienols now, because the data seems to be pretty robust for that.  So, we know that patients with existing heart disease, and diabetes, et cetera, high blood pressure, have an increased risk. So, what can these patients do prophylactically to, besides, we’re talking about the blood thinner thing, what else could they do to make sure that they’re most likely going to have the best possible outcome?

Dr. Elkin:              And by the way, this is probably the most important question anyone can ask, which is what I’ve written about, blogged about. First of all, keep your appointments with your practitioners. Because-

Dr. Weitz:            And, I should say, besides losing 50 pounds, getting your blood pressure totally under control, and doing all those things to have perfect health. But what can they do in his short term?

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Okay, so, you’ve mentioned it already. Let me just give you a little bit of a rundown of the numbers. If you have preexisting heart disease, you’re twice as likely to have a negative result, I mean death. Your increase of mortality are doubled. I’m sorry, three times. You’re three times more likely. Same thing with diabetes. So, diabetes and preexisting heart disease are your two biggies. Kidney failure, twice as likely to die. And then the next one is obesity, which is, as you know, about 40% of the American population is obese, and about 70% are overweight. So we’re not dealing with a healthy crowd to begin with.  And that’s what I’ve been talking about. Use this opportunity to improve your overall health. If you’re hypertensive, get your blood pressure down. I’m really strict on that one, because, the numbers now are incredible. It used to be 70 million and now there’s 80 or 90 million people in this country with hypertension. Most of them do not know it. Most of them are not adequately treated, at least according to the standards that we’re looking for. So it’s really-

Dr. Weitz:            And according to the current standards, and the way you see the literature, what constitutes, what number of systolic diastolic blood pressure constitutes hypertension? And what is the ideal range that they should be in?

Dr. Elkin:              Right. I always tell people that the ideal blood pressure, whether you’re 20, 30, 60, 80, or 100, is always 120 over 70. And that doesn’t mean I try to get that in everybody, but that’s the ideal. But the standards now, which have been present for about a year and a half, is that anything above 130, on the systolic range, and above 80 on the diastolic range is considered hypertensive. So if you’re 131 over 81, that’s considered hypertension.  Now, does that mean I try to get everybody to that number, that’d be ridiculous, because patients would be on three or four medicines, they’d have to see me every three to six weeks. But, I do pick and choose.  On younger people, people that are really proactive about their health, people that really want to get to optimal. Yes, we will do our best to get that way. There’s so much you can do with lifestyle. People think that we should go straight to medicines, and I don’t tend to do that, when I see a new patient, unless the blood pressure is off the wall.

Dr. Weitz:            So what are the most impactful lifestyle factors that we can utilize?

Dr. Elkin:              Well, it always boils down to diet and exercise, right? I mean, because most of these patients are overweight, overstressed, and they don’t exercise on a regular basis. Same thing with diabetes.  So, for me, an ideal diabetic should be in the non-diabetic range.  I have many diabetics that start off with high A1Cs, I get them to being a pre-diabetic.  Then I get them below 5.7, and they’re really a diabetic, but we’ve got them very well maintained, and it can be done. It’s work but…

Dr. Weitz:            What are the most impactful dietary factors, A, for heart disease, and B, for diabetes?

Dr. Elkin:              Okay. 

Dr. Weitz:            Why don’t we start with hypertension?

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Then it always comes down to this topic about salt, right? I mean, just this age old problem that’s been going on for years. And, if you are a person with normal blood pressure, you do not have to worry about salt. Okay? It’s just unnecessary. If you have blood pressure, hypertension, it really is going to depend on whether or not you’re a salt retainer. Though there’s not a test that shows whether or not your salt retainer, but, if you tend to collect edema, or swelling of the ankles, if you’re African American, or Mexican American, these people tend to have a higher incidence of hypertension.  In the Caucasian group, it really depends. I am not overly strict about sodium, unless they have heart failure, kidney failure, liver failure, or they fall into those groups. Also, kidney failure is a very big one, and you have to be very careful about sodium with them. The average hypertensive, I very rarely give diuretics, which help you get rid of sodium. And I don’t super restrict, I just say, “Use a prudent diet.” I mean, you should be-

Dr. Weitz:            And of course, there’s a balance between sodium on one end, and potassium, magnesium, calcium on the other.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. People have to understand that sodium is not to be vilified. I mean, it’s important for nerve and muscle function, and it also helps create balance of the body fluids. So it’s essential for life, so I think that’s been over-emphasized. It’s actually been shown, I did a recent reading on this, that sugar, believe it or not, sugar is actually not good for the heart. I don’t know… For us in functional medicine, it’s not major surprise, right? But the emphasis has really never been on sugar.  In fact, some of these… On What the Health, was a documentary that came out a couple years ago, which is… I won’t go into my thoughts about it, but sugar was minimized, as far as any mal-effect at all on the body. So, it’s crazy. But back to the preventative stuff you were saying, I’m sorry.

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, the easiest way to weaken your immune system, is to eat a bunch of sugar.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. And I didn’t know this, but in my research, that sugar actually competes with vitamin C for your immune system. And so, my thing is, why would you want sugar to compete? And why would you want sugar to win? Because it will.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah.

Dr. Elkin:              I mean, I’ve had patients who wrote on Facebook, “Wow. Since this pandemic, I’ve stayed at home, I’ve gained 15 pounds, and I’m baking bread and chocolate chip cookies.” It’s like, “You serious?” People are doing this. I mean, I drive by this [inaudible 00:24:51] place, I never stop out there, but on the way to work. And it’s packed.  Or I was at CVS, getting some razor blades, about two weeks ago, and I just happened to happen to walk by the candy aisle, it’s like almost everything is gone. These poor kids are at home because they’re not in school, and the parents are probably trying to shut them up, and giving them candy. Terrible. So those are the kinds of things. Sugar is very deleterious to your health, and is the last thing you want if you’re trying to build, or optimize your immune system.

 



 

Dr. Weitz:                            We’ve been having a great discussion, but I’d like to take a minute to tell you about the sponsor for this episode. I’m thrilled that we are being sponsored for this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast by Integrative Therapeutics, which is one of the few lines of professional products that I use in my office. Integrative Therapeutics is a top tier manufacturer of clinician designed, cutting edge nutritional products, with therapeutic dosages of scientifically proven ingredients, to help patients prevent chronic diseases and feel better naturally.

                                                Integrative Therapeutics is also the founding sponsor of Tap Integrated, a dynamic resource of practitioners to learn with and from leading experts and fellow clinicians. I am a subscriber and if you include the discount code Weitz, W-E-I-T-Z, you’ll be able to subscribe for only $99, instead of $149 for the year. And now, back to our discussion.

 



 

Dr. Weitz:             Are there any particular supplements that patients with hypertension might take at this point?

Dr. Elkin:          Yes. First of all, I do use, even though I don’t normally supplement with potassium, I don’t think you normally have to, if you eat adequate fruits, and vegetables. I sometimes will add just a little bit of potassium, because that can help lower blood pressure. Magnesium, so I’m big on minerals. I’m big on minerals. I have a product that has olive leaf extract in it, which has been shown in a population of patients have been effective. It’s also anti-carcinogenic. CoQ10 can be helpful. These supplements have small, but potentially cumulative roles.

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Elkin:              So, I really try to… Fish oil, CoQ10, those two are much.

