Dr. Howard Elkin and Dr. Ben Weitz discuss Why Bodybuilders Are Dying Young but How Weight Training Promotes Health.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

0:27  Quite a number of professional bodybuilders have been dying recently at young ages due to anabolic steroid use/abuse, including the death of the 2018 Mr. Olympia Shawn Rhoden, who died of a massive heart attack at age 46 several weeks ago.

7:48  The goals of this podcast are 1. to describe the health risks of anabolic steroids for those bodybuilders who are taking them and who are not aware of the risks, and 2. to explain why weightlifting promotes health, so those who hear about bodybuilders dying are not discouraged from weight lifting.

9:20  Weightlifting promotes longevity by allowing you to gain muscle and strength.  Muscles support and stabilize your joints including your spine.  Maintaining muscle strength allows you to maintain your mobility as you get older.  Loss of muscle is called sarcopenia and this can lead to loss of mobility as you age.  Seniors with sarcopenia are more likely to fall and break a hip, which can be catastrophic.  You are much more likely to die in the next few years after breaking a hip.  If seniors end up on the ground, they often cannot get up without help due to them being too weak. In fact, being able to get up from the ground without help has been shown to be a predictor of longevity. (De Brito LBB, Ricardo DR, de Araújo DSMS, Ramos PS, Myers J, de Araújo CGS. Ability to sit and rise from the floor as a predictor of all-cause mortality. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2014;21(7):892-898. doi:10.1177/2047487312471759) On average, after the age of 30, we lose about 1/2 lb of muscle per year unless you do weight training and this loss of muscle accelerates after age 50.

12:38  Weightlifting promotes bone strength.  As we age, the loss of bone, osteopenia or osteoporosis, can lead to fracture, sometimes catastrophic.  Weight training can not only strengthen your muscles, but your bones as well by placing controlled amounts of stress on your bones. Weight training not only loads the bones but also as the muscles contract, they pull on the bones, leading to both better bone density and bone strength.

15:47 The cardiovascular benefits of weight training. Weight training improves your cholesterol and lipids. It increases blood flow, dilates your blood vessels and helps keep the arterial walls compliant and reduces their stiffness. Most studies show that weight training lowers your levels of LDL (“bad” cholesterol) and cholesterol and raises your HDL (“good” cholesterol). (Sheikholeslami Vatani D, Ahmadi S, Ahmadi Dehrashid K, Gharibi F. Changes in cardiovascular risk factors and inflammatory markers of young, healthy, men after six weeks of moderate or high intensity resistance training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011 Dec;51(4):695-700.)

18:09  Weight training also helps with weight loss, since it raises your metabolic rate, which is the rate at which your burning calories all day long even when you are not exercising.  The more muscle you have, the higher your metabolic rate.  And obesity certainly increases your risk of heart disease.

19:39  While both cardiovascular and weight training reduce epicardial fat, only weight training reduces pericardial fat. (Christensen RH, Wedell-Neergaard A, Lehrskov LL, et al. Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Cardiac Adipose TissuesSecondary Analyses From a Randomized Clinical TrialJAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(8):778–787.)  

21:02  Weight training will lower blood pressure. While your blood pressure may rise temporarily during weight training, such as while doing a leg press, performed consistently it will lower blood pressure.(de Sousa EC, et al. Resistance training alone reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure in prehypertensive and hypertensive individuals: meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2017 Nov;40(11):927-931.)

22:22  Weight training can also help to reduce the risk of diabetes.  Weight training reduces blood glucose levels and has been shown to reduce hemoglobin A1C, which represents a three month average of blood sugar.  As you use the muscles around the body, they use their glycogen up and then glucose will be pulled from the bloodstream into these muscles, thus lowering blood glucose. And having more muscle gives you more storage for glucose.

25:58  Professional bodybuilders are dying at a young age due to anabolic steroids and other drug use.  What are anabolic steroids?  All our hormones are steroids due to their molecular structure and this includes estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone. But only testosterone is considered to be “anabolic” or growth promoting.  Therefore, anabolic steroids refers to both testosterone and various synthetic derivatives of testosterone that have been designed by chemists to have the muscle growth promoting properties of testosterone without some of the negative effects of taking high levels of testosterone. These drugs have names like Dianabol, Primobolan, and Deca-durabolin.

33:12  Liver damage from taking anabolic steroids.  We may see elevations of liver function on lab testing, esp. AST, ALT, and GGTP levels.  Various things can cause liver function tests to elevate, including drinking alcohol and taking Tylenol and other medications.  Patients who consume a lot of processed carbohydrates and other junk food and who drink soda and eat a lot of sugar can get Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.  The oral anabolic steroids are the ones that are more likely to damage the liver.  Anabolic steroids can cause a condition called Peliosis hepatitis, which are blood-filled cysts in the liver.  There are also reports of bodybuilders who develop various forms of liver cancer.

36:28  Cardiovascular damage from anabolic steroids.  A lot of these bodybuilders that we have been reading about dying young have been dying from heart attacks and blood clots and heart failures.  They usually have an unhealthy lipid profile. One of the most characteristic features is that they tend to have an extremely levels of HDL, which is the good cholesterol. And it can be extremely low, such as under 10, when it is supposed to be over 50.  And their LDL (bad cholesterol) tends to be mildly elevated.  Having an unfavorable lipid profile means that they’re more likely to develop atherosclerosis which is the buildup of cholesterol plaques in their arteries which can block the flow of blood to their heart. So, it’s increasing the risk of both heart attack and a stroke.

38:46  Bodybuilders tend to develop an increase in their hematocrit levels because they are producing so many red blood cells. Their blood gets thicker, which increases the risk for clotting. This must be treated by getting a therapeutic phlebotomy.  In addition, anabolic steroids tend to promote platelet aggregation, which also leads to the risk of more blood clotting. And platelets play a significant role in heart attacks. We used to think that what happened with a heart attack was that you get a plaque that gets bigger and bigger and occludes the artery and causes a heart attack. But what we know now is that the plaque, which may only occlude the artery by 50%, becomes unstable and ruptures and then platelets come to the area and form a platelet plug, which stops the blood flow to the heart, causing the heart attack.

42:03  Kidney damage from anabolic steroids.  Anabolic steroid users tend to develop high blood pressure, which means the heart is stressed and has to work harder to pump blood around the body, causing the heart to hypertrophy (become enlarged). This also puts stress on the kidneys and causes kidney damage, and kidney damage leads to more high blood pressure.  There are quite a number of professional bodybuilders who have had kidney failure and have ended up on dialysis and had kidney transplants.  The kidney stress is made worse by the common usage among many bodybuilders of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like ibuprofen and naproxen.  And this thickening of the heart’s walls leads to difficulty with the ability of the heart to relax during diastole and this leads to congestive heart failure at an early age.

 

 



Dr. Howard Elkin is an Integrative Cardiologist and he is the director of HeartWise Fitness and Longevity Center with offices in both Whittier and Santa Monica, California. He has been in practice since 1986. While Dr. Elkin does utilize medications and he performs angioplasty and stent placement and other surgical procedures, his focus in his practice is employing natural strategies for helping patients, including recommendations for exercise, diet, and lifestyle changes to improve their condition. He also utilizes non-invasive procedures like External Enhanced Counter Pulsation (EECP) as an alternative to angioplasty and by-pass surgery for the treatment of heart disease.  Dr. Elkin has written a book, From Both Sides of the Table: When Doctor Becomes Patient, that will soon be published. He can be contacted at 562-945-3753 or through his website, HeartWise.com.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest and cutting-edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.

Why are there so many dead bodybuilders today? I recently read about the death of the 2018 Mr. Olympia Shawn Rhoden at age 46 dying of a massive heart attack and I was saddened. And then I thought I need to call my friend Dr. Howard Elkin, integrative cardiologist, because I think it’s important for some health care professionals to speak up about why so many professional bodybuilders are dying.  And I think that both myself and Dr. Howard Elkins are uniquely qualified to talk about this particular topic. And that’s because we’re both health professionals. Both of us have treated quite a number of professional bodybuilders in the past. And both of us have also competed at bodybuilding at a substantial level in the past.  So, let me introduce myself. I’m Dr. Ben Weitz. And I am a sports chiropractor. And I’m also a functional nutritionist. Howard, perhaps you can introduce yourself.

Dr. Elkin:              Thank you. Thank you, Ben. It’s always great to be with you on these podcasts. I’m Dr. Howard Elkin. I’m an integrative cardiologist and also anti-aging medical specialist. So, I’ve been doing cardiology for 35 years and anti-aging medicine for about 21 years. So I’ve done a lot with hormone replacement in general and, of course, dealing with body builders as well. So, I’m glad we’re here together today.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. I am, too. Thank you, Howard. So, both of us have been reading about, it seems like a recent run of quite a number of professional bodybuilders, former professional bodybuilders dying at a relatively young age, largely from cardiovascular but also from liver and kidney disease. I mentioned Shawn Rhoden. Several weeks before that, before the Mr. Olympia, George Peterson died.  There’s just been a whole plethora of professional bodybuilders who have been dying in their 30s, 40s, even 50s. And it’s quite upsetting to me that these men and women who look like the pillars of health are dying early.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. I totally agree. And I think 2021 has been a really bad year for competitive bodybuilding on the professional level, and also the high amateur level. I mean, I did a little research on this. And there’s 16 deaths that I have noticed in 2021 alone. Shawn Rhoden, of course, being the most famous because he was Mr. Olympia. In fact, he was the oldest Mr. Olympia to get the crown.  And so, it’s disturbing and what comes to my mind after reading these people are dying in their sleep, okay, people are having strokes, heart attacks, death of amputation of a limb, these are not things that happen to healthy individuals in their 20s, 30s and 40s. You would expect, like Dr. Weitz, just mentioned that these people are like the pillars of health. But inside, things are happening that are anything but.  And you just saw here these deaths in young people that are healthy. And I think this was like the final straw with Shawn Rhoden. It’s like, “Okay, something’s got to stop here,” because this is not looking good, 16 deaths in less than a year. And I think there were three in October or September. So it’s excessive. Deaths among bodybuilders is not unusual. We’ve dealt with this for years but lately, it’s out of control. And I think we need to address the reasons why.

