Dr. Peter Kozlowski speaks about How to Unfunc Your Gut with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

5:00  The gut is so important for our overall health because as Hippocrates told us 3,000 years ago, that all disease begins in the gut.  A lot of things that we do in modern life is damaging to the gut, including EMFs from our phones, stress, our food supply, toxins in the environment, antibiotics, meds, etc.  One of the most important things about the gut is that it is the barrier to keep things out that might harm us, so leaky gut is so problematic.  Once you get inflammation in the body, it can go anywhere and that’s why you get different symptoms when people get SIBO or candida or gluten sensitivity.  We also have 3 to 5 lbs of bacteria living in our microbiome and these bacteria interact with our genes and they help to keep us healthy.  We are mostly bacteria.

8:23  Dr. Kozlowski in his book Unfunc Your Gut discusses the important role that mental, emotional and spiritual health play in our gut health. Your nervous system talks to your gut through the vagus nerve. This is largely through our autonomic nervous system and we tend to be very sympathetic nervous system dominant.  The more we can activate our parasympathetic nervous system through meditation, therapy, heart rate variability, gratitude, acupuncture, breathing, the better your gut is going to function.

19:40  Food sensitivities.  Dr. Kozlowski does not find food sensitivity tests helpful since what typically comes out as a positive is based on what foods they have been eating for the last few months.  Most people who show multiple food sensitivities have open gap junctions, ie. leaky gut. He prefers to place patients on a 21 day elimination diet that eliminates at least gluten, dairy, soy, corn, eggs, and sugar.  On a full elimination diet, he will also cut out beef, pork, shellfish, processed meats, and coffee.   After 21 days, the eliminated foods will be reintroduced one by one. Foods that they still can’t tolerate, they should work on improving their gut health and then test those foods back in 6 months.

28:14  The healthiest diet for longevity is some version of the Mediterranean diet. Dr. Kozlowski recommends that people eat 9-12 servings of vegetables and fruits per day and a serving is 1 cup raw or 1/2 cup cooked.  In our standard American diet we don’t eat many vegetables.  In our typical breakfast of pancakes, bacon, breakfast sandwiches, cereal, etc. we typically don’t eat any vegetables. And then lunch is pizza or hotdogs or sandwiches, no vegetables again. And then perhaps there’s a side of broccoli at dinner.  So we’re eating one to three servings of vegetables instead of 9-12 servings of vegetables and fruits per day that he recommends.  We should definitely avoid sugar, processed foods, and processed vegetable oils in our diet.

31:25  The microbiome.  When you don’t take care of your garden, weeds grow and this happens with our microbiome.  Antibiotics are the easiest way to screw up your microbiome and one round of broad spectrum antibiotics can wipe out half your microbiome.  And then weeds take over your garden, which is dysbiosis.  Dr. Kozlowski prefers to do a stool test and urine testing to see what might be overgrown or out of balance in your microbiome.  It is a bad strategy to give probiotics to patients with SIBO or dysbiosis or candida, since you need to pull out the weeds first before trying to grow back the healthy bacteria. This is typically done through taking herbs like grapefruit seed extract or uva ursi or silver or berberine or oil of oregano or caprylic acid or garlic, or you can use the elemental diet to starve the dysbiotic bacteria.  Dr. Kozlowski likes to order the stool test from Doctor’s Data, which tells you which natural products will likely be effective against whatever is overgrown in your gut. He often uses combination supplements such as FC-Cidal, Dysbiocide, and A.D.P. from Biotics Research or Candibactin AR and BR from Metagenics.  He also likes to use Biocidin, which has the longest research behind it.  If the gut lining is inflamed, Dr. Kozlowski will use L-glutamine 5 gm 3 times per day. He may use high dose fish oil or GLA. He may recommend HCL, digestive enzymes, and/or ox bile.  They may need gall bladder support. His favorite SIBO protocol involves taking the herbs two weeks on, one week off for a total of nine weeks. For re-growing the microbiome, Dr. Kozlowski prefers to use prebiotics like Arabinogalactan or inulin and prebiotic foods like banana, asparagus, and artichokes rather than taking probiotics. 

 



Dr. Peter Kozlowski is a medical doctor who transitioned to Functional Medicine as an intern in medical school. He has trained with leaders in the Functional Medicine field, including Dr. Mark Hyman and Dr. Deepak Chopra. Dr. Kozlowski’s unique take on gut health is described in his new book, Unfunc Your Gut.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:                            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting-edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me, and let’s jump into the podcast.

Hello, Rational Wellness podcasters. Today, our topic is gut health with Dr. Peter Kozlowski. Dr. Peter Kozlowski, he will give his unique take on gut health as described in his new book, Unfunc Your Gut. Dr. Kozlowski started out as a family practice MD, but transitioned to functional medicine as an intern. He has trained with leaders in the functional medicine field, including Dr. Mark Hyman and Dr. Deepak Chopra. Dr. Kozlowski, thank you so much for joining us today.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    It’s an honor. Thank you for having me.

Dr. Weitz:                           Good. Good. Good. So you’re speaking to us from Montana. How are things in Montana right now?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    I think we’re on like day number 20 over 90 degrees. So, hotter than normal here.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah. But climate change doesn’t exist.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                           So since you started off as a functional medicine MD, how did you find your way to functional medicine?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Completely randomly. I just tell people that I got lucky. The majority of practitioners that I know in the functional medicine world usually got into it because they got sick themselves and they tried the traditional route and they couldn’t get better, so they found functional medicine and then decided to use that in their practice.  For me, I was an intern in family practice residency. And as an intern or as a resident, you do different rotations every month. So one month we focus on clinics, outpatient, inpatient, cardiology, OB/GYN, and you’re constantly being trained by different physicians. And when you’re on the inpatient service, every week, there’s somebody new that teaches you.  

And we had one doctor that every patient that was hospitalized, he would put them on a multi-vitamin and vitamin D. And we, as residents, thought it was ridiculous and used to make fun of him that he would make us write those kinds of orders because nobody else did it and we just didn’t get it. So I was working with him on… It was a Sunday night at like 2:00 AM and we had some downtime and I just asked him, I was like, “Why are you weird? Why are you different?”  And he’s like, “I’m studying something called functional medicine.” And I was like, “What is that?” And he took me to the IFM website and it just took off from there. I looked at it, I was like, “This looks pretty interesting.” They require you to go do CME during residency. So I was like, “Why not go check this out?” And within the first hour of the first conference, I just couldn’t look at medicine the same. It was all taught from a science, biochemistry, a physiology level. I couldn’t really argue with it, and it just made sense to me.

And then another thing was, at this conference, there was doctors that were from every profession from chiropractic, acupuncture, ophthalmology, cardiology, neurology, and they’re all here. And I was like… I didn’t get it. I was like, “What are you guys doing here?” And they were like, “This is the future of medicine.” And I heard that over and over and over.  So I left that conference and just really with my brain overloaded, but I was like, “I’m going to slowly focus my career on this.” And I continued throughout residency to go to conference, to work on my certification and got invited to do away rotation. So I left residency for like a month at a time to go work with some of the leaders in the field, and I would just follow them around.  And it wasn’t just the doctors. I would follow around the staff, the nutritionist, the health coach, the life coach, because everything was new to me. It was a completely different approach than I had learned in residency. So I was learning from everybody and I just took notes. And when I graduated, I started my own practice and I’ve been out on my own for seven years now.

Dr. Weitz:                            Cool. So why is the gut so important to our overall health?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. So Hippocrates said it 3,000 years ago, right? All disease begins in the gut. And what I always tell people is, basically, since he said that, everything we’ve done is pretty damaging to the gut. With our phones, with stress, with what we’ve done to our food supply, our environment, antibiotics, meds, all of that stuff is damaging our gut.  But the reason, the true reason that it’s the key to our health is, in my opinion, because the gut is the gateway into your body. So when we say gut, it’s a long tube that starts with the mouth and ends with the anus, and it has openings on both ends, so it’s literally just a tube. And the inside of that tube is actually considered outside of your body. So if you swallow something and poop it out, it’s never been in your body.  So to me, the gut’s most important job besides digesting and absorbing is to decide what comes in and what stays out. So that’s where a lot of people have heard of this term, leaky gut. That’s pretty much exactly what it means. When your gut’s leaky, the junctions are wide open and anything that’s passing through your gut tube can pass into your body. Now it’s fair game, it’s in your blood, and the blood goes everywhere.  So you could take a hundred patients with SIBO, candida, gluten sensitivity, and they all have different symptoms because the inflammation is in the body and it can go anywhere. That, I think is the biggest reason. And then the secondary one is your microbiome, is that we all have three to five pounds of bacteria growing on the inside of the large intestine, the last part of your gut. And that bacteria constantly talks to us.  We, as humans have about 23,000 genes. They’ve found over 20 million bacterial genes in our gut. So one of my favorite T-shirts that I have says, “Mostly microbe,” that we’re mostly bacteria. And those bacteria, they develop, they start when we’re born and then we can either keep them healthy through our diet and lifestyle or we can damage them through our diet and lifestyle. So those are the two reasons why the gut is the key to your health.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. I certainly know all about the importance of the microbiome and there’s incredible amount of research going on. But one thing I always find interesting is there are people who do not have a colon, they had Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, and they had their colon cut out. And yet they continue to thrive, probably not ideally, but I’m always amazed about that.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. I think it just proves the point of how resilient our bodies are, right? I assume if your large intestine gets cut out, your microbiome just starts to grow at the end of your small intestine and your body adjusts.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. I don’t know. It’s a question we need to answer one of these days. So in your book, Unfunc Your Gut, in the beginning, you talk about stress, which is really important and often not talked about. So how does our mental, emotional, and spiritual health play, or what factor does that play in our gut health?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    So, spoiler alert, that’s the big secret that I reveal in the book is that your mental, emotional, spiritual health is the most important component. And that I learned through my own story, but more in my… I learned it from my patients because one of my faults is that I’m a perfectionist. So I don’t really think about the patients that get better, I only focus on the ones that didn’t.  And trying to figure out why could I put 10 people on a CBO Protocol and half get better and half don’t. And what I started to see over and over, it was usually their mental, emotional, spiritual health, which other terms are anxiety, depression, trauma. To me, I like mental, emotional, spiritual health.  But this, just like everything else in functional medicine, and there’s science behind it; and the main reason, anatomically, why that is because your gut, that tube is surrounded by a nervous system called the enteric nervous system. There’s 200-250 million neurons in that nervous system, more than in your brain or spinal cord or anywhere else.  That nervous system talks to your gut, but then it also sends signals to your brain and your brain sends signals to your gut. So that whole gut-brain connection that people talk about, it’s between the two nervous systems; your central and your enteric. Those systems are connected by the vagus nerve, that’s one of your cranial nerves. And this is where the mental, emotional, spiritual component comes in.

Your vagus nerve runs on your autonomic nervous system, which is your automatic nervous system, which is divided into two responses; sympathetic and parasympathetic. Sympathetic is fight-or-flight. So that is hiking in Montana, you see a bear and you want to escape, all the blood goes to your muscles and brain to try to figure out how to get away. Then when you’re sitting by the campfire, you go into parasympathetic and you rest and digest your food.  People right now, nowadays, are living as if they’re running from a bear 24/7. We wake up, we go straight to our phone, we check our email, our texts, we check the news, we sit down for breakfast, we’re reading our phone or watching the news. And so we’re just constantly activating that sympathetic nervous system, which is sending signals down your vagus nerve to your gut to tell you to not digest, to not absorb. It shuts down your gut bacteria. So that is the connection.  So the more that someone can activate their parasympathetic nervous system through things like meditation, therapy, heart rate variability, gratitude, acupuncture, there is a lot of ways to do it, just breathing, the better your gut is going to function. And then treating something like candida or dysbiosis or SIBO is much easier.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah. Actually, this is a device that uses vibrations and it helps get you into a parasympathetic mode as well.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Oh, excellent.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah. Yeah.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    What’s it called?

Dr. Weitz:                            The Apollo.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Okay. I’ll take a look at that.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. So what do we do about how stress, our mental, emotional spiritual health affects our gut health? You just hinted at it by saying we got to get out of being in sympathetic mode all the time, but what else do we do? If your emotional health is affecting your gut health, what can you do?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah, the first step is just admitting there’s a problem. My own personal story is I’m in recovery and I used alcohol as a coping mechanism, and so that’s where I learned mental, emotional, spiritual health personally. But what I’ve seen over and over is, as someone who’s spent a long time in denial, usually, you can see it in other people, and so I see it in my patients.  And just having the first… Like I said, the first step is just admitting like, “Okay, maybe my relationship with my parents or with my spouse or my kids or my job could be having a role in my health.” And once you know that, you can’t really un-know it. And even though it’s the most important part of health, it’s the most difficult one for me to help someone with because it’s not what I was trained in. I learned it from my own story, but-



Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. I’ve really been enjoying this discussion, but I’d like to take a minute to tell you about a new product that I’m very excited about. I’d like to tell you about a new wearable called the Apollo. This is a device that can be worn on the wrist or the ankle, and it uses vibrations to stimulate your parasympathetic nervous system. This device has amazing benefits in terms of getting you out of that stressed out sympathetic nervous system and stimulating the parasympathetic nervous system. It has a number of different functions, especially helping you to relax, to focus, to concentrate, get into a deeper meditative state, even to help you sleep, and there’s even a mode to help you wake up. This all occurs through the scientific use of subtle vibrations.

                                For those of you who might be interested in getting the Apollo for yourself to help you reset your nervous system, go to apolloneuro.com and use the affiliate code, Weitz10. That’s my last name, WEITZ10. Now, back to the discussion.

 



 

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Every patient that I meet, I encourage them to work with a therapist while they’re working with me.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    And therapy was a huge part for me to uncover why did I need to use alcohol to deal with my feelings and emotions? And the analogy is like peeling back the layers of an onion. And over time, you just get deeper and deeper and figuring out what’s underlying that. And so that takes… I mean, it’s hard. It’s not easy, so I get why people don’t want to do it. It would be a lot easier to just find the right supplements to take or find the right procedure or treatment, whatever. This is the real work.  And for most people, it starts when we’re children. Trauma is… I have the best definition I’ve heard of trauma, is trauma is anything less than nurturing. And for a lot of us, it could be your parents working two jobs or working and not being around. And then that can start making you feel like you’re not good enough, and then that affects your gut, and then you start having abdominal symptoms. And then by the time you come into my office, you’re in your 30s, 40s, 50s and there’s autoimmune disease. And it started with something as simple as just being uncomfortable in your own skin, which shut down your gut.

So then the good thing about mental, emotional, spiritual health is there are so many different modalities to use, and it’s about exploring and finding which one works for you. For me, exercise is a big one. I feel much better when I exercise. I do a gratitude list every day with my wife. We usually take a walk in the evening and we always do three things that we’re grateful for. Building connections, helping others, these are things that work for me, but then there’s meditation, prayer. So it’s about exploring what is the right combo for you.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, it’s interesting. I think that there’s a tendency for… When dealing with patients with some of these gut disorders that are not really structural, these functional gut disorders like SIBO and IBS, over the years, because it’s been difficult to get quantitative tests that really show what’s wrong. Typically, if you have a patient with IBS, a traditional gastroenterologist is going to do a colonoscope or an endoscope or a CAT scan, you’re not going to see anything.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Never.

Dr. Weitz:                           So it’s difficult to see the exact structural reasons for why they’re having the problem. So, for many years, patients with IBS were dismissed as basically having an emotional disorder and given antidepressants and things like that. So there’s, I think, a tendency to try really hard to focus on the physical causes for these conditions. And maybe we’ve gone too far and forgotten that there really are emotional and stress-related issues that affect the gut.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah, I agree. And I think that there’s just a balance because for the… I mean, a lot of patients that have been diagnosed with IBS that come through with me and we do testing, the most common thing that I find is SIBO, an intestinal overgrowth of your small intestine, or dysbiosis or candida or low stomach acid, leaky gut. And treating those things, to me, I think we have good testing now so there’s tests for all of those conditions, and then there’s treatment plans that work.  I guess my point of my book was just, if that’s not working, if you’ve had the right testing, you’ve had a good treatment plan and it’s still not getting better, in my experience, usually, it’s been the mental, emotional, spiritual health that was the big thing that was missed.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. Let’s talk about food sensitivities.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                            To begin with, why do so many people seem to have a lot of food sensitivities these days?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    I think it’s mostly because of what we’ve done to our food supply. Most of the food that we eat is not in the form that it started, that it was created as. It started with the hybridization of wheat in the 1960s. Right now, over 90% of soy and corn are genetically modified in the United States. Cows don’t eat grass. They are put in pens and fed hay and other things.  So we’ve changed the proteins of the majority of the foods that we eat, but we never tested how that would affect human beings. And that is, I think, the biggest reason why food sensitivities are increasing at the rate that they are.

Dr. Weitz:                            Now, there’s lots of sophisticated lab tests to measure food sensitivities that look at IgG, IgM, IgA. Companies like Cyrex, [inaudible 00:20:53] have very sophisticated food sensitivity testing. But you say in your book that you don’t feel like these tests are helpful.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. And my experience has been that those tests are helpful for diagnosing leaky gut. And when someone does those… The majority of people that do those tests, it’s typically a log of what they’ve been eating for the last few months. Because if your gap junctions in your gut are open, then those proteins from those foods are going to be getting into your blood and you’re more likely to create an immune response against them.  To me, the gold standard that I’ve always used is an elimination diet, which is 21 days of cutting out the biggest offending foods and then reintroducing them one by one. And that’s another thing that is science-based. And when you have a sensitivity, you create IgG antibodies.  Everything in your body has a half-life. So if you smoke cigarettes, if you take prescription meds, if you drink alcohol, everything has a different half-life, or your hormones, toxins. The half-life of IgG antibodies is around 21 days. So let’s say I react to gluten and I had a bagel for breakfast today, and I have 100 antibodies floating around; if I don’t have any gluten for the next 21 days, that antibody count will drop in half to 50.  When I eat it again on day 22, if my immune system has identified it as an invader, it will attack and create inflammation which can present as symptoms like a headache, abdominal pain, a rash, acne, joint pain, it can present anywhere. So, to me, the best way that I’ve found to diagnose sensitivities, the most reliable, is you cut out the foods and then you add them back in one by one, every two days.

Dr. Weitz:                            Now, there’s different versions of the elimination diet. Some people recommend cutting out two foods or six foods or 10 foods. Which foods do you recommend cutting out?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    So typically, the top five or six offenders are gluten, dairy, soy, corn, eggs, and sugar. In a “full elimination diet”, we also cut out beef, pork, shellfish, processed meats, coffee. And I think there might be one more that I’m missing. I have it listed, the full list in the book.  So I really believe in meeting patients where they’re at. There are some people where if all you’re ready to cut out is your energy drink, that’s better than nothing, right? And if you’re just ready to cut out gluten, I’d rather have you do that than try to do a full elimination diet and quit after a day because you’re going nuts.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    One of the things that I think has happened in our field is that there’s so many restrictive diets out there and there’s so much information out there that’s like, “You have to be paleo or you have to be keto or vegan or Mediterranean.”

To me, I and my patients think I’m nuts, I tell them, I’d rather have you eating fast food if it doesn’t stress you out. If you’re so worried about eating the perfect meal, it’s not going to help. You’re going to shut down your digestion, your cortisol is going to elevate, and you’re not going to get the benefits from that meal. And that’s okay. Like right now, you might not be ready for an elimination diet, but a year from now, you might be.

Dr. Weitz:                            [inaudible 00:24:38] is when they layer one diet on top of the other.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Right.

Dr. Weitz:                           So they’re following their paleo diet, and then they eliminate high-FODMAP foods, and then they eliminate histamine foods.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. Right. Then there’s like three things you can eat.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    I’ve seen that a lot with the sensitivity testing too. People come in, they’ve had the testing and they’re eating like six foods. I believe in a candida diet, a low-FODMAP diet, elimination diet, but in short-term. Right? Some of those diets are too stressful to do long-term.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah. Short-term to get rid of symptoms, to help get your condition on the road to healing.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Exactly.

Dr. Weitz:                           But long-term, you’re going to end up with nutritional deficiencies.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Right. Yeah, absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:                           So you have patients cut out all these foods for 21 days. And then how often do they put food back and how long do they wait for? How many times a day do they need to eat it?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. We’re starting an elimination diet challenge on August 1st on social media, on my Instagram and Facebook. So I’m going to be posting… In my book, we have over 50 recipes to help people, but we’re going to be posting recipes, answering questions, and just hopefully making it easier for people to do.  The way that I approach it is you reintroduce the food, one food at a time, three times that day. So day 22, you introduce, let’s say, gluten three times. You don’t add anything else new. You wait, day 23. If nothing’s happened in those two days, then you start the next food. So we’re doing every two days. A classic reaction to dairy is like, everything’s fine on day 22. But day 23, you wake up and your face is broken out in acne or something.  So, we do one food every two days, three servings on that day. If you have a reaction, you wait until the reaction’s gone to start the next food. For some people, it could be a couple of days. I’ve seen it be a week. And you use a tracking journal, which we have a copy of, and you just write down what happened. And the symptoms, if you went into an elimination diet because of migraines, when you have dairy and you react to it, you might get joint pain. You might not get the exact symptom that you’re looking for, but it still means it’s inflaming your body.

Dr. Weitz:                           If somebody has a pretty strong reaction to gluten, will you have them try it again in the future or will you just say, “Just avoid gluten?”

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. I tell people to try it again. What I tell them is to Unfunc their gut, get their gut right, and then try again in about six months. I mean, it can change. I’ve seen it change. What you’re sensitive to, you might not be sensitive to in the future. So my advice always is to try, especially if you’re missing the food… You meet a lot of people that are like, “I don’t care about gluten. I don’t ever want to eat it again.” And they’re fine. But then, I think more people are like, “Well, when can I eat this again?” So I always encourage trying.

Dr. Weitz:                            Sure. So what’s the healthiest diet for most people to follow for longevity?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    I keep it very, very simple. I give two main goals. The most evidence, what I’ve seen is behind the Mediterranean diet. But to keep things simple, what I encourage people to do is to eat 9-12 servings of vegetables and fruit a day. And if you’re eating that… A serving is a cup raw or a half-cup cooked. And if you’re eating that many vegetables and fruit in a day, there’s not room for the other stuff. You’re full from everything else.  And so, in our standard American diet, our typical breakfast of pancakes, bacon, breakfast sandwiches, all this stuff, cereal, we don’t eat any vegetables. And then lunch is pizza or hotdogs or sandwiches, no vegetables again. And then there’s a side of broccoli at dinner. So we’re eating one to three probably, the average American. Whereas I encourage people to shoot for 9-12.