Dr. Weitz:            Of course, quercetin is a product that could be potentially beneficial for COVID-19 patients, because it’s a zinc transporter, but that also potentially can help with hypertension.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, exactly. So, minerals, there are things you can do. So, I add them. Plus, because of my standing as an integrative cardiologist, a lot of people come to me because they don’t want to go on medications. They’ve been to three or four doctors, they’ve all put them on medicines, they’ve had side effects. They don’t like it. So they’ve heard about me, and they come to me for that reason. So, these are the people I like to work with. But, it’s always gonna start with lifestyle, number one. We’ll add the supplements, and do my best to avoid going on medications. Lots of times you need it, because, again, to stay out of the hypertensive range, you may need to add pharmaceuticals. But it’s not my go to, at least initially, unless you’re really, really high.

Dr. Weitz:            It would be really nice if we utilize this opportunity. If we look at the fact, I’d be curious when we’re done with this, if we see how well the American public has fared with the COVID-19 infection, compared to other countries. But given the fact that we are, I believe, still the number one country in terms of rates of overweight, and obesity, and I’m sure we’ve got to be close to the top on diabetes, and we know heart disease is just rampant, as well as these other chronic diseases, we could use this as an opportunity to focus on trying to get our society healthier. And that would be a great thing for the health of our nation going forwards, and would also be beneficial for every other possible reason, in terms of lowering our healthcare costs, and even making people more productive. I think we should try to seize this opportunity to focus on what we can do to reduce the chronic disease burden.

Dr. Elkin:              And I could not agree with you more. And I really laud some of the things that you are personally doing. I mean, you have these Tuesday afternoon Zoom sessions, that people can dial in, and talk, actually share their thoughts about COVID-19. And, I mean, that is a great move. I just put together my own supplement, which is really basic, called ImmunoWise, to help boost the immune system. It’s very basic. It’s got the proper dose of vitamin C, and zinc, and I’m blanking now. But it’s got quercetin, but it’s a nice supplement, in one bottle. If you take three day, it’s going to help with your immune system.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s great.

Dr. Elkin:              So, we’re doing things, and I’d like to think that a lot of our colleagues are doing the same, taking that opportunity. And also to reassure patients, they don’t have to have negative outcomes, even if you have a heart problem.

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, I don’t know if you just came across the bulletin boards. There is a pre-print of a study from hospitals in New York, and they utilized zinc along with hydroxychloroquine, and it turns out that the patients who were taking zinc did remarkably better in terms of mortality rates, and being released from the hospital, or not ending up on a ventilator. And the dosage of zinc was actually quite high. They were using 50 milligrams of zinc, twice per day. So, that’s 100 milligrams of elemental zinc.

Dr. Elkin:              Right.

Dr. Weitz:            And I think that’s interesting that now you have traditional hospitals utilizing essentially a pharmaceutical dosage of zinc, and getting incredible levels. So, I think it’s interesting to see that some of these natural substances can be quite powerful.

Dr. Elkin:              And I think this is, again, why this is such an important learning process. We really don’t know. I avoid this whole hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine Z-Pak thing. We can talk about it. We probably should, because, I mean, I see these posts on Facebook, and I want to just scream, because these people are obsessed about who’s right, who’s wrong, why they’re right. It’s like, “You guys.” I say-

Dr. Weitz:            Just make sure when you take your hydroxychloroquine, wash it down with some bleach.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Exactly. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:            And inject some Lysol right after that.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. I saw this cartoon of our president, and he’s getting erect, and getting an enema. Oh boy. So anyway-

Dr. Weitz:            So yeah, why don’t you talk about… So hydroxychloroquine, or chloroquine. These are drugs that have traditionally been used for malaria. And there are some reasons to see that they may be potentially of benefit.  Even though, if they are effective, they’re certainly not going to be the cure all.  And, one of the benefits of hydroxychloroquine is that it helps as a zinc transporter. Unfortunately, it has a lot of potential side effects, and maybe you can talk about that.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. So, hydroxychloroquine, which has been used, like you say, for a long time, it’s also used in certain autoimmune disorders, rheumatologists use it for-

Dr. Weitz:             Lupus.

Dr. Elkin:              Lupus. Rheumatoid arthritis. I had a patient that was on it for briefly, for mixed connective tissue disease.  She was followed by a rheumatologist at UCLA, and had problems.  Here’s the thing.  The success stories are basically very anecdotal.  There’s a lot of observational studies, and I understand, it’s a new disease, basically, we don’t have a lot of data.  But some people are jumping to, “Oh wow, they’re using this in Inglewood, a hospital in Inglewood with great successes.” It’s like, okay, I would not take that as gospel.  But anyways, so here’s what we worry about.  It can prolong the QT interval. What is that? The QT interval is something we actually measure on a routine EKG. It has to do with your electrical… It’s resetting your electrical setting, electrical activity between beats. So you have a depolarisation, electrical impulse, and then the heart contracts. Then it has to relax in between beats, for the next one. So it’s electrical activity that can be… The certain part of the cardiac cycle can be prolonged, electrically, as a result of these drugs.  We’re talking about at least 20% or more of patients on these drugs will develop QT prolongation. Now, if you add azithromycin into it, which is not benign, like people think it is, then you’re probably magnifying that by double. You probably double it. So the two in combination, can really prolong QT interval. Why would you care? Because QT prolongation could lead to malignant arrhythmias. There’s one that we look for called torsades de pointes, which means a twisting of the points in French, and I’ve seen it, and it can be deadly. I mean, this is what can lead to sudden death. So, these patients really have to be monitored. I’ve had people ask me, “Can I have a prescription for hydroxychloroquine just in case?” I said, “Are you serious?” They said, “Just in case.” I’ve actually had people ask me this.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, just go to the pet store, and get the kind you use to clean your fish tank. You see how that worked out for them.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Right. Exactly. So-

Dr. Weitz:            I’m referring to somebody in the news, who consumed that, unfortunately, didn’t have a good outcome.

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah, yeah. He thought it would… Amazing. So anyway, another reason to be concerned is because these patients are in ICU, they’re critically ill to begin with. Like I said, about 20% of them are going to have elevated troponin levels, if you look at the new data coming out. So, I don’t know. I would not want to give this to someone with an elevated troponin level, who’s already at higher risk of arrhythmias, right?  And then you’re going to potentially worsen that. So, these people that are so pro that combination, because it works, it’s worth… And a doctor in New York, who I don’t know this doctor, I’m sure you’ve heard about him. He’s said it work in every patient he gave it to.

Dr. Weitz:            I seen that report, too. Yeah, so I’d like to make a couple of comments about the hydroxychloroquine. One is, in the functional medicine world, people have jumped on this. I don’t know why, but somehow, there’s people especially tend to be attracted to conspiracy theories, and they think that we have this drug that works, but the medical establishment is telling people not to take it, because they want to force everybody to get vaccines.  And, I think it’s clear that we really don’t know if it might work. And, I certainly wouldn’t jump on it. And I think there’s an alternative. And then, number two is, there are folks in the natural medicine world, who have figured, “Since hydroxychloroquine may be of benefit, I’ll just give the patients quinine water.” And unfortunately, the amount of chloroquine in quinine water is so low, that there’s no way. If chloroquine, or hydroxychloroquine has a beneficial therapeutic outcome, then the amount in quinine is going to be insignificant. So, forget that idea.