Dr. Weitz:            And I suspect for every professional bodybuilder who makes the news, there’s 20 amateur bodybuilders. And so, one of the reasons why we both felt that it was really important to speak out is as a professional bodybuilder, you may need to do some things that put your health at risk. Unfortunately, today, this sport of professional bodybuilding, the way it is right now, requires the competitors to take performance enhancing drugs, i.e. anabolic steroids and some take a host of other drugs as well.  And these definitely put their health at risk. I’m not sure everybody’s aware of that. But if you choose to do that as a professional bodybuilder with money and fame on the line, you may decide to make that calculation. But as somebody working out in a gym who just wants to get bigger and stronger, maybe hopes of being a professional bodybuilder one day, those are the people we really want to speak to and make sure they understand what are the specific risks to their health, particularly to their cardiovascular system, to their kidneys, to their liver, on top of a bunch of other, unhealthy side effects that may not be life-threatening but are not happy from taking anabolic steroids.

Dr. Elkin:              I just want to interject one thing. You’re absolutely right at all this. I think what bothers me is that we’re dealing with a lot of young people that looked at these big professional bodybuilders as heroes. Even when I went over all their … the scanty information I could find regarding their death was like, “Oh, we honor these people ourselves.” Of course, anytime anyone passes away, it’s a very sad thing.  Sometimes it’s almost like we honor these people, and yet these death I think in my opinion, a lot of them could have been prevented, avoided. But we’re sending a bad message to the youth. You probably heard Richard Piana, he was a big, massive guy, put tons of stuff.

Dr. Weitz:            Yes, I remember seeing him at Gold’s Gym. When he walked in, it was like a cartoon. I didn’t even think he was a real person.

Dr. Elkin:              Between the tattoos and the size. And he knew he was going to die before 50 and he did. He led up to his own self-fulfilling prophecy. He did excessive stuff. He had a huge, here’s my point, huge amount of followers. A lot of young people think, “Oh, wow, this is really cool. I want to get big. I want to get strong. I want to look like this person or that person.”  And so, although I love it bodybuilding, we’ll get into all those good things that we like about it in a minute, it’s just scary to me because the youth of today are seeing this. And they think that it’s an almost aspiration to be like this. And that’s what really frightens me.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. So, really what we hope and expect to be able to accomplish with this podcast video and we’re both going to be writing articles that we’re going to publish very soon on our websites is, A, make sure all these folks who are taking or are considering taking anabolic steroids know what the risks are. And, B, we also don’t want people to hear about these bodybuilders dying and say, “You know what, I don’t think I want to do weightlifting because it’s unhealthy.” They need to understand that lifting weights, resistance training, weight training, however we want to describe it, is one of the most beneficial activities you can possibly perform to promote your health.

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely. I’m about to address this whole issue on one of my YouTube blogs coming up about why bodybuilding, that’s the question. And it’s probably the singular best thing we have to fountain of youth if you don’t really have as we age. And I tell everybody regardless of age, we’ll talk about this together, but it’s like muscle is your greatest ally, I don’t care if you’re a woman, a man, what age you are.  I think in your article that I was just recently reading, yeah, studies have shown that people in their 80s and 90s can still gain muscle.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. And muscles are super important, not just for appearance, much more important because they support and stabilize your joints including your spine. Muscles are what allows you to be mobile and active. You need your muscles to fire at an appropriate time to maintain your stability so you can get around.  And one of the things that really jeopardizes our longevity is the loss of muscle. In fact, it’s given a name, sarcopenia. And that’s a health condition. And loss of mobility is a major factor for older people. In fact, there are seniors who cannot get out of bed simply because they lack the strength to do so. And this is really sad. It doesn’t have to happen. There are people whose digestive systems don’t work because they didn’t have enough muscle tone in their abdomen to keep everything in place.  As we get older, if we lose our strength, people fall. They break a hip, just breaking a hip significantly decreases your lifespan. You’re much more likely to die in a few years after breaking a hip.

Dr. Elkin:              End up with a pneumonia. It’s a vicious cycle. When I tell people, “If you don’t have enough strength to open a jar, close a window, shut a garage door, then those are called activities of daily living.” And a lot of the elderly can’t do that because they haven’t prepared for it.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. A lot of seniors, my mom included, if they end up on the ground, on the floor, maybe they bend over to pick something up, they can’t get up. They simply lack the strength. And that’s because on average, after the age of 30, we lose about a half-a-pound of muscle per year unless you do weight training. And this loss of muscle accelerates after age 50.

Dr. Elkin:              I usually call it use it or lose it.

Dr. Weitz:            Exactly. And so, it’s super important for maintaining your muscle that we do some form of resistance training, weight training. And studies show that even men and women who perform regular weight training can gain muscle even in their 70s and 80s.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, absolutely. So, both Dr. Weitz, we promote resistance training, weight training. And in fact, it may be the single most important exercise you do. Cardio is very important but … and also in all fairness, resistance training has not gotten the attention it really deserves. It is now starting to. But for years and years when you read about exercise and the many benefits, they basically talked a lot about cardio, walking, running, jogging, swimming, cycling, etcetera, etcetera, and all of which are good.  But resistance training was relegated to the back bench for some reason. But things are changing. And I think most of us that deal with sports medicine and longevity realize the benefits. We’re trying to really impress that everyone as they age. You’re never too old to work on strength.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. So, we just mentioned the importance of maintaining muscle. But not only does weight training strengthen your muscles, it also strengthens your bones. And as we age, loss of bone, mass quality strength often referred to as osteoporosis is a major factor that affects your ability to get around and your longevity.  So, the way you maintain your bone density is by putting stress on your bones. Your body reacts to controlled amounts of stress by getting stronger. You put controlled amounts of stress on your muscles and you muscles get stronger. You put controlled amounts of stress on your bones and your bones get stronger.

Some people think that you have all the bone density you’re ever going to have when you’re young, but that’s not true. There’s a constant ebb and flow. There are, throughout your life, osteoblastic cells that are building new bone. And you also have osteoclastic cells that are breaking down bone. And why would they be breaking down bone? Because during even normal activities without any weight training, some of the bone gets broken down. And we need to clear out those junky bone cells so we can make way for new healthier cells, just the way you upkeep your house.

Dr. Elkin:              And just one other point, too. It happened to me last week. I had one of my patients who is a master swimmer, I mean, great shape. And so, we did a bone density scan. It was pretty severe osteoporosis. Why? Because swimming which is an excellent, excellent aerobic activity and also for many, many other reasons, also cycling, there’s no real impact.  Listen. So, these people are very … they may be cardiovascular-wise very healthy, but their bones haven’t benefited because there’s no pounding. So that’s why I tell these people, the swimmers and cyclists, you need to implement weight training. Because just doing the aerobic activity that you do alone is not going to make it.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. I am totally on the same page with you. In fact, if I’m talking to a patient and they have an hour to exercise, I’m going to encourage them to do at least 30 or 40 minutes of weight training, and maybe 20 minutes of aerobic or cardiovascular activity because the weight training is so important. And the way that weight training stimulates the bones is that, A, you load the bones. The body feels that stress in the bones and says, “We’ve got to make these bones stronger.”  And also, when you contract the muscles hard, they’re pulling on the bones because muscles are attached through tendons to bones and joints. And they pull. And that pulling stresses the bones, strains the bones, puts torque on the bones, and the body needs to make sure those bones get stronger so they can resist that.

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:            So now, let’s get into the cardiovascular benefits of weight training which I think are generally not that well-known.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. And one of the things you can do which we didn’t know until recent years is that it actually improves your cholesterol, the whole lipid milieu. We thought, “Oh, well, we know that cardio does.” But what is weight training does is it has a beneficial effect. Also, it has a beneficial effect on your circulation in general. When you do load the muscle and the bone, like Dr. Weitz has mentioned, you’re bringing blood to the area. So, an increased blood flow is important.

Dr. Weitz:            You’re dilating those arteries. You’re exercising the arterial walls, keeping them compliant, allowing them to expand and contract.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Because as we get older, what we see instead is arterial stiffness.

Dr. Weitz:            Yes.

Dr. Elkin:              From the heart going all the way to all your vessels, your big arteries, your small arteries and everything in between. So, weight training has one advantage that we didn’t really appreciate until recently.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. We all know that diet plays a huge role in our cholesterol metabolism, but most people don’t realize. And of course, the studies are mixed, not all the studies are consistent on this. But generally speaking, it appears as though for most of the data that I’ve been looking at that resistance training improves your lipids.  One of the most significant effects is that it raises your levels of HDL which is your healthy cholesterol, your good cholesterol that produces reverse cholesterol transport. And studies also show that it reduces your LDL and total cholesterol.

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely. And we didn’t really appreciate … I mean, 10 years ago when I was researching exercise, we didn’t really know much about weight training, what did it really do?  But it’s really on par with cardio or aerobic training as far as what it can do for your lipids.  So, it’s really exciting news for me because that’s how we can inculcate the importance of all this to our patients.

Dr. Weitz:            And one factor that affects our overall health, our cardiovascular health in particular, is obesity. And if people want to help fight weight gain, if they want to lose some weight, probably the most beneficial thing you can do is weight training. Now, of course, aerobic training is a great way to burn fat. However, the most significant factor is raising your metabolic rate. That’s the rate at which you’re burning calories all day long even when you’re not exercising.  And in a 24-hour-a-day, even if you’re doing super intense aerobic exercise, the rest of the day, if you don’t have a significant amount of muscle mass, you’re going to have a lower metabolic rate and you’re going to be burning fewer calories at rest.

Dr. Elkin:              I can’t agree with you more. And this comes up all the time especially when I deal with women, “I don’t want to get big, I don’t want to get bulky.” It’s like, “Believe me, it’s not going to happen. You’re not going to look like a bodybuilder unless you do the strange things that bodybuilders do.” A muscle is your greatest ally.  And like Dr. Weitz says, the metabolic rate is so much better. I think we look at a pound of fat versus a pound of muscle. I mean, I think it’s like a difference of … it’s quite a difference. I can’t remember the exact numbers now.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. It takes a lot of energy to maintain muscle where essentially fat is relatively inert. Now, one of the interesting things that we learned recently about weight training that’s really unique to it is that while both cardiovascular and weight training reduce epicardial fat, only weight training has been shown to reduce pericardial fat. Perhaps, you can explain what those are.