So I think that’s an easy… I mean, it’s not easy for people to do, but it’s easy to remember like, “Okay, if I’m going to try to eat well, what should I do?” And it’s just like, “Increase that intake of natural vegetables and fruit.” And then I think that everybody should do an elimination diet because you might not even have symptoms right now, but you might be sensitive to some things. Besides the Mediterranean diet, that’s what I would recommend for people.  But I’ve met people that they swear by vegan, they swear by paleo, they swear by keto. That’s fine. I don’t tell people, “No. If that’s working for you, you have to stop it because I believe in something else.”

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. So in terms of prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease, what do you think are some of the things to focus on? What foods or food groups or macronutrients, what should we reduce or avoid for most people?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Sugar.

Dr. Weitz:                            Sugar.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. You just cut out sugar, it’ll take you a long, long way.

Dr. Weitz:                            [inaudible 00:30:42].

Dr. Kozlowski:                    And then processed foods and saturated foods.

Dr. Weitz:                            Okay.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                            What do you mean? Saturated fat? Is that what you mean?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. Yes. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                            Okay. Lots of controversy over what causes heart disease. Does saturated fat really cause heart disease? Does it raise your LDL Why? How does saturated fat do that?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Sorry. So I misspoke. Yeah, I agree with you. So it’s like the trans fats, the fats that are in fast food and in French fries and the processed vegetable oils and canola oils and all that stuff.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. Okay. Can you talk about the microbiome and what’s the best way to test for it, and what do we do to optimize our microbiome?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. Your microbiome, the analogy that I really like is it’s like your own garden, like your garden at home. And so, in that analogy, the probiotics are the plants of your garden. Fibers and good sugars are the fertilizer of your garden. But what happens when you don’t take care of your garden is weeds grow, right? And that’s what happens in our guts. And that’s where you can get dysbiosis, candida, SIBO, those things.  So I think the best way to screw up your microbiome is antibiotics because antibiotics are tablets that were designed to kill bacteria. And where do you put them typically? In a tube that has five pounds of bacteria in it. So just taking antibiotics once can wipe out up to half of your microbiome. And then if half your garden is wiped out, what happens? Weeds start to take over, right?  And we’re being exposed to all these different weeds every day, all the time. And if your garden’s empty, those weeds see this fertile soil and will take over. So antibiotics are a big thing. A microbiome in general, because of that analogy, even though I’m known for gut health, I don’t typically start probiotics. I prefer to do it through food.

Probiotics, there’s a lot of discussion of do they actually stay in your gut? Where do they get broken down? How long do the effects last? But also, if there’s weeds overgrowing in your garden, you wouldn’t go to the nursery and buy more plants, right? You would pull the weeds out. And so pulling the weeds out is, in my experience, done through stool and urine-testing to identify what’s growing in there, and then treating that to make sure it goes away, and then focusing on pre and probiotic foods.  The other thing that’s happened to me is the most common condition that I treat is SIBO, and that’s when your microbiome, which should be living in your large intestine, is now living in your small intestine. And your small intestine is where you should be absorbing your nutrients and digesting some food, should not be covered in bacteria. So it’s bacteria overgrowing.  And if you have SIBO and you start a probiotic, you can actually get worse because you’re feeding the problem. And in our general society, if you tell someone you’ve got abdominal pain, they’re going to tell you to eat more fiber and take a probiotic, which for a lot of people works but if it doesn’t and you’re feeling worse, that could be a sign that you have SIBO.  So, stool testing, a stool analysis tells us what’s growing in your garden, how inflamed your gut is, how well your gut bacteria eat, do you have parasites?

 



Dr. Weitz:                            I’d like to interrupt this fascinating discussion we’re having for another few minutes to tell you about another really exciting product that has changed my life and the life of my family, especially as it pertains to getting good quality sleep. It’s something called the chiliPAD, C-H-I-L-I-P-A-D. It can be found at the website chilisleep.com, which is C-H-I-L-I-S-L-E-E-P dot com.

So, this product involves a water-cooled mattress pad that goes underneath your sheets and helps you maintain a constant temperature at night. If you’ve ever gotten woken up because temperature has changed, typically gets warmer, this product will maintain your body at a very even temperature, and it tends to promote uninterrupted quality deep and REM sleep, which is super important for healing and for overall health.

If you go to chilisleep.com and you use the affiliate code, Weitz20, that’s my last name, W-E-I-T-Z, 20. You’ll get 20% off a chiliPAD. So, check it out and let’s get back to this discussion.



 

Dr. Weitz:                            So, Peter, what do you use to treat dysbiosis or bacterial overgrowth?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah, it varies in everybody. The three options typically are antibiotics, which I usually try to push people away from just due to all the side effects; a natural herbal approach, which I’ll talk a little bit more about; and then a third, and I call it the nuclear option, is an elemental diet, a liquid diet for two or three weeks. That’s usually… I’ve only used in either people that can’t get an ulcerative colitis under control or people that have failed treatment with SIBO multiple times, I’ll try that.  I’ve had a few patients over the years that have just started with an elemental diet, but that’s pretty rare because it’s so difficult. But when it comes to the herbal approach, so if you do a stool analysis and they find dysbiotic bacteria, they’ll do sensitivity testing. So they’ll tell you that whatever species is growing inside you reacts, responds to grapefruit seed extract or uva ursi or silver or berberine or oil of oregano. So if you have that information, you can really target your treatment because you’ll see resistant patterns on there.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah. Some of the stool-test companies do and others don’t. What stool tests do you usually order?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Majority of the time I use Doctor’s Data.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Because I’ve just found they always test more herbs than anybody else. So I like to see the resistance and sensitivity patterns. And my experience is that they seem to be better at catching candida and yeast overgrowth than other labs that I’ve used. So I like Doctor’s Data a lot.

Dr. Weitz:                           I think a lot of us are using other stool tests that don’t necessarily test those. So if you don’t have those, how do you decide what herbs to use?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    It’s a shotgun approach. So you can pick the herbs that are the most effective, and that’s some of that list, oil of oregano, uva ursi, silver, grapefruit seed extract, caprylic acid, garlic. These are all things that you can use. And when I’m treating, let’s say, SIBO, which with SIBO, through breath testing, you can get a yes or no answer. “Yes, you have it.” “No, you don’t.” But you have no clue what’s overgrowing.  So you don’t know if that’s probiotics overgrowing, you don’t know if that’s yeast overgrowing, you don’t know if it’s dysbiosis growing. So that’s a situation where we’re definitely using a shotgun approach. We’re just doing a broad spectrum.

Dr. Weitz:                           Well, a little bit, because if it’s methane, you know it’s archaea. If it’s hydrogen-

Dr. Kozlowski:                    That’s true.

Dr. Weitz:                           It’s likely different organisms. And now we have the hydrogen sulfide, which some say it’s the type of organisms that are involved in that.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    So when I’m treating those, I typically use a supplement from Biotics Research, FC-Cidal, Dysbiocide, and A.D.P. That combination of the three, that I’ve used for the last few years, mostly. Metagenics makes a combo product called CandiBactin.

Dr. Weitz:                            [inaudible 00:39:41].

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yep, exactly. And then Biocidin, I think has the longest research behind it, or at least I’ve used that one the longest. And right now, just with all the things going on in the world, so many things are backordered, so it’s just trying to figure out what’s available and trying that.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Stuff.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yep. Yep. Yep. So, besides herbal antimicrobials, what else will you use?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    So, for dysbiosis, if somebody’s gut lining looks very inflamed, then I might do things to calm the gut lining, and my favorite is glutamine.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    High dose. Five grams, three times a day. Sometimes just anti-inflammatories like high-dose fish oil or gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), omega-6. So sometimes I’ll do some stuff like that. If somebody we suspect or they have low stomach acid, I will put them on hydrochloric acid. Sometimes we’ll use pancreatic or digestive enzymes, ox bile, gallbladder support. So those are the main things I think that I use.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay. And do you go through phases of treatment or?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Usually, my SIBO most common treatment plan is nine weeks where it’s two weeks on, one week off, and you cycle that three times.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay. With the same herbs each time?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Mm-hmm (affirmative). Yeah. There’s been times where I’ve tried to use different ones because one of the concerns is if you use the same stuff over and over, there’s obviously resistance. So you can definitely try to cycle it.  But no, typically, I’ll use… At least through the first time through, right? In the first two or three months that we’re trying, then I’ll stick to the same regimen and then either repeat testing or talk to the person and see if they’re not really getting better, then we need to adjust something.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    I always try to take the path of least resistance. So usually, whatever’s going to be the easiest, let’s try that first, assuming the symptoms are not severe. Instead of just throwing everything all at once. It can be overwhelming, I think.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. So let’s say you have a SIBO patient, you do the nine weeks of herbs. Is treatment done then?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    If they’re better. It depends. If their symptoms have gone away, which happens many times, it’s great, and they move on. And then the next phase is reintroducing the higher FODMAPs because I do like people to stay on a low-FODMAP diet during SIBO treatment.  The interesting thing I’ve found with people that have recovered from SIBO is frequently you’ll hear that there’s one food that they just can’t tolerate. And it’s always different. Every person tells me something different. So it’s just adding them back in the higher FODMAPs and making sure that your body doesn’t react to those still.

Dr. Weitz:                            I know Dr. Pimentel will put the patients on a promotility, prokinetic after he uses antibiotics, to decrease the likelihood that it’ll come back because there’s a whole motility focus. Some natural practitioners will use natural prokinetics.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Absolutely. Yeah, I definitely agree with that, with the motility activators. I’ve found to be, to me, more important is to make sure the patient’s digesting, that their stomach acid is sufficient because to me, that’s the key, that’s what kills off the bacteria. So if you’re not making enough stomach acid, then that’s a pretty high recurrence rate for SIBO.

Dr. Weitz:                            So how do you know if you’re not making enough stomach acid?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    There’s two ways to test that I’ve found to be reliable. And the first one to me, when I first heard about it, I laughed. I thought it sounded kind of ridiculous. It’s called the baking soda test where you mix a quarter teaspoon of baking soda and a few ounces of water, drink it on an empty stomach. Baking soda is basic, your stomach should be acidic. When the bass and the acid meet, it creates an explosion which presents as gas and you start burping, which you should burp in the first three to five minutes.  So when I first heard of that, I was like, “This sounds like a high school chemistry experiment. This sounds ridiculous.” But I’ve actually found it to be pretty reliable. If people don’t burp, then it usually means they don’t have enough acid.

And then the second step is actually supplementing hydrochloric acid. I outline the whole protocol in the book, but you start with one capsule, but you only take it before eating protein. So I tell people in the beginning, just with meat, fish, eggs, your bigger proteins. Definitely not with a smoothie. But you start with one and you take it and then you eat.

A normal reaction would be to get some heartburn, to get some discomfort because you dropped in acid, your stomach’s making acid, there’s too much and it refluxes. An abnormal response to that is to not feel anything or to feel better, that’s a marker that you have low acid. And then the question is how bad is it? So every two days, we increase the dose from one to two, two to three, until you get some heartburn or discomfort. And let’s say that happens after you took three, then your dose is two. And that’s what I would have you on.

And the most common question that I get is, “Well, how long am I going to be on this?” And to me, it usually depends. What I tell people is it depends on the underlying cause. With majority of people that I’ve seen, the biggest cause of low stomach acid besides aging is our stress and the sympathetic nervous system. So if that’s activated, you’re shutting down your acid production. So when your parasympathetic gets activated, then you’ll start making more. And then let’s say you’ve been on two capsules; all of a sudden, you take it one day and it kind of burns, you know it’s time to cut back or come off of it.

Dr. Weitz:                            And you don’t like to use probiotics. You use what? Fermented foods?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    For stimulating the microbiome?

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. I prefer focusing on pre and probiotics and foods. So fermented foods, sauerkraut, things like that, dairy or dairy alternatives, and then prebiotics. I believe more in prebiotics, so things like banana, asparagus, artichokes, things like that, that are going to feed your microbiome.  And to me, if you’re going to supplement one, I usually actually go with prebiotics just to stimulate your bacteria to grow. I can’t say that I don’t ever use them. In general, supplements I think should be supplements. And so what I tell people frequently is if you’re traveling or if your diet sucks that day, you didn’t have anything fermented, then take a probiotic. But if your diet is strong, then you don’t need it, in my opinion.

Dr. Weitz:                            What’s your favorite prebiotic product?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Arabinogalactan or inulin? Inulin is typically in a powder. Arabinogalactan comes in capsules and powder, so sometimes that’s easier. If you take your pre and probiotic together, they call it a symbiotic. So those are the two big ones that I would use.

Dr. Weitz:                            Okay. I think that’s pretty much a wrap, Dr. Kozlowski. Have final thoughts you want to leave our viewers and listeners?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    No, thank you very much for having me. And if I can give one piece of advice, it is to stay in the present moment. There is an ancient philosopher that said anxiety is worrying about the future, depression is worrying about the past, so what’s the best treatment is the present moment. And I think so much of our lives are taking us out of the present moment, so the best thing you can do is to get back into it and your gut will heal and then all the protocols or supplements or whatever you need to treat whatever’s going on will be much more effective.

Dr. Weitz:                           That’s great. How can listeners and viewers find out more about you, your book, et cetera?

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. So my book, Unfunc Your Gut, with a C, Unfunc with a C, you can get it anywhere on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, your local bookstores, so it’s pretty available. To contact me or to learn more about me, doc-koz.com, D-O-C dash K-O-Z dot-com. And I’m on Instagram and Facebook. On Instagram, it’s @doc_koz. And on Facebook, it’s just Peter Kozlowski M.D., which I’ve gotten more active lately and just sharing stuff there.

Dr. Weitz:                           Great. Thanks, doc.

Dr. Kozlowski:                    Yeah. Thank you.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:                            Thank you listeners for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. Please take… I’d also like to let everybody know that I now have a few openings for new clients for nutritional consultations. If you’re interested, please call my office in Santa Monica at 310-395-3111. That’s 310-395-3111. And take one of the few openings we have now for an individual consultation for nutrition with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you and see you next week.

 

Dr. Joe Pizzorno speaks about  Underappreciated Micronutrients with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

6:00  A useful approach to to analyzing new drugs as well as natural interventions is to look at numbers needed to treat for benefit and numbers needed to treat for adverse effects.  If the number needed to treat to get a benefit is like 400, then that doesn’t sound so great. and if the number needed to treat to get an adverse event is three or four, then that doesn’t sound like such a good drug.  So many of the new drugs seem to have less and less benefit and are more and more expensive.

7:20  Vitamin E.  Much of the research on vitamin E started with research on the benefits of wheat germ oil, which had some fairly robust benefits for preventing cardiovascular disease and improving fertility. When nutrition research started about 100 years ago, researchers were limited by our lack of understanding of biochemistry and by our tools, so we concluded that between vitamins, minerals, amino acids and fatty acids that there were 43 molecules in food that were important and all of the other 50,000 molecules in food were unimportant, which means that 99.9% were unimportant. Now we discover interesting molecules in food such as phytonutrients that have lots of benefits, so we extract them and modify them and make them patentable and tout it as the new wonder drug.  But these molecules  were already in the food supply before we started modifying the food with hybridization and GMOs and chemical farming and they got lost from the food supply. How is that progress?  Research on wheat germ oil showed good results, but research on DL-alpha-tocopherol was not that successful.  This is partially because gamma tocopherol is much more important for human health than alpha tocopherol and synthetic DL-alpha-tocopherol is even less beneficial.  And high dosages of alpha tocopherol will inhibit the more beneficial gamma tocopherol.  The same phenomenon can occur with flavonoids, including high levels of beta carotene that can saturate the absorption sites and inhibit other carotenoids that may be more important for health, such as lycopene for men’s prostate health.

18:44  Folic acid. Whereas folic acid is synthetic, natural folates are found in many foods.  As we’ve refined our food supply, such as by refining wheat to make breads and cereals, we’ve lost the natural folates, which leads to neural tube defects and elevated homocysteine and other problems and then we add back in synthetic folic acid. But because so many people have MTHFR polymorphisms and can’t utilize synthetic folic acid.  This is why natural folates like methyl folate are protective against cancer, but synthetic folic acid when supplemented at high dosages can increase cancer risk. Eat real food. 

23:22  Mycorrhizae is the fungi that colonize the roots of plants and it participates in improving the soil and supplying nutrition to the plants. Just like the natural bacteria in our gut, there are also natural fungi that contribute to the health of our microbiome. The soil where we grow our plants and fruits and vegetables contains natural bacteria and fungus, like our microbiome, and some of the chemicals used in agriculture like glyphosate, which is widely used in the food supply as an herbicide that poisons plants through disrupting the shikimate pathway and it also disrupts the fungal and bacterial balance in the soil, so the plants make fewer polyphenols and other important phytonutrients, which has a negative effect on our health. By disrupting the soil we make the plants less healthy and that makes us less healthy. Some of these phytonutrients have antiviral properties, which makes us less susceptible to viral infections.  When phytonutrient content in our food goes down, the potential for viral infections in us goes up.

35:31  Our DNA is now more susceptible to damage from arsenic and other heavy metals because of a lower intake of phytonutrients like bioflavonoids that protect us from heavy metals.  Arsenic levels have also gone up in our environment. Arsenic is found in the water supply and we see high levels in rice, which are grown in water. We used to put arsenic in the food supply of chickens to make them more resistant to parasites and to plump them up more.  Wood climbing toys that kids climb on that are often found in parks often have arsenic in them as wood preservatives. Certain industries are spewing arsenic into the environment.

42:29  Tomatine is another phytonutrient found in tomatoes.  Tomatoes are often grown in greenhouses with chemicals and they have found that such tomatoes often maintain enough of those carotenoids and flavonoids that give tomatoes their characteristic color and bit of their natural taste. But by not growing them organically in soil without chemical, they lose many other phytonutrients like tomatine that have not been recognized as important. Tomatine helps to prevent prostate cancer growth.  But the answer is not to just take a supplement of tomatine but to understand that we need to eat whole foods and to grow our food in the most natural methods possible.

 

 



Dr. Joe Pizzorno is a transformational leader in natural medicine, one of the founding members of the Functional Medicine movement, and the founding president of Bastyr University, which was the first accredited institution in the field of natural medicine.  He is a Naturopathic Doctor, researcher, and educator, who has written or co-authored more than 12 books including, The Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine, which has now sold over two million copies, and The Toxin Solution, and his textbook Clinical Environmental Medicine, his two newest books.  Here’s the website to learn more about his The Toxin Solution book: http://www.thetoxinsolution.com/  You can also learn more about Dr. Pizzorno from his website: http://drpizzorno.com/ 

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:                            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting-edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website doctorweitz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.

Hello, Rational Wellness podcasters. Today we have a very exciting interview with Dr. Joe Pizzorno, one of the founders of the Functional Medicine Movement. Our topic today is the importance of micronutrients, of physiological phytonutrients and specific forms of vitamins and minerals that are often underappreciated. And these are often eliminated by modern agriculture, and not included when synthetic vitamins are simply added back to processed foods. When plants are hybridized to increase levels of certain micronutrients, there is often a decrease in the production of other nutrients. Our modern food supply grown with genetically modified seeds and with many chemicals has lost many phytonutrients.  When crops are sprayed with herbicides to control weeds and pesticides to protect from insects, viruses and molds, the plants lose the ability to resist these naturally. This is why many natural phytochemicals may have antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral properties as well as being able to, as well as being anti-insect, anti-herbivore, and anti-oxidant.  When foods are refined, the simplification of research on vitamins is often not appreciated. The subtleties of the differences between what’s found in nature, such as the family of nutrients found in wheat germ oil, known as alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta-tocopherols and alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-tocotrienols. As opposed to stripping out a synthetic vitamin, alpha-tocopherol, and studying that and ignoring the rest of the family and other phytonutrients that are present in wheat germ oil, including some that have yet to be studied.

Dr. Pizzorno referred to these as unimportant molecules found in our food at a presentation that he gave at the Institute of Functional Medicine annual meeting this year, which was a great meeting. Furthermore, the loss of these micronutrients from our food is associated with chronic diseases and diseases resulting from genetic variations referred to as single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Therefore, it makes sense to increase our consumption of these important “unimportant molecules” by eating organically grown plants and taking the right nutritional supplements.

Our special guest today is Dr. Joe Pizzorno, who will be talking about this very important topic. Dr. Pizzorno is one of the most important Naturopathic doctors, educators, researchers, and one of the founding members of the Functional Medicine movement. Dr. Pizzorno has written or co-authored more than 12 books including, The Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine, which has now sold over two million copies, the Textbook of Natural Medicine, Natural Medicine for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer, The Toxin Solution, and co-author of Clinical Environmental Medicine. He’s also the editor of the Integrative Medicine Journal. Dr. Pizzorno, thank you so much for joining us today.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, Dr. Ben, thank you for your very kind introduction and excellent overview of my presentation.

Dr. Weitz:                           Good. So before we get into the topic for today, since you’re one of the founders of the Functional Medicine Movement, where do you think Functional Medicine is right now?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, and thank you, I’m happy to have contributed to the evolution of this body of knowledge. So, I think Functional Medicine is doing very, very well right now. We’ve developed very good educational programs. We’re now starting to do some research evaluation of what we’re doing and worldwide interest in Functional Medicine is just exploding. And it’s not surprising because as you know, we now suffer the highest burden of chronic disease in every age group ever in human history. So not only the public is arising, there’s a need to think differently, but so are doctors.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yes, yes. I think just look at what’s happened in the last month where almost simultaneously we have a new drug for Alzheimer’s gets approved, which actually does nothing to reverse the condition at all.  It doesn’t cure anybody.  Maybe it slows down the progression in a percentage of people. Unfortunately, 30 to 40% of them end up with swelling or inflammation or bleeding in their brain. And almost at the exact same time, a Functional Medicine study is published by Dr. Dale Bredesen showing that using a Functional Medicine approach of diet, lifestyle, exercise, targeted nutraceuticals that we can actually reverse, cure people with Alzheimer’s. So, I think we’re reaching a point where some of these drugs are just not really adequate responses to the chronic conditions of today and Functional Medicine is starting to show itself to be a much more effective solution.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      And well said. Something I’ve started to realize is a kind of a useful approach to think about these new drugs as well as new natural interventions is numbers needed to treat for benefit and numbers needed to treat for adverse effects. And so many of these drugs, when it’s all this latest, greatest thing, you look at, well, how many people have to be treated to get benefit? And it’s like 400 people before somebody gets a benefit. Well, that doesn’t sound great. Well, I mean, need to be treated before we get an adverse event? Three, four. Okay, so your adverse events are more likely than clinical benefit. Now, I want to be clear, I’m not anti-drug, but I’m anti-drugs, which have more damage than benefit. And so, many of the new drugs, there’s so little benefit left for the drug approach, that the returns are becoming less and less and more and more expensive.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. That new drug for Alzheimer’s [aducanumab] is just only $56,000 a year.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Works great for the drug companies, but-

Dr. Weitz:                            [crosstalk 00:07:02], right?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      And really desperate people might give it a try, but we already know how to prevent Alzheimer’s disease. And we even know some things about how to actually start reversal of that. So, the drug approach is great in some areas, but not so good for everyday health.