And one of the main things that hydroxychloroquine seems to do is, it increases the ability to get zinc into the cells, they call it a zinc ionophore, and because the cells tend to repel the zinc, and in this recent study in New York, it turns out that the patients on hydroxychloroquine really had few benefits compared to the patients who were taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc, which really what that study shows is that zinc is a real benefit, and that hydroxychloroquine is just getting it into the cells.  So, those of us in the natural world use 250, to 500 milligrams quercetin each time you take the zinc, and that’s a natural alternative to getting the zinc into the system. And then one other potential benefit to hydroxychloroquine, is once the coronavirus gets into the cells, it gets put into an endosome, and then it gets pushed out of the cell, where it could spread. And, that that endospore requires an alkaline environment, and the hydroxychloroquine creates an alkaline environment, so it may suppress the ability of the virus to spread. But there’s an actual agent known as Chinese skullcap, that can also do the same thing. So you can combine quercetin and Chinese skullcap with zinc, and you’re probably going to get the same benefits without having any arrhythmia.

Dr. Elkin:              That’s interesting. That’s new to me, because I’m familiar with skullcap. It’s an actual anti-inflammatory, but I’ve never seen it in that context. But it’s interesting though, these… And like you said, I think- 

Dr. Weitz:            That was pointed out to me by Dr. Peter D’Adamo from the Eat Right for Your Blood Type, who I did a podcast with a few weeks ago. I wanted to ask you about one more set of drugs that are used for heart disease. So, we know that this novel coronavirus, they say it’s novel because we don’t have any immunity to it. So, this coronavirus tends to attach to, and gain entry into our cells through ACE-2 receptors, which are found in the lungs, and virtually on almost all the tissues of the body. And so, there’s been some speculation that certain common drugs for hypertension, like ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin response blockers might increase the risk of worse infection. What’s your perspective on this?

Dr. Elkin:              Okay, I’m glad you mentioned that. First of all, so there are ACE-2 receptors in the lung, in the heart, in the myocardium, in the kidney. I mean, they’re all over. But, that’s also probably why they work, why they’re so effective in blood pressure. But, so, this started off as an observational study. And I don’t even know if it was in vivo or in vitro, in China, when they noticed this, and it does make sense, right? I mean, if it’s the same port of entry, the virus enters the cell by attaching to an ACE-2 receptor, does it make it worse?  And then, the big thing about that, is that okay, well, ACE inhibitors and ARBs are the most commonly used agents for hypertension, and it’s certainly my practice, because generally you can do them once a day, and they are well tolerated with very little side effects.

They also have utility in heart failure, and renal conservation, people that are diabetic, so we use them a lot. To take all these patients off without any real evidence that they’re bad, could really make matters worse, because what we don’t want is more heart disease, or kidney disease. So, the American College of Cardiology, and the American Heart Association, I think, have both come out with statements saying, there’s no… And there’s truly no real evidence that it does make it worse, despite the theoretical information that we have. Some people say, I don’t know if you’ve read about this, that there actually may be some improvements.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. And you can think about that, right? If the ACE inhibitors are blocking the ACE receptors…

Dr. Elkin:              Exactly. So, I have not taken anyone off of ACE or an ARB as a result of this information. I’ve had many phone calls. I’ve heard about this, but I have dissuaded them from changing. Plus, when you change blood pressure medications, and let’s say you have something, a combo that’s working, you’ve got to start all over again, with a different class of medications.

Dr. Weitz:            And the worst thing you want is out of control hypertension, and then get infected, and have to deal with more problems.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Or heart failure, or worse, even kidney failure.

Dr. Weitz:            Exactly, exactly. Okay, so I think those are the main topics I wanted to cover. Is there anything else you wanted to tell the listeners, and viewers?

Dr. Elkin:              [crosstalk 00:42:38] Just one that’s interesting, I don’t have the answer to this.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah.

Dr. Elkin:              But I want to hear your opinion, as well. This whole thing about testing.

Dr. Weitz:            Yes.

Dr. Elkin:              Should I be tested? Should I not be tested? And then you’ve got, again, the same kind of protagonists, and antagonists in the social media world, saying, “Oh, no.” So, what we look for, and I want to really get your opinion is, we want a test to be 100% sensitive, and 100% specific. 

Dr. Weitz:            And that doesn’t exist in the real world.

Dr. Elkin:              It doesn’t exist in the real world. So, if I am a true negative, that means I definitely don’t have the virus, or never had it, or [inaudible 00:43:13]. So, there’s loopholes, and as far as testing is concerned, it does not clearly confer immunity, and we don’t know how long immunity really will last.

Dr. Weitz:            So are you now talking about antibody testing, or virus testing?

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah, yeah. Not so much the nasal swab. We know that the nasal swab will be… If the nasal swab is done correctly, and these centers know how to do it.

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, it was just approved, I think either this morning, or yesterday, using saliva, a home viral test using saliva where the patients spit into a tube, and send it in. It’s been tested in New Jersey for a couple of weeks now. That was now approved as a new way to test, and that’s going to be a game changer for… We don’t have to worry about having enough of the swabs, it doesn’t require the same reagents, you don’t have to have somebody in a hazmat suit, with full PPE, worried about sticking a swab down someone’s nose, and being uncomfortable, and everything else. So, testing for the virus-

Dr. Elkin:              You’ve got to go way up there.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, this is going to be a big game changer as far as that goes.

Dr. Elkin:              So the antibody testing, there’s no perfect test. If you’re going to have it done, and I did have it done, you want to check… Even though I don’t think there’s anything that’s truly FDA approved yet, that takes a while to happen. Okay? You’ve not going to have FDA approval in such a short time period.

Dr. Weitz:            Well, what’s been happening is, is there are tests on the market that haven’t gotten any recognition at all, but there’s somewhere around, I don’t know, 80, 90 tests, maybe more, on the market that have been given emergency approval by the FDA. Meaning, hey, you guys have some data, it looks like you guys have done some thorough testing. We don’t really have time to investigate all the details, but go ahead, and put it on the market. It looks like you guys are doing a good job to start with. And so, I would certainly use a test that at least has emergency FDA approval.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. And I chose one that does both IGM, and IGG, and it’s quantitative. So, my test was negative. I maybe will repeat that in three months. There’s no set pattern as to when you do it. So, we don’t have the answers. There’s no perfect test. There probably would never be a perfect test. But, we will learn more about testing as we learn more about this virus.

Dr. Weitz:            Well, so there’s two types of tests. There’s one test where you prick your finger, and it’s called a blood spot test. And then there’s tests where they take serum. And the serum tests are decidedly more accurate. So, the blood spot tests are some ways in the 50% to 70% rate of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. And whereas, the companies that have done a good job with the serum tests are somewhere in the 90% to 100% range.

Dr. Elkin:              Correct.

Dr. Weitz:            So, I would go with a serum test, rather than a blood spot test. The blood spot tests are the ones where you get the results in 10, 15 minutes. The serum tests, unfortunately you have to send it in to a lab, and get it back.

Dr. Elkin:              Right.

Dr. Weitz:            But I’d like to make a comment about whether antibodies are protective. Now, it’s good to be cautious. It’s good to be careful. It’s good not to get ahead of the research. And it’s easy for people to extrapolate, make all kinds of claims that aren’t accurate. So, I applaud the medical establishment for being very careful, and saying, “Hey, we don’t know for sure if antibodies are protective.”  But, we know that the way our immune system fights against viruses, any virus, is to create antibodies. And this virus is, in many ways, similar to other viruses. And we know that our bodies do mount antibodies, and for the most part, not 100%, not in everybody, but generally speaking, I’d like to say that I think if we looked at the preponderance of evidence, even though we don’t have 100% proof yet, antibodies are going to be protective.  That’s the way our body works. If antibodies were not protective, a vaccine will never work, nothing’s ever going to work. Herd immunity won’t work. The whole point of herd immunity is everybody builds up antibodies. A vaccine is to synthetically stimulate your body to form antibodies. So, I know everybody’s being cautious, and fine. But, I’m not saying I have proof for this, but I think methodologically, it makes sense that antibodies are going to be protective.  The proof we do have is that they’re using convalescent plasma therapy, which is taking antibodies from patients who’ve been infected, and we’ve seen really good results. Also, they did a study with rhesus monkeys, and for antibody production, I guess, rhesus monkeys are fairly predictive. And they gave the rhesus monkeys the coronavirus, the COVID-19. They tested positive, they got over it, they tested negative, then they reinfected them with COVID-19, and they did not get infected again.