Dr. Elkin:              Okay. So, if you’re dealing with fat and obesity or visceral fat we call which is a scary kind of fat that as people get older, the middle-aged brother gets bigger and bigger and bigger. We used to think years ago, “Oh, fat is fat.” It’s inert because it has such a poor blood supply. Well, that’s not really true. Fat is really very metabolically active but in a very negative way, because you’ve heard of cytokines, these things that happen during COVID.

And so, there are so many cytokines with the abdominal fat and the visceral fat that actually it promotes inflammation, and it’s not a good thing. So, the same thing happens here in the organ. It’s not just visceral fat. Your liver gets fat. Your pancreas gets fat. And your heart gets fat. So pericardial is the area … peri- means around from the Greek. So, it’s around the heart. And yeah, I’ve seen these hearts at autopsy. They’re not pretty.  They look like a bunch of fat encasing the heart. So, this is new information which is really exciting. I didn’t know that myself until I recently read it.

Dr. Weitz:            And lifting weights reduces blood pressure. Even though while you’re performing a heavy exercise, let’s say you’re doing a set of leg press, for the 30 seconds that you’re doing a leg press, your blood pressure may shoot up. And when done consistently, weight training lowers blood pressure.

Dr. Elkin:              And I’m so glad that resistance training is getting the attention it deserves now because it really was like the back … it’s actually by the back seat for a long, long time. Because everything was based on cardio, cardio, cardio, aerobic training, which still has its role. And I think it’s important, I think you mentioned this, too, Ben that if you take a person that’s the same age as Dr. Weitz and myself, the same size and everything, okay, yeah …

Dr. Weitz:            Two men in their 30s.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. Copy that. Well, if we’re both sitting down watching a football game or something, we’ll lose more fat just sitting there than the other person will.

Dr. Weitz:            Yes.

Dr. Elkin:              Our metabolic rate being higher because of the muscle.

Dr. Weitz:            I have to eat over 3,000 calories a day or I will lose weight. And I’m not trying to lose weight.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, it’s true.

Dr. Weitz:            So, one more thing I wanted to mention is the benefits of weight training for preventing and actually managing diabetes because weight training is actually super beneficial in reducing blood glucose levels, and has been shown to reduce hemoglobin A1c. When your muscles contract, they’re using up the glycogen that’s stored in those muscles. And then that allows the glucose in the bloodstream to go into those muscles.  And because with weight training, you’re not just say using your legs like you might do when you’re running, you’re using your chest muscles, your back muscles, your arm muscles, your leg muscles, your torso muscles. All of those muscles will have need for more glycogen and they’ll pull in glucose. And having more muscle also gives you more storage for glucose to get it out of the bloodstream to reduce inflammation, to reduce it from building up in the liver and the other organs.

Dr. Elkin:              Absolutely. I mean, everything you said is correct. And something I thought but it escaped my memory for a second. But anyway, I’ll tell you about the diabetes thing. One thing I have to say about bodybuilders and I’m not talking about the excessive ones, but bodybuilding in itself and all my patients that are bodybuilders, they’re extremely insulin sensitive which is a great thing, because as we get older, insulin resistance seems to be the, it’s quite known, it seems to be what happens as we get older.  Why? Because we’re less active, we put on fat, muscle does not turn to fat, fat doesn’t turn to muscle. But because we’re inactive and our muscle cells shrink in atrophy, it’s easier to put on weight because we’re not doing anything. But people that work with weights that are bodybuilders and on any level, they tend … and I measure insulin levels in almost all my patients so I see this. They tend to have really low insulin levels and they’re always metabolically healthy.  And only 12% of the adult American population is really metabolically healthy. So, that’s another very good aspect of bodybuilding and resistance training in general.

Dr. Weitz:            Right. And I have quite a number of patients over the years I’ve talked to who don’t like doing weight training. And I just wanted to say one thing about that, is often people who come in my office, they’re very flexible, they can wrap their legs around their head. And when I ask them what kind of exercise they do, “Oh, I do lots of yoga. I don’t like weight training.”  Well, one of the reasons why they like to do yoga is because they’re really good at it. Unfortunately, if you’re really good at it, you probably don’t need it. It’s probably not going to help you as much as doing weight training. And one of the reasons you probably don’t like to do weight training is because you’re not good at it. And this is a case where doing things that you’re not good at are good.

Dr. Elkin:              And I’m sure in your line of work as a chiropractor, you’ve seen a ton of yoga-related injuries.

Dr. Weitz:            Absolutely. People think that stretching is always the way to solve injuries. And the fact is we need a balance of mobility, flexibility and stability. And stability comes from muscle strength.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:            So, let’s talk about why these professional bodybuilders are dying which essentially really has nothing to do with the weight training. It has to do with the drugs that they’re taking.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. So, keep in mind that weight training itself is not going to like tear your aorta or cause a massive heart attack or anything like that. Like I said, we’ve outlined the advantages and why it’s so important. So now, we can focus on what happened to these unfortunates and others. These aren’t the only guys that die. These are the well-known professionals and high-level amateurs.

Dr. Weitz:            Right. Just to give people a little description, I want to mention a story about bodybuilder Andreas Munzer. Yes, I know he died in 1996 but he was a well-known professional bodybuilder. He had extremely low body fat. In the bodybuilding lingo, he was ripped. But he died at age 32. And when he died, he was having internal bleeding and his liver and kidneys failed.  Now, on autopsy, they found within his body 20 different drugs. His liver had a consistency similar to plastic. He had multiple tennis-size tumors in his liver. His kidneys were swelling to immense proportions. And his heart was so enlarged that it was a double the size of a normal heart. And this is basically due to all these drugs that professional bodybuilders take. The most important of which, for what we’re talking about, here are anabolic steroids.  Can you explain what anabolic steroids are, Howard?

Dr. Elkin:              First of all, steroid isn’t some horrible kind of term. I mean, it describes a ring-like structure of hormones. And by the way, besides testosterone being a steroid, estrogen is a steroid, progesterone is a steroid. So, it describes the structure of these hormones. So, we all normally produce testosterone, both men and women, men to a much greater extent. And the same thing with estrogen.  But what happens is that these guys take these performance-enhancing drugs, most notably steroids to get that added edge, to get faster, stronger and whatnot. And it’s when these become excessive that we start seeing these problems.

Dr. Weitz:            So, these guys are taking testosterone which is an anabolic steroid. By the way, that’s one of the differences between testosterone and estrogen is testosterone is anabolic meaning producing-muscle growth. And then they take synthetic derivatives of testosterone. And these are basically designer anabolic steroids. They’ve been around for a long time. The reports show that the Germans first produced Dianabol in World War II to make their soldiers stronger and more aggressive.  And basically, these synthetic testosterone derivatives, these anabolic steroids are designed to enhance the muscle-producing properties of steroids and decrease some of the other properties that are less desirable.

Dr. Elkin:              It’s got to do with the protein synthesis. So the more you can increase protein synthesis within the muscle cell, you’ll have bigger muscle.

Dr. Weitz:            And these drugs, some are taken orally, some probably more often are injected intramuscularly. Howard is an anti-aging doctor and both of us understand and appreciate and support the idea of hormone replacement therapy for men and women, women after menopause, men after andropause who have low levels of hormones, who are taking a physiological dosage to maintain their health and vitality. And we both believe that this can be done in a healthy manner if they were taking the right amount in the right way.  But what these bodybuilders are taking is hundreds of times higher dosages than would be used for hormone replacement.

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah. As opposed to like 100 milligrams of testosterone, they’re talking 1, 2, 3, 4 or five grams a week, I mean, out of sight.

Dr. Weitz:            Right, thousands of milligrams. Yup. And often, they’re taking growth hormone.  Sometimes to facilitate the growth hormone usage, they’re taking insulin. They’re taking diuretics. They’re taking antiestrogen drugs, thyroid stimulants like clenbuterol. So, there’s a whole plethora of drugs. But really, we want to focus on the potential negative effects of anabolic steroids.  And when we look at anabolic steroids, there’s a bunch of side effects that are annoying like acne and water retention, acceleration of male pattern baldness, testicular atrophy, not a great attribute, gynecomastia in males, that’s where the breasts actually … they grow female breasts. Some men have actually been known to squirt out milk, not a pretty sight, sexual dysfunction, voice deepening, clitoral enlargement in women, muscle and tendon tears, violent behavior, etcetera, etcetera.  But what we want to focus on are the negative aspects of anabolic steroids that impact your life which is cardiovascular disease, kidney disease and liver disease.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, those are the three main ones. And one quick segue into oral anabolics. So there’s oral and there’s intramuscular. And actually, oral is much more dangerous because anything oral has to go what we call first pass. So, it goes from the gut to the liver and that’s where the problem is because as they get to the liver, it’s toxic. So the liver has to work very hard to detoxify or make a less toxic substance or metabolite.  And in doing so, the liver takes a brunt. It takes a big brunt. And I can’t tell you how many bodybuilders I’ve seen with liver dysfunction.

Dr. Weitz:            And this is also a reason why women who are taking hormone replacement therapy should not take oral estrogen.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. We don’t use any oral estrogens in dealing with bioidentical hormones with women. So that’s really important, too.