Dr. Weitz:                            So, let’s start with vitamin E, which really started in a lot of ways with the research on the benefits of wheat germ oil…

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Correct.

Dr. Weitz:                            … which was fairly robust in its benefits for preventing cardiovascular disease and fertility and other things.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So, let me step back and kind of contextualize this a bit. So, remember that our research on nutrition is only about 100 years old. I mean, you could find some examples earlier like vitamin C in British sailors, things like this. But in terms of really good quality laboratory diving into this, we didn’t have the tools until about 100 years ago to actually start looking at, “Well, what in food is important?” So, the researchers were limited one, by our lack of understanding of Biochemistry, but also by the tools that were available. And they pretty much had to look at food and determine, “Well, what things in food are necessary for animals to continue to live?” So, it’s all about what’s necessary.  So, we call them vitamins, life, okay? What vitamins are required for living? What minerals required for living? What amino acids are required for life? And we came up with, well, it turns out 43 molecules as being important molecules and minerals. Okay. And so, that was defined as what’s important in food. And so, we decided that everything else in food was not important. That’s why my facetious’ name unimportant molecules. So, you might say, “Okay, well, fine, so there’s 43 molecules in food.” Let’s say 50, okay, for round numbers. “How many other molecules are there in food that we decided were unimportant?” Well, it turns out there’s about 50,000 molecules in food, so we decided 99.9% was unimportant.  Now, we start seeing this research, which didn’t come out last 20 years or so, of these, well, look at these interesting molecules that are in food and given all these fancy names, like phytonutrients. You take this phytonutrient and look all these benefits. Ignoring the fact that they were in the food supply until we start modifying the food supply with hybridizations and GMOs and chemical farming and such, and they got lost from the food supply. Now, give it back to people, so we damaged the food supply causing disease. And we extract out and come back and say, “Oh, well, let’s look at this particular molecule. Let’s modify it a little bit and make it patentable. Give it back to people as a new wonder drug?” Well, it was in the food begin with. How’s that progress?

Dr. Weitz:                            And it shouldn’t be surprising that we end up with all these disappointing trials on DL-alpha-tocopherol.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, yes. So now let’s go back to the next one. So, there’s a really interesting, but I think, now, is your audience primary consumers or doctors or healthcare professionals?

Dr. Weitz:                            It leans more towards practitioners, but there are certainly educated consumers, who listen as well.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Great. Okay, I love talking to this particular group, okay. So, there’s a book by Bicknell and Prescott published 50 years ago, where they compiled a lot of the research in nutrition that was available at that time. And it’s fascinating when you read through this book. It’s not always true in every factor, but what you tend to see as when the research was being done on a food concentrate, like wheat germ oil, they got all these really good results. Then they decided, “Now, it’s only this particular component that’s important.” Then all the research went from there. And you see the clinical results dropped dramatically.  So, then they say, “Oh, well, the DL-alpha-tocopherol,” which is a synthetic form of just one of the eight vitamin E versions, “well, it didn’t work. Therefore, vitamins don’t work.” Wait a minute, wait a minute. You only tested one synthetic version, which are not actually found in nature and used that to then describe the whole field of vitamins. So, what happened with the wheat germ oil is they got benefit, synthesized out one particular aspect. Didn’t get benefit and throughout the whole field.  But in reality, we look back at the whole food extract, which is concentrating the family of foods, that’s where you get the benefit. And so much of our modern food supply has been losing these other molecules. They’re so critical. Because you said, “Well, they weren’t important.” So, when you’ve changed the food supply to lose these molecules, well, since they weren’t important, it doesn’t matter. What happens?  All this disease.

Dr. Weitz:                           Exactly.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      These molecules were necessary for health, not for life.

Dr. Weitz:                           So, what should we get out of this wheat germ oil/vitamin E story? What should we think about as the most important ways to get the vitamin E family into our body or should we?  There’s actually been some interesting research on tocotrienols.  And then, perhaps using tocopherols with more of a gamma heavy focus or using tocotrienols, or using them at different times of day, or going back to wheat germ oil.  What do you think is, where are we with all that?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So, great. So, let’s start with a quote from, how about, Hippocrates, “Let your food be your medicine and your medicine your food.” Great concept, but it has to be real food. And what do I mean by that? I mean, real food is heirloom-type seeds, so they had not been hybridized too much. Grown organically, so that they have all these important molecules and of course, in stored properly, so you don’t contaminate them with chemicals leaching from plastics into the food supply.

Dr. Weitz:                           You mean like Kellogg’s Frosted Flakes?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah. So, you remember, when Kellogg’s started, it was whole grains. Now, look at what you’ve got, all this synthetic stuff with lots of chemicals.

Dr. Weitz:                           And then where you throw back some synthetic folic acid and a few others, they’re vitamins.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right. So anyway, so when we’re looking at all these food molecules, there’s no substitute for real food. Now, having said that, there’s plenty of roles for vitamins. So, going back to the vitamin E. So, when you look at the clinical research, so it turns out that when you look at animals, well, alpha-tocopherol was most important based on the field of reabsorption assay. So, what this was. So, they took pregnant rats, they put them on a vitamin E deficient diet and the rats absorbed their fetuses. When they then gave them various kinds of vitamin E, they found that alpha-tocopherol prevented the resourcing of the fetus. So therefore, they decided that was the only important vitamin E.  But you look at human research, it turns out that the gamma-tocopherol is way more important than the alpha-tocopherol. Now, I want to be clear. All the tocopherol is important, but gamma-tocopherol is more important. So, we started doing research using large amounts of DL-alpha-tocopherol or more healthier, the alpha-tocopherol. We give high doses of one vitamin E, you decrease the absorption of the other vitamin Es. So, what happens is you start getting studies that show not only no benefit, but sometimes even detriment from using high doses of a single version of a vitamin.

Dr. Weitz:                            So, taking a vitamin, a multivitamin, for example, that has alpha-tocopherol could potentially if it’s in high enough dosages decrease absorption of gamma-tocopherol, which is probably more important.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, yeah. And same thing happens with the flavonoids for example, so you get people on carotenoids, too, so we look at, give people high dose of beta-carotene. Well, beta-carotene is only one of hundreds of carotenes in the food supply. And we give people high levels of beta carotene, you saturate the absorption sites, you get lower low levels of the other carotenoids and many of which are more important. So for example, for men, well, the lycopene is really important. When you give people a high dose of beta-carotene, you make it harder to absorb the lycopene that men need for the prostate. There’s just so many examples.

Dr. Weitz:                           Interesting. What do you think about their latest research on the tocotrienols, which is part of the vitamin E family?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, of course. It’s part of the food supply. We evolved expecting those molecules to be in the food supply. You think about the food supply and give it back to people and say, “Oh, wow. Isn’t this wonderful?” It should have been there to begin with. Okay? Now, I’m not saying don’t do it, but look back at your food. Eat real food. I can’t emphasize this enough and I’ve-

Dr. Weitz:                           It’s hard to get a real food. Where do you get heirloom fruit-grown from heirloom seeds?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right. So, something that I’ve noticed where my wife and I have decided to make the investment in growing more and more of our own food. So, I actually spent a significant amount of time, my time now growing our own food. So many times, we’ve compared chemically grown foods. That’s what I’m calling it. It’s not commercially grown foods. I call them chemically grown foods, okay? Because I want conventionally grown to be organic. You compare it, for example, tomato. I like that, because it’s such a great example. And we like the cherry tomatoes.  So, just do it yourself. Go to the store. Buy a chemically-grown cherry tomato, buy an organically-grown cherry tomato, and grow a cherry tomato of your own and compare them. There’s no comparison. So yes, the organically-grown tomato is way better than the chemically-grown tomato, but I’ll tell you my home-grown, organically-grown tomatoes are way better than store bought organically-grown tomatoes. Why is that? So, when I say it tastes better, what’s that mean? Well, taste means we’re sensing more molecules. And we look at these other molecules, these more diverse molecules to have all these beneficial effects in our bodies.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah, it’s not easy, though, to grow a lot of fruits and vegetables on your own without using any chemicals. I gave up. Every time I would get these tomatoes, I’d have these great green tomatoes and I’d want to leave them on until they turn red and by the time they turn red, they got eaten by something.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right, right. Yes, it’s not…yes, you have to… it’s not easy.

Dr. Weitz:                           It takes a lot of work.

 



Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. I’ve really been enjoying this discussion, but I’d like to take a minute to tell you about a new product that I’m very excited about. I’d like to tell you about a new wearable called the Apollo. This is a device that can be worn on the wrist or the ankle, and it uses vibrations to stimulate your parasympathetic nervous system. This device has amazing benefits in terms of getting you out of that stressed out sympathetic nervous system and stimulating the parasympathetic nervous system. It has a number of different functions, especially helping you to relax, to focus, to concentrate, get into a deeper meditative state, even to help you sleep, and there’s even a mode to help you wake up. This all occurs through the scientific use of subtle vibrations.

                                For those of you who might be interested in getting the Apollo for yourself to help you reset your nervous system, go to apolloneuro.com and use the affiliate code, Weitz10. That’s my last name, WEITZ10. Now, back to the discussion.

 



 

Dr. Weitz:                           Whereas folic acid is synthetic, natural folates are found in many foods. Maybe you can talk about this family or you can talk about this family of B vitamins.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So, let me just make a complimentary comment. I work really hard producing these lectures and it is so gratifying to see someone like yourself, dive into them and understand what I’m saying. I mean, it’s just so good to hear. Okay?

Dr. Weitz:                           Well, you know what? [crosstalk 00:19:14]…

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Because I know-

Dr. Weitz:                           … I thought, “Wow, this is really amazing.” And then I thought, “What is he really talking about? Unimportant.” So, I had to go through the slides several times in the morning. I went through it, it was more like going through a Shakespearean play where I was, “Oh, there’s another layer here.” And so, that’s why I thought it was important to read the intro and get people to start thinking about this and dive into it.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Thank you. Well, well said. So folic acid is a great example of how off track we got. So, when you look at food, there’s no folic acid in food. All you have are folates, and typically methylated folates. Okay. So, as we’ve refined our food supply, we have lost the natural folates from the food supply. For example, look at wheat, you remember that slide. So, here’s how much natural folates are in wheat. Well, then you grow the wheat synthetically and then you process it into bread and they let it sit on the shelf for a while. And by the time the wheat actually gets to people, there’s almost no folates left in it. So that results in things like neural tube defects and all kinds of other elevated homocysteine, which cause Alzheimer’s and everything else.

So, what do we do? We give people folic acid. Okay, well, the good news is folic acid definitely decreased this side of, the adverse events of our having decreased the amount of folates in the food supply. But there’s a big problem here. And that is folic acid is not actually used by the body, it has to be methylated. And next we have these MTHFR polymorphisms. A substantial portion of the population, one-quarter, one-third don’t do that very well.

Dr. Weitz:                           All right, [crosstalk 00:20:51].

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So, the-

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, I’m thinking more than 50% actually.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah, it may be that high. I’m trying to be a little conservative here, okay? Anyway, so they don’t make the conversion, so or they make the conversion poorly, so now we’re getting too much, too high levels of folic acid in the body, that’s not normally there and it itself becomes problematic. Then let’s go back to food supply. The food supply has natural methylated folates in it, so they don’t have to be converted through MTHFR and you don’t have to worry about the polymorphisms. So, this whole polymorphism problem came about because we so distorted the food supply and lost the natural folates in the food supply.

Dr. Weitz:                           And in fact, while somebody researched on just folic acid, once again, just like vitamin E, where it was supposed to be this super protective vitamin and it would prevent cancer, and in some of the studies showed that it increased cancer. And so, all of a sudden, everybody was like, “Oh, my God, what do we do?” And the reality is, is while synthetic folic acid, which often is unmetabolized and builds up, may increase cancer risk. Natural folate is actually protective against cancer.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, that, when I found that study, well, there are several studies now, I was really intrigued. Because they’re showing that indeed, the natural folates, there’s an inverse correlation between levels of natural folates in the blood and many kinds of cancers. But there’s unfortunately in some cancers, particularly like colon cancer, a positive correlation between folic acid levels in the blood and the cancer. So, I want to be real clear. People listening to this might become fearful of vitamins. No, that’s not the issue. So, the issue number one is “Eat real food” and number two is we take in vitamins and make sure they’re the natural forms of the vitamins, not the synthetic forms of the vitamins. Now, sometimes synthetic should be the same as natural and that’s just fine, but so many times, the synthetic forms of the vitamins are different molecules and that’s where we run into trouble.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right, so on folic acid, you want your supplement to contain natural folates?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes.

Dr. Weitz:                           It should say methyl folate or a natural folate, right?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, exactly.

Dr. Weitz:                           Rather than folic acid.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Exactly. You don’t want folic acid.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. So, another topic you mentioned is Mycorrhizae, which is, most people don’t realize this, but the soil where food is grown, actually has this network of a fungus that runs through it that gives integrity and importance to that soil. Perhaps you can talk about this.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah, that’s also fascinating. And my wife, who also is involved in Medicine, made an interesting comment. She said, “We’re all now very aware of how disruption to the natural bacteria in our gut result in disease. Well, what happens if you have disruption in natural bacteria and fungus and you drive something such in the soil, won’t that affect the health of the plant?” And the answer turns out to be yes. So, let’s look at glyphosate as a good example. So, glyphosate is now fairly widely spread, widespread use in the food supply. And the reason so why it’s-

Dr. Weitz:                            But we both know it’s the main ingredient in Roundup, which is an herbicide used to grow many foods. People use it on their lawns to kill weeds.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, exactly so, and it’s not safe for humans because it poisons something called the shikimate pathway, which is only found in plants. It’s not found in humans, so therefore, it’s not a dangerous chemical for humans. Okay, well, that’s a matter of debate, but let’s ignore that for a second. And by the way, if you guys are not aware of it, Roundup is only 50% glyphosate. It’s 50% undisclosed ingredients, which are typically way more toxic than the glyphosate. Okay. But we won’t get to that right now.

Dr. Weitz:                           Well-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Let’s just stick with glyphosate. So, the glyphosate disrupts the microbial balance in the soil and when you disrupt the microbial balance in the soil, the plant start making fewer of these unimportant molecules. And addition, many of these flavonoids that are so important for our health are made through the shikimate pathway. These polyphenols and such, so the plants are making less of these unimportant molecules. And those unimportant molecules when they go down in our body, the amount of disease goes up. So, by disrupting, making the plants less healthy, we’re making ourselves less healthy.

Dr. Weitz:                           Dressing, and-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      And let me go further with that. You may bring it up again, but this is a good point, I’ll bring it up. So, I’ve been really fascinated by the increase and worried by the increasing incidence of epidemics and pandemics in our society. It directly correlates with growing foods chemically, because we grow foods chemically.

Dr. Weitz:                           I mean, who’s ever heard of a pandemic?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right, right. So, we grow foods chemically, they have less of these bioflavonoids. Now, why is bioflavonoids being produced by the plants? Because they’re antiviral. So, plants are producing the bioflavonoids to protect themselves from viruses, so when we eat them, we’re protected from viruses as well. But what happens when they’re not there anymore? Also, we’re more susceptible to viral infections. Gee, could it be that we made our population so susceptible to infection that we’re going to be seeing more and more of these? And I want to say, well, vaccines have their place, Isn’t it better to not get the disease to begin with rather than wait for somebody to develop a vaccination with unknown long-term adverse effects?

Dr. Weitz:                            And develop and strengthen your immune system? So, if you do come into contact with the virus, your body will be able to fight it off.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, exactly. And think about the person eating organically grown food, particularly rich and plant molecules, and plant-based diet, they have a lot of these antiviral molecules in the blood. So, guess what? When the virus tries to get in, now you’ll have our mucous membranes to protect us, now you’ll have the innate and antibody-based immune systems to protect us. We all have these antiviral molecules as well. You think about the advantage for immune system if the antiviral levels block or slow down the replication the virus, say for a day or a couple of days? Well, look at that head start our immune system gets.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. It’s interesting. We’re talking about fungus and the importance of fungus, and we’re talking about soil. And I think it’s an interesting analogy to think about the microbiome, which is a soil in our guts where all these beneficial microorganisms grow. And there’s been a lot of talk, as you know, about the bacteria and which are the best bacteria to grow there. And there’s just been a ton of research, but we really haven’t delved that much into the importance of the fungi that are there.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes.

Dr. Weitz:                            And we talk a lot about there being too high levels of fungi, too high levels of Candida, et cetera, and that can certainly be a problem, but there could be a problem not having enough fungi. And not only is there a microbiome here, there’s a micro fungi. And at some point, we realize that there are viruses that are probably an important part of our microbiome as well as parasites.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, yes. And well said. As we evolved as a species, our guts are colonized by a wide range of organisms and we developed these relationships with them, okay? And the ones that causes disease, we got rid of and the ones that were commensal and helped us be healthy, we stuck with. But then we screwed things up by giving people antibiotics, which are nonspecific and by giving animals these antibiotics. And now, we’re starting to develop these new groups of organisms, which we did not evolve with and had a lot of negative effects in our body.

Dr. Weitz:                            And the pesticides that we spray on the plant also kill the bacteria and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories that damage our guts, on and on and on.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes.

Dr. Weitz:                            So, you mentioned organic heirloom plants?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes.

Dr. Weitz:                            Can you explain what heirloom plants and where can we get these?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      It’s a very good question. It’s not only the heirloom plants or foods we eat, but also heirloom herbal medicines. Okay. That’s another interesting topic. So, looking at the heirloom seeds, so just think about this kind of logically. If you take a plant’s seed and you then, well, let’s ignore GMOs, things like that. Let’s just say, we as farmers, well, farmers tend to pick the seeds that will produce the biggest crop, crop with the most protein in it, the crop with one, where a particular characteristic you want more of. And so, you hybridize and hybridize and hybridized, you get more and more of the characteristics that you want.  Well, remember, plants have limited physiological function and if you start forcing one pathway of physiological functions, necessarily, the plants can have less energy to produce those other pathways, the other molecules that we decided were not important. So, the further we can go back in our gathering of seeds, the less likely we’ve hybridized them to the point where we’ve lost too many of these unimportant molecules. I facetiously call them unimportant molecules. I wonder if I need to come up with a better name because while it grabs attention, it also kind of gives that wrong orientation. But the reality is that we’re losing these other molecules, because of hybridization.

So, where do you get these heirloom seeds? The good news is that there are a number of resources for doing that. There’s a place here in Washington State called Uprising Seeds, I get my seeds from them. But then, once I get the original seeds for them, if I have a successful crop and we’d like the food, we then harvest it seeds. So, now these seeds are a little more wild, okay? Because they’ve interacted with nature. And so, we now, we started ourselves kind of going back a little bit to get a little more and more diverse seeds, you might say.

Dr. Weitz:                            And that’s really super important and that’s something that farmers did for thousands years until we started getting genetically modified seeds. And one of the things built into genetically modified seeds is that those seeds, those plants from the genetically modified seeds will not produce seeds that can be replanted. So, you have to continue to buy genetically modified seeds from the company that you bought them from originally.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes. It’s a vicious cycle.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. And so, what this means is you’re getting plants that are more and more further away from nature and are going to probably have less and less of those phytonutrients.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yep, exactly.

Dr. Weitz:                            And then it’s subsistence farmers in places like Africa and other parts of the world end up in a bad cycle where now, they can’t harvest their own seeds and they’re forced to continue to buy seeds from these companies that are selling them, these genetically modified seeds.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes. It’s not good for the world. It’s just, I mean, and the ones that say, well, look, we were able to grow with the GMOs food in areas that had inadequate water or whatever the case may be. Well, you can see some of those strategies are a good idea, but stop pretending there’s no a price associated with them, and start making these seeds that require now people to keep buying them because they can no longer reproduce themselves. That you had good reasons for it, but then what they actually do is it’s actually pretty bad.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. And something just came through my mind, I always make these bizarre associations, but I know we’re talking about plants. But let’s just talk about animals for a minute. And in order to make sure people have enough animal protein to eat, leaving aside the debate as to whether or not we need animal protein. They’re now making synthetic meat. There’s no animal involved at all. They’re just growing meat in a lab. And you can imagine, whatever benefits there are in say grass-fed beef, and I think there are many for the right person in the right situation, those are not going to exist in meat grown in a lab.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes. You come up with all kind of ethical reasons for why it’s good to grow meat in the lab, but it’s not going to be a healthy food. I mean, over the long-term. I mean, in the short term, yeah, fine. But in the long term, it’s not going to have these other molecules. And when I say something, which may offend some of your audience, but when you think about how to farm foods, what do you think about growing foods in incredibly synthetic environment of the grown just in water.  You put these screens up. You grow the food on these screens with a very carefully controlled water and you put into water what you think is important. You grow these foods that look nice, but not aware of all these other molecules. So, control, growing food in these really synthetic environments doesn’t seem like such a great idea. That’s called hydroponics. Sounds like a good idea, but is that really the food you want to be eating?

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. Yeah, the soil is important.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Soil is critically important. Important.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, just like your microbiome. Think of it like that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes.

Dr. Weitz:                           You mentioned in your talk about protecting the DNA from arsenic and other heavy metals. Maybe you can talk about that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      You really got my lecture. This is so great. Okay, so I’ve been involved in Medicine now for literally over half a century. Okay, so I’ve learned a lot and over that period of time, you get to see patterns, okay? And one of the things that really grabbed my attention about 10 years ago was the effect of environmental toxins on our health. And I’m now going around the world, literally lecturing that environmental toxins have become the primary drivers of disease, but it’s not just environmental toxins, it’s in the context of the severe distortion of our food supply.  So, we’re really smart. We recognized, well, I mean, got smart enough to recognize, well, lead was a problem, so we stopped putting lead into the environment. We recognized DDT was a problem, got rid of that. Recognized PCBs were a problem, decreased those. I mean, these are all good public health ventures. But we haven’t done much about arsenic. And I was kind of surprised, because I was looking at the research. Arsenic is actually the worst toxin we’re being exposed to right now and probably even worse than lead and PCBs and DDTs. So I was thinking, “Well, if arsenic is so bad, why isn’t it getting more attention?”