Dr. Elkin:              Right.

Dr. Weitz:            Because they had the antibodies. And I understand we’re being cautious about making these recommendations, and I think it would be foolish for somebody to say, “Hey, I had a positive antibody test, I’m going to run around without a mask, and infect everybody else, and not worry about anything else.” Because we can’t say 100%.

Dr. Elkin:              It’s like you’re having these COVID-19 parties. I agree with you. I [inaudible 00:49:17].

Dr. Weitz:            I think for the most part, we should think that antibodies should generally be protective. Don’t you agree with that?

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely. And it always goes back to your immune system. People think, they want to think, and I’m not going to try to politicize this by any way, matter, or form, is that a vaccine is like a magic bullet. A magic pill. Americans, we always want that magic pill or bullet, which doesn’t really exist. Now vaccines can be effective, but you’ve got to remember about, if you look at just the flu vaccine, just that simple, little flu vaccine, about 50% of people do not respond favorably to it. Why? Because they’re obese, diabetic, hypertensive heart disease, renal failure, and they can’t mount an adequate immune response.  When we give you a vaccine, we’re really giving you the antigen, we give you an attenuated form of the virus. We’re dependent on your body to form antibodies. And if your body isn’t healthy, you’re not going to have the same response. So it still boils back to the lifestyle, the kind of stuff that you and I talk about all the time.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. Excellent, Dr. Elkin, I really appreciate it.

Dr. Elkin:              [crosstalk 00:50:22].

Dr. Weitz:            I enjoyed the discussion. For those who don’t know, Dr. Elkin’s on the west side, in my office on Tuesdays. And I believe you are probably the only integrative cardiologist on the West Side of LA right now. So, patients should take advantage of the ability to see Dr. Elkin, in Santa Monica.  And, I also wanted to say to our listeners and viewers, that in addition to this podcast showing up on Apple Podcasts, where if you give me a positive rating and review, I would really appreciate it. But it’s on Spotify, it’s on all the other places you get podcasts. And there’s also a video version on YouTube. And also, if you go to my website, drweitz.com, you can find a complete transcript, and detailed show notes. And then how can listeners and viewers get a hold of you, Dr. Elkin?

Dr. Elkin:              The best place, probably through my website, www.heartwise.com. I’m also on Facebook, at HeartWise Fitness & Longevity Center. I’m also on Instagram. So, I’m all over social media. So, I’d be glad to talk to, meet anyone. Clear pleasure.

Dr. Weitz:            Excellent. Great. Thank you. I’ll talk to you soon.

 

Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition
Keto Green with Dr. Anna Cabeca: Rational Wellness Podcast 155
Loading
/

Dr. Anna Cabeca discusses her Keto Green Approach to Diet with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/weitzchiro/]

 

Podcast Highlights

4:55  The Keto Green 16 diet allows you to get results in 16 days. Dr. Cabeca also recommends doing a 16 hour intermittent fast. And in numerology 16 means willpower, intuition and transformation.  The Keto Green diet is a super low carb diet that puts you into a fat burning state, into ketosis by eating mostly healthy fats and quality proteins and lots of dark, leafy green vegetables that help to alkalinize your system. Other keto diets tend to put you into an acidic state, which has a catabolic effect on hormones and can lead to an inflammatory state.  This program helps to balance our master hormones: cortisol, insulin, and oxytocin. These help us to balance our sex hormones: progesterone, estrogen and testosterone and even DHEA. Measuring and keeping our urine pH in an alkaline state will help to manage our cortisol levels and our other hormones.

12:24   Does testing urine pH really make a difference in our health when the pH of our blood stays in a very narrow range no matter what we eat.  Also, certain portions of our body thrive on an acidic environment, like our digestive tract and the vagina, among other areas.  Dr. Cabeca pointed out that when we do a urinalysis we always measure the pH.  If a patient is really sick in her clinic, she would draw out arterial blood and measure the gases to see what their pH is and if it slightly low, she will give IV bicarbonate to quickly resuscitate them and get them balanced.  Our body works hard to maintain this metabolic balance and if we become slightly more acidic we will pull minerals like calcium and magnesium from the bones to increase alkalinity, which can promote osteoporosis. Emotions and stress can also play a role in this metabolic balance. Laughter, a walk on the beach, fun with friends can make you more alkaline as measured in your urine. Incorporating dark green leafy vegetables, sprouts, herbs, and Dr. Cabeca’s Mighty Maca Greens powder can also lead to more alkalinity.

17:52  A traditional ketogenic diet often seems to revolve around eating a lot of meat and Dr Cabeca has an omnivore plan that includes meat and fish, but she also has vegan and vegetarian plans as well.  All her plans are dairy free. Dr. Cabeca has been wearing a continuous glucose monitor and finds that by following her Keto Green diet her blood sugar stays in a narrow range with no peaks or valleys.  She is even able to eat Keto-Green chocolate mousse, made with avocado and cocoa and only 3 grams of carbs.

20:35  Some might question why it matters what women eat when it comes to hormones, since once they hit menopause, their hormones decline fairly dramatically.  But if we balance our blood sugar, that can help with hormone balance.  And blood sugar control is important for brain health. In order for our brains to use glucose, women need some estrogen, so after menopause it is better to have your brain run on ketones rather than on glucose. This is one reason why the ketogenic diet is so beneficial, since it shifts us into using ketones for energy.  This need by the female brain for estrogen to use glucose may be one of the reasons why older women are so much more prone than men to Alzheimer’s Disease.  The ketogenic diet also helps reduce weight gain, anxiety, insomnia, and fatigue that are neurological symptoms of endocrine imbalances that occur with menopause.

 

 



Dr. Ana Cabeca is a triple board certified OBGYN, in Integrative Medicine and in Anti-aging and Regenerative Medicine as well as an expert in Functional Medicine, menopause, and women’s sexual health. She specializes in bio-identical hormone replacement therapy and natural alternatives, successful menopause and age management medicine. And Dr. Cabeca has just  published her second book, Keto Green 16. Her first book, The Hormone Fix, was a USA Today bestseller in 2019. 

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations, including remote consults via video or phone, specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111 or go to www.drweitz.com. Phone or video consulting with Dr. Weitz is available.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, DrWeitz.com. Thanks for joining me, and let’s jump into the podcast.  Hello Rational Wellness Podcasters. Thank you so much for joining me again today. For those of you who enjoy listening to the Rational Wellness Podcast, I would appreciate it if you can give me a ratings and review on Apple Podcast. If you’d like to see a video version, please go to my YouTube page. And if you go to my website, DrWeitz.com, you can find detailed show notes and a complete transcript.

So our topic for today is the ketogenic diet with Dr. Anna Cabeca. So we are going to talk about Dr. Cabeca’s version of the ketogenic diet and how this can help to balance our hormones, help us to lose weight and promote our overall health. Dr. Anna Cabeca is Triple Board-certified OBGYN. She is also an expert in integrative and functional medicine. She specializes in women’s sexual health and helping women with the changes of menopause. Dr. Cabeca will soon be publishing her second book, Keto-Green, will be coming out very shortly. And her first book, The Hormone Fix was a USA Today bestseller in 2019. And she also has a podcast that she recently renamed The Girlfriend Doctor Podcast. Dr. Cabeca, thank you so much for joining me today.