Dr. Weitz:            So, why don’t we start with the liver since you brought that up? And one of the first things we’ll see is liver function tests like AST, ALT. They’ll start to go up.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, exactly. And there’s another one called GGTP which is very specific for the liver.  ALT is specifically for the liver as well.  SGOT could be liver and muscle. But when we start seeing those go up, and now there’s other things that will cause it to go up, drinking alcohol, of course. And a big one that we’re seeing in this day and age, of course, is this entity called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. That’s a whole different entity.  But steroids themselves and the doses that are being used by these competitors can certainly cause liver injury especially if it’s anything oral. And I can tell you, these guys are taking oral stuff. The women definitely take oral stuff. And the men do, too, to get level because the oral stuff is more of immediate. And along with oral anabolics, you get a lot of water retention. And a lot of water retention, you get a big surge in blood pressure.  And these people go to doctors, most of them don’t. I mean, I get some that do. And the ones that do relatively, I wouldn’t say totally unscathed, but they do okay.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. One of the conditions that is seen in anabolic steroid use is a condition called Peliosis hepatitis which are blood-filled cysts in the liver. And this is an extremely unusual condition. And so, this is something that can be directly traced to anabolic steroids.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. And there have been some reports that can you develop liver cancer or what we call … we used to call it hepatoma. Now, we just call it a liver cancer which is not a good cancer to have. I think there have been some reports. I tried to do some research on that. I couldn’t … as a direct quote. I mean, I think any kind of toxic substance like hepatitis C can eventually lead to liver cancer.

Dr. Weitz:            People need to understand when these liver function tests are positive, it often means that there’s damage occurring to the liver. And consider that the liver and the kidneys are your two main organs that are filtering out toxins. And the more you burden those organs, the more you stress them constantly over time, stressing a tissue excessively is something that can lead to cancer.

Now, a lot of the things we’re talking about, unfortunately there are not large randomized clinical trials of double-blind placebo. So, a lot of these are coming from case reports but nobody is going to do a multimillion dollar double-blind placebo-controlled study on anabolic steroids because they’re not used legally in this country. And nobody’s going to pay for that. But there’s certainly plenty of anecdotal reports that both of us have seen about liver damage.  Let’s get into the cardiovascular damage because a lot of these men and women that we’re hearing about are dying of heart attacks and blood clots and heart failures.

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah. So the first thing that comes to my mind always is the lipids, the blood fats. Okay. So, what we characteristically see is really a low … HDL I’ll say is high density, but basically I call it healthy and LDL is lousy just for ease of remembering. But it’s a little more complicated in that. But what we characteristically see in these folks that the LDL tends to be elevated. That’s the bad cholesterol. And HDL tends to be low. And I don’t mean low, I mean real low.  I have seen women competitors that are just doing like the mild steroids but they’re oral, they’re oral. And they have single-digit HDL, it’s like under 10.

Dr. Weitz:            Wow, that’s incredible and interesting. If they weren’t doing weight training, it’s probably even lower.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, exactly.

Dr. Weitz:            And having this unfavorable lipid profile means that they’re more likely to develop atherosclerosis which is the buildup of cholesterol plaques in their arteries which can block the flow of blood to their heart. So, it’s increasing the risk of both heart attack and a stroke.

Dr. Elkin:              For example, I have a 38-year-old bodybuilder. I always like giving stories. Talented guy, he wants to go pro. But he does come to see me. And he’s putting a limit on, “If I don’t do within a year-and-a-half, I’m out.” But okay, in the last year-and-a-half, his blood pressure has gotten super … he’s put on tons of muscle, tons of weight.  So, in the last year-and-a-half, he’s become hypertensive. He’s got sleep apnea. His HDL is in the toilet. He’s now on a statin. The same thing, it’s crazy. So, he was pretty healthy before he was none of these medications. Also, he’s got to get regular phlebotomies because the hematocrit, hemoglobin are too high which we’ll get into.

Dr. Weitz:            Why don’t we talk about that? So, bodybuilders have their blood gets thicker because they’re producing so many red blood cells. So, your blood is made up of this liquid part called plasma. And then there’s also these red blood cells. And there’s a certain percentage of red blood cells you’re supposed to have in a certain liter of blood. And this hematocrit measure is something we measure through blood testing. And when that hematocrit goes up, what that means is you’ve got too many red blood cells which means your blood is thicker.  Now, cyclists who compete in the Tour de France, they encourage this and sometimes do it for a short period of time because it allows them to have more oxygen going to their muscles so they can win the race. But this is very dangerous state to be in.

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah. It’s called doping. And I got to tell you, it’s a major problem. And my folks, a lot of my folks that are on physiological replacement doses, we’re talking low doses like 100 milligrams or less, but some actually still have that tendency to produce too much red blood cells. And now keep in mind, that’s one of the pluses. I mean, we want to have some increased red blood cells because it increases our oxygen-carrying capacity. So you have muscular endurance, improving the muscular endurance.  However, the double-edged sword of that could also … it could be overly done. And even with normal physiologic doses, so I [inaudible 00:40:28] watch all my patients on testosterone and I carefully watch their hematocrits. And if they get too high, we’d have to stop it or they have to do bloodletting. So now, that’s just with regular physiologic replacement doses. Can you imagine these massive doses? And who knows …

Dr. Weitz:            When you say bloodletting, Howard, essentially what you mean is they have to go and donate blood.

Dr. Elkin:             Right, yeah. Either donate blood or you can go to a hospital in your insurance and they’ll … it’s called a therapeutic phlebotomy. You’re actually giving up blood.

Dr. Weitz:            Right. And there’s another factor which is that bodybuilders tend to get increased platelet aggregation. So not only is your blood thicker but it’s more likely to clot because the platelets are the components in the blood that lead to clotting.

Dr. Elkin:             Right. In fact, platelets are usually the final thing that led to this a heart attack. We used to think that with cardiovascular disease, coronary disease that you get a blockage that gets bigger and bigger and bigger in 30 years and eventually just get a heart attack. No, that’s what we thought when I was a fellow many years ago. Now, we know that’s all inflammation. That most of the heart attacks that take place are blockages like probably 50% at most.  But what happens, there’s a rupture. The plaque becomes unstable, it ruptures. And then platelets come to the area and they form what’s called a platelet plug, and then you have no blood flow, and they have a heart attack. So already, just when you have an aggregation … when you have platelet problems and they’re sticking together and coming together, that’s a great that … all you have to have is an unstable plaque and you got a heart attack ready to happen.

Dr. Weitz:            And you mentioned the bodybuilder that you’re seeing who has hypertension, increased blood pressure. And now, that also means that’s putting more stress on the heart because when the heart pumps the blood, if the blood pressure is up, it means that it’s harder for the heart to push the blood around the body. And so, then the heart has to work harder, the heart tends to hypertrophy.  This stresses out the kidneys. You tend to have kidney damage from this. People with kidney problems, that tends to lead to more hypertension. And you have this vicious cycle.

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah. This yin and yang thing because the kidneys respond to the heart, the heart responds to the kidneys. And it’s a big deal. As you know, there are several pro-level bodybuilders that have ended up on dialysis in the past. Even a couple of renal kidney transplants.

Dr. Weitz:            Many, many, many kidney transplants.

Dr. Elkin:              Also, in all fairness, they also take a lot of NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like ibuprofen and Aleve. And they’re taking big doses. And they’re taking it every day which is very renal damaging. But like Dr. Weitz has said, it’s that the hypertrophy of the heart, the heart has to work harder, the kidneys sense that. It is a vicious cycle.  And I think also with this hypertrophy thing, I’ll take it one more stage. So, with years and years of hypertrophy, the heart’s getting thicker and thicker and thicker, because the heart’s a muscle. So you’re stimulating your skeletal muscles and also your heart muscle because the heart is a muscle. But when it gets so thick, then it has a difficulty relaxing.

And there’s these two phases of the cardiac cycle. One is we call it systole which the heart contracts. And then we have one called diastole in which the heart relaxes. And actually, the energy needed to relax the heart is actually more than it is to contract, probably because it’s longer. It’s almost twice as long. So that’s what’s impaired. So the relaxation phase, the diastole, is impaired because the heart is so thick, how can it relax?  And by the way, this can lead … as we see now with older people especially in women, diastolic heart failure is seen in more than 50% of cases that hits the hospital with congestive heart failure. Now, we’re seeing it in bodybuilders which we should not be seeing it at such a young age.

Dr. Weitz:            And this could also be partially related to massive dosages of growth hormone that many of the guys take at the same time with anabolic steroids which can lead to growth of the internal organs, correct?

Dr. Elkin:              I don’t know if you … I’m sure you’ve noticed and we all have noticed. I mean, I don’t go to bodybuilding shows anymore. Why? Because I don’t like the looks. I mean, these big bellies. I mean, you see these big bellies, yet they are ripped because they’ve used so much growth hormone and insulin together that the kidneys get bigger, the intestines get bigger, all the internal organs get bigger, the heart gets bigger. This is like not a good thing.  And guess what. This will never go away. Once you’ve enlarged your organs, that’s how it’s going to be.

Dr. Weitz:            The only thing that doesn’t get bigger is the brain.

Dr. Elkin:              Right, unfortunately.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. So, let’s just touch on one more topic which we’ve already talked about which is how anabolic steroids negatively affect the kidneys.

Dr. Elkin:              Okay. Well, I think we’ve mentioned one, the interplay between the heart.

Dr. Weitz:            Well, we could start with the fact that the oral steroids go through the liver, but the injectable steroids make their way into the kidneys.

Dr. Elkin:              Right. And I think it’s a dose-related thing. I’ve never seen a problem with many people on physiologic replacement doses, never. I’ve never seen a kidney problem ever or liver problem because we’re using injectables and we’re using low doses. But well, it could be … some of these are more kidney toxic and others. There’s one called trenbolone. I don’t even know … it’s a synthetic form of testosterone. I don’t really know much about it.  But I can tell you that if you take that for more than six or eight weeks, you are definitely putting your kidneys at risk. It’s directly kidney toxic. And I think probably could be with any of these antibiotics that are overdone. There’s a direct toxic effect on the kidney. And here’s you got to remember, the liver has some ability to regenerate which is … unless you …

Dr. Weitz:            A remarkable ability to regenerate, yeah.

Dr. Elkin:              Kidneys do not regenerate. Once your kidneys damaged, it staged. It does not get better.

Dr. Weitz:            And there’s a particular condition that’s been related directly to anabolic steroids. There’s a condition called focal segmental glomerulosclerosis which is a development of scar tissue in the filtering structures of the kidneys. And I’m not saying that anabolic steroids are the only thing that causes, but it’s been directly linked with the use of anabolic steroids.