Then I went for myself, “Could it be that arsenic is now more toxic than it used to be?” And I thought, “Well, all these bioflavonoids I’m noticing are leaving the food supply, these other molecules, could that be part of the reason?” So, I had a researcher from last year, one student come to me and say, “Well, I want to work with you, Dr. Pizzorno.” I said, “Fine, here. I want you to go to research to look at do bioflavonoids have an impact on arsenic toxicity. So, it turns out that bioflavonoids are really important for protecting our DNA from arsenic.  So what happens when you have increasing levels of arsenic in the population, which by the way, the data is very clear. Arsenic levels have actually gone up, but you have decreased levels of flavonoids to protect us from the arsenic, so all of a sudden now, you’re seeing arsenic playing a much bigger role in disease than in the past. So, it’s a combination of not only increased exposure to toxins, but decrease in an ability to protect ourselves from those toxins and that’s why we’re getting all this disease.

 



Dr. Weitz:                            I’d like to interrupt this fascinating discussion we’re having for another few minutes to tell you about another really exciting product that has changed my life and the life of my family, especially as it pertains to getting good quality sleep. It’s something called the chiliPAD, C-H-I-L-I-P-A-D. It can be found at the website chilisleep.com, which is C-H-I-L-I-S-L-E-E-P dot com.

So, this product involves a water-cooled mattress pad that goes underneath your sheets and helps you maintain a constant temperature at night. If you’ve ever gotten woken up because temperature has changed, typically gets warmer, this product will maintain your body at a very even temperature, and it tends to promote uninterrupted quality deep and REM sleep, which is super important for healing and for overall health.

If you go to chilisleep.com and you use the affiliate code, Weitz20, that’s my last name, W-E-I-T-Z, 20. You’ll get 20% off a chiliPAD. So, check it out and let’s get back to this discussion.



 

 

Dr. Weitz:                           So, what are some of the most important phytonutrients that help protect us from arsenic?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I’m hesitant to say. Okay, now I’ve got a table which shows the various flavonoids, which ones have left.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, yeah. The one you listed on your slides. You had a beta carotene, something called Bio-Quinone E, ECGC, naringenin, and floratin.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, quite a long list. Okay?

Dr. Weitz:                           Right.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I don’t know what are most important at this point. I think we’re a little early in the research. When I see things like this, as long as there’s balance between get into the details and forgetting the forest for the trees. Okay? So, I’d say, “Well, it’s this particular fibrinoid, okay, well then people say, “Well, I guess I’d better take a vitamin with that.” Well, okay, fine, you can do that, but I’d rather you just get the food that has it in it, and all the other ones because the other ones are important as well.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. Now, where is arsenic found most? We’ve heard reports of arsenic in rice. We know that, I don’t know if they still do, but at one time, they were feeding the chickens, fruits feed that had arsenic in it to help them grow faster.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right, so epidemiologically, the research is strongest with arsenic in the water supply. And there’s just, there’s this huge amounts of data on that area. Now, we also get arsenic from rice because if rice is grown in water that has high levels of arsenic, it will absorb it, just really efficiently absorb it, like beans are really efficient at absorbing cadmium, for example. So, you get it in rice if water supply is contaminated.  Now up until just recently, putting arsenic into the food supply of chickens with a standard of care, because it made the chickens more resistant to parasites, and it made them plump up more and have more white meat. Okay. But as problems with arsenic became more recognized, it now is no longer the standard of care. It doesn’t mean farmers aren’t doing it anymore and it’s not exactly illegal. But up until recently, it’s been a major source. So, primary sources are water, rice and chicken.  But having said that, if you have an old wood climbing toy in your backyard or in your local park, well, those wood preservatives are very high in arsenic. So, a child growing with those things, it’s going to get arsenic contamination. If you’re living near an industry that is leaking arsenic into the environment, well, you’re going to have more arsenic in your body. Okay. But those are the big three, but they’re not the only three, for sure.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. And isn’t it the case that farmers in certain states are allowed to dump toxic waste on their farm as fertilizer and use toxic wastewater to fertilize their farms in some cases?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I don’t know. I would not be surprised, but I haven’t seen that particular research.

Dr. Weitz:                            Okay. So, another phytonutrient, you mentioned in your presentation that I was not familiar with is something called tomatine, which is found in tomatoes.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right. Okay, so I use that as an example, that when you’re looking at the various molecules in the food supply, which ones are being preserved. There was a great study, I pointed out there where they looked at tomatoes grown in a greenhouse where half the tomatoes were grown with chemicals, half are grown organically. Okay, so it was really carefully controlled environment. They then looked over the whole year period of time the level of the carotenoids and flavonoids in these foods. And what they found was that the chemically grown foods tended to maintain enough of those carotenoids and flavonoids to give the foods these characteristic color and a bit of its natural taste. Okay? But all the other ones are lost because they weren’t considered important.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. And tomatine is especially important for prostate.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah, so just that’s one example I gave. So, tomatine important for prostate and there’s research that was done looking at giving people tomatine. For example, cell culture with prostate cancer cells, you put tomatine in there and the cancer cells can’t grow. Just, there’s just so many examples. I’m hesitant to point out single ones like tomatine or quercetin, et cetera. But I can give you a lot of examples where they’re beneficial. But the main thing is it’s all of them, not just one.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. And I think what you’re pointing to is it’s very easy to look at some research to show that lycopene is preventative against prostate cancer, which comes from tomatoes, so I’m just going to take lycopene. And then you’re missing out on the tomatine and other phytonutrients…

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Exactly, exactly.

Dr. Weitz:                            … present in these natural foods like tomatoes. So, while it’s perhaps not a bad idea to top off your dietary regimen with some concentrated levels of some of these phytonutrients, make sure you’re getting plenty of the natural foods like tomatoes in your diet, because that’s going to have a much more powerful effect than any one particular isolated phytonutrients.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Exactly. I’m glad you’re reinforcing that topic. So, let’s say we look at research comparing tomatine to some drug, okay? Well, the drugs are going to be more effective. Maybe the tomatine only helps like 10%, okay? So, we do have issues like that. We isolate out individually factoring, you might say, “Well, yeah, it had some benefit, but not very, very strong and the drug is way better.” But we realize there are hundreds of these things in the food supply. Each adds it’s one or two or 10% benefit., now all together, you have huge benefit without adverse effects. These things are safe. Okay?

Dr. Weitz:                            But it’s very hard to study that, because usually when they study the benefits or effects of foods, they give people food frequency questionnaires, and they’re going to ask them, “How many times have you eaten tomatoes?” Well, they’re probably going to include ketchup in half on their cheeseburger. And then how do you know if the tomatoes they’re eating would most likely are going to be nonorganic, non-heirloom, are probably not going to have the right levels.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      But even, despite that, this is interesting. Despite the weakness of the food supply, it’s still better to eat vegetables than not eat vegetables. But having said that, we’re way better eating vegetables that are rich in nutrients and low in toxins.

Dr. Weitz:                            Now, you’ve mentioned hybrid farming. We’ve been talking about that. I’m not sure everybody knows what hybrid farming is. We’ve all heard about genetically modified crops, and we’re like, “I don’t want GMOs. I don’t want GMOs.” But talk a little more about hybrid farming.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yep. You’ve used the term, “I’m not aware of.” Maybe you better tell me, what is hybrid farming?

Dr. Weitz:                            Well, you mentioned. Hybrid farming is, as I understand it, you can correct me is how where we’re mixing different versions of plants to get the fruits and vegetables to be sweeter, for the tomatoes to look redder and to, you know?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, I thought… I see how you use the term now. It wasn’t clear where you were gone. Okay, okay. Yeah, the intent is basically selection, just not a way of saying selection. Selecting food for specific characteristics and losing everything else.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. And people don’t realize that this has been going on for a long time. And as you’re pointing out, you may be getting a tomato that sweeter, which may not be all that good for us, because it may have a higher sugar content. But we’re also, losing some of the richness of tomatoes that’s grown naturally.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes. And there’s another aspect here, which actually is a little surprising, totally different from these factors we’ve been talking about and that is, when farmers are choosing seeds to grow. They’re also choosing seeds that will grow foods that transport better, that are more resistant to break down on the store shelves or things like this. Something I’ve been quite surprised is when we had to buy a store bought versus something, you put it in refrigerator, it lasts for a week or two, it’s fine. When you grow them your own, you put it in the refrigerator, it will only last a few days. So, the foods that you can grow yourself are much less robust, you might say, in terms of storage. But that means they can use their resources to produce all the other molecules that are really good and aren’t in those store-bought versions.

Dr. Weitz:                            Exactly. Yeah, every once in a while, my wife will go to Costco, and she’ll buy some fruit or vegetable, we usually buy everything we’re getting from the local coop and from Whole Foods and wherever. But, occasionally, she’ll buy some grapes from Costco and she’ll leave them out and they’ll sit there for two weeks and they’re not moldy. And I’m like, “How is that even possible? These things must be, have so many chemicals on them.”

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah, yeah, exactly or they’ve been just so hybridized that they’re really resistant. Well, you’re paying a price for that. And it’s not, the problem is the price we’re paying for this highly hybridized and chemically-grown foods, it’s not obvious what their price is in terms of long-term health effects. But the research is now there. It’s very, very clear.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. I know you don’t want to target these phytonutrients too much, but I want to mention a couple more before we wrap up. I wanted to mention quercetin, which has incredible amount of benefits. And we’ve been hearing a lot about quercetin during this pandemic because among its other benefits, quercetin is a zinc ionophore and it helps get zinc into the cells more as well as helping to protect one tissue. But perhaps you can talk about quercetin for a minute.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, thanks. So, it was actually the quercetin story that really cemented my interest in unimportant molecules. So, I won’t get into the whole line-

Dr. Weitz:                            Or by the way, are we supposed to pronounce it quercetin or quercetin?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I’ve always pronounced it quercetin, but we’re not linguists, that is right about. But that’s what most and the people I know describe it. So, I don’t want to get too long sorry, but just real quickly. A year ago when I was working with another chiropractor, Sam Yanuck and a naturopathic Dr. Fitzgerald and medical doctor, Helen Messier. We were looking at, well, what’s the natural medicine approach to COVID-19. And I was looking at the research and I found this great study that showed that quercetin binds to the spike proteins in the coronavirus to make them more difficult to enter into the body. That’s what really got me to dive deeply into this whole antiviral aspect of these flavonoids.  So, here’s what’s fascinating. I don’t know if you’ve seen or not, but there’s a research colleague of mine by the name Francesco Di Pierro, who has a research lab in Italy, where he has a number of Masters in PhDs working with him looking at the benefits of natural health products. One of the areas he just got accepted for publication was looking at quercetin with four people with COVID-19. He just published two studies, clinical studies. The first study was 152 people with COVID-19, half got quercetin and half got standard of care. Well, all got standard of care, but half also got quercetin. They then looked at hospitalizations. Greater than 50% reduction in hospitalization. And if they got hospitalized, greater than 50% reduction in hospitalization.

Then he had another study just came out, where they actually looked at, took people who had COVID-19 documented. They then measured their viral load and they gave half of them the quercetin. They decrease their viral load 80% faster. So for example, for five days, 80% of the people on the quercetin, their viruses were gone versus only 20% of people who were using the standard of care.  So, we’re seeing now that, and again, these early studies, not fully controlled. There’s potential commercial bias because he’s a scientist, scientific consultant for the company that makes the product, but you have to look at these and be aware of those things. But nonetheless, it’s exactly what we expected. Quercetin protects us from infection, so viral infections like SARS-CoV-2.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah, amazing. Let’s just hit on one more phytonutrient, let’s see. Let’s hit on pomegranate, which is a pretty amazing food that has an amazing, seems to have an amazing amount of benefits for prostate, for all kinds of cardiovascular risks.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So, the other area of fascination with foods like pomegranate that are so high in these various carotenoids and flavonoids, particularly the flavonoids, is their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects. So, as you know, much of the damage from these viral infections, like in SARS-CoV-2, for example, is the ongoing inflammation in the microvasculature. It looks like a lot of these kind of these long hollers because of the inflammation in microvasculature. Well, what protects the microvasculature from inflammation? Carotenoids and flavonoids. So, a lot of these things like pomegranate juice or really high in these molecules that protect the body from these infections.  I’m actually right now working on developing a formula, an antiviral formula. And as I’m considering, “Well, should I be putting in some flavonoids that aren’t so antiviral, but really anti-inflammatory?” So, it’s important.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah, when lab test that may be an indicator of some of this microvascular inflammation is myeloperoxidase and pomegranate is an interesting modulator of that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Now, you said something interesting I’m not aware of. So, you’re saying myeloperoxidase is a good measure of microvasculature inflammation?

Dr. Weitz:                            I think it’s an indicator particularly of it. Unfortunately, we haven’t really studied the microvascular response. We pretty much focused on the large vessels. I mean, that’s where all the research is. But there are a percentage of people, especially women, who end up having heart attacks that are at least partially related to the microvasculature and very little is done to try to look at or measure that. Stenting is all focused on large vessels and the way we image things is all generally based on that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      That’s an interesting suggestion. I’m going to look into that because, so we do know that the inflammation of microvasculature is a big issue with the long haul. If we have a good measure like myeloperoxidase is an indicator of that inflammation of small vessels, that’d be really helpful. I’m going to look into that. Thanks. Thanks for the suggestion.

Dr. Weitz:                            Do you think the clotting and inflammation in the microvasculature is a big, is one of the big factors in the long haul of symptoms?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Absolutely, that’s very, very clear. Scripts came out with a study about a month ago and I think, they dove into it pretty well. I think they may have a very convincing case.

Dr. Weitz:                            Great, excellent. This has been a fascinating discussion. Dr. Pizzorno, thank you so much for your time.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Thanks for the invitation.

Dr. Weitz:                            For listeners and viewers who want to find out about your books and whatever other programs you offer, where should they go to get more information?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, what I offer these days are mainly the books that I write. So, just go to Amazon, put my name in, and my books will come up. So, if you’re interested Environmental Medicine, for example, I’ve got a consumer book called The Toxin Solution and for doctors, I co-authored a book called Clinical Environmental Medicine, where we show doctors how toxic cause disease, how you diagnose them, how you get them out of the body. It’s very comprehensive. And those who want to apply this body of knowledge to all healthcare problems, my Textbook of Natural Medicine. That was first published in 1985.

Dr. Weitz:                            It’s-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      We’re now in our Fifth Edition. It’s sold 100,000 copies.

Dr. Weitz:                            [crosstalk 00:56:21].

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Thank you.

Dr. Weitz:                            [crosstalk 00:56:22] should have a copy of that book.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, it sold 100,000 copies in four languages, so it’s helped establish a scientific foundation for these whole fields of Naturopathic and Chiropractic and Integrative and Functional Medicine. It showed the research. The research is there, folks. This way of thinking about health. It’s very valid and it’s been substantiated.

Dr. Weitz:                            On behalf of the Functional Medicine community, Dr. Pizzorno, thank you so much for your lifetime of achievements and contribution to the field.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, thank you.

 


Dr. Weitz:                            Thank you listeners for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness podcast. Please take… I’d also like to let everybody know that I now have a few openings for new clients for nutritional consultations. If you’re interested, please call my office in Santa Monica at 310-395-3111. That’s 310-395-3111, and take one of the few openings we have now for an individual consultation for nutrition with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you, and see you next week.

 

 

Dr. Joseph Antoun speaks about Longevity and the Fasting Mimicking Diet with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

5:35  There are five things you can do to prevent chronic diseases and keep your body younger:  1. Nutrition and diet, 2. Exercise, 3. Stress, 4. Sleep, 5. Happiness and receiving and giving love. 

7:13  There are pro-aging pathways in a cell, including the PKA, the RAS, and the TOR pathways.  If you trigger those pathways, it sends a pro-growth signal which is a pro-aging signal. These three pathways are triggered by protein intake and carbs and are inhibited by exercise and caloric restriction.  Patients with acromegaly have very high growth hormone levels and they tend to die much younger.  You also see bodybuilders and wrestlers who inject growth hormone and steroids tend to die in their 50s, 60s, and their 70s. 

9:37  Is promoting growth good or bad for aging and longevity?  When we get older, we tend to get weaker, our bones tend to get thinner, we tend to lose brain cells, and we get frail. Our thymus gland tends to shrink and our immune system gets weaker.  We tend to get pathological fractures. Breaking a hip dramatically increases your mortality.  This is why the anti-aging movement was mostly about giving hormone replacement therapy, growth hormone, and other interventions designed to keep people from getting weak and frail as they age.  Whereas now the focus in the longevity movement is on reducing calories, fasting, and reducing growth, including reducing IGF1 levels by consuming less animal protein.  On the other hand, Dr. Longo believes that at age 75 you should make sure that you get a good level of protein because increasing IGF1 at that age is important for longevity to maintain strength and mobility.  When you are in your 50s you are at the pre-chronic disease onset age with significant risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer and fasting or the Fasting mimicking diet can have great value in reducing these risks, whereas it does not make much sense to fast someone who’s 16 and is growing fast or someone who is 82, who really needs more nutrition.  

17:09  The Longevity Diet was developed by Dr. Valter Longo. It’s based on the science and they also studied centenarians to see what they have in common. It is a pescatarian diet that is mainly plant based but includes fish a few times per week and some red meat from time to time.  People who live the longest do not eat red meat every day, but they are also not vegetarian. Keto is also not the best diet. While Dr. Antoun and Dr. Longo believe in precision medicine and that each person’s diet should be unique, those who live the longest are somewhere between pescatarian, flexitarian, and Mediterranean.

24:57  Dr. Antoun says that having more muscle in your 40s and 50s does not promote longevity and bodybuilders tend not to live as long. Most of the people who live to 100 and beyond did not have large muscles or six pack abs at age 55.  While eating low carb should be recommended for diabetics, for most people, eating a plant based diet with complex carbs and moderate protein, such as .7 or .8 gms of protein per pound of bodyweight is best for longevity.  But today many in the fitness world are eating too much protein and drinking protein shakes and this is not necessary and Dr. Antoun argues that cancer rates are increasing and he claims that cancer is driven mainly by protein intake.

32:38  Fasting.  Fasting should not be equated with caloric restriction because they are very different.  If you restrict your calories, your body will adjust and make some changes but not drastically.  If you fast, esp. for more than a few days, your body is in a crisis mode and your cells will start eating debris and organelles, which is called autophagy. After a few days, you also stimulate stem cells to replace older cells, which is a regenerative phase, which goes beyond autophagy.

41:14  Fasting.  We should all go 12-14 hours per day without eating, which should be called time restricted eating, but most of us are constantly eating and snacking and this is not good for longevity.  Dr. Antoun recommends the Fasting Mimicking Diet which mimics fasting while eating a lower calorie, lower protein and lower carbohydrate diet contained in a kit called Prolon.  This program, developed by Dr. Valter Longo at USC stimulates your cells to rejuvenate over a five day period.

 



Dr. Joseph Antoun is the CEO and Chairman of the Board of L-Nutra, which is the company founded by Dr. Valter Longo that  developed the Prolon kit that is utilized in the Fasting mimicking Diet.  Dr. Antoun is an MD who studied Public Policy at Harvard, Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, and has a masters in Medical and Biological Sciences from Saint Joseph University. The Longevity Diet from Valter Longo is available from Barnes and Noble. 

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talked to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest and cutting-edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website drwhite.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.

Hello, Rational Wellness Podcasters. My topic for today is longevity with Dr. Joseph Antoun. Among the topics, we’re speaking about the benefits of caloric restriction, fasting, and the Fasting Mimicking Diet. There has been a lot of ongoing research on potential benefits of caloric restriction and fasting to promote longevity and to reduce the chronic disease burden, but what if there is a way to get the benefits of caloric restriction without having to starve yourself and without the stress associated with the difficulty of not eating for days on end? Dr. Valter Longo worked in the lab of Dr. Roy Walford who pioneered the concept of caloric restriction to promote longevity and even took part living in the Biosphere 2 for two years during which he lost considerable weight and when he came out, looked particularly unhealthy. And Dr. Walford basically lived the life of caloric restriction. Unfortunately, despite much promising research in animals, Dr. Walford died at age 79 from ALS. And then, he speculate that his early demise may be linked to a combination of stress and prolonged caloric restriction.

Dr. Longo continued researching longevity at USC, and he wanted to find a way to get the benefits of fasting and caloric restriction without the downside and make it less painful and inconvenient. Dr. Longo developed the Fasting Mimicking Diet, which involves consuming the ProLon kit for five days, which is being sold and marketed through a private company L-Nutra, which Dr. Joseph Antoun is the CEO and Chairman of the Board. This program involves eating the contents of the ProLon kit for five days, and this is essentially a vegetarian low-protein, low-calorie program.  

Dr. Antoun studied Public Policy at Harvard, Public Health at Johns Hopkins. He has a Masters in Medical and Biological Sciences from St. Joseph University as well as an MD degree. Dr. Antoun, thank you so much for joining us today.

Dr. Antoun:        Thanks for having me, Ben. I look forward for a healthy discussion.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. We need to know the keys and we need to know them now. So, Dr. Antoun, before we get into diet and some of the things that we can do to promote longevity, what do you think are some of the most important mechanisms or processes underlying the aging process that we need to address if we want to live longer and live better? That is, if we want to not just extend chronological life but have better biological age.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. Thanks for this question and I think it’s pretty important to understand the difference between chronological and biological aging, and the easy example for the audience is the car. I always give the example of our cars. You may have a 2017, whatever, Mercedes, but if it has been driven only for 100,000 miles versus a 2019 that has been driven for 300,000 miles. And actually, the one that’s younger, the 2019, is more exposed to having issues because it was driven for 300,000 miles. And this is what we need to do for our body is how do we keep our body healthy from the inside and our biological age younger than our chronological age.  Experts talk about five things you can do to help your body stay healthy longer and, obviously, this is five natural things. And science and medicine and research are looking at potential pharmaceutical or nutraceutical intervention to bias biological aging, but I think five things that we can do, I’ll give you five tips that we could do naturally to-

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, how about before we get to that, what are the mechanisms? The biological factors? People talk about a whole series of different things that we should be focused on. How do we prevent or delay the onset of chronic diseases?  How do we prevent sarcopenia and osteoporosis?  How do we prevent neuronal degeneration, the importance of insulin sensitivity, inflammation, oxidation, glycation, DNA damage?  What are some of the most important things that we should focus on before we get to the interventions?