Dr. Cabeca:         Thanks for having me. Good to be with you again, Dr. Weitz. Thanks.

Dr. Weitz:            As we’re filming this, we’re still in the midst of this coronavirus, COVID-19 pandemic. So just on a personal note, how is this affecting you and your family and your endeavors?

Dr. Cabeca:         Initially, it started off a little bit rough because I had a daughter studying in Holland, and she was in her third year of university. She was studying in Holland, admist weekend travels and everything else. And so when all this started, I was looking at the research, trying to understand what’s going on. And I’m well connected and spoken internationally with some of the medical societies. One of my dear friends, a founder, Dr. Francesco Marotta of the ReGenera Medical Society of Italy. And I reached out to him and got a hold of him, and he’s like, “Bring her home right away.” And so that ignited some panic, that ignited some PTSD because, Ben, my story, we lost a child and the fear that, “Oh my God, would we lose another child? I can’t get to her in time.”  All of that really triggered me. So I had a really rough start till I got her home. And then just all the principles of practice that I teach of really just, again, just foundational disciplines and principles, I incorporated that. And I will tell you, we are doing better than ever. We are doing better than ever. And definitely, I’m in line supporting my medical colleagues and my clients and my patients on a daily basis. But as a family and personally, feeling strong, resilient, and grateful for every day that I have here.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s great. That’s great. You can get lost in fear. You spend all your time watching the news and get depressed, or you can try to remake yourself and make something good out of a tough situation.

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. And I think that’s it too, looking for those silver linings and just being very conscientious and bringing back to that family dinner time, which has been certainly a bonus of us. Now, we’re a household of five women and two female dogs.

Dr. Weitz:            So the question I have is, how do you eat while wearing a mask?

Dr. Cabeca:         I know, not in our house, which is so cool. Gosh, wearing this mask continuously, when I go out, it just brings back those flashbacks to operating in the operating room, wearing a mask and having a runny nose and being like, “I can’t freaking touch anything. This is terrible.”

Dr. Weitz:            I’m not used to wearing a mask at all, and right now I have the mark of the mask, which is this red mark across the bridge of my nose from wearing an N95 mask and not knowing exactly how to properly fit it. So, how do you come up with the name Keto-Green 16? Where does 16 come from?

Dr. Cabeca:         Well, 16 is actually, it’s a fun. The science is, number one, I wanted the shortest amount of days that I could get the maximum amount of results. I’m all about efficiency, quick results. Those are quick wins that keep us compliant, especially as women and me and around my age, I’m 53 years old and 53 with a 12-year-old, Ben. I’ve got to keep my hormones healthy. And so especially again, time efficient everything out. So 16 days, that was the number that stuck in my head, and I really felt committed. And then I dug in, there’s some great research studies that looked at 16 programs that got results in 16 days, so I felt like I didn’t have to do a 21-day, a 40-day program, and that was the first thing.

And then also I wanted 16-hour intermittent fasting. So the 16’s also 16 hours intermittent fasting and really working for that for the 16 days and staying committed to that. So again, I was just like going off on the number 16. I’m like, “How many key food ingredient types?” And I just wrote it down, lo and behold, 16, 16 key food ingredient types. And then I was like, “Well, how about for high intensity exercise? How many minutes can I get away with? Okay, 15, but 16.” And so I just kept going. And then I did some research and someone actually told me, he said, “Well, do what the number 16 means as far as numerology or angel numbers and something like that?” And I was like, “I have no idea.”  And it’s willpower, intuition and transformation. I’m like, “Oh, perfect.” And then there’s one other bonus is like, how many 16-day diet plans have you failed? Probably none because there really aren’t any.

Dr. Weitz:            Got to be the first.

Dr. Cabeca:         So that’s a good track record.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, absolutely. So how does this program help us balance our hormones?

Dr. Cabeca:         Well, this is all part of being, our hormones-

Dr. Weitz:            Well, maybe you should explain what your program is.

Dr. Cabeca:         Oh yeah, that’s a good point. So beyond the 16. The Keto-Green plan, and this is where it comes into the key parts of hormone balancing. And the dog in the background is just proof in pudding that I am home with my animals. The 16 Keto-Green comes from understanding what is happening, how we can master our physiology in the menopause time period. Now, again, pre-menopause, post-menopause, men do fabulous, but women have the toughest time in the peri-menopause, in this menopausal transition. And I experienced it myself. And as a gynecologist, I’d love to say that it’s all about progesterone, estrogen and testosterone and even DHEA.  But the truth is that it’s really about these major hormones such as cortisol, insulin and our master hormone, oxytocin. And so the Keto-Green way is about getting into ketosis, getting into that fat-burning state through healthy fats, good quality proteins. But the key part, and this is where keto dieters make a mistake that they are eating very acidic foods leading an acidic lifestyle for too long and that really creates a catabolic effect on their hormones and they can get into trouble, inflammatory diseases, etc. So you have to do it right and there in comes the green aspect, which is the fiber again, because keto dieters are constantly constipated and have that issue. Many of them, not all. Again, there’s right way and wrong way-

Dr. Weitz:            And that’s because for those who aren’t familiar, ketogenic diet is a super low carb diet. And when you take a lot of the carbohydrates out, you tend to remove a lot of the fiber.

Dr. Cabeca:         Right, exactly. And so we want to add that fiber back in the form of low carbohydrate, dark leafy greens that are micronutrient rich, so that helps to balance cell membrane health. Now, even so we see fabulous results right away because we’re improving cell membrane health. But it’s not just about what we eat, that alkalinizing component is also the thoughts we keep, the way we live. When we manage cortisol, we have more of an alkaline urine pH. When we’re more cortisol driven, we have a more acidic urine pH. So my alkaline approach really does require a little self-assessment tools such as checking urine pH for pennies a day, just check your urine pH. It makes a huge difference.  So the Keto-Green, Keto Alkaline way is this. And where it transformed my life was when I was 48, experiencing my second menopause, let’s say. Because I’d been diagnosed at 39 with infertility and early menopause. reversed it, had a baby at 41, that 12-year-old that I’m now homeschooling. Blissfully. So blissfully homeschooling. It’s not my forte, Ben, it is not my forte. I was 48 and I was spiraling down and that’s when like brain fog, memory loss, I gained 20 pounds overnight without doing anything different. Our patients would come in and say that to us. “Dr. Anna, I’m gaining five, 10, 20 pounds and I’m not doing anything different.” And as a young confident physician, highly trained, I would think in my mind, “Really? How is that possible? How can that be possible?”  And then it just freaking happened to me. So of course I dug into the research to understand why, very humbly so, and a silent apology out to all my patients I doubted. However, I always did the backup work on hormones and everything. Really it does happen, without doing anything different, I gained 20 pounds overnight. And having been well over 240 pounds at one point in my life and losing those 80 pounds, keeping them off for like nearly a decade, that rapid weight gain, I was like, “I’ll be 300.” So that’s where I really started doing keto. And it’s low carbohydrate, higher fats, high protein, and just restricted the carbs. And I certainly I’ve put patients on these types of programs in the past.