Dr. Elkin:              Yeah. I didn’t know that until I read it from you. So, the glomerulus is the part of the kidney … well, there’s millions and millions, but that’s where it all begins. So, that’s where the blood has to filter through this big cap. I call it the big cap of capillaries in order to enter the kidney itself, the nephron to go through the filtering process.  So, if you have less and less glomeruli because of this necrosis we’re just talking about or sclerosis is that then you already having diminished renal function. So yeah, that’s a new one. I mean, I didn’t hear there’s direct effect but the kidneys, yeah. And then if you add the drugs that they use to help with all their pain, like I said, all these nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, it’s adding insult to injury.  And I mean, some of these bodybuilders I’ve heard, the doses are … it [inaudible 00:48:06] you if you know how much they were taking. And then you add diuretics which dehydrates them which makes the kidneys even worse.

Dr. Weitz:            And then guys, getting ready for shows not only do diuretics, they don’t drink water for sometimes days on end. And that’s stressing your kidneys out, too.

Dr. Elkin:              I have to give you a funny story. Well, it wasn’t funny. But my first matches.

Dr. Weitz:            Bodybuilding contests.

Dr. Elkin:              Matches which is in 2001. And so, I’m on stage. And this guy just passes out. Now, there’s like six of us. I don’t know how many were. So of course, I’m the only doctor so I have to do something. So I had to maintain my form as I went down there. And back then, they didn’t have paramedics there. We called for them and then they came and then looked at the EKG, it was normal. It was dehydration and he uses like because I see this, he uses diuretics.  The same thing happened at my last show which I think was 2012 or ’13. And guy passed out. I said, “What is this? So I had to break … this time, we had paramedics but still they knew … they’re like, “Can you read his EKG?” He was okay.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s great.

Dr. Elkin:              My firsthand bodybuilders collapsing. Thank God it was … didn’t have a heart attack but they could have.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. I wonder if there’s more use of diuretics now because when I competed, it was back in the ’80s, in 1985. I won the Mr. LA. I won the Hawaii-Western Open. And I eventually won the Natural Mr. International. But I don’t remember a lot of guys collapsing, but maybe they weren’t using as many drugs or some of the drugs that they’re using now.

Dr. Elkin:              It’s the combination of so many different substances. It’s just excessive.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. Howard, I think we’ve done a great job with this topic. I think we’ve given people a lot of really useful information. Perhaps, you can tell our listeners and viewers how they can get ahold of you and also let them know about your YouTube Live.

Dr. Elkin:              Okay. So, my website is heartwise.com H-E-A-R-T-W-I-S-E dot com. And then I’m on Instagram under dochelkin, D-O-C-H-E-L-K-I-N. And then on Facebook, it’s Heart Wise Fitness and Longevity Center. I do a YouTube every two weeks. And my next one will be next week. And we’re going to be probably talking about bodybuilding.

Dr. Weitz:            And what time and date is it and how they can get to your YouTube page?

Dr. Elkin:              Okay. So basically, it’s The Medical Advocate Howard Elkin MD, The Medical Advocate, Howard Elkin MD. Well, just have that at the search button. If you subscribe which I suggest that you do, you’ll be getting an alert so you’ll know exactly when I’m going to do it. It’s generally every two weeks. It would have been this week but it’s Thanksgiving. So we’re making it next week. But generally it’s every two weeks, 7:00 p.m, Pacific Standard Time.  And it’s fun. I pick a topic. I talk about 12 minutes and the rest is chat time. So people can ask questions in the chat box. It’s a lot of fun.

Dr. Weitz:            And I’m Dr. Ben Weitz. You can get ahold of me at my chiropractic office in Santa Monica by calling 310-395-3111. And we can see you for chiropractic. We can see you for functional nutrition consultations. If you go to my website www.drweitz.com, you can find links to my podcast and blog posts and more information about my practice.  This is part of my Rational Wellness Podcast which is available on Apple podcasts, Spotify, also my YouTube page Weitz Chiro. And if you enjoy this podcast, please go to Apple podcasts and give me a five-star ratings and review. And look forward to seeing everybody next week.

Dr. Elkin:              You’re a very prolific guy.

Dr. Weitz:            Thank you, Howard.

Dr. Elkin:              All right guys, thank you so much, Ben. We’ll see you soon. Take care.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:            Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. And if you enjoyed this podcast, please go to Apple podcast and give us a five-star ratings and review. That way, more people will be able to find this Rational Wellness Podcast when they’re searching for health podcasts.  And I wanted to let everybody know that I do now have a few openings for new nutritional consultations for patients at my Santa Monica Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition Clinic. So, if you’re interested, please call my office 310-395-3111 and sign up for one of the few remaining slots for a comprehensive nutritional consultation with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you and see you next week.

 

Dr. Tom Fabian speaks about the Role of the Microbiome in Food Allergies with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

1:30  Food allergies vs Food sensitivities vs Food intolerances.  Food allergies are mediated by Immunoglobulin E and mast cells tend to play a role.  Patients with true food allergies may have very severe reactions such as anaphylaxis and they are immediate after eating that food.  Food sensitivities are typically  mediated by IgG and they tend to be delayed reactions. They can also be mediated by IgM and IgA, though these are less well defined.  Secretory IgA, which is reported on the GI Map stool test from Diagnostic Solutions, is known to play multiple roles in the gut both in terms of reacting to things thought to be threats, but also a protective role in terms of commensal bacteria in which IgA binds to these commensals and by binding to normal food antigens, it helps to reduce or prevent over-reactivity from the immune system.

7:13  A Food Intolerance is a non-immune mediated reaction to a food, such as a carbohydrate intolerance or a histamine intolerance, which can be mediated by a lack of diamine oxidase enzyme, which keeps you from breaking down histamine.

8:46  A healthy microbiome can play a role in our oral tolerance to foods that might otherwise be harmless. Our immune system has a balance of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory. Immune tolerance is a mechanism by which the immune system restrains overreaction, which applies to food allergies, and involves Treg cells. There are a number of products from the microbiome that promote Treg cells that promote immune tolerance and the one that has been best studied is butyrate.  Certain commensal microbes seem to be especially important. In the small intestine, the important microbes are Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Prevotella, esp. a particular species, Prevotella histicola, which has been shown to protect against food sensitivities. 

15:46  Leaky Gut. If you have leaky gut or increased intestinal permeability, then you can more easily get food antigens across the epithelial lining of the gut and react with the immune cells in the intestinal mucosa. If you have overgrowth of inflammatory type bacteria, such as E. coli, Klebsiella, or Ciotrobacter, this can cause leaky gut.  Certain microbes can modify how antigenic a protein is. Pseudomonas, which is common resident of the small intestine, can break down certain proteins, such as gluten in a way that makes it easier for the gluten to get through the leaky gut. Then the gluten doesn’t break down enough till it is broken into individual amino acids, which is the ideal situation, since amino acids usually do not cause immune reactions. It’s the larger proteins that cause immune reactions. This is one of the reasons why hydrochloric acid is so important to break down proteins and a lot of people do not have enough hydrochloric acid. 

 

 

 



Tom Fabian, PhD in Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology. Tom is also a certified Nutrition Therapy Practitioner and he specializes in the microbiome and how it relates to digestive, immune, brain, and metabolic health. Tom offers a Microbiome Mastery course through his website, Microbiomemastery.com. Tom also works with Diagnostic Solutions helping to interpret the GI Map stool test. https://www.diagnosticsolutionslab.com/

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me. And let’s jump into the podcast.

Hello, Rational Wellness podcasters. Today, I’m very excited to be speaking with Dr. Tom Fabian on the role of the microbiome in promoting and preventing food allergies, food sensitivities, and food intolerances. Dr. Tom Fabian has a PhD in Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, and he’s a certified nutrition therapy practitioner. Tom specializes in the microbiome and how it relates to digestive, immune, brain and metabolic health. And he offers a microbiome mastery course through his website, microbiomemastery.com. Tom also works with Diagnostic Solutions, helping clinicians to interpret the GI-MAP stool test and educate practitioners about stool testing and the microbiome. Tom, thank you so much for joining us today.

Dr. Fabian:          All right. Thanks so much, Dr. Ben, it’s great to be here again today.

Dr. Weitz:            Excellent. Excellent. So I was thinking, before we get into trying to understand how a healthy microbiome can play an important role in reducing the risk of food allergies, sensitivities, can you explain, what is the difference between a food allergy, a food sensitivity, and a food intolerance? Because I’m not sure most people are really aware of what those differences are.

Dr. Fabian:          Sure, yes. And the lines are actually somewhat blurred a little bit with some new information that’s come out from research, plus they often coexist for some patients. So that’s just one of things to keep in mind, it’s not always a case where something fits in a nice, neat and tidy box. But generally, food allergies are caused by or mediated by immunoglobulin E in particular. They often have, of course, involvement of mast cells, so mast cells tend to play a key role in terms of food allergies. So typically, what happens is patients become sensitized to certain antigens through various mechanisms potentially, so that the immune system next time it recognizes that antigen, so the next time a patient consumes that food, they can have a pretty significant allergic reaction to that. So a lot of that’s mediated by mast cell release of histamine, for example, so they’ll often have histamine related symptoms, and of course, it can be pretty severe in the terms of anaphylaxis. So that’s the main concern with food allergies that are severe.

Then there’s the food sensitivity category, which is a little bit less well defined, but certainly we all know that, that tends to be mediated by a different immunoglobulin, which is immunoglobulin G. Again, the mechanisms are similar where patients become sensitized to particular antigens, and then instead of having an IgE anaphylactic type response, they’ll have a more subtle response typically. Again, it ranges across a broad range of significance and often it’s more delayed, so instead of having a more immediate type reaction, it’s something that can happen hours later, sometimes even days later. So it’s a little bit more of a chronic type issue or just longer term issue in terms of the symptoms manifesting.

Dr. Weitz:            And I guess it could be IgM or IgA mediated as well, right?