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. There are five things, five common factors that I think would help. All the things you mentioned are symptoms of aging, right?

Dr. Weitz:           I’m trying to get to, I want to know what the underlying mechanisms are.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. All the health conditions you mentioned are symptoms of aging and in order to keep the body younger, this is how you get the onset of all these age-related health conditions. This is how you postpone their onset, and there are five things you can do. Number one is we’re going to talk a lot about nutrition and diet today. What kind and how and timing of eating and all of that. Exercise definitely is very well known to be a slower or slower of the pace of aging. And then number three is stress.  Decreasing stress and having that serene and happy inside. NIH is sponsoring studies on yoga today.  We also know that people who are observing religiously tend to live a little bit healthier and longer.  Actually, there are some documentations that are on that, so stress and serenity is an important factor. Sleep is emerging as a very important factor that now, not even on just as a prevention but also in the short term people with sleep apnea is others were seeing eminent direct cardiovascular and other consequences and actually event linked to the brain.  And then, number five, very important actually, could be actually the second most important, is happiness and receiving and giving love.  And what we call under social capital.  So, people who are close to their families, they feel loved and they spend time with others, and these moments of human to human interaction seemed to be also very beneficial for longevity.  So, nutrition, exercise, stress, sleep, and social capital.

Dr. Weitz:          So let me ask the question another way.

Dr. Antoun:        Okay.

Dr. Weitz:          What are the most important physiological processes that makes you age faster than me, say? I’m not saying you’re aging faster than me, but… yeah.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. You mean within the body biologically?

Dr. Weitz:          Yeah.

Dr. Antoun:        Oh, okay. If you’re talking about the perception of a cell, there are pathways in a cell that we call the pro-aging pathways.

Dr. Weitz:           Okay.

Dr. Antoun:        If you accelerate those, if you trigger those, so the PKA, the RAS, the TOR pathways, if you actually trigger those pathways, it sends a growth signal to the cell. And when the cell, we are born in a day and the faster we go, we go towards our end, we don’t go somewhere else. And the more you trigger a pro-aging signal to cells, the pro growth signals are actually related to pro-aging signals of the cell. And so, these three pathway cells are triggered by nutrition proteins and carbs that are also inhibited by exercise and caloric restriction. Our pathways that tell the cell, “Hey, you feel free to grow,” and when the cell grows it’s biologically aging is the same routes, common routes of growth and aging.  One good example there is the overstimulation of growth is either people are born with acromegaly. They have a very high growth hormone in their body and the pituitary gland is producing the stimulus. And they actually tend to be giants but actually they die younger, so that’s an overstimulation. A more personal intervention is our bodybuilders that inject themselves with growth hormone or you’d say high level of proteins, it over triggers the TOR pathway, which tells the cells to age faster.  And this is how we Ronny Coleman, for example, and was at his high level in the 40 suddenly  and unfortunately, we lost him. In many of the big wrestlers or bodybuilders, you see them passing away at ages of 60s and 50s and 70s. Their inside from their biological clock is probably 10 to 15 years older.

Dr. Weitz:            Well, I think this is one of the main controversies in aging is when I first studied to focus on longevity and anti-aging maybe 20 years ago, the big focus was on promoting growth that when people get older, they get frail, they get weak, their bones get thinner, their muscles get thinner. There’s people who can’t get out of bed because they’re simply too weak. They have sarcopenia. People get these pathological fractures. When you break a hip, your mortality increases dramatically. You’re much more likely to die. And the importance of maintaining a level of growth and regeneration, as you get older, your brain cells tend to break down and not get replaced this quickly. Your thymus gland tends to shrink and your immune system is weaker.  There was a big focus in the beginnings of the longevity, anti-aging movement on giving hormone replacement therapy, giving growth hormone, doing various interventions that keep people from getting weak and frail as they get older.  And now, the focus is on… So it was all about giving people more, yet so… Now, it’s all about taking things away, about reducing, about trying to reduce aging, about reducing IGF-1, about making sure… taking away, reducing calories, fasting, and I wonder if that has-

Dr. Antoun:        It’s not-

Dr. Weitz:            … become sort of a balance there because we need to maintain strength and structural integrity, and we look at a 25-year-old as the marker of great health, and they’ve got all these growth factors going on.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. This is actually a really critical question, and science is lacking in the answer. So, everything you said, actually, is right on both sides. It’s about also timing. And we see this ourselves that one of the papers that was found there published, Dr. Longo. Again, Time Magazine nominated him among the top 50 most influential people in health for his work, but he discovered that, and there are other papers coming out, about IGF as stimulating the muscle and stimulating growth hormone is actually the value of the reader’s defer in life, right?  So like you said, if you’re 75 and your muscle at that age, especially if you’re frail, is an organ of longevity. You want to maintain the muscle and you might need to feed more meat actually, and there’s more absorption at that age.  Mobility is so important for so many factors.  And in that time, feeding a good level of protein and increasing IGF is actually important for longevity.

Now, if you’re 50 or 55, you’re at that pre-chronic disease onset age. You have a good risk of cancer coming up from your genetics. If you have other risk of cardiovascular, and this is where at that age your muscle is probably not the most important longevity factor but actually your risk of cancer, your risk of cardiovascular. And this is where, at that age, you might want to have a different level of IGF in your body and different level of nutrition and proteins.

So, we’ve studied actually at L-Nutra and the USC, University of Southern California, as the main university that our research comes from.  They’re looking in, as they have the longevity institute in the world, and they’re looking at different phases of life, examining each organ at different phases of life.  When you fast, somebody who is 16 and is growing fast.  When you fast somebody who’s 82 and needs actually nutrition, but there’s a great value of fasting somebody with certain health condition, which we’re looking into but also for longevity purposes at mid-age when you are pre-health condition and you want to create that gains you extra years of biological age before you see the onset of those.  I don’t want to disclose things that we haven’t published yet, but even the value of IGF and insulin in the blood versus longevity is not linear.  It’s not flat.  It’s actually a U-shape curve, and there’s going to be different value for different… But the wave of, like you said, from a commercial perspective, there was a big wave of growth hormone injection for aging.  And we got to be careful because on the short-term you look a little better, that’s the growth stimulus you give but not necessarily on a long-term, and hormone replacement therapy again has a lot of great benefits especially around the menopause age, where… And again, everything is depending on age and balance, right?  Is that person has more cardiovascular risk or is the bone fracture risk higher in nutrition precision medicine and precision lifestyle is the future because, again, different age, different body, different risk, and the body has always been a balance.  Thinking about one diet is right, one diet is wrong or thinking about we should inject this or that is definitely a wrong statement from the beginning.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. We are definitely in accordance with the precision personalized medicine approach.

 



Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. I’ve really been enjoying this discussion, but I’d like to take a minute to tell you about a new product that I’m very excited about. I’d like to tell you about a new wearable called the Apollo. This is a device that can be worn on the wrist or the ankle, and it uses vibrations to stimulate your parasympathetic nervous system. This device has amazing benefits in terms of getting you out of that stressed out sympathetic nervous system and stimulating the parasympathetic nervous system. It has a number of different functions, especially helping you to relax, to focus, to concentrate, get into a deeper meditative state, even to help you sleep, and there’s even a mode to help you wake up. This all occurs through the scientific use of subtle vibrations.

                                For those of you who might be interested in getting the Apollo for yourself to help you reset your nervous system, go to apolloneuro.com and use the affiliate code, Weitz10. That’s my last name, WEITZ10. Now, back to the discussion.

 



 

Dr. Weitz:            So, let’s get into diet, what do we know about what’s the healthiest diet to promote longevity?

Dr. Antoun:        So, I don’t know if you’ve seen The Longevity Diet book, which Valter Longo promoted. It’s two-and-a-half year old now, but it still has the older foundations in the big discoveries, and we try to look at this topic from different angle. The angle of human evolution and what have we because our body at the end of the day has been sculptured by its interaction with nature. And we’re going to talk more about what that interaction led to. We’ll look at that topic also from a lab perspective and science perspective. If anything about L-Nutra, where our company is, where we start with science and trials before we start talking. And that’s important I think to give the right respect for nutrition, and we think nutrition is important as medicine, so we got to put the right science behind it. So we’ll go back to labs and we do trials and to prove what we’re thinking about.

Then, we look at people living long today. We studied the centenarians, people living 100 and beyond. What do they have in common? And how do they eat? And then, we come up and we look at system biology and we study the body and then from a multi-angle and we come up with the recommendations. But what makes sense and what this could talk about is that humans lived around rivers for the longest period. The river had the water that we can drink, and there was grass and trees and green and fruits and vegetables and things to eat, which you cannot find on the shores of an ocean, and definitely when you live in a desert or on the top of mountains.  So, around rivers, the diet was mainly plant-based and fish is one of the few animals that cannot run or fly or see easily, so it was easy to fish. And so, pescatarian diet where it’s mainly plant-based and has fish a few times a week and we can go more into details. The sequence of amino acid in fish and the combination of the omegas that you eat with fish are also very healthy, but this is explaining downstream. I’m just talking the evolution and how [crosstalk 00:19:13]-

Dr. Weitz:            So, I just want to push back on the evolutionary concept. I think if we really look at evolution, we’ll see that depending upon where human beings developed, diet was drastically different. Dr. Longo mentioned this, but if you were a Greenland Eskimo, you ate a lot of seal meat and whale blubber because that’s what you had to give you calories. If you were an IKung Bushman, you ate a lot of mongo mongo nuts. Within some other part of the planet, you might have eaten a lot of cows and drinking their blood-

Dr. Antoun:        The reason we had to develop ways to domesticate animals and develop cows, but what everyone… what every human you mentioned from Alaska all the way to let’s say South Africa, we had to live next to fresh water. There was no way to survive without fresh water. Let’s agree… let’s start at there, right?

Dr. Weitz:           Okay.

Dr. Antoun:        So, you might have in Alaska, you had more reserve. You had to reserve some of the things you find and you had to live with more carnivore than herbivore for these extraneous circumstances.

Dr. Weitz:           They didn’t have a lot of vegetables and fruits.

Dr. Antoun:        Exactly, exactly.

Dr. Weitz:           They certainly didn’t have grains or beans.

Dr. Antoun:        I agree but this is why first, we’re going to the mainstream evolution but also we’re taking evolution as just one out of the five pillars. We go back and test. We look at centenarians. I can guarantee you that the centenarians living 100 and beyond, most of them are not sitting and eating red meat every day. And I can guarantee you that they’re just don’t sit and eat vegetables and they’re fully vegetarian every day. They are somewhere between the pescatarian and the flexitarian eating meats because also humanity had discovered how to hunt and that happened long time ago, so we evolved also with that. So anywhere between seafood being the main source of animal protein and plus or minus definitely flexitarian/Mediterranean adding some red meat from time to time seems to be, again, you’re asking me a generalist question, and we started the discussion by saying there’s no generalist question.

Precision medicine and precision nutrition, I think, is going to be. But if you ask me today, I can tell you probably if you eat meat every day, you’re not going to live the longest. If you can just eat vegetable every day, you’re not going to live the longest. If you’re going to do keto every day, you’re not going to live the longest. Now, you’re going to live the longest circulating in between a pescatarian, flexitarian, Mediterranean. I would put my money on that person rather than others.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. So, let’s just put it out there that the longevity diet is generally a lower animal protein diet, right?  Increased protein intake is associated with increased IGF1 levels, which is bad for longevity, right?

Dr. Antoun:        But again, at certain age, so I would say yes if you’re, say, 30 to 55. If you’re 65, 70, Valter has published many times that at that level, like you said, muscle becomes an important organ for growth versus others. And this is where you have malabsorption, et cetera, so after age 65, the recommendation is you can go back and increase your animal source of protein intake.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. I guess my response to that would be if you want to have a strong body when you’re 70, your best bet is not to lose muscle in your 50s so you don’t suddenly have to build muscle in your 70s.  So, that would be why I would be hesitant to want to follow a lower protein diet.  And the other problem with a lower protein diet is we only have three macronutrients, fats, carbs, and proteins.  And if we reduce protein, then we’re left with carbs and fats.  And the problem with the longevity diet, as I see it, is that it ends up being a high-carb diet and it’s hard for me to see how you… In a lot of people, they’re going to have trouble, in my opinion, from my experience, in maintaining insulin sensitivity and stable, lower glucose levels.  I looked through the longevity diet two-week meal plan and almost every morning, there was either toast or a bagel or bread or cereal in the morning, there was often pasta or rice or a pizza at night for dinner, sometimes there was a snack that included some healthy version of a chocolate bar, and so from what I’ve seen is if I ate that way, and I ate that way at one time, I couldn’t maintain stable glucose/insulin levels. And by upping the protein and reducing those complex carbs, for me and a lot of my patients, we find that a better way to maintain higher levels of insulin sensitivity, which leads to lower insulin and glucose levels.

Dr. Antoun:        A great question. We get this question asked a lot, right?

Dr. Weitz:          I’m sure, I’m sure.

Dr. Antoun:        Because we live in a craze of I should eat low carb, right? I mean, the craze went so far that I should eat almost no carb and be on keto every day.

Dr. Weitz:           Those on the carnivore diet eat only meat.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. Meat or fat, right? It’s either meat or fat, and this is carnivore or full-blown keto. First of all, what you’re saying is a reaction to what the market is saying, address everything you said, but the science doesn’t prove anything of what you’re saying. There’s no science saying that actually the buff guys that, like you’re saying, at your age have a lot of muscle and even see as you mentioned Roy Walford who passed away, unfortunately, at a younger age and he was big buff at 70. So, most of people who live 100 and beyond, since we’re talking longevity, did not have six packs at age 55 or big muscle and plus, I can show you many trials showing that. But this is great question because we live in multiple lies in nutrition.  The FDA has done a great job regulating drug but has still some progress to do on food because food was for dieting. It was for lose weight, et cetera. They have not enforced heavy science so that people really know the truth rather than live in different waves of whatever the trend is. Let’s right books and publish them, make a little bit of vlogs and make buzz and generate some personal revenues. This is, unfortunately, what’s happening in nutrition, and hardcore science lack… And the most important input in our life which is nutrition.  So, you’re right, it makes much more sense, say, let me eat protein and let me drop my carb. The biggest disease around the world today is diabetes. We’re all concerned with that, right? And you mentioned the word patients and yet the patient with diabetes should eat low carb for sure.

Dr. Weitz:            And obesity. What do people overeat?  People do not eat more chicken. They rarely overeat chicken.

Dr. Antoun:        Exactly. The overeating is the problem. Let me go back to your question and address every part of it. The first part of it you’re talking about the protein levels and about Mediterranean and about the longevity diet being a low protein. The longevity diet is a lower protein. What we’re eating today, we’re over eating protein.  Go to the WHO recommendation.  Go to every longevity.  You should be at 0.7, 0.8.  We’re not saying go 0.4 or 0.5, but the marketing in the nutrition world has been so intensive.  They took advantage of the carb craze, is that you should eat protein. And now, every bodybuilder, everyone going to the gym, or many people going to the gym were drinking the powders every day, were eating meat every day and trying to keep the proteins high.  And the marginal increase in muscle by being over protein, you stated, is very, very low.  So, what’s actually pushing aging so big with being in a high-protein setting versus… And when you push aging, you push risk of cancer, and the question that I would ask everyone is, “Hey, diabetes is increasing.” And because of the high concentration of glucose, we’ll talk about that, but cancer is increasing. Cancer is driven mainly also by protein. So, nobody tells you the other truth, which is cancer has increased tremendously but will tell you, “Oh, we have better diagnosis.” I mean, people were dying before of cancer as well and yet, we don’t have the sophisticated imaging but in the last 20 years we have those, we’re not in the ’80s now to say that. We have imaging. So cancer have increased tremendously but as being over proteinated, we have to watch for that.

The second thing is you’re saying a big part of the longevity diet is carb. It’s complex carb though. And this is why when we talk about the pasta and sugars, diet doesn’t assume that you’re going and eating dessert with it. It just tells you this is what your body needs to operate in a healthy way, which is actually the truth. Look at the evolution. We ate fruits, vegetables, grains, et cetera for years and years. These were the only things available for humanity.

Dr. Weitz:           There were not a lot of grains available.

Dr. Antoun:        Not a lot of grains initially, yes. But the fruits and vegetables that was the main source of… So, complex carbs is what we talked about, not refined carbs. And the body, by the way, truth for everyone to think about, the body works on carb. There’s no… every cell…ATP production.  have actually realized [inaudible 00:29:42] now you tell me my patient is pre-diabetic. Unfortunately, we live in a sick world where most people are overweight. You’re starting with a condition and now on the short term, obviously, you take the low carb and you help them go back to normal. But once they’re normal, the longevity diet assumes you’re a healthy person trying to live longer, does not assume you’re a patient, does not assume you’re an athlete who wants to grow muscle. But in these conditions, it’s important to realize that our body lives on carb and you got to eat a good amount of complex carb.

Dr. Weitz:           And by the way, I saw at least one study in Diabetes Care in 2010 that linked lower IGF-1 levels and increased risk of diabetes. [Association Between Serum IGF-1 and Diabetes Among U.S. Adults]  

Dr. Antoun:        Well, was that randomized or observational? Because it could be low. They’re eating high carb for a while. It doesn’t make sense to be eating less and dropping IGF and developing diabetes, so I would like to see it if you want to send it to me, but it could be observational, not randomized control.

Dr. Weitz:          Yeah.

Dr. Antoun:        So but there are probably, if you do meta-analysis there, many, many trials to show you that high IGF-1 linked with both diabetes and cancer. And high insulin, obviously, is linked to both as well. And it makes sense. Dr. Ben, we got to go with what make sense for us as doctors. You eat, you fill this body. This body has to get the growth.

Dr. Weitz:           Right.

Dr. Antoun:        The growth push. You grow a cell. A cell does a mistake in the application becomes cancerous. You grow forward, you increase insulin resistance, you increase aging. So, there might be satellite studies, observation, or some biases here and there, but I think to certain extent, we got the science today as trending in the same direction. But it’s important for people to… Because we live in a craze of carbs, we live in a craze of Atkins then and the protein, now we’re living the craze of keto, and these are craze because they don’t make sense from a longevity standpoint now. If you have a neurological condition you are diabetic kid, you should go on a low fat, low carb on a short-term, God bless, but good fats, low plant-based protein, not animal sources, and low carb would match as your obesity or diabetes control plus longevity. This is what we are, this is what we preach, this is what we study.

Dr. Weitz:           Okay. Let’s talk about the importance of exercise for promoting longevity.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. I mean, this is and we’ll talk about fasting as well. There’s a lot of concept that I would love to clear from science coming in here.

Dr. Weitz:           Let’s go to fasting. Go ahead. Let’s talk about fasting.

Dr. Antoun:        Probably that would be a little bit more because it’s more relevant to clear for people’s concept because every day you hear a new idea in that field, and I want to make sure people listen to what the science says and hear. 

Dr. Weitz:           Yeah. I interviewed a doctor who puts patients on a 30-day fasting in a medically supervised setting and claims to get incredible benefits from it.

Dr. Antoun:        You would, if you have autoimmune disease you would, but what the other damages would be that’s different topic. And this is-

Dr. Weitz:           [crosstalk 00:33:16].

Dr. Antoun:        When I told you the way we look at things, one of the ways we look at things is just to embrace it. Again, it’s like also some of the diets where you get super low on carb but you’re doing other damages, and it’s all about balance and the best intervention is timely and gives you the most benefit with the least side effects. 

Dr. Weitz:           So what are the benefits of fasting?

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. And you equated almost calorie restriction with fasting, and they’re very different actually.

Dr. Weitz:           Okay.

Dr. Antoun:        I mean, obviously, fasting induces calorie restriction but the way fasting works is a little bit different than calorie restriction, and I’ll give you these examples.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Antoun:        So, say, you’re the CEO of a company and you need a million dollar a month to operate and if I come and then tell you, “Look, I’m not going to give you a million. I’m going to give you 900K.” So, your bank account stops dropping. You’re losing 100K, so you’re fat, I’m equating… I’m going to compare your low-calorie diet with fasting and your body like your company. So your fat starts decreasing because you have 900 out of a million, and this is how most diets work historically. But you can cope with it, you have almost everything you need. You lose some adjustments on the way you manage your corporation and you probably decrease some of your investments or expenditures and you cope with it.

In fasting, it’s different. Fasting is, in a company, I say, “You need a million, I give you nothing.” And as you can imagine, your bank account will drop super fast, but you’re not going to sit and wait for it and cope with it. You’re in a big stress, and the word stress is very critical with fasting. That stress is going to make you as CEO go and restructure the company. You change structure, you let some people go, you change some of the titles, you merge some departments. And in function as well, you got to stop some of the not-so-essential investments and costs, but you’re going to take structure and function actually.  And this is what we see with fasting. The stress is so high on the body that there’s a pressure on… The body tells the cell, “Hey, I have enough.” A little bit of reserve in the fat and some of it is in glycogen in the muscle, and we do have fat cells. We do have some reserve but it’s a crisis.” After a couple of days, this tells the body cannot nourish them any longer and then ask the cells to start eating the debris and organelles inside and try to fix some of the structure and function, and this is what’s called autophagy, and it won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2016.

We do believe that after… So again, going in the first two days you can live off your fat, then you ask the cell to eat whatever is inside. What after? In Valter’s research, at least in mice, it’s showing that there’s some level of preservation, meaning now you tell the stem cells that are younger to replace older cells. That’s going from rejuvenation to reservation, which we showed in fasting in mice, meaning you are the CEO, you change the structure, change the function and then now you have to let some people go and maybe you let the expensive salary, the ones in the body, the cells that are a little bit older. They consume calories. They’re not producing at their best, their job and you push a little bit the younger cells who are more cost-effective in the way they spend their calories to promote those.  So this is why fasting, if you want, is now a big wave. It didn’t come as a… It worked only through low-calorie restriction. We have low-calorie diet. We don’t need to go and starve to achieve that goal. So, what people are trying to do with fasting, they’re trying to obtain certain level of autophagia at the cellular level, which hopefully biologically, it’s like taking your car to the mechanic and trying to a little bit fix your things and work with on them-

Dr. Weitz:           Specifically, autophagy is when the body is consuming old bits of protein and damaged cells and it’s a regenerative process, right?