And as I started experiencing, not so much keto flu, but keto crazy, I was irritable, I knew something was up with my neurotransmitters and my hormones and that this transition period of menopause creates a more vulnerable time period, and likely because of our decrease in our natural progesterone, yet my hormones as a hormone expert were dialed in. Dialed in, pretty optimized, and that’s why I say it takes more than hormones to fix our hormones. And so as I discovered why, I started checking my urine pH, I was so acidic. I was so acidic. Now, we’re not talking blood pH as you know, but urine pH, this is another vital sign for us. And so that was an aha moment for me where I’m like, “Okay, let me add in the greens.”  But that also as, I started testing every time I went to the bathroom essentially to get more alkaline in, it started to improve. But I noticed the days that when I woke up and I walked outside, did a nice leisurely walk in nature and, or did my gratitude journaling in the morning, I was more alkaline all day. And so that’s when I researched like, “Why? How does stress or cortisol cause this?” And that’s a physiologic effect of cortisol, is urinary acidification. So here we can use urine pH testing to manage cortisol, our lifestyle and our nutrient base. And this is where we really see the needle moving.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, this alkalinizing urine thing is something that’s fairly popular in the Functional Medicine world, and the traditional medical world severely criticizes it. Now, criticisms are because the pH in the blood stays in a very, very narrow range between 7.35, 7.45, never really changes, doesn’t matter so much what you eat at all. And in fact, it can’t change because you would die if it got significantly off. And big parts of our body actually thrive on an acidic environment like the digestive track and the vagina, etc. So does it really matter what the pH of your urine is, if the pH inside the body is different?

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. And this is that beauty of this discovery. And I want to say too, as far as medical, I think at some point physicians, the medical societies realize how important pH testing was because it’s on all our urine test strips. Every time you go to the doctor, we dip, definitely an OBGYN, we dip your urine, pH is always on there.  At some point we forgot.  We stopped looking at it when like we pass renal physiology in medical school and we don’t look unless we go back to nephrology. But in this conversation, as I started discovering this with myself, I went to a nephrologist and spoke with him, even though again, renal physiology, it was a long time ago.  This is where I really dug into it. Now, we know, because like if someone came into my operating room or my clinic and they were really, really sick, I would put a needle in the radial artery right here at the wrist, base of the wrist and draw out arterial blood gas, not even venous. Arterial blood gas as closely delivered from the heart as possible, the most oxygenated blood. And we know if that is slightly high, slightly low, and it’s typically slightly low when they’re crashing, that little difference, they are crashing and we’re going to give them bicarb like baking soda, essentially. By that, we’re going to do IV bicarbonate to quickly resuscitate them and get them balanced.

How do they get there? That is a metabolic imbalance. Certainly there’s a metabolic imbalance between potassium, magnesium conversations across the cell membrane. And how do we maintain that? We maintain it so specifically to keep us alive, so we will rob Peter to pay Paul to keep that mineral balance, to keep that alkaline balance in our blood from, what? Minerals. Where do we get those? Bones. So who are more likely to be osteoporotic? Those with acidic urinary pH. So the urinary pH, just like our pulse and our blood pressure now becomes a vital sign that helps us do our Nancy Drew detective work. Maybe for you it was Hardy Boys, for me it was Nancy Drew. Nancy Drew detective work.

When I did karaoke the other night, oh my gosh, my urine pH was eight. It was so much fun. That laughter, the walk on the beach. But stress, thinking about the coronavirus, thinking about someone who’s sick and I have no control over, I quickly are able to gather my thoughts to say, “I am the only one who can upset myself.” That’s the tragic situation. But I can choose how to react, and that’s where we create, and it talks about this in the Bible, through faith, these practices. That we create the peace that surpasses all understanding.  And that was it for me, as I created that alkalinity aspect into my life, I was still perimenopause, I was still this single mom, two kids with one in high school, one in middle school.  And then my young one in her first years of elementary school.

None of that had changed. I was still the breadwinner. I was still cycling down burnout from my business, but I had this peace, and that enabled me to go from burnout, foggy brain, struggling with my relationships, unable to like remember my kids’ names, let alone write a blog, to I’m now writing and publishing two bestselling books, another additional two online programs and having a community of over 300,000 people that I serve blissfully to help support them during this time, because I’ve been to hell and back. I’ve been there and I know what works, and this Keto-Green way for me and how important it is fine tuning our physiology, and how much control we have as being our own physician, listening to our internal physician, our intuition too. That has just transformed my life, and I know many others’.

I love it. I love Detective Drew, it’s so cool, so much fun. And right now running some group medical visits with Keto-Green 16, that’s what my clients said. They said. “Thankfully, I’m checking urine pH, I’m seeing where my mind is stressing me out, and quickly gaining control of it with your spiritual practices, going for long walks, doing these things as well as nourishing their body with the greens, adding in supplemental like Mighty Maca greens, adding in the sprouts and the herbs that are all so alkalinizing and powerful. They said they just felt so much better having something positive to focus on. And it really did. It took them out of fear-based thinking and they had fabulous results.

Dr. Weitz:            So your version of the ketogenic diet, how is it different than a traditional ketogenic diet? Traditional ketogenic diets, even though they’re supposed to be moderate or lower in meat, they often seem to revolve around meat with every meal.

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. Well, with Keto-Green 16, we have the omnivore plan, which also has, it has meat, fish and also some vegan options certainly. But also we have a 16-day vegan and vegetarian Keto-Green plan. All my plans are dairy free because I’m dairy free, if I can’t have milk, neither can you. That’s not why, but because it’s one of the most common food sensitivities. You can optionally add something, but yeah, it’s pretty much eliminated. And they’re gluten free, grain free for the most part. And so that really does help with insulin sensitivity. So what I’m thinking about with my Keto-Green plan, it is what want to eat, the healthy fats, the good quality proteins and the plentiful fiber and dark green leafies. But it’s also when we’re eating, we’re not snacking anymore.  Monitoring blood sugar, one thing I’ve done, you’re going to love this, Ben. You know FreeStyle Libre, the 14 day blood sugar monitor?

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Cabeca:         Over the past year, as soon as I found out about this, I was like, “Oh my God, I got to get one.” It’s like there’s toys. I know you’re like that in chiropractic, “Oh, what’s this gadget?” And you don’t need a monitor, you just use your smartphone and you can just see, “Here, I’m an hour or so after my Keto-Green breakfast, my blood sugar is 85.” And you can see there’s… I don’t know how well you can see that, anyone who’s listening, but this is the last eight hours. There’s no peaks, blood sugar stays… This is 24 hours, blood sugar stays really, really stable. And that’s eating two or three healthy Keto-Green meals per day.  And even my Keto-Green chocolate mousse, my avocado chocolate mousse, it’s a fabulous a feast, but it’s like three grams of carbs and done with avocado and cocoa. So we can have these fun things and keep our blood sugar stable, which creates insulin sensitivity. And keto, we’re looking for that, but then there’s the different ways that you can do it. The key component is that we are really focusing on balancing our hormones and creating not just the right nutrient combinations, because like adding fermented foods and digestive support is critical to my plan, that’s not thought about in general keto, but also it is the lifestyle factors that we put in that makes this plan so powerfully successful.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, women, once they hit perimenopause, menopause, their hormones decline and they decline fairly dramatically. So what difference does make what they eat?

Dr. Cabeca:         Oh, see, this is so important. Thank you. You’re teasing me, I know This is so beautiful, because look, this is what I found out too. I had to think, “Well, why am I having the brain fog? Why was I experiencing in the brain fog?” And no one talked about this. No one has talked about this. I needed to understand, I’m always like, “Why do research? I don’t know if this about me. I did research with the US Navy and exercise physiology before I went to medical school.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, cool.