Dr. Fabian:          Potentially. Again, those are a little less well defined. So IgA is a mixed picture. It’s thought that Secretory IgA plays multiple roles in the gut, both in terms of responding to things that are thought to be threats, especially pathogens, but it also plays more of a protective role for things like commensals where we don’t want to overreact, and also just normal food antigens, we don’t want to overreact to those either. So it’s thought that Secretory IgA binds to these normal commensals, binds to normal food antigens, and by binding, it’s thought that, that’s part of how that helps to reduce or prevent overreactivity from the immune system.

So it’s partly a physical thing whereby binding these antigens or microbes keeps them away from the epithelium. So again, usually closer the organisms or the antigens get to the epithelium, the immune system can detect that and may start to overreact. So they’re still learning some of these features of IgA. It’s pretty fascinating that it plays so many different roles, but a lot of it is protective to help reduce the actions. But of course, if we overreact to certain things, that can be another reason why there might be an elevated Secretory IgA. So for example, on the GI-MAP test we have anti-gliadin one the markers, and that is generally thought to be a marker for gluten sensitivity, gluten reactivity. So it’s not always easy to tell when you have a positive result with IgA, is that a protective response? Is that more of a response [crosstalk 00:05:44]?

Dr. Weitz:            So interesting.

Dr. Fabian:          Yes.

Dr. Weitz:            Because I know like Cyrex testing often includes IgM, and IgA, as well as IgG.

Dr. Fabian:          Exactly. Yes, so I think it’s important, if possible, to get the more complete picture of what’s going on, because all these different immunoglobulins serve different roles. So I think that’s an evolving picture, we don’t have all the answers yet, unfortunately.

Dr. Weitz:            And is there a sense that food allergies are more longer term or even permanent than food sensitivities which can come and go?

Dr. Fabian:          That’s a great question. So I can’t say I have a really good answer for that, I’m not as familiar with the research on the comparative longer term picture with those different immunoglobulins. But definitely, there is evidence that, that can change over time, whether it’s an outright allergy or a sensitivity, depending on lots of factors. If you’re just not exposed to the antigens for a long time, the immune system may not be as responsive after a certain period of time. And again, we do see that with certain immunoglobulins like IgA. And referring back to the anti-gliadin IgA, if patients haven’t been exposed to gluten for, say, the last three to six months, that may go back down to normal ranges, indicating that there may be less responsiveness over a period of time.

Dr. Weitz:            And then what is a food intolerance in contrast to a food allergy and a food sensitivity?

Dr. Fabian:          So food allergies and sensitivities are immune mediated reactions, whereas food intolerances are defined as non-immune mediated. Again, newer research indicates that those lines are a little bit blurred now, but classically, food intolerances are things like carbohydrate intolerance, so there’s usually no significant immune mediated reaction there, but patients essentially don’t digest and absorb these well. So they end up going lower down to the GI tract, often the colon, where the microbes then ferment these into gases and other products that then can provoke symptoms. Similar scenario to histamine intolerance where normally we have an enzyme in the gut called diamine oxidase that helps to break down histamine. So if you have a lack of diamine oxidase due to a genetic deficiency or possibly due to damage in the small intestine, inflammation in small intestine, that can reduce the DAO enzyme, and so then you’re not able to break down histamine. So if you consume high histamine foods, for example, that can provoke a histamine related reaction. And there are others as well, like oxalates, lots of different components of food potentially are things that certain individuals can react to. So broadly speaking, those would be intolerances.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. So let’s talk about how a healthy microbiome and healthy commensal bacteria play a role in the risk of food allergy, sensitivities and intolerances.

Dr. Fabian:          So there’s a lot of research that started coming out in the last, say, 10 years or so on defining the role of the microbiome in oral tolerance. So that’s the concept where typically the harmless foods, day to day foods that we’re eating, of course, we don’t want to react to those from an immune standpoint. And it turns out that the immune system of course has a balance of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory, to keep it simplistic. The anti-inflammatory response is similar and overlaps with the immune tolerance response. So basically, immune tolerance is a mechanism by which the immune system restrains overreaction, and that applies to food allergies, respiratory allergies, et cetera. And mostly that involves what are called Treg cells.

So it turns out a lot of the recent research shows that various products from the microbiome can promote these Treg cells that promote immune tolerance. And probably the best study of these is butyrate, so that’s made primarily by butyrate producing bacteria in the colon from fiber. And lots of studies have shown that in various scenarios, whether it’s autoimmunity, whether it’s allergies, sensitivities, that the butyrate may often be deficient, butyrate producers and the butyrate itself in the gut may be deficient, and then that can lead to a deficiency in Treg type responses. So that’s really thought to be the main mechanism. It depends where you’re talking along the GI tract. So the colon is probably the best study, again, that mostly involves butyrate producers, but also other products produced by the microbiome. And that list is growing as they do more research.

So generally, the commensal normal microbes tend to promote immune tolerance, which makes sense because they’re normal residents of the gut and they don’t want to provoke an immune response, because obviously, then they wouldn’t thrive in the gut. But in the upper GI tract, in the small intestine, they’re starting to define some of the normal microbes there, and among the main ones would be things like Streptococcus, which actually is a normal microbe in the small intestine, Prevotella species are pretty common in the small intestine, of course Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium to some extent, although Bifido is mostly resident of the colon from what we know, but especially Lactobacillus is important.

And then there’s a particular species of Prevotella that’s been studied recently and they’re actually looking at it as a potential probiotic, similar to Akkermansia where it’s not easy to grow because it’s more of an anaerobic type species, but it’s called Prevotella histicola. And that one has been shown to help protect against things like food sensitivities, et cetera, so it helps to reduce overactive immune responses in the small intestine.

Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. Yes, it’d be nice to have some tools besides simply avoiding foods that people are sensitive to.

Dr. Fabian:          That’s really the whole point of this research is for years that’s been the paradigm in addressing food sensitivities is to run a food sensitivity test or just to approach it with a standard elimination diet or both, and just see what people are reacting to, and then of course eliminating those. Which poses a lot of problems, I mean, that’s difficult to maintain long term, people of course don’t want to give up their favorite foods, plus there’s always the chance that, depending on how restrictive the diet is and what’s being restricted, that can lead to nutrient deficiencies, and of course we all want to avoid that scenario as well. And of course, we’ve known that of these different categories, allergy, sensitivities and tolerances and so some of them can be addressed, such as the lactose intolerance is the classic one, that can be addressed to some extent, of course, by avoiding lactose containing foods, but can be addressed to some extent by taking the enzyme, lactase, et cetera.

The immune response mediated reactions, so allergies and sensitivities, are a bit more challenging to potentially address their protocols that allergist use for desensitization that may be effective in some cases. But the recent research because of these insights about the microbiome … and I think this is really the key concepts on this whole topic is, as we learn more for research, we’re learning the ones that promote the immune mediated type reactions, sensitivities and allergies, and then the ones that basically help protect against. So when you have an imbalance where you start to lose some of those species or they decrease that help protect, and then you have an overgrowth of some of the ones that promote, that’s the classic imbalance that’s thought to be a key factor in driving the immune responses. So a lot of interest in research now in figuring out what these species are and then what they’re doing, and how that may be applied, of course, therapeutically.

 



Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. I’ve really been enjoying this discussion, but I’d like to take a minute to tell you about a new product that I’m very excited about. I’d like to tell you about a new wearable called the Apollo. This is a device that can be worn on the wrist or the ankle, and it uses vibrations to stimulate your parasympathetic nervous system. This device has amazing benefits in terms of getting you out of that stressed out sympathetic nervous system and stimulating the parasympathetic nervous system. It has a number of different functions, especially helping you to relax, to focus, to concentrate, get into a deeper meditative state, even to help you sleep, and there’s even a mode to help you wake up. This all occurs through the scientific use of subtle vibrations.

                                For those of you who might be interested in getting the Apollo for yourself to help you reset your nervous system, go to apolloneuro.com and use the affiliate code, Weitz10. That’s my last name, WEITZ10. Now, back to the discussion.

 



 

Dr. Weitz:            Now, the one concept that we’ve used for years is this whole leaky gut concept, and I think a lot of us have explained food sensitivities partially in terms of leaky gut, especially we get one of these food sensitivity tests back and the patient has a huge number of food sensitivities, and the usual explanation is, well, you have leaky gut, because the leaky gut, these proteins are getting into the bloodstream and creating immune reactions. And so if we just heal up the gut, reduce the leaky gut, then we won’t have as many food sensitivities. But after reading so many articles you sent me and watching your webinar, it’s way more complex than that and there’s all these other mechanisms which I’d like you to start going into.

Dr. Fabian:          Sure, absolutely. I mean, the leaky gut thing is still certainly applicable, just one of the factors, and it’s actually related to the whole picture of immune imbalances and microbiome imbalances. So as you can imagine, that concept of when you have leaky gut then these antigens can more easily get across the epithelial lining. And certainly, once something gets across that epithelium where they’re not supposed to be, then that usually is an alarm signal for the immune system where they can detect that and then basically react to that scenario.

Dr. Weitz:            For those who don’t understand, the epithelium is the lining of the gut, and if food particles, proteins cross that lining making it directly into the bloodstream.

Dr. Fabian:          Exactly. And they can also react to just the immune cells that are already present in the intestinal mucosa that are just underneath the lining.

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Fabian:          And then once the immune system gets going, that can further exacerbate or promote leaky gut, so it’s this vicious cycle scenario. But we know from recent research that, once again, microbes can influence a lot of the different steps in that process. So one is, of course, just general idea of overgrowth of inflammatory type bacteria, such as Escherichia or E. coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, these types of more inflammatory bacteria, if they’re overgrown for any reason in the gut, especially mostly in the small intestine because that’s where, of course, these food antigens are first starting to be broken down as part of digestion, that, that can basically then set the stage, when you have inflammation, inflammation then can also cause leaky gut. So it’s a general concept.

But new research actually shows that even the antigens themselves, the state of the antigen or how antigenic a protein is, can be modified by microbes. So there are certain microbes that have been shown to actually break down certain proteins such as gluten. In this case, there’s a lot of research on Pseudomonas, for example, which is a common resident of the small intestine. So when Pseudomonas is overgrown, it can release certain enzymes that break down gluten in a way that makes it easier for the gluten to get through the leaky gut essentially. So then it doesn’t break them down enough to get to a point where they’re no longer stimulating the immune system. If you have good digestion, that’s really efficient, the idea is that you’re going to break down proteins all the way to their component amino acids, and then amino acids are not going to be stimulating the immune system, usually it’s larger structures that stimulate immune response. But because-

Dr. Weitz:            And it probably the reasons why hydrochloric acid is so important, because that’s super important for breaking down proteins and a lot of people end up not having enough hydrochloric acid.