Dr. Antoun:        The definition of autophagy is self-eat. Auto and phagia, self-eat.  So the cell starts eating the inside because it doesn’t have enough calories from the outside.  That’s the rejuvenation side.  Now, there’s a post-autophagia stress, if the stress goes longer now the body starts trying to get rid of certain old cells because this is carrying dead weight that cannot feed or finance and pushes the younger cells to rejuvenate. That’s not part of autophagia. That’s a regenerative phase, which is the advanced phase of fasting we’ll see in-

Dr. Weitz:           So what phase? The…

Dr. Antoun:        The regenerative one. So, you have fast weight loss first two days, rejuvenation with autophagy, regeneration with younger cells being promoted to replace older cells, which again we have seen in some, after research in mice. And that, if you want very fast weight loss. And there’s something very important with the weight loss with fasting is muscle is protected, so as the stress, again remember fasting is calorie and stress component. With stress, you have a high stress hormone so you have a good muscle tone, and there’s some rejuvenation at the muscle. So in fasting, unless though you go for longer period, everything will be depleted. But on the short period, the muscle is more maintained with fasting versus other diets. So, you lose fat, it’s selective fat loss, which is important especially for many people mid-aged women who are after menopause. So, you get all the metabolic benefits the way it relates metabolic benefit, and you start working on the cells.  And this is where you started to see now this therapeutic fasting emerging as when you put the body under stress, now the body is in fixing mode, is in coping, is not as stressed, and want to look after what’s going on and fix it. You start seeing these articles emerging on fasting for health conditions, and this is why fasting has been different from any other diets.

 



Dr. Weitz:                            I’d like to interrupt this fascinating discussion we’re having for another few minutes to tell you about another really exciting product that has changed my life and the life of my family, especially as it pertains to getting good quality sleep. It’s something called the chiliPAD, C-H-I-L-I-P-A-D. It can be found at the website chilisleep.com, which is C-H-I-L-I-S-L-E-E-P dot com.

So, this product involves a water-cooled mattress pad that goes underneath your sheets and helps you maintain a constant temperature at night. If you’ve ever gotten woken up because temperature has changed, typically gets warmer, this product will maintain your body at a very even temperature, and it tends to promote uninterrupted quality deep and REM sleep, which is super important for healing and for overall health.

If you go to chilisleep.com and you use the affiliate code, Weitz20, that’s my last name, W-E-I-T-Z, 20. You’ll get 20% off a chiliPAD. So, check it out and let’s get back to this discussion.



 

Dr. Weitz:           So do you recommend fasting?

Dr. Antoun:        Again, there’s right fast and there’s dangerous fast. So, I’ll tell you what I recommend with fasting. I think for healthy individuals, doing 12 to 14 hours a day of fasting is important. We call it today fancy as fasting. It is how people should eat. We’re overeating today. That’s the problem, and we call fasting if you stay 12 to 14 hours. But the Nobel Prize in Medicine, people don’t talk about in 2017, was about the biological clock of the organs. And we have program with the sun as well and 12 hours of sleep is what our ancestors used to have or 10 to 12, whatever. The sun was down. There was no electricity. Our organs also track the daylight, cycle of the circadian rhythm. But also, it’s like, I go back to the bank account example, and if you keep putting money in, it will grow. So, if you keep eating all the time versus allowing some time to spend that money.  So we believe the 12, max 14 hours, is the healthy way of time restricted eating and is how we, human, should eat. We call it, in a fancy way, fasting today, but it’s something I would recommend, again, for healthy people [crosstalk 00:42:36]-

Dr. Weitz:           So, what you’re saying is this, I think the term that these people typically use is intermittent fasting. That’s really time-restricted eating and that’s what we should call it.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. I mean, a fasting goes from several hours to two days, by the book definition, intermittent fasting. And after two days, you call it periodic fasting. So time-restricted eating is the time within one day how many hours you restrict your food intake. And so, periodic eating and time-restricted eating is a portion of intermittent fasting. Intermittent fasting goes a little bit one day up to two days before you start calling it a period-of-time or periodic fasting.

Dr. Weitz:           Okay. So, you recommend eating within a 12- or a 10-hour window?

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. And then, in most people today doing intermittent fasting and going up to 16 or 18 hours and, again, there are some going beyond that. And this is where we go back to, is it good for who and what? Because you go back… Now, you’re reducing a longer stress, right? So it comes that you lose more weight, unless you binge eat after, you lose more weight the longer you stay. At the same time, you’re stressing your organs that need to eat, right? So your heart pumps every second or whatever. I don’t know the exact milliseconds or seconds. Your brain has to function in the morning because the muscle is active and you need to feed these organs.  And the body doesn’t have a magic switch where, oh no, you turn it to ketones. It’s a process. Every organ has to go through the stress and then you switch to ketones and then the body has to… And by the way, that happens probably 15 to 16 hours after fasting. Nobody has that exact number. We have tested that and we start seeing ketones after 15 hours in the blood. So, it’s not a magic after 10 hours, the brain needs ketones, calls for it and it’s there, so there’s a stress that goes there. We don’t know how healthy it is for a normal individual to go 16 or 18 hours from a longevity perspective. And then, if that person wants to lose weight on a short term or is pre-diabetic or starting diabetes, I think that tips the balance so if you go a little bit longer and you get a little bit the short-term benefit. But from a longevity perspective, we don’t know.

The periodic fasting now is a different story going longer. We don’t recommend to go long on water fasting when you have the option to do it with food, and this is why we are in the business of the Fasting Mimicking Diet. People ask us why we try to mimic fasting with food. And by discovery, by the way, most people don’t know the fasting mimicking diet is funded by the National Institute of Health after seeing the benefits of fasting and it all comes from the studies at USC, University of Southern California. We’re studying fasting for cancer, for diabetes in the longer periods. It’s the same [inaudible 00:45:39], right? The longer you go, you have more stress on the cells, the cells try to rejuvenate, which is positive. You have more stress on fat, so you lose fat, so that’s positive. At the same time, you’re stressing your brain, your heart, your essential organs, and these are everything that needs to operate and it needs eats food.  So, the NIH has funded that trials to make fasting a compliant and safe procedure, and they funded the creation of the Fasting Mimicking Diet at USC, and the goal was to make periodic fasting now a little bit healthy and safe and compliant. So, what we advise, what I personally would advise is most people to do your 12 hours of fasting, you can go all the way to 14. If you have short-term reasons, obesity, pre-diabetes, you can go a little bit longer. We always advise you do it with certain food just to keep that balance, again, we’re talking about. And if you want to do a five-day fast, which is what we have, we do it with food, and it’s called the Fasting Mimicking Diet.

Dr. Weitz:           So tell us what does the Fasting Mimicking Diet consist of.

Dr. Antoun:        So, in order to mimic fasting, the body, you mentioned, the body we ingest the macronutrients, fat, carbs, and proteins. And this tells the aging signals respond mainly to proteins and carb. So if you want to really mimic fasting, you have to be a little bit low on carbs and on proteins, and this is what we have mimicked and induced in our fasting mimicking diets. It’s a high fat but good fat. There’s the healthy medium chain fatty acid, so it’s the healthy fat. Everything is from plant-based sources. And then, it’s a low carb, complex carb, and it’s low in protein as well. And there are a lot of probably secrets there, which kind of proteins, which kind of amino acids.  But in order to really mimic fasting and the stress of fasting, you got to be in [inaudible 00:47:45] of carbon IGF, and there’s a lot more. I’m simplifying this, but a lot more of which fast and when, which sequence of amino acids and when, and which sequences of carbs and when that would provide on a daily basis.

Dr. Weitz:           Okay. What if somebody wanted to do the Fasting Mimicking Diet without ProLon? Is that something that they could do?

Dr. Antoun:        I always say you can eat lettuce in the morning and you’ll be fasting. You can eat cucumbers and two pecans, you’ll be fasting. The Fasting Mimicking Diet’s objective is not to just mimic fasting because you can mimic fasting by barely eating or not eating. The goal is to make it safe. There’s three goals. So number one is to really keep the body in a fasting mode, number two is to nourish the body because, again, we want you to experience a healthy fast, and number three is how can we enhance the fast. Like you said, you can go and eat a cucumber in the morning a little bit and you’ll be fasting or you’ll be fasting by starvation. With the fasting mimicking diet, you’ll be fasting by nourishment. And so that makes-

Dr. Weitz:           Is there an ideal amount of calories that somebody should eat and does it depend on the person, their metabolism, their metabolic rate, their size?

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. The calorie is one input and it’s not the most important. I don’t want to reveal a lot of confidential information, but we’ve tested the Fasting Mimicking Diet on many ages, many different sizes of the body, and because we have found the right amounts, combination, and sequence of carb and amino acids with the right level of fat under a margin of calories, we’ve been able to mimic fasting at different ranges and at different ingredient, so it works for most. Obviously, if you’re a 400 pounder versus a 100 pounder, we might in the future tailor that a little bit more. But today, with what we’ve tested all the way from age 20 to 70, different combinations and different calorie counting, it works. Calorie is on a signal but most important is the sequence of what we feed you with, at which time, and with which combination.

Dr. Weitz:            So, essentially, to follow the program is you get the ProLon box and it tells you exactly what to eat. All the food is contained in the box, soups, and things like that, right?

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. So when you get the box delivered, you open the box and you have your food for everyday of the five days. And you open the daily box and it has… We try to be as consumer friendly as mimicking your daily normal foods, so you have a bar for the morning and you have soups and crackers for lunches and dinner. There’s a drink and there are some pills for supplementations. You’ll get everything you need to eat within one day starting from 1101 calories on the first day all the way to 800 calories. On the remaining days, that will nourish your body, will make your fasting safe. I think we’ve crossed now 700,000 or 800,000 unit consumption of ProLon, and we haven’t had any major safety or event.

Dr. Antoun:        And again, going back to, can you mimic fasting at home? You can, but you’re taking the risk, the safety risk, and this is why science has shown you that you get the benefits that we’ve tested and [inaudible 00:51:40] at the same time.

Dr. Weitz:           You get the same level of autophagy as you do with the water-only fast?

Dr. Antoun:        So, we have never measured autophagy head-to-head on water in the FMD. Autophagy, again, is important and is the buzz word of the day, but-

Dr. Weitz:           Sorry, how are you supposed to pronounce it, it’s autophagy?

Dr. Antoun:        Nobody knows. It’s autophagy, autophagy, or yeah, autophagy, autophagy. I’ve heard all of that. But yeah, we haven’t gone head-to-head versus water fasting. When you do randomized clinical trials as well, you got to file for safety and going several days on water fast, I don’t know if that’s [inaudible 00:52:30]. This is why the Fasting Mimicking Diet was created. It was… people couldn’t comply. On water fast, it was risky as well for some patients. And the National Institute of Health tapped into how to create this. So I don’t know if we would ever do this. We would have to talk with the IRB Board, under safety on a water only arm and maybe do in the hospital, and that’s the main reason why we haven’t done it.

Dr. Weitz:            Have you used the Fasting Mimicking Diet in cancer patients?

Dr. Antoun:        In trials. We have multiple trials testing the Fasting Mimicking Diet in cancer patients, and several of them are ongoing. We have finished a couple last year. So today, we don’t sell the Fasting Mimicking Diet in the market for cancer yet. We’re still trying to translate the science of it with policy and regulatory to see whether and how we could do so.  We’re very compliant as a company.  It’s very important for us to follow all the regulations FDA, FDC, and others. And food as medicine is a concept we always talked about, but if you go under regulatory basis, food has no pathway to go as medicine. Even the word medical food or the class as medical food is actually restricted to nutrition being an issue for that person, not the disease itself.  So, we are actually in the process of… We’re talking to regulatory about what we have discovered, and we have a lot of interesting findings, again, I don’t want talk openly today so that we don’t look like [inaudible 00:54:11] people to take some action today. But if we talk again a few months, you’ll have a better answer. We are planning to go to regulatories and talk with them how can the system embrace what we have discovered, which could potentially be food as medicine.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. Going forwards, I hope that you, guys, can incorporate studies where the Fasting Mimicking Diet or the longevity diet are compared with other versions of what are considered a healthy diet because one of the issues with a lot of diet studies is you take any sort of healthier version of a diet and compare it to the standard American diet and you’re going to see significant better value.

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah. We did actually. The article is being submitted. So we did with Dr. Mark Houston. We did a trial on ProLon versus Mediterranean diet. So, we were exactly what you said. We said, “Hey, how does finding a ProLon compared to everyday healthy diet?” and we went with the Mediterranean because that’s one of the healthiest from an American Heart Association’s standpoint. And so, I don’t know if we had results before we go up, but we are neck to neck with eating healthy food every day.

Dr. Weitz:           And then what should the person eat when he come off the Fasting Mimicking Diet?  Should they just go back to what they’re eating before or should they go on to the longevity diet?

Dr. Antoun:        Yeah, so again, it depends on their goal. If they’re healthy weight and their first objective is longevity, they can go back to pescatarian diet or the flexitarian diet and continue that process. They could do a second ProLon within a quarter or two to three times a year. If they’re healthy, they don’t need to repeat it. Then, when another person might want to lose weight aggressively and that could be one of their concerns, then you can go on a weight-related dietary pattern after ProLon.  Do a second ProLon second month and third month. We’ve tested ProLon in three months and four months, the first Mediterranean diet was four months. And a lot of great benefits there.  So it depends on the goal of that person. If it’s longevity, we recommend pescatarian, flexitarian.

Dr. Weitz:           Awesome. Okay. So I think we’d pretty much have a wrap. Any closing thoughts and then how do people find out about the ProLon program?

Dr. Antoun:        My closing thought is really for people to read the science and think logic rather than think of anything they see in the media today as they give it and work with it. We respect food literally as medicine. We live by it as a company, as people, and we personally… I’m an MD with health policy, and I ended up in nutrition because that’s the biggest trigger I think for longevity and public health. So, we ought to identify and clarify the source of information before we start making conclusions because I think there’s a lot of ideas that are being spread out there that are not scientifically founded. We would love also for regulatory to intervene and come in and really put some discipline in nutrition because I think-

Dr. Weitz:          I hope they don’t, really, because if we think that… We’re getting the most amazing experiments in nutrition. Where else would you get what’s happening…

Dr. Antoun:        Oh, you can [crosstalk 00:57:53]-

Dr. Weitz:            … happening with all these people following carnivore diet [crosstalk 00:57:56]-

Dr. Antoun:        We should keep the entrepreneurship. We should keep the entrepreneurship.

Dr. Weitz:            … all the intervention of the [inaudible 00:58:01] by everybody saying you can only say yes or you get kicked off.

Dr. Antoun:        What you can say is definitely what you can experiment. The FDA and FDC they’re never recommended experimentation, but they would recommend with what you can say. And we’re seeing things that are killing people out there. I mean, you just mentioned people fasting for 30 days. You can talk about people eating protein at 3 grams per kilo per day, and-

Dr. Weitz:            Well, the guy, the doctor who is doing that, he has people medically supervised every day, so [crosstalk 00:58:36]-

Dr. Antoun:        It’s clear that we’re not doing better on neither obesity nor diabetes nor cancer, we’re doing worse as humanity. And there are billions of dollars invested in nutrition. There’s a book published every minute probably and as people are taking advantage of the system at the expense of life of others. So I agree with you, it does not mean that we need to reprimand innovation as much as we still need to put some boundaries and some scientific evidence behind what’s happening because there’s masculine, I mean, companies living off exploiting your taste, your bud taste, other just selling you books and diets, but at least it teaches us in medicine that hypertension is a silent killer. I think there’re many other silent killers out there that nobody talks about.

Dr. Weitz:           How do people listening whether they be doctors, practitioners or patients, find about ProLon? And how-

Dr. Antoun:        There are two ways-

Dr. Weitz:           do they find the Fasting Mimicking Diet?

Dr. Antoun:        Two ways to access ProLon, if you’re healthy, you can go and buy it online. You have to sign off that you’re healthy and can take it, and there are parameters of finding if you’re healthy while you’re checking out on prolonfast.com. And if you have a health condition, we actually have 13,000 clinics in the US, registered with us to recommend ProLon, so you can go to any of the ProLon practitioner. Otherwise, go to your practitioners and talk them on ProLon. We’re happy to then detail them about the product. So you can get it through your provider if you have health condition or online directly through us.

Dr. Weitz:            Excellent. Thank you, Dr. Antoun.

Dr. Antoun:        Thank you very much. Have a good one.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:            Thank you, listeners, for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. Please take a few minutes and go to Apple podcast and give us a five-star ratings and review. That would really help us so more people can find us in their listing of health podcasts. I’d also like to let everybody know that I now have a few openings for new clients for nutritional consultations. If you’re interested, please call my office in Santa Monica at 310-395-3111, that’s 310-395-3111, and take one of the few openings we have now for individual consultation for nutrition with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you and see you next week.

 

Dr. Steven Sandberg-Lewis speaks about the SIBO and IBS with Dr. Ben Weitz at the Functional Medicine Discussion Group meeting on July 22, 2021.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

10:09  Dr. SSL explained that a group of influential doctors that he is a part of that meet once a month to discuss hydrogen sulfide SIBO, including a major researcher, and they have discussed treating patients who either show a flat line on traditional two gas SIBO breath testing or test positive for hydrogen sufide on the new Trio-smart test that measures hydrogen sulfide as well as hydrogen and methane.  A flat line is when you have the results of a two gas SIBO lactulose breath test and there is no peak in hydrogen or methane gas anywhere along the three hours, not even after 120 minutes when you know you are in the large intestine.  You have a relatively flat line all three hours for both gases. This has often been interpreted to mean that you have a case of hydrogen sulfide SIBO, since the bacteria that produce hydrogen sulfide gas and the archaea that produce methane gas both consume hydrogen as fuel. 

14:05  Also, for patients with slow motility, such as those with constipation, we may want to use 120 minutes as the cut off for interpreting a positive test. Dr. Pimentel says that it takes about 15 minutes from the time the lactulose gets to that part of the bowel where the bugs are, before they make the gas. So you’re actually measuring something that’s delayed another 15 minutes.

16:26  Treatment for Hydrogen Sulfide SIBO.  Some practitioners treat patients with hydrogen sulfide the same as they do patients with hydrogen and the same as they treat methane if they are constipated and that often seems to work. 

20:12  It is important that the patients follow the proper pre-test procedures, which includes avoiding taking laxatives for at least four days and they should also avoid high dose magnesium and vitamin C.  Anything that flushes things through the small intestine may lower gas levels.  If they do need something, they can use a water enema. Or they could use a suppository, a glycerin suppository, because that’s just going to affect the outlet down in the colon and the rectum.  They should also not take any antibiotics or natural antimicrobials for at least 14 days and for as much as 30 days.  You should also avoid probiotics for at least a week prior. 

24:34  Anne asked a question that she heard that the folks at Gemelli had changed the parameters for a positive test because they were having so many patients testing positive for hydrogen sulfide. Dr. SSL pointed out that while Dr. Pimentel has said that hydrogen sulfide is a diarrhea-causing gas, but he and Dr. Siebecker and others in his group have a lot of cases of patients with constipation who test positive for hydrogen sulfide. The range for hydrogen sulfide in constipation may be a lower value than five, which is the cutoff for diarrhea.

28:20  Josh Goldenberg in Colorado has treated a lot of patients with hydrogen sulfide SIBO based on trio-smart with an inexpensive product with bismuth called 5 Symptom Digestive Relief. Another option is to use bismuth plus whatever other normal treatment you would use for either diarrhea type or constipation type SIBO.  One doctor who is part of the group of doctors that Dr. SSL meets with who uses uva ursi mother tincture three times a day, as well as colloidal silver and she has found very good results with before and after testing for hydrogen sulfide. 

34:16  The underlying causes of SIBO.  Food poisoning can lead to elevated levels of anti-vinculin and anti-CdtB antibodies, which then attacks the interstitial cells of Cajal, which decreases the Migrating Motor Complex, which can result in SIBO.  If patients have a thickened bowel wall, such as in Crohn’s disease, then this will decrease gut motility. If your Crohn’s patients are not responding to your standard treatments for inflammatory bowel disease, then you may have to treat their overgrowth.  Scleroderma is another condition where you get an increase in bowel thickness.  And any sort of mechanical or pseudo intestinal obstruction will impair gut motility.  Sometimes patients will ask how long SIBO needs to be treated for and that depends upon whether we can correct the underlying situation. If we can normalize bowel thickness, if we can’t restore the pliability of the tissues, if we can’t restore the MMC, if we can’t fix the ileocecal valve, if we can’t normalize their digestive secretions, then unfortunately, this bacterial overgrowth will be recurrent. Patients who have immunosuppression or immunocompromise, such as being on immunosuppressive medications for organ transplants or autoimmune diseases, are more likely to have bacterial overgrowth recurrence. Traumatic brain injury is another condition that can adversely affect gut motility and the health of the intestinal mucous membranes.  Diabetes, and even prediabetes and metabolic syndrome can result in diabetic enteropathy, which can result in delayed gastric emptying, gastroparesis and other enteropathies that slow down or speed up the bowel.  Hypothyroidism can also slow bowel motility.  Bowel adhesions can slow motility, but these can be treated with manual therapy by specially trained therapists.

44:42  Dr. SSL will use one of five different diets for SIBO patients: 1. Dr. Siebecker’s SIBO-Specific Food Guide  2. the Monash Low FODMAP diet, 3. Dr. Nirala Jacobi’s Bi-Phasic Diet, 4. the Specific Carbohydrate Diet, or 5. the Cedars Sinai Diet, which he will use for patients that are traveling or just can’t make extensive changes, which is the least restrictive of all the diets.

46:23  For the treatment phase of SIBO Dr. SSL will usually use diet plus either prescription or herbal antimicrobials.  After the treatment phase, during the prevention phase, Dr. SSL will tend to use diet plus a pro-kinetic, either natural or prescription.  If they have elevated IBS antibodies, Dr. SSL will offer them low dose naltroxen, high dose fish oil, and vitamin D, which he makes sure are in the normal range to promote regulatory T cells to help the autoimmune mechanism.

48:23  Ehlers Danlos syndrome.  Patients like this who have hypermobility due to altered collagen, such as patients with Ehlers Danlos or Marfan’s have a lot of digestive problems and are prone to altered ileocecal valves due to the loss of tone. Also, they are prone to having open ileocecal valves and to prolapse of the stomach, the small intestine, and/or the large intestine, which can cause kinks and pressure that slows motility.  You can use the Beighton scoring system to assess joint hypermobility in such patients.

58:40  SIBO test prep for vegans. Some vegans just eat white rice all day, which is questionable, esp. if a lot of white rice is not part of their normal diet. a vegan could simply fast or they could do elemental diet.