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. So I loved it, hyperbaric medicine, physiology, and then I was the physiology mentor in medical school. So I wanted to understand why, the mechanism of action, like “What the heck is going on here?” It blew my mind when I figured this out. First of all, I knew that once I got Keto-Green, I had clarity, my memory was back, I was sharp and it wasn’t like this caffeine clarity, kit’s this calm piece, like I mentioned, I call it energized enlightenment. Not only did I lose that 20 pounds within weeks, but I had this clarity and this peace. I created amazing relationships with my children. Like I said, able to write and create the programs that I have, but I needed to understand why.

And so what happens during this time, yes, we’re declining progesterone and declining estrogen, what’s really key, why the brain fog when our hormone levels are shifting? It’s because gluconeogenesis in the brain is an estrogen-dependent phenomenon. In other words, for our brain to be able to use glucose, we need some estrogen on board. Now, as our ovarian function declines, it’s really a sharp decline in progesterone, also precursor to estrogen. When we add stress, brain fog. A sharper decline of our neuroprotective hormone because cortisol steals away progesterone, that also estrogen and testosterone suffer.

Now, what’s really amazing is why don’t men experience this to any notable degree that I’ve heard explained anywhere? Well, number one, men have 10 times as much testosterone which converts to estrogen, and according to research that I found, in men’s brain, there is six times as much, up to six times as much circulating estrogen because number one, you don’t rely on ovaries for estrogen production, go figure. We rely predominantly on ovarian function, so when this ovarian function declines and we don’t shift to go… We have to shift when we are in this perimenopause. That’s why I say, getting Keto-Green in the perimenopause and beyond is absolutely necessary for us.

It is absolutely necessary to get into ketosis because we can shift to use ketones for fuel, which is actually preferred by the brain and ketones are to the brain. I like to make the example of glucose is to gasoline as ketones are to jet fuel. And that’s what it feels like because use of ketones in the brain is not hormone dependent to any degree that I’m aware of. And that creates this clarity, this memory. And part of this may be an explanation as to why women have 2.6 times as much Alzheimer’s as men, 2.6 times as much Alzheimer’s because our brain as estrogen declines, is it’s suffocating a little bit, it’s starving because it’s not getting the glucose, the fuel it needs as readily into the cells.

But ketones, yes. And that clarifying point was for me, another aha moment to understand, and yet when we look at the curves, now, we’ve been studying the brain and we can look at glucose utilization in the brain, that drop in glucose utilization in the brain follows our decline in progesterone. So 35 to 55, that period of neuroendocrine vulnerability, and the big problem is how that manifests clinically. Our patients come in saying, “Dr. Anna, I’m having brain fog, I’m having PMs, I’m gaining weight, I’m having hot flashes, I’m irritable, I hate my husband two weeks out of the month.” I was like, “Don’t say that because it’s more than two weeks, it’s your husband. If it’s only two weeks, it may be your hormones.”

And so this during this time, but it’s anxiety, it’s insomnia, it’s fatigue. So these are neurologic symptoms along with the endocrine symptoms such as the irregular cycle, the ovarian cysts, the irregular uterine bleeding, which often leads women to get hysterectomies and their ovaries out, which is going to worsen the problem. The uterus is a victim. Sometimes we still need to remove it, but we always want to address the underlying reason why we need that hysterectomy to begin with, and address the underlying reasons. Not enough to say, “Well, I had heavy periods, that’s why I had a hysterectomy.”  Well, why did you have the heavy periods? And that is certainly my husband, my pet peeve with my profession, my colleagues and my profession, but also my patients, you’ve got to ask why, you’re responsible for your body.

Dr. Weitz:            And that of course is the Functional Medicine approach and how it’s different than traditional medicine is asking why, let’s find the underlying reasons, let’s see what we can do to get your body to work the way it knows how to work instead of overwhelming it and just fixing the problem with a drug or a surgery that certainly can be lifesaving in certain circumstances, but if it’s not needed and we get to the underlying cause, that’s a better way to go about it.

Dr. Cabeca:         Yes, absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, everybody focuses on estrogen and progesterone, and you talk a lot about some other hormones like oxytocin, most people don’t really give it much attention. Why is oxytocin so important?

Dr. Cabeca:         It is the most powerful hormone in our body. Oxytocin is absolutely the most powerful hormone in our body and it is actually the most alkalinizing hormone. As acidifying as cortisol is, Oxytocin is alkalinizing. I want to give an example of how this plays out. I had a client age 67, she’s been following my online magic menopause programs for the last few years. So she’s very comfortable checking her urine pH, and here she is in Northern New York and as soon as this COVID quarantine hit, she was distanced from her daughter and her grandson and she’s locked in with her husband. I’m not exactly sure which was worse.

But she said that she was really struggling, she was struggling on getting alkaline, nothing shifted, just worried and watching the news and she goes, “I’ve been working on it though.” And she said, “Dr. Anna, I have to share with you this though.” She goes, “My grandson was turning two and I wasn’t going to be able to be there with him for his birthday, and so my daughter had us do a Skype virtual birthday party for him, and I got to see him eat his cake and open his presents. And he just laughed and giggled at me and oh my gosh, it just made my day.” And she goes, “Dr. Anna, I couldn’t wait to go run to the bathroom and check my urine, and sure enough, I was like a pH of eight. I was so alkaline.”

And she goes, “Yep, the power of oxytocin.” Absolutely. That is the power of oxytocin. That is really what we live for, and we need more oxytocin in our life now more than ever, it really does help us manage cortisol and overpowers the negative physiologic effects of chronic stress. So the more we can get oxytocin, the better. Now, I know it from a personal, and this is again, I didn’t study this, I had to research it. I didn’t learn this in med school, I didn’t learn this in residency there. All I knew about oxytocin in residency, certainly love bonding hormone, the hormone to help us breastfeed, to help moms breastfeed, and the hormone that we give IV during labor, Pitocin is oxytocin. Pitocin to increase the speed of labor contractions.

And so that’s where my knowledge had sufficed up until I hit that deep, dark, bottomless pit of depression and anxiety and grief. And as a result of PTSD and trauma where cortisol was winning and fear based mentality beyond everything I knew. I lost a child, so thinking, “Oh my God, checking on my other children, are they breathing at night? What’s going on?” Not sleeping for three hours a night. And then we knew, my husband I knew that when couple’s lose a child, they have an significantly increased risk of divorce, and we didn’t want to be that couple. We wanted to stay together forever, that was our vows. And we went to counseling, we did this, we did that and yet we divorced.

And so because predominantly, I felt nothing. I couldn’t feel love, I couldn’t feel connected. I felt disconnected, and all the other symptoms that chronic PTSD, I mean PTSD-ers, like I’m going to say, we’re going to be… I prefer post-traumatic growth. Now, I’m in a totally post-traumatic growth stage or post-traumatic resilience stage, but I didn’t know that at the time, I didn’t know what was happening under the surface. And so the physiology of that disconnect, the physiology of that divorce was the oxytocin-cortisol disconnect. And so when cortisol goes low and oxytocin is low at the same time and cortisol is suppressed and oxytocin is low, that feeling is that feeling of isolation, of a loneliness.

And this is what now I see it everywhere, I no longer feel love, I no longer feel connected. I know I love my husband, I don’t feel love for him, something’s wrong. And also oxytocin seeking behaviors intuitively, and you see this in, and I’m not going to say midlife crisis, I hate that term, but binging or shopping or the midlife crisis or sex seeking, those are often oxytocin seeking behaviors because there’s this bottom-down disconnect. And those of us who have had trauma or adverse childhood experiences, we know that in the menopause, and I would say in the andropause too, we get a flare up of the symptoms.