Dr. Fabian:          Absolutely. Yes. And that’s pretty common and we do see that clinically very often. I’m sure you see that as well that a pretty high proportion of patients seem to have varying degrees of low stomach acid, poor digestion in general.

Dr. Weitz:            It’d be nice if there was an easy to do task for stomach acid.

Dr. Fabian:          It would. The classic definitive test is invasive.

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Fabian:          There are these ways to approximate that with experimenting with Betaine HCL supplements, the bicarbonate tests, et cetera.

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Fabian:          So that’s really important, but overall digestion is important because, as I mentioned, if the whole digestion process goes efficiently, then you break those proteins down generally pretty efficiently into amino acids so they’re less likely to cause an immune reaction. Some proteins are harder just naturally harder to break down like gluten, so that’s one of the reasons why it’s thought to be more of a problem. But then you have these microbes that can interfere with that process in a way that makes the antigens more available to the immune system to react to. But it’s all about balance. So again, research indicates that various types of probiotic type species, the beneficial species, like Lactobacillus also can break down gluten as well but they tend to break it down more efficiently to smaller components, essentially, that don’t stimulate the immune system.

So it’s thought that it’s not necessarily just the bad guys but the balance of your bad guys to the good guys. And that’s the classic concept of dysbiosis. So oftentimes, just overgrowth alone can be a problem or lack of beneficial bacteria can be a problem, but oftentimes it’s both. And there’s a few other examples of that, but probably the best studied is the Pseudomonas and Lactobacillus scenario, that balance is likely to be pretty important. So that’s really where the interest is in probiotics, for example, and fermented foods, because that helps potentially increase these beneficial Lactobacillus species. And also some of the Bifidobacterium species, like certain strains of Bifidobacterium longum, also produce factors that can actually inhibit some of those enzymes produced by the bad guys that break down gluten in a way that make the gluten more inflammatory.

Dr. Weitz:            Now, do we know if those strains of, say, Lactobacillus, if the Lactobacillus that are growing in our microbiome produce those? Do we know if Lactobacillus strains that we consume in probiotic capsules, do they necessarily have the same effects, especially since they’re only temporary visitors?

Dr. Fabian:          As far as we know the answer is yes. So some of the strains that have been studied are native to the gut, others are more probiotic strains, and sometimes they’re both, because some researchers, of course, over time have isolated some of these native species and then they’ve been able to cultivate those and now products are available. So one of the best studied Lactobacillus species overall is called Lactobacillus reuteri, R-E-U-T-E-R-I, which is available in a number of probiotic products. There’s quite a bit of research suggesting that Lactobacillus in the small intestine produces factors that help inhibit overreaction of the immune system. So they promote those T regulatory type responses. So again, that’s thought that promoting the native bacteria, of course, can be helpful, we don’t necessarily know all the different ways to do that, we have some clues, but that can be difficult for some people to try to get their native Lactobacillus to come back just through diet, et cetera, and that’s really where probiotics and fermented foods come into play.

There’s actually a recent research article that just came out comparing the benefits of fiber to fermented foods. And this study found that fiber was a little bit more heterogeneous, some people it was anti-inflammatory for the majority, and a subset of people certain fibers may have more of a pro-inflammatory response, probably depending on which microbes those are promoting. Whereas the fermented foods that they studied basically had largely anti-inflammatory effects. So-

Dr. Weitz:            Yes, I think there’s a dilemma of, with clinicians, do we recommend more fiber for patients who come in, say, with gut disorders or it seems at least a certain subset of patients do better when they avoid fiber, avoid certain types of fiber, like say fermentable fiber by being on a low FODMAP diet?

Dr. Fabian:          Absolutely. Yes. So it’s a complicated picture as always when you get into the details, but I thought this study was very interesting and I think that’s pretty well noted clinically by a lot of functional medicine clinicians that fiber is not always beneficial in terms of symptoms, sometimes it just exacerbates what’s going on, and yet we have this concept that fiber is just always something that you want to try to get more of. So probably it has to do with the combination of the microbiome that, that patient has and how that microbiome reacts to the fiber, but also the type of fiber.

So just a quick aside is that a lot of research has been done on different types of fiber and their effects on the microbiome, and to some extent, in certain conditions like IBS. And so the FODMAP diet, for example, that restricts mostly short chain, so of course, monosaccharides, disaccharides and oligosaccharides, those are all pretty short chain type fermentable carbohydrates. Typically, for patients that don’t do well with those, then they end up getting over-fermented, they rapidly go through the GI tract in some patients, and then they arrive in this high concentration to where the bacteria are that ferment them, and that can create a pretty big spike in things like gas production and other products that might provoke symptoms.

Whereas the longer chain fibers, so psyllium, for example, has been well studied and is actually suggested even in conventional medicine as a possible treatment that can help with IBS symptoms. And so, one study showed that inulin, which is a shorter chain fiber, can cause higher levels of gas and provoke symptoms for some patients, but when you add psyllium to it, it draws that process out so you don’t get this big spike, you get a more gradual increase in gas, et cetera, that can be more tolerable. So the types of fiber and including these longer chain fibers for some patients, may actually be good even though they might react poorly to FODMAPs. So it’s really, I think, opens up some possibilities here because we don’t necessarily want to completely restrict FODMAPs, because patients can end up with a very restricted diet.

Dr. Weitz:            Sure.

Dr. Fabian:          And then they have beneficial effects, they promote short chain fatty acids, et cetera. So if you have the right mix of types of fibers, then that may work for certain patients.

Dr. Weitz:            Yes, I think the concept that a lot of us have been using, is if we have a patient who has overgrowth of certain bacteria that shouldn’t be there in those levels, we’ll restrict the fiber, is restrict the low fermentable fiber and will starve them and then maybe we’ll use, at the same time, other supplements or antibiotics. A lot of us in functional medicine world will use antimicrobial supplements like oregano oil and Berberine and things like this in the idea of killing or reducing some of these bacteria while we hold back their food. And then once we can get that cleared out, then we can restore it and we store those foods back, and then we’ll have a healthier microbiome.

Dr. Fabian:          Yes. And I think you hit on this key phenomenon that we see clinically, but also there’s a lot of research coming out that supports this idea that we all know that sometimes antimicrobial protocols, they might work temporarily, but then the symptoms come back at some point, so patients relapse or they just don’t respond that well at all to that approach. And it’s thought that part of that has to do with the diet and also part of it has to do with, again, digestion. So we see this quite a bit with advanced stool testing where you get some markers for the microbiome, for digestion, et cetera, and oftentimes I see results for patients that were treated with antimicrobials, but basically the patients just didn’t respond well to that. In many cases, you’ll see evidence for reduced digestion, so things like lower last days, which is an indicator of pancreatic dysfunction.

And then I think there’s also a couple other things to keep in mind. So there’s some really interesting research coming out about particularly food intolerances, so the carbohydrate related symptoms, so things like FODMAPs, et cetera. A couple things there, I think, that are really important for clinicians to note that’s new information, one has to do with the types of carbohydrates. So we talked about different types of fibers, but it turns out that one of the brush border enzymes called sucrase-isomaltase, that’s an important brush border enzyme that actually appears to be deficient in a pretty high proportion of patients with IBS, for example. So it turns out that some of that can be genetic, there’s some common snips that can reduce that enzyme, but also anything that causes inflammation, even minor damage in the small intestine, infections, et cetera, overgrowth, those can inhibit those brush border enzyme.

So recent studies indicate that up to 35% of patients that have IBS-D actually have reduced sucrase-isomaltase that may be contributing to their symptoms. So there’s also additional studies following up on that showing that patients that don’t respond well to low FODMAP diet, it may be because they have low levels of this sucrase-isomaltase enzyme, so they actually do better by restricting starches and sucrose sources. So again, I think this is really where the Precision Medicine personalized diet aspect comes into play where we have these standard approaches that we start with, like low FODMAP diet, but if those don’t work, we need to be aware of this other mechanisms so we can say, okay, well that didn’t work, maybe we’ll try a low starch diet or low sucrose type diet.

Dr. Weitz:            How can we know if patients have low deficiency of these brush border enzymes?

Dr. Fabian:          That’s a good question. So the snips are being defined and so certain genetic tests may contain that information, so that’s one route to go is potentially doing a genetic test to see if patients have the snips. It’s not really common yet in clinical practice to really assess brush border enzyme activity directly, that’s an invasive process, but potentially indirectly through like a sucrose based breath tests, there’s various types of carbohydrate malabsorption breath tests that can be done, fructose, et cetera, lactose, and sucrose is available. That’s not something I’m really familiar with, but potentially, that’s an option for people. And then, of course, just the elimination diet approach, just restricting those sources for a while and seeing if symptoms improve, which is usually the most straightforward.

Dr. Weitz:            And then how do we rebuild these brush border enzymes? I know there are supplements of brush board enzymes we can take.

Dr. Fabian:          So it’s a combination thing. So yes, I mean, that’s the replace option from the five bar protocol that when you’re deficient in something, replace that from a supplement standpoint. So there are various options out there that are either supplements that have just the brush border enzymes, plus there are a broad spectrum digestive enzyme products that have the pancreatic enzymes, brush border enzymes, and then sometimes other things like [inaudible 00:32:46] and some supplemental acid, for example.

So those products can be helpful, but they don’t necessarily address the cause, of course. And ultimately, in terms of medicine, root cause is really something you want to try to address if possible. So as I mentioned, genetic snips can be part of the picture, but also just anything that damages or causes inflammation in the small intestine. There was a great review article that I include in some of my webinar slide presentations that’s this table from a review paper showing a lot of the different factors that can affect the small intestine, so that includes infections, including even things like H. Pylori, so it’s not well known that H. Pylori can also infect the upper small intestine, duodenum, and in some patients that can have a negative effect on the brush border, but also things like Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and probably various types of dysbiosis. So as I mentioned-

Dr. Weitz:            If we see H. pylori either elevated or maybe just above the detectable level in that zone where it’s not flagged as high but it’s higher than it should be, and maybe there are not any of those … what are the factors called that they react to?