1:00:40  Microbiome Labs has a new product called FODMATE, which contains enzymes that break down inulin, glucans, and fructans.

 

 



 

Dr. Steven Sandberg-Lewis is a practicing Naturopathic physician for nearly 40 years and he teaches at the National University of Natural Medicine and he wrote a medical textbook, Functional Gastroenterology, now in its 2nd edition. Dr. SSL (as he is often called) practices at 8 Hearts Health and Wellness in Portland, Oregon.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations, including remote consults via video or phone, specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111 or go to www.drweitz.com. Phone or video consulting with Dr. Weitz is available.

 



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:                            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drwietz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.

Thank you everybody for joining us tonight. We’re very, very happy that Dr. Steven Sandberg-Lewis will be joining us tonight, and he’ll be giving us an update on some of the latest research on SIBO and IBS. We do have two sponsors for this evening, Integrative Therapeutics and Vibrant American. So I want to sincerely thank both of them. First, I’ll take a few minutes to tell you about Vibrant, and then I’ll play a pre-recorded message from Dr. Steve Snyder of Integrative Therapeutics. Then I’ll introduce Dr. Sandberg-Lewis, and then we’ll get started.

Vibrant-America

So I’d like to tell everybody about Vibrant America, which is, if you’re not familiar with them, they’re a leading science and tech company at the forefront of modern medicine. They have a wide range of the most clinically relevant testing options with cutting edge technology. On today’s topic of IBS and SIBO, I’d like to introduce you to Vibrant’s comprehensive stool panel, the Gut Zoomer 3.0. Vibrant uses their proprietary silicon micro-array platform to look at 171 gut commensals, 67 gut pathogens plus critical markers of inflammation and digestive insufficiency to offer you the most complete look at the gut microbiome. Vibrant realizes the difficulty in finding reliable stool testing, which is why they came out with this panel that boasts of unheard of levels of sensitivity and specificity as published in the Journal of Gut Pathogens.  Not only is their test extremely accurate, but Vibrant’s Gut Zoomer has incredibly competitive pricing to save your patient money. Check out their site at www.vibrantwellness.com and open your account today. I’ll mention that I also use Vibrant for a lot of our standard lab testing. And for an extremely reasonable price, you can get a really nice panel set up to do all your standard testing. I use them for hormone testing, advanced lipids, metabolic panel, et cetera. And so for like 250 bucks, I can get an incredible amount of testing. And they also have this great micronutrient test that’s sort of like the SpectraCell test, but much better.

 


 

Integrative Therapeutics

Anyway, so now, okay, so I’m going to play this short video with Dr. Steve Snyder of Integrative Therapeutics. I want to thank Integrative Therapeutics for sponsoring this meeting. We have Steve Snyder here and he’d like to tell us a little bit about some of the Integrative fantastic products. 

Steve Snyder:           Thanks, Dr. Weitz. We really appreciate the opportunity to sponsor your group. It’s been a privilege and I’m sorry that I can’t get there tonight, but I’ll definitely be listening to the recording. Dr. SSL, he’s been around for a long time. He’s been a big deal for a long time and you guys are in for a privilege tonight. I’m especially interested in learning more about the ileocecal valve release that he does, and I know that’s kind of a passion of his and that’s often a missing part of the treatment for SIBO. So that’ll be cool. Before you guys get started, real quick, I just wanted to mention a couple of our products that kind of target the SIBO crowd.

The first one is the Physicians’ Elemental Diet. This is based on the groundbreaking research from Dr. Pimentel over at Cedars, showing basically that an elemental diet treatment in SIBO for just two weeks resulted in about an 80% negative breath test. Adding another week of treatment got that up to 85. However, the product that they use was a formula called Vivonex by Nestle, and it could quite possibly be the worst tasting thing I’ve ever put in my mouth. And so we were asked by people in the community to develop a product that could replace it.

And actually, Dr. SSL was one of the main people we consulted with. And he provided some invaluable input for it. The result was Physicians’ Elemental Diet and Physicians’ Elemental Diet Dextrose Free. They’re medical foods that provide all the daily nutritional leads in the simplest form. So simple sugars, preformed amino acids and medium chain triglycerides, which provides basically, complete gut rest and a reboot of the gut. It also allows or provides starvation of the displaced bacteria in SIBO. It’s hypoallergenic, it actually tastes pretty good, think pina colada. And it’s free of intact proteins, polypeptides, corn, gluten, soy, dairy, all the stuff that was in Vivonex that was bad.  It’s really one of the only true elemental diet formulas out there. So don’t be confused by any of the pretenders. If you want to hear more about it, reach out to me directly. The other product I wanted to briefly mention is-

Dr. Weitz:                            By the way, Steve, we probably should point out that there are products on the market that are pretending to be an elemental diet, and essentially, they’re a meal replacement, that include like whey or vegetable protein powder. And that is not even close to a replacement for the elemental diet. Because having complex proteins, even if it’s in a liquid form, it takes a lot of difficulty for your gut system to break down. You’ve got to have free form amino acids, not protein powder.

Steve Snyder:            Right, the complete gut rest is basically, just what it says, and breaking down all those other proteins in whey and the things you mentioned, that takes work. And they’re also allergens. So it really isn’t an elemental diet. Thanks for pointing that out. It’s something we deal with all the time. We have to set people straight, I don’t want to mention any names, but we all know who they are. But they’re not really elemental diets. And the other one, real quick, is Motility Activator, is a combination of high potency artichoke and ginger extracts that have been shown to reduce epigastric fullness and pain, GI bloating and nausea. It’s not the ginger and artichoke you get in Whole Foods Market, these are souped up, high potency products. And that’s why we get the efficacy we do.

This formula has been instrumental in the reintroduction of food after the elemental diet treatments. It helps provide a clear playing field for the migrating motor complex. So that can do its job. And it’s just a really, really good adjunct to the elemental diet treatment. And just for everybody’s information, we just recently reduced the price about 20% as kind of a nod to, hey, this isn’t an experiment anymore, this is the real deal. We know it works and we’re selling it. So we’ve recouped our investment and we’re able to offer it at a lower price. So that’s kind of it. If anybody wants to reach me, I’m at 920-492-0343. Also steve.snyder@integrativepro.com. I hope you guys have a great time tonight and thanks again Dr. Weitz.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:                       Thank you so much, Steve. Let me introduce Dr. Steven Sandburg-Lewis, so I’m very, very happy that one of the top experts on using a functional medicine approach to understanding and treating gastrointestinal disorders will be able to join us for a discussion on SIBO and IBS, with a focus on some of the latest research. Dr. Steven Sandberg-Lewis is a legendary naturopathic physician for nearly 40 years, and a professor of gastroenterology at the National College of Natural medicine. He wrote an awesome medical textbook, Functional Gastroenterology. And he will soon be publishing his second book on gastroesophageal reflux disorder. Dr. Steven Sandburg-Lewis, you have the floor.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:          All right. Well, earlier we talked a little bit about the trio-smart. If you’re going to have Dr. Pimentel come in a couple of months, I think I’ll let him talk about it, since he’s the one that created that test.

Dr. Weitz:                            Well, that’s okay, you have a different perspective being an integrative doctor.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         That’s true. Also, he’s not a clinician anymore. He’s a researcher. He’s stopped seeing patients. But yeah, as I said, there’s a group of us that meets once a month for an hour. And we have the incredible resource of Joshua Goldenberg, whose a naturopathic doctor, who’s, he’s actually a major researcher. And he’s got a lot of papers out there with his name as the principal investigator. He’s helping us to kind of monitor the response of various treatments that doctors choose to treat hydrogen sulfide, SIBO, and testing whether it’s a flat-line two gas test, or an actual trio-smart that measures all three, and then tracking the results over time and how the patient does symptomatically.

Dr. Weitz:                            Just in case anybody who’s joining tonight is not familiar with what you’re talking about, maybe you could just explain quickly, what a flat-line result on a SIBO breath test is, versus a trio-smart.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, so if you’ve looked at two gas standard breath tests, we noticed a long time ago that there are some people that look like they’re not alive, once you look at their tests. Because things just go across. Sometimes they’re all zeros, both hydrogen and methane throughout the small and large intestine. That’s less common than very low levels, often, definitely below six, or even below three. So all zeros, ones, twos and threes, all the way through. And we know that if a patient drinks lactulose or glucose as a substrate, they really should have some fermentation of the normal hydrogen-producing flora in the small bowel and the large bowel. And definitely, when it gets to the large bowel, you should see the levels really go up as you get into the millions per mil.

Dr. Weitz:                            And we assume after 90 minutes or 120 minutes, somewhere in there is when you’re getting into the large bowel, right?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, if you use the North American Consensus that was put together about three years ago, they decided that 90 minutes was the cutoff for hydrogen. Differentiating what’s small bowel and what’s large bowel as the lactulose moves through. Because lactulose is an unabsorbable sugar. So it goes all the way through and comes out in the toilet. So it shows you what’s happening with hydrogen-producers throughout the entire digestive tract, starting in the small intestine. And it also shows you if you do have methanogens, archaea organisms that can convert hydrogen to methane. It’ll show them as well. Everybody agrees that with methane, you can find an elevated level of greater than 10 parts per million anywhere on the test.

Dr. Weitz:                            By the way, what do you think about 90 minutes as a cut off?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Well, we do breath testing at our office. And so I’ve asked if we could have a 90 minute sample. Because up till now, we’ve had every 20 minutes, so we only have 80 and 100. And because of the North American Consensus 90 minute cut off, I want to be able to have that too. So we’re going to change the times when we take the samples. So we’ll be able to see what the standard QuinTron guidelines say is a positive test. And also these other guidelines, just to have them both.

Dr. Weitz:                            Do we know that 90 minutes really accounts for patients who may have slow motility?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Well, that’s the thing I think that makes the test less individualized, the idea that everybody has the same transit time through the small bowel. We know that’s not true. And if you do a smart pill, or you do a test with the plastic markers that go through, the sitz markers, you can actually measure the small and large intestine transit time. And we know that it varies with different patients. Especially if you have a patient who is constipated and seems to have slow transit, I think using the 120 minutes makes a lot of sense. And the fact that it takes about, I believe, Pimentel will say it takes about 15 minutes from the time the lactulose gets to that part of the bowel where the bugs are, before they make the gas. So you’re actually measuring something that’s delayed another 15 minutes.

In any case, that’s the test that we’re talking about, is there’s this new test since September of last year, that one lab does, Gemelli Biotech, it’s called a trio-smart test. It’s the only lab that’s doing it right now. Pimentel sort of licensed it to them initially. And finally, they came up with a machine that could measure all three gases. So you can either use that flat-line on a two gas test, meaning a lot is going towards hydrogen sulfide, and it doesn’t measure it. So it all looks flat, like nothing’s happening. Or you can use the trio-smart and check all three gases. And that’s what this group is doing. We’re kind of comparing the two with a group of doctors who do a lot of testing. And then we have this researcher doctor, who’s also a clinician that’s working with us.

Do you have specific questions? You want to talk about treatment for hydrogen sulfide, or…

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah, for sure. I mean, I would love some of your insights. Hydrogen sulfide, I think for a lot of us is a bit of a mystery, having treated differently. I’ve interviewed doctors who say, you have to use a completely different set of nutritional products and/or drugs. Other practitioners say you can use pretty much the same set of nutritional products.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, well, the thing is hydrogen is the source of hydrogen sulfide and methane. You have a second set of bugs that then convert the hydrogen that’s made by the hydrogen producers into hydrogen sulfide, or methane. And you can kind of think of it as if hydrogen sulfide and methane organisms condense the gas into a new gas, which has more than one constituent besides just hydrogen. And so some of us have treated hydrogen sulfide just exactly the same as we would treat hydrogen. Or if the patient is constipated, we treat it the way that we would treat methane. And I’ve certainly seen that work. In fact, when I was using flat-line tests to diagnose it, if we gave a treatment, whatever normal treatment, I can tell you what my normal treatments are for hydrogen and for methane.

Dr. Weitz:                          Yeah, why don’t we do that? Why don’t you tell us what your typical treatment approaches are?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         I would just say that though, using those typical approaches, sometimes what would happen then, and very often what would happen is, that flat-line test started looking like a regular positive test. And then the second test that we did after treatment would look like a more normal SIBO positive test. And then we would treat based on what that looked like. So it was a second phase.

Dr. Weitz:                          By the way, somebody just asked, is there an age limit for when the SIBO breath test can be used?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, just today, my last patient today, 23 months, the parents wanted to do a breath test. I said, you cannot get a two year old to properly breathe into the machine to get the samples, you just can’t. Interesting thing to know, in veterinary medicine, doctors that treat SIBO, you can’t get a dog or a cat to breathe into the bag either. So what they do is they use serum folate. If the serum folic acid level is elevated and the dog or cat has symptoms that fit it, they consider that a positive test.

Dr. Weitz:                          A couple of people asked, are there false negatives? And I think what happens is, and I’m just speculating here, is you have a patient with what seems like SIBO and then they get the breath test and it’s negative.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, well, sometimes that’s because they have hydrogen sulfide SIBO, and you’re not measuring hydrogen sulfide.

Dr. Weitz:                          Right, but now we’re talking about the trio-smart test.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yes, so you have that option. If you really think the patient has overgrowth, you can always check the third gas, if you’re not seeing a classic flat-line, that tells you it’s hydrogen sulfide.

Dr. Weitz:                          Now, I’ll just put in here, one of the things you got to make sure is that the patients A, follow the proper pre-test procedures, and B, that they actually perform the test properly.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Well, yeah, one of the things we found, and Pimentel talks about this too, is that if the patient is taking any kind of laxative for four days prior, that can make the levels look much, much lower. So as long as it’s not going to kill the patient to not take their laxative, they’re not so constipated that they’re going to get blocked, we try to get them to avoid even high dose magnesium or vitamin C or any kind of laxative. If they do need something, they can use a water enema. Or they could use a suppository, a glycerin suppository, because that’s just going to affect the outlet down in the colon and the rectum. But we don’t want anything that’s actually going to flush things through the small intestine and perhaps lower the gas levels.

Dr. Weitz:                            Well, what about other nutrients and/or drugs? Because I had seen that the different breath testing companies seem to have different rules for when patients should stop taking certain drugs or nutrients, like, say, probiotics, or there’s a series of prescription medications that could affect it as well.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, so this is especially important the first time you’re doing a test. So you’re doing a virgin test, you’ve never tested the patient before. You really want to follow all these things. So that means no antibiotics for, some say 30 days, some say 14 days, whether that’s any anti-microbial natural products or prescriptions. We mentioned the four days before the test for the laxatives. Probiotics, most will say a week prior, you want to avoid those. And if they’ve had a procedure, such as a barium swallow, a CT with contrast, those kinds of things where you’re putting a contrast media into the gut, often they’ll say 30 days to wait before you do the test, to get an optimal, accurate result.  And your question about are there false negatives, there are false negatives with every test. And there certainly are for this too. But again, if the patient comes to you with a test already, and said, this was my test, you can ask these kinds of questions, how did you prep?

Dr. Weitz:                          Can you comment on the diet, because the trio-smart, they have a little booklet in there. And what they say about diet is different than what Nirala says, which is different than the recommendations given by Genova.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah. I think probably the important thing is to be consistent. I mean, we’ve had doctors from Italy who do a lot of this work and a lot of research in SIBO, come and speak at seminars. And one of them who’s really knowledgeable, he’s a gastroenterologist and teaches, and he is also a pharmacologist. He says that they don’t even use a prep diet when they test patients in their office, clinically. When they do research, they use a prep diet just to keep things very status quo. But he says they don’t even use a prep diet in their office. So there’s all kinds of variants. I think if you always do the same thing, if you keep it consistent, then you can look at your results and they’re valid.

Dr. Weitz:                          I think Anne wants to ask a question. Did you want to ask a question, Anne, to follow?

Anne:                                 Yeah, I’m sorry. This is Anne, can you hear me?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Hi Anne.

Anne:                                 Hi, how are you?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Good.

Anne:                                  I have a patient today that, I swear she has some kind of SIBO, we were just hunting and hunting and hunting and she did the trio-smart. I checked every way about prep or whatever. So I just had heard from some online thing that they were changing the parameters a little. She did about five or six months ago. And there was some question about whether or not everybody was testing positive for a while, then they switched things. I’m just trying to track this down for this patient.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, we talked about this today at our meeting, hydrogen sulfide meeting. And yeah, apparently they were getting too many positives, and they’ve changed their cut off. And the details, you’ll have to ask Pimentel, when he comes in two months about that. But there’s also, at this point unpublished, some research that they’re doing at Gemelli, because a lot of us out in the field said… Pimentel was saying that hydrogen sulfide is a diarrhea-causing gas. That these cases are all going to be diarrhea. And what Dr. Siebecker and I and many others in this group were finding is that, a lot of them are constipated. And they’re still showing hydrogen sulfide. So we mentioned that to Pimentel. And he apparently got Gemelli to look at some of their data. And they’re not sure yet, but they’re thinking, well, we’re onto something here with this constipation.  And that probably, the range for hydrogen sulfide in constipation is a lower value. So instead of five as the cut off, it may be somewhere between two and four. That’s not official yet, but it’s something that they’re really looking into. Because we’ve seen so many constipation cases that don’t fit their normal model.

Dr. Weitz:                          Okay, now, what do you tell patients about diet prep?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Well, did I answer Anne’s question?

Anne:                                 Yes, you did. Basically, it’s almost worth retrying with a regular test and seeing if I get the flat-line, with her, I think, rather than trying to do trio-smart again with her. She’s thinking about retesting.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, again, ask Pimentel about this when he comes. But at this point, we’re trying to get our sea legs on this and really try to understand the difference between them. And whether it’s apples and oranges, whether you can compare the hydrogen and methane from a regular test to the trio-smart. And whether a flat-line really does equal hydrogen sulfide. So we’re putting this together.

Anne:                                 So I guess really the reason I keep pursuing this, is she’s having a lot of sulfur intolerance, and she’s been trying for a number of months to work with the CBS pathways and other pathways like that, and getting nowhere. So we’re trying to figure out what’s the driver? And does SIBO fit the clinical picture the best? So anyway, please go on. I’m interested in hearing what you’re doing treatment-wise, too.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Sure. So interesting thing, Josh Goldenberg in Colorado, he has treated a good number of patients with hydrogen sulfide SIBO based on trio-smart. And what he’s using is dirt cheap to treat these patients. 30 days of a bismuth formula, which kind of goes with the guidelines that Pimentel talks about. He talks about using his standard antibiotic protocol for either hydrogen or methane, depending on whether the patient, he says mostly he was finding patients with diarrhea, and then he would add bismuth to it at the same time during the two-week course.  Josh Goldenberg is using a really inexpensive product from Target drugstore called 5 Symptom Relief formula, I guess it is. Or 5 Symptom Digestive Relief. And it’s just a bismuth, it’s basically Pepto Bismol. It’s a bismuth subsalicylate. And two TID for 30 days. And he’s seen before and after test can be very effective. What’s that?

Dr. Weitz:                         No, I think we just heard some noise.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Okay, okay.

Dr. Weitz:                         So they had muted themselves.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        And again, you can also use either bismuth subsalicylate or bismuth, what’s the other one, folks? Instead of the salicylate, bismuth subnitrate at 262 milligrams, three times a day, 30 days. Or you can add that to what you would normally use to treat either hydrogen or methane, based on the stool type.

Dr. Weitz:                         That’s kind of what I’ve done. I added the product from Priority One that Paul Anderson developed, that’s a biofilm buster that contains bismuth.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, BioFilm Phase Two.

Anne:                                Can I say something about that product, though?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Sure-

Dr. Weitz:                         Yeah.

Anne:                                Paul Anderson says that if you mix the bismuth with the disulfides, you actually end up with a separate molecule. It’s not bismuth anymore, it doesn’t act as bismuth. So I’m not sure that is a good delivery system for bismuth.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Meaning if you add the disulfides, meaning in-

Anne:                                The thiols that he puts in that product for the, so, the bismuth-thiol combination molecule for BioFilm is no longer bismuth or a thiol, according to Paul Anderson.

Dr. Weitz:                         But the [inaudible 00:31:23]. So if everybody’s not familiar, he has one version that’s a prescription made up by a compounding pharmacy, and then he has an over-the-counter product that simply, it’s lipoic acid as the thiol.

Anne:                                Well, yes, it’s lipoic acid and Nigella sativa. But he is saying that that combination makes it no longer a bismuth molecule. I mean, that’s what he said to me four or five times, like it changes.

Dr. Weitz:                         Really?

Anne:                                Yeah, it’s not bismuth anymore.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        So your option is to just use a straight bismuth.

Dr. Weitz:                         Okay.

Anne:                                Yeah.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        There’s all kinds of other approaches that doctors have, some strange things that doctors have done with different prescription antibiotics and things that we probably wouldn’t use. But I’d say the basic idea is either bismuth by itself, which seems to be working quite well in the initial group of patients, not dozens and dozens and dozens. Or bismuth plus whatever other normal treatment you would use for either diarrhea type or constipation type SIBO.

Dr. Weitz:                          Yeah, there’s a doctor in Canada, Dr. Preet Khangura who I interviewed who treats a lot of patients with hydrogen sulfide SIBO. And he adds to the mix uva ursi, because he says that some of the bacteria that are often involved in UTIs, are also involved in hydrogen sulfide SIBA.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Well, yeah, and there’s a doctor that we meet with once a month. And her approach has been to use uva ursi mother tincture three times a day, as well as colloidal silver. And she has found very good results with before and after testing for hydrogen sulfide. And she does quite a bit of it. So that’s her-

Dr. Weitz:                          I think Dr. Khangura mentioned that mother tincture, it’s actually mother something, right? Or I think it’s short for mother something. Mostly it’s this super strong product or something.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Well, there are extracts and there are mother tinctures, mother tinctures are actually what you start out with to make a homeopathic remedy.

Dr. Weitz:                         Oh, really?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        It’s not as concentrated as a fluid extract, that’s much more concentrated.

Dr. Weitz:                         Oh, okay, I got.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        In any case, I was hoping we could also talk about some of the underlying causes for SIBO.

Dr. Weitz:                         Yeah, that’d be great.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Okay, so I’m going to share my screen.

Dr. Weitz:                         Okay.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        So this is my little quick and dirty chart that I made for PowerPoint, that that shows some of the major etiologies for SIBO. And of course, you’re probably familiar with the food poisoning, travelers diarrhea, leading to elevated levels of anti-vinculin and anti-CdtB antibodies, which then attacks the interstitial cells of-

Dr. Weitz:                         Hey, Doc, you want to make it the full screen? I think you’ve got one more thing to click to make it the full screen.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        What do I need to click to do that?