And so once you’re aware, that’s why this education is so important that you’re giving and that we’re sharing today too, is that when we’re aware of this, we see it, and then we can say, “Okay, well, let me just give this a try. What if I empower oxytocin and master oxytocin in the most helpful ways through loving, kind gestures, maybe playing with a pet, doing karaoke with your friends, having virtual birthday parties, whatever it is. And how does that make us feel?” That’s what we want at the end of our lives anyway, that we loved well, we lived well and we’ve looked back on the hard times of our life and saw how much grace and kindness and love was still there.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s great. Can your program be effective for women who are taking hormones?

Dr. Cabeca:         Absolutely, yeah. And even in men too. In the study, we had one man, in fact, he came along with his wife, because I was looking at postmenopausal women, and so in 16 days he lost 30 pounds and he had high blood pressure, his blood pressure had run, I have to look at the numbers again, but like 150, his diastolic was 100. And so his diastolic got down to 70 and it was weaned off, started to wean off his blood pressure medicine. So yeah, men do really, really well too on the program. I have a whole men’s chapter this time for you guys, Ben, in Keto-Green 16.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. And of course, following a program similar to yours, a ketogenic diet could potentially be helpful for reducing inflammation and that could be helpful at this time of Coronavirus because people who do get infected who don’t do well, they get into this state of high oxidative stress, inflammation in the lungs and that’s when they tend to go downhill.

Dr. Cabeca:         Ketones can be protective, plus, we’re getting insulin sensitive. There was an article and actually I was just reviewing this today and I know you’ll love it, I’ll put the article in the footnotes. It was published by Journal of Neurology in 2006 and it looked at the Avian Coronavirus Infectious Bronchitis Virus undergoes direct low pH dependent fusion activation during entry into host cells. So what they said, a more basic environment was protective, so hence that alkaline environment is more protective. And so again, that why that is so critical and why our smokers have more trouble because they’re more acidic in the lung and they get increased viral replication.  And I think that’s really a critical component. So both the Keto and the alkaline aspects are really important. And granted, again, stomach pH, very acidic, vaginal pH, naturally acidic. And if not, definitely use Julva, a little plug for my cream, but other areas of the body more alkaline. So again, consider urine pH, a thermostat, a thermometer just measuring how well are you doing.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. That’s actually one of the proposed mechanisms why hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine might have some benefit is that it tends to alkalinize that endosomes and a virus needs that endosome environment to be acidic to be able to reproduce. Not that I would recommend that, but the other thing that chloroquine does is it’s a zinc transporter, but of course-

Dr. Cabeca:         That’s why zinc is beneficial.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. The issue though is getting zinc into the cells, so the best combo is to add quercetin with your zinc, because that’s a natural zinc transporter.

Dr. Cabeca:         Okay. I didn’t know that. That’s awesome. I’m doing it all; quercetin, zinc. Mighty Maca has quercetin, turmeric, resveratrol, green tea extract, Cat’s Claw. It’s all in my Mighty Maca Plus Formula. I’m drinking that too.

Dr. Weitz:            Well, green tea is also a zinc transporter too, also helps with that.

Dr. Cabeca:         Awesome. And zinc too for hair loss by the way. You know my stress related hair loss, zinc helps with that too. That’s the reason I’m doing it, really. Again, I’ve been okay. If I get sick… No, no, I’m just kidding, I don’t want the hair loss.

Dr. Weitz:            And zinc can help thyroid function and testosterone levels too in men who are low in zinc.

Dr. Cabeca:         Yes, absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:            So besides following the Keto-Green diet, you also recommend some nutritional supplements for women and men?

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. And I think that’s definitely where we certainly agree. For me, I would say, if I want my clients to leave with two things by my own prejudice, because it helped me on my journey, reversed my infertility and helped my hormones, my Mighty Maca Plus. Over 30 superfoods, everything we’ve just mentioned is in here. The Maca, Peruvian Maca, which is interesting too with the altitude sickness. We haven’t looked at Maca with altitude sickness, but it grows in the high alps. And I know in Peru, I haven’t researched this, but when I was in Peru, if you have altitude sickness, do the Maca, do the cocoa leaves. That was one part.  So I wonder if there’s something with this altitude sickness and also like how they’re saying the heme oxygenation, if that improves heme oxygenation because Maca only grows, the pure Maca and the one I use, grows in the high altitude.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. Now, they’ve been discarding the typical protocols for ventilation because they’re not working and they’re saying that this is much closer to altitude sickness and using some of the medications that are traditionally used for that, it seems like they might have more efficacy for the type of respiratory problems that people are having. So that’s an interesting thought.

Dr. Cabeca:         I know. I’m curious about that. So with Mighty Maca Plus too, we talk quercetin, Cat’s Claw herbs, turmeric, resveratrol, green tea extract, 30 superfoods. So that’s one. And then Omega-3 fish oils, always supporting cell membrane function, and a probiotic, but I use the fermented foods. So if we need to, we can add a probiotic on top of that. I definitely think it’s beneficial as we get older. I monitor myself, but I probably will do a probiotic once or twice a week now because I am doing fermented foods on a regular basis as part of my nutritional combinations. And also I think that the other thing I use, I definitely in the perimenopausal, postmenopausal woman is a bioidentical progesterone. So my PPR Cream progesterone with Pregnenolone, both neuroprotective hormones.

And then of course I added in some anti-aging ingredients into my formula just because anyway, because I can, and it’s for me. And that’s a really big one, I think sometimes gets overlooked. We want to support the adrenals so that’s bottom up and we want to support top down and just progesterone deficiency. Certainly, I think in post-menopause we should be doing a little bit of progesterone at bedtime, at least five or six nights a week. And certainly, it helps men to have sleep issues. So again, a little bit goes a long way. And that’s part of my supplement regimen amongst vitamin C and zinc, those are our core supplements.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. So I think that pretty much takes us to the end of the discussion unless you’ve anything else that you’d like to bring up? I’m sure there’s a lot of, a lot of topics we could add in.

Dr. Cabeca:         Well, I think definitely that’s a big thing to know is that, again, when we get Keto-Green, we’re mastering insulin sensitivity and we are working on these alkalinizers and in a very short amount of time following this plan my Keto-Green 16 Plan, we’re going to see fabulous results. And again, it’s all about discovery. And I want to let clients know, no matter if you have five pounds to lose or 200 pounds to lose or you’re dealing with diagnoses like I was, I was 39 dealing with an infertility diagnosis and an early menopause diagnosis. But let me just tell you, that we can reverse these diagnosis, diabetes, high blood pressure.  We’ve seen just amazing results and quickly and it is about us claiming our power back. And I say this very wholeheartedly, the answer is not finding a vaccine, the answer is in creating a resilient, healthy community and being inhospitable to invasions of any sort.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s great. So how can viewers, listeners get ahold of you and find out about your program and how can they get your book that’s going to be coming out? Can they pre-order it?

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. Anywhere books are sold, I definitely encourage calling your local bookstore, leaving a message, getting that order in there.

Dr. Weitz:            Amazon’s got enough orders.

Dr. Cabeca:         Yeah. But certainly it’s available, Amazon, Barnes and Nobles, Books-A-Million and all the Indie Booksellers. It’s published by Ballantine Penguin Random House. And we have book bonuses at my website, just enter in your receipt number, whether it’s from an Indie Bookstore, a local bookstore or anywhere else, and you guys can just snapshot that receipt or enter that receipt number and get a bunch of extra book bonuses too.

Dr. Weitz:            And what’s your website?

Dr. Cabeca:       dranna.com. Like DrAnna, D-R-A-N-N-A.com.

Dr. Weitz:          Cool. Thank you.

Dr. Cabeca:         Thank you, Ben. Thank you.