Dr. Fabian:          Virulence factors?

Dr. Weitz:            Yes, there’s no virulence factors, when do we think that, that could be a problem or should we always be concerned about it? Because there’s a lot of controversy over H. pylori and whether it’s actually a beneficial microbe, et cetera.

Dr. Fabian:          Exactly. Yes. So it is something that is very common, worldwide it’s present in I think at least 50% of the population and the vast majority people don’t have obvious symptoms from it. And it is known from just endoscopic studies, et cetera, that patients that have H. pylori can be completely asymptomatic even though they might have low grade or low level inflammation in the stomach, so low grade gastritis. And it’s not clear that, that’s necessarily a problem. Even long term, in most cases, it doesn’t seem to lead to any progression to things like cancer for most patients. And that’s really where the virulence factors come in, because there’re various strains of H. Pylori. So that’s important information to take into account, because if there are virulence factors that suggest the strains that are present may be more aggressive and more likely to contribute to worse gas gastritis, for example, and that can set the stage for ulcers, cancer, et cetera. So the levels, keep in mind that in stool testing.

So PCR is a very sensitive technique and can pick up things at very low levels, which is great especially when you’re detecting something coming all the way from the stomach, so by the time it gets to the colon obviously the levels may be lower than what’s detected directly in the stomach. So the low levels that we see on PCR tests like GI-MAP, for most patients if they’re not high, that’s usually consistent with patients not having significant symptoms related to H. pylori. But because it’s not a completely linear relationship, for some patients, again, that’s really where the assessment comes into play where you have to really focus on symptoms, focus on the rest of the picture. So clinicians sometimes do treat when H. pylori levels are not high and they do often find that, that can be helpful from a system standpoint. So it’s a mixed picture, and again, I think clinical judgment is really key there when it’s not an obvious situation, you have to be careful and make sure you’re assessing the situation properly.

Dr. Weitz:            So when I watched your webinar, two things that came out that seemed to be significant that stuck in my mind, and one was the importance of promoting the way in which a healthy microbiome and healthy commensal bacteria can promote T regulatory cells, which seem to blunt these adverse immune reactions like food sensitivities. Can you talk more about that? And then what are some of the strategies we can do to promote that?

Dr. Fabian:          Absolutely. Yes. So, certainly there’s a lot of growing evidence that butyrate can be helpful in helping to promote T regulatory cells. So we don’t know all the mechanisms, but it’s thought that one of the key ones is that … so butyrate can basically act on immune cells in various ways. So they have receptors on the outside of the cell that can detect butyrate and then you can have reactions, responses of those immune cells based on the interaction of butyrate with those receptors. But it’s thought that the main way that butyrate affects the function of immune cells, whether they become more pro-inflammatory or antiinflammatory, so of course, butyrate tends to promote the antiinflammatory development path of those immune cells, is through epigenetics, so basically altering long term gene expression.

So butyrate results in turning on and turning off certain genes. So essentially, turning off the more pro-inflammatory type genes and then promoting the primary functions of Treg cells. So in the development process from what’s called a naive T cell that’s not yet become a Th1 or a Treg cell, et cetera, butyrate influences that progression so they more likely to become Treg cells. And then Treg cells secrete various things, especially cytokines that then act on other cells in the immune system to basically quiet them down so they’re less likely to be inflammatory.

Dr. Weitz:            So it sounds like one of the real keys is promoting the growth or health of butyrate producing microbes.

Dr. Fabian:          Indeed, yes. So main ways to do that tend to be, of course, generally fiber, but it does depend to some extent on the type of fiber. And again, that’s likely to be somewhat specific to the types of microbes that an individual has, so certain microbes respond to certain fibers. So in general, probably the best studied fibers for promoting butyrate production would be inulin, so the combination of FOS, fructooligosaccharides, and inulin, those are often together in various products. Resistant starch, I mean, that’s certainly a very well studied group of fermentable carbohydrates that can promote butyrate-

Dr. Weitz:            So for those who don’t know what resistant starch is, can you explain what resistance starch is?

Dr. Fabian:          Sure. So basically, starch contains different subtypes of starch. So there’s the type of starch that’s more easily broken down just in the small intestine into sugars and then absorbed, then there’s a type of starch that’s much harder to break down by our digestive enzymes, so then that basically travels down into the colon just similar to fiber, basically, it’s like a type of fiber, then the microbes have additional enzymes that we don’t have that can further break that down. And then once they break it down, then they can take up those component sugars, and then they can basically metabolize those into producing butyrate and other short chain fatty acids.

Dr. Weitz:            And what are the best sources of resistant starch? I’ve certainly heard about eating cold potatoes and things like that.

Dr. Fabian:          I can’t say that we necessarily know overall what are the best sources, there are certainly some that are more convenient than others. So there’s a growing amount of products out there that contain things like potato starch, green banana or plantain starch, those are probably among the most common.

Dr. Weitz:            And there’s something about the potato starch that after you cook it and then cool it down or put it in the fridge, and then you eat it, that it becomes more resistant, right?

Dr. Fabian:          Right. Yes, somehow that changes the structure a bit into the more just resistant type starch so that our enzymes can’t break it down as easily, and again, more of that ends up in the colon to fuel the growth of these butyrate producers.

Dr. Weitz:            But this is probably not a good excuse for eating day old french fries or any french fries.

Dr. Fabian:          No, because it’s all in the balance, and of course, those types of foods have a lot of bad things in them that can disrupt the microbiome and promote inflammation, so it defeats the purpose.

 



Dr. Weitz:                            I’d like to interrupt this fascinating discussion we’re having for another few minutes to tell you about another really exciting product that has changed my life and the life of my family, especially as it pertains to getting good quality sleep. It’s something called the chiliPAD, C-H-I-L-I-P-A-D. It can be found at the website chilisleep.com, which is C-H-I-L-I-S-L-E-E-P dot com.

So, this product involves a water-cooled mattress pad that goes underneath your sheets and helps you maintain a constant temperature at night. If you’ve ever gotten woken up because temperature has changed, typically gets warmer, this product will maintain your body at a very even temperature, and it tends to promote uninterrupted quality deep and REM sleep, which is super important for healing and for overall health.

If you go to chilisleep.com and you use the affiliate code, Weitz20, that’s my last name, W-E-I-T-Z, 20. You’ll get 20% off a chiliPAD. So, check it out and let’s get back to this discussion.



 

Dr. Weitz:            So what are some of the other sources of resistant starch besides potatoes?

Dr. Fabian:          That’s a good question. So pretty wide range of foods have some levels of resistant starches, and I can’t say that I’m familiar with all of them.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          There are some that are more natural. So as you mentioned, you can cook rice and let it cool and then a fair amount of that if you eat it cold instead of reheating it, then it will retain that amount of resistant starch. So that is how some people get their resistant starch, whether it’s potatoes or white rice, and so those are pretty common. Then when it comes to supplements, again, green banana powder, plantain powder, and then typically potato starch are all pretty common as well.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          Those are the ones that I’m most familiar with.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. And what are some of the other strategies for promoting butyrate producing bacteria in our gut?

Dr. Fabian:          So it’s mostly looking at the big picture. In terms of foods and supplements, we know that polyphenols in general help to promote beneficial bacteria and at the same time typically help inhibit bad bacteria, so they’re good balancers. Research indicates that they’re often synergistic with fiber. So along with getting more fiber in the diet, which of course is typically from things like fruits and vegetables that happen to also contain polyphenols, that’s probably, of course, one of the key reasons why those foods tend to be very health promoting.

And then in terms of supplements, there’s a pretty wide range of different types of supplements that have these polyphenols. And it’s a broad category, so examples would be things like curcumin, quercetin, resveratrol, green tea extract, those sorts of plant extracts that we typically think of as more antiinflammatory and antioxidant.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          Generally, most of those that have been studied, so curcumin, quercetin, resveratrol, grape seed extract, pomegranate extract, those are among the best studied sources of polyphenols that have been shown to help balance. But even things like chocolate tea, cocoa extract, there’s a growing list of things that have been studied. So polyphenols in general, especially in combination with fiber. And then there’s also supplementing with butyrate directly, and there are a variety of different types of supplements out there. There is quite a bit of research on butyrate supplementation and a wide range of health benefits. In addition to promoting those Treg cells, butyrate can promote a lot of other beneficial functions. So it helps-

Dr. Weitz:            So are butyrate supplements absorbed? I’ve heard some controversy about this.

Dr. Fabian:          So it’s a bit of a mixed picture, and to my knowledge, it’s not as well studied as it should be at this point, but there are some products that are known to be more likely to reach the colon. From what I understand, that would include products that include butyrate in the form of tributyrin, but also some of the products basically, I don’t know technically how they do it, but basically the butyrate is bound or attached somehow to the probiotics. So essentially, the butyrate isn’t released until the bacteria in the colon start to break down the fibers and then release the butyrate. So there are various ways to deliver it and I think that’s an ongoing effort in the industry to look at the best ways to deliver butyrate.

But one thing I would mention is, some release of butyrate in the small intestine may not be a bad thing, because there is evidence that some butyrate is produced also in the small intestine. So one of the species that’s pretty common in the small intestine is called Fusobacterium, which is another one of these, it’s a good guy and a bad guy, depending on the circumstances. It can produce hydrogen sulfide, for example, which can-

Dr. Weitz:            Yes, Dr. Pimentel mentioned that. Yes.

Dr. Fabian:          And in the small intestine it’s normal. On our tests we do have Fusobacterium on GI-MAP, and virtually everyone has detectable Fusobacterium. And we know from research that it’s normally present from the oral microbiome down to the small intestine, sometimes in the colon where it’s not really supposed to be as much, but it produces butyrate.

Dr. Weitz:            So do you think taking supplements of butyrate would be more likely to be effective or I know there’s at least one or more products on the market that contain the other short chain fatty