Dr. Weitz:                         I think the thing on the bottom that’s quick, three things to the right of that.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Oh, okay.

Dr. Weitz:                         No, to the left of that. No, no, no, right there-

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        There it is.

Dr. Weitz:                         There you go.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, that’s it. So the food poisoning and then the autoimmune reaction that attacks the interstitial cells Cajal and slows down the migrating motor complex, promoting bacterial overgrowth. But in addition, really keep this in mind that if your patient has a thickened bowel wall, they’re going to have loss of motility. So, your Crohn’s patients, because Crohn’s by definition is transmural thickening of the small bowel, in most cases. Few cases are somewhere else in the gut or might just be in the colon, but most are in the small intestine. Crohn’s ileitis is a real big cause of people who have both IBS and IBD. And you really have to consider that when your Crohn’s patients are not responding to your standard treatments for inflammatory bowel disease, that you may have to treat their overgrowth. Scleroderma is a really classic example where the tissues thickened, and then you’re not going to have normal motility. And then, of course, if you have any kind of pseudo obstruction or loss of actual motility in the bowel.

But when these things are present, if you can’t get back that that pliability of the tissue, you’re basically going to have to tell the patient, this is a case where we’re going to be managing this for most of your life. We we can keep you in remission from some of these symptoms, with the right treatments, but this is not a one and done kind of situation. Unless you can really normalize the bowel thickness. So keep that in mind. Sometimes patients will ask, “Hey, Doc, I’ve heard SIBO is just something you have to treat forever. Is that right?” Well, it’s right if you can’t treat the underlying cause. If you can’t get the migrating motor complex back, if you can’t fix the ileocecal valve, if you can’t normalize their digestive secretions, whatever the underlying cause is, then it will be recurrent. If they have adhesions.

Dr. Weitz:                            By the way, Doc, I just want to mention that you teach a manual therapy visceral manipulation technique, to help with the ileocecal valve, isn’t that right?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, yeah. And I have a whole chapter in my textbook about that as well. But yeah, it’s something I like to teach. I teach it at the National University. And in a course and other weekend courses. Immunosuppression or immunocompromised patients is another important thing to consider, that if you don’t deal with that, you’re going to have bacterial overgrowth occurring over and over. Because the immune system is in-part responsible for keeping the normal flora in check so they don’t overgrow. So your patients that are on immunosuppressive medications, that have had transplants, you really have to take that into account. And you’re probably going to have a more long term condition where you have to keep it under control and prevent recurrence.

Traumatic brain injury is another one, is one of the first things that happens when the brain shakes and gets injured, is that motility and secretion and the health of the mucous membrane changes in the gut. I mentioned the secretion, so acid, pancreatic enzymes, brush border enzymes and bile. Any deficiencies of these things will really tend to allow for overgrowth. The bugs don’t like these things, and that’s what keeps the small bowel having fewer than 1,000 organisms per gram normally.

Next to that is diabetes, and I would include pre-diabetes and metabolic syndrome as well. There’s a group of conditions called diabetic enteropathy. It includes things like delayed gastric emptying, gastroparesis and other enteropathies that slow down or speed up the bowel. And in small bowel, it tends to slow down very commonly, which allows overgrowth to take place.  Hypothyroidism, the thyroid is very much associated with motility. And when it’s not properly treated, everything slows down in the gut and allows for overgrowth. So these are all conditions you have to kind of screen for when your patient has SIBO, especially if it’s recurrent.

Blind loops and adhesions are really important. And the good news with adhesions is, often, they can be treated with manual therapy by people that do visceral manipulation. They can be, of course, brought on by surgery and a real common one is after appendectomy, especially with appendicitis that perforated before they removed the appendix. Because they have to wash out all that pus from the peritoneal sac when they’re doing the surgery. And it can really lead to pretty massive adhesions. Another one would be endometriosis, with monthly bleeding into the peritoneal sac, can create a lot of spot type adhesions, that cause twists and turns and narrowing of the small bowel and make it a perfect place to grow bacteria, because they can hide in those twists and turns, just like the [inaudible 00:41:56] blind loops such as diverticula. Or surgical blind loops, such as in bariatric surgeries.

So remember, if you have a patient who’s had bariatric surgery, you want to really talk to them first about whether or not they want to treat their SIBO. Because SIBO is a desired response to bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery is designed to reduce the amount of food that the person can take in by making the stomach smaller. And depending on the type of surgery, leading to malabsorption. And the malabsorption and the blind loops, the loops of bowel that just kind of suddenly end and they have a dead end, those are great places for bacteria to overgrow. And when you have SIBO, we know you tend to get malabsorption. So it helps the weight loss. Most patients with SIBO are underweight in our practice, they’re not overweight. Occasionally, you find an overweight patient, but it’s much less common than the underweight patients.  So talk very seriously with your patients that have had bariatric surgery before you treat their SIBO, because they may gain weight. And that’s going to undo all of that misery they had with the surgery. So know what you’re doing before you work with those patients.

Dr. Weitz:                         Of course, Dr. Pimentel talks about the methane patients perhaps being overweight, because it slows the digestive and motility, they absorb more calories from their food.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, methane producers, the archaea that make that have been associated with overweight status. So yeah, there are different kinds right there. SIBO, it says SIBO here, SIBO really nowadays refers to hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen. Methane, when the methane is elevated, we now call that IMO or Intestinal Methanogen Overgrowth. Because they’re not bacteria, so call it Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth is a misnomer for methane. And elevated methane levels in the colon cause just as much trouble as in the small bowel. So it’s not small bowel only, and it’s not bacteria. So we use the term IMO or Methane Bloom, to talk about elevated methane.

Dr. Weitz:                         By the way, a question came in, not to change the topic. We’ll get right back to this, but somebody was asking, you talked about treatment and you talked about using antimicrobials. Do you normally also put the patients on a specific diet at the same time?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, I use one of five different diets. The most common diets that I use, which is also, I have a chapter in my textbook about this, would be Dr. Siebecker’s SIBO-Specific Food Guide. Or I’ll use the Monash Low FODMAP. Or I’ll use the Bi-Phasic Diet which Dr. Jacobi created, based on Dr. Siebecker’s diet. Or I’ll use the diet that Dr. Siebecker originally got the ideas from, the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. She married the specific carbohydrate diet with the Monash FODMAP Diet, and put those together to make the SIBO-Specific Diet. So those are the most common diets I use. If I have a patient who has an eating disorder, and they really want to make just the minimum amount of changes, so that they’re not stimulating any upheaval of their eating disorder, we would probably use something like the Cedars Sinai Diet.  And also with patients that are traveling or just can’t make more extensive changes, we’ll have them use the Cedars Sinai Diet, which is the least restrictive of all the diets.

Dr. Weitz:                          Actually, since we’re on it, why don’t we just hit a couple more things? Do you also use a pro-kinetic, a natural or prescription? And do you ever address biofilms as part of the treatment?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:         Yeah, so the pro-kinetics are part of the prevention phase, that we go into after the treatment phase. The treatment phase will involve diet plus either prescription antimicrobials, or herbal antimicrobials. The option, other than that, would be the elemental diet. And the advantage there, of course, is it can bring down gas levels by over 100 parts per million in two to three weeks, which you can’t usually do with the others. And then in the prevention phase, which we start right as they finish the treatment phase, we’ll use diet plus pro-kinetic. And if they have elevated IBS smart-test, if those antibodies for vinculin or CDT are elevated, I will also offer them low dose naltrexone, high dose fish oil. And I’ll make sure that their vitamin D levels are in the normal range to promote regulatory T cells to help with that autoimmune mechanism.

Dr. Weitz:                         I mean, vitamin D in the optimal range?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Well, it depends who you listen to. Alan Gaby, one of the real experts on vitamin D, he wrote an article a couple years ago saying that for many years, he tried to get people to optimal levels, say 50 to 60. And he found, over time, that it really didn’t have any advantage over just getting them into the normal range. So you can do it either way.

Dr. Weitz:                         Okay.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        I’ll just mention these last two things, so I can cut this slide off. But altered collagen such as hypermobility type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or patients with Marfan syndrome or other collagen variants, these patients have a lot of digestive problems, whether or not they have bacterial overgrowth. They have a higher tendency to have sliding hiatal hernia, up to 60% of them have either diarrhea or constipation on a chronic basis. They’re very prone to open ileocecal valves, because of the loss of tone. And prolapse of the stomach, the small intestine and/or the large intestine, which again can cause kinks and pressure that slows down motility.

So this is something I screen every new patient for, by doing a Beighton score. And then also if that’s positive, I’ll do what’s called [criterion-2 00:49:40] testing. A lot of it you can do, initial testing, you can do over the internet too, if you’re doing a telemedicine visit, which is a good way to initially assess. And then the last one, as you mentioned, is the ileocecal valve dysfunction, which can allow cecoileal reflux from the colon into the small bowel, bringing a huge amount, millions per ml of bacteria into the small bowel.  I can take other questions if people have them.

Dr. Weitz:                            Which do you think are the most common causes for SIBO?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        I’ll tell you, I keep thinking I’m going to make a little button that people can walk around with it says endometriosis equals SIBO, chronic SIBO. In females, I would say it’s absolutely the most common thing that I run into for recurrent chronic SIBO. So you have to have a good index of suspicion for endometriosis. If your patient has severe dysmenorrhea, if you know they already have adhesions from it. Patients that are incapacitated by their dysmenorrhea. Patients that have a fixed uterus, I screen my new patients that I see in person, female patients for adhesions. So I’ll check in the mid abdomen, I’ll let my fingers sink down into the abdominal tissue with the patient supine, and I’ll slowly rotate in both directions. And see, if you do that on every patient, male and female, you’ll get a sense of what feels normal. How the organs move underneath the muscles and the subcutaneous fat.

There’s often a very free feeling to it. As opposed to someone who’s got a lot of adhesions, you may actually feel areas that, if you felt somebody with more superficial scarring and adhesions, you can really feel the hardness of it. But there’s also, for the deeper adhesions, you may be able to feel the organs kind of being stiff and not wanting to move. And then I’ll put my fingers on either side of the uterus, and I’ll move it laterally; to the right and to the left. And I’ll see how much mobility the uterus has. Very commonly with endometriosis, or after a patient’s had one or more caesarian sections, they’ll have adhesions that actually fix the uterus to either the pubic bone, to the colon, or to the small bowel.

And it may move nicely in one direction. Or normally, the uterus will move so that you can go actually all the way to the midline with the lateral edge of the uterus. If the uterus was really held in place well, when a woman had a pregnancy, she would rip herself apart. You’ve got to have a really mobile uterus, so that it can grow and enlarge all the way up to the diaphragm, basically. So it’s great to feel women that have never had endometriosis, have never had surgeries in the abdomen, that have never had appendectomies or C-sections and feel what that normal movement is like. It’s quite dramatic. And then when you feel one where it’s locked, you’ll really feel the difference.

Dr. Weitz:                         You just mentioned Ehlers Danlos syndrome. How do you manage SIBO in patients with that?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Well, I’ve got to tell you, I don’t know, and I’ve looked at a lot. I don’t know any cures for that genetic condition. I know things not to do. So for instance, I’m not going to use high velocity, low amplitude manipulation for them, because it’s going to make them even more unstable. If they do have problems with their joints, which often they do, because their check ligaments are looser and they have hyperextension of joints, I will probably refer them for injection therapies like PRP and prolotherapy. Or even stem cell injections. And I’ve had patients just thank me profusely when they’ve had that done. It can be a real lifesaver for these patients. Even when I do my myofascial release with them, I’m not going to do it the full extent that I would do it with a patient who’s not hyper mobile. Because I don’t want to make them more mobile. Sure, I want to release things that are fixated, but muscle tension and adhesion formation is part of the way the body deals with hypermobility.

It’s a natural response to it. So you have to kind of set up some kind of agreement with the body, how much you’re going to allow. We do tend to tell those patients, it’s worth trying bone broth, if you tolerate it, if you don’t have a histamine problem, or collagen extracts, if you do, collagen powder, grass-fed collagen powder. Two scoops a day is a common thing that we’ll use. We’ll use MSM, if they don’t have a sulfur problem. As a way, first of all, good for pain, good for the liver, but also the sulfur moiety that helps with the collagen formation. And then moderate doses of vitamin C to help that process as well. But I can’t say that I have a cure, and I’ve never had anybody tell me a cure for this genetic condition. But you can work so that you don’t make it worse. And you can try some things that might make it more stable.

Dr. Weitz:                         When patients have hydrogen sulfide SIBO, do you put them on a low sulfur diet at the same time as a low FODMAP diet?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        I have found that that can really get a person’s symptoms way down. But whenever you add another layer of avoidance to a diet, it gets more and more impossible to follow. Especially for your underweight patients to begin with. So it’s a real balancing act. And I often rely on my nutritionist and other nutritionists that I recommend to really help people to individualize the diet, and try to make it the least restrictive as they can.

Dr. Weitz:                         So with the patient with hydrogen sulfide, would it be better to do a low FODMAP or low sulfur diet, if you’re going to pick one?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Well, the FODMAP is helping to reduce fermentable carbohydrates, and that’s going to be important to prevent relapse. Whether you use that or the minimal Cedars Sinai diet, or any low fermentation diet. And then the low sulfur diet is really more of a way of trying to get symptom relief in patients that are really suffering, until you can get them to tolerate sulfur more effectively. So you do what you have to do and what the patient can tolerate, but it can get pretty dicey. And then you’ve got patients coming to you on a low sulfur, low oxalate, low histamine, low fermentation diet. They’re basically eating meat. And it’s not a healthy thing, maybe for a short period of time, if they’re really suffering, but try to correct whatever you can.

Dr. Weitz:                         What about SIBO test prep for vegans?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        For vegans, so I just had a patient today, who, she was new to me, she’d had a breath test. And I asked her what she did for a prep diet, she’s vegan, she said, “I just ate white rice.” So she just ate white rice all day. Questionable, if white rice weren’t a major portion of her diet to begin with, and then just for the prep diet, she just ate white rice all day, that possibly could skew things. It just really depends how much. We try to tell people, if you don’t normally eat a lot of white rice, don’t live on it the day before the test. Or don’t even introduce it, just eat other foods. If you’re vegan, it gets tough. And they can fast. They could do a water fast, or they could do elemental diet powder. That’s a prep diet. So that’s another option. Because it has nothing in there that feeds the bacteria, or the archaea.

Dr. Weitz:                         What if they were any really, really soft vegetables, like they just overcooked them?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        It’s still not recommended. Now, you could take the approach that Dr. Carmelo Scarpignato in Italy takes, and that’s no prep at all. No diet prep. Just a 12-hour fast from the night before, before they do the test. That’s your other option, if you have a patient who really just can’t do the prep diet. But the PED or other elemental diet, fully elemental diet is a great option for one day, if they have diarrhea tendencies, and two days if they’re constipated.

Dr. Weitz:                         Somebody has a question about a product from Microbiome Labs called Foodmate, which is supposed to break down FODMAPs?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        FODMATE.

Dr. Weitz:                         FODMATE, okay.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, this has just been available since May, I think. And it’s the brainchild of a new graduate, MD. She’s just in her first year of practice, but she’s brilliant. I worked with her a lot, putting on courses up at Bastyr where she graduated. And she came up, she thought, well, if we could make an enzyme that would break down inulin, glucans, and fructans, then people could eat a lot more food, if they were on very restricted low FODMAP diets. And we’ll see how it works. I’ve only given two or three patients that enzyme so far, because it’s so new. But I have a lot of positive hopes for it. It’s called FODMATE, F-O-D.

Dr. Weitz:                         Okay. Do you see any correlation between Lyme disease and SIBO?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Especially Lyme disease, and methane IMO, not so much SIBO. When I see a breath test that the methane begins high, like today I worked with a patient who had a methane, baseline was 28. And then it was high at every test, every sample, throughout the entire 10 samples. And in the last specimen, it was 84. We lovingly call that mega meth, and I didn’t come up with that term, Dr. Rahbar came up with that, which I think is very cute. But anyway, that kind of mega meth, where it’s always high, including at the baseline first sample, I give them the Horowitz questionnaire for Lyme and tick borne related diseases. And I see, if they’re higher than 46 on it, then I’ll probably refer them to another doctor in my office who’s a tick borne disease expert.

Dr. Weitz:                         Do you find IMO harder to treat than hydrogen?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        I think it depends on what kind you’re talking about. So this mega meth, probably more complicated. Because there might be kind of an occult infection behind it, and whether or not you uncover that, you may have trouble.

Dr. Weitz:                         I think that’s how Dr. Rahbar came up with it, because he found that the IMO patients didn’t respond as well to the treatments that were working for hydrogen. And so he found them to be more resistant. So he started looking for other reasons whether they-

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                         Sometimes he finds parasites, sometimes he finds Lyme.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, and compare that to someone who has elevated hydrogen, but also has maybe a baseline methane of zero, and then it peaks at 14, which is a positive for IMO. But it’s very different than that patient who has no elevation of hydrogen, but their methanes are sky high at every reading during the test.

Dr. Weitz:                         By the way, do you think that seeing elevated methanogens on a stool test is a potential indication of IMO?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        You mean the PCR testing that shows methanobrevibacter’s elevated?

Dr. Weitz:                         Exactly.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        I don’t know, I’ve been looking at it. And I’ve seen sometimes it correlates. I think it depends whether it’s in the colon. If your methane level peaks in the colon on the last three specimens, it probably will show up high with PCR testing of methanobrevibacter smithii in the stool. But if it’s more in the small intestine, and not so much in the large intestine, you might not see that.

Dr. Weitz:                         Right. But since IMO could be anywhere, if we see elevated methanobrevibacter…

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, the problem I have with that, with PCR testing, it’s just my personal thing, PCR measuring DNA of organisms, half of the organisms in the colon are dead. Stool is made up of dead bacteria sloughed off cells from the lining of the gut, and fiber that hasn’t been fermented by the bacteria. And then other waste materials. And so, when you’re looking at DNA, it doesn’t say, this methanobrevibacter is alive. It’s saying, it’s there; dead and alive. It’s like those old wanted posters, wanted dead or alive. That’s what you’re seeing when you’re looking at stool, PCR. If you do a culture, you can’t culture anaerobes. So they won’t show up at all. But that’s living bacteria when you culture it. But when you’re doing PCR, it’s dead and alive. So I don’t really, at this point, I don’t put a lot of faith in that.  Sure, if there’s a pathogen on a stool test, that’s important. I find the PCR testing fascinating and nerdy for me and other doctors, but I think a lot of doctors are probably making missed diagnoses based on that, because you don’t know how much of that you’re reading is dead. And who wants to treat dead bacteria? They’re coming out anyway.

Dr. Weitz:                         Do you think that a stool test is only looking at the colon?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Stool test is colon, when you’re looking at the organisms. If you’re looking at elastase, that’s that small intestine, pancreatic levels. If you’re looking at calprotectin and lysozyme or lactoferrin, you’re also seeing if there’s small intestine inflammation, those will go up. Especially calprotectin. But the other tests are large intestine.

Dr. Weitz:                         Well, according to Tom Fabian from GI Map Diagnostic Solutions, a number of organisms that come up on the GI map are actually typically-

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Small bowel flora-

Dr. Weitz:                         … small bowel, and also, they measure H. pylori, which is more in the stomach.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:       Yeah, again, they’re measuring PCR of H. pylori, which is not a standard H. pylori test. Sure, if you have H. pylori, dead or alive, it may eventually come out in the stool. It’s part of the digestive tract. But I don’t think it’s reliable to say that organisms from higher up, checking in the stool is a good way to check for it. Now we know that stool antigen for H. pylori is a valid test. So that’s actually a protein that H. pylori makes. But to actually be using PCR and looking at stool H. pylori, you don’t know how much of that is viable. So that’s why the stool antigen is a more typical test. And the GI map, I think, is the only test that really does a stool H. pylori.

Dr. Weitz:                        But they also look at virulence factors. So doesn’t that increase the potential accuracy, especially if there’s a couple of virulence factors that tend to be more significant, according to some of the data?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:       Yeah, I mean, it depends what research you read. Some research says the virulence factors really don’t tell you whether they need to be treated or not. But certainly, I think it gives you a more credence for it, if there are virulence factors, as opposed to not. The interesting thing, I do a two-hour lecture on H. pylori, so don’t get me started. But the interesting thing is that virulence factors such as VacA, they actually have some beneficial effects. And H. pylori, of course, is a commensal organism that’s very important for priming the digestive immune system in children. And VacA and CagA, many studies have shown that a mixture of VacA and CagA-positive strains are actually very beneficial for preventing food allergies, eczema, asthma, Crohn’s disease, long list of things.  So, you really have to decipher between H. pylori that really deserves treatment and that which is commensal. And that’s what I lecture about, is how we might consider the various factors, because it’s protective against more conditions than it is causative of conditions.

Dr. Weitz:                         And you think the antibody test for H. pylori is the most accurate way to test for it?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        The antibody test, IgG, in the blood tells you if you’ve been exposed to H. pylori in high numbers. And actually, if I have a patient with a positive, who doesn’t necessarily have GI problems, I give them a high five. I say, “All right, you have commensal H. pylori.” Now, if you do an H. pylori antigen, stool antigen or a breath test for H. pylori, that tells you the H. pylori is there now, in high amounts. And if you treat the patient, if you choose to treat them, you can use that within a couple of weeks after treatment, to see if you were successful. But the antibody test isn’t as reliable. It could stay high for many months or even years after you treat them. So it kind of depends how you test.

Dr. Weitz:                         So you consider the stool antigen or the breath test the most accurate?

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        Yeah, because when those are positive, you know it’s there now and it’s viable. Yeah, that was fun. Always nice to talk with you and your group.

Dr. Weitz:                         Absolutely.

Dr. Sandberg-Lewis:        And I didn’t get to see Anne, because she had her camera off. But I’ve known Anne from way back when she was student at NUNM.

Dr. Weitz:                         Oh, cool. Okay, thank you, Doc. Thank you to everybody. And we’ll see you next month.

 


Dr. Weitz:                            Thank you listeners for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. Please take a few minutes and go to Apple Podcasts, and give us a five-star ratings and review. That would really help us, so more people can find us in their listing of health podcasts. I’d also like to let everybody know that I now have a few openings for new clients for nutritional consultations. If you’re interested, please call my office in Santa Monica at 310-395-3111. That’s 310-395-3111 and take one of the few openings we have now for an individual consultation for nutrition with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you and see you next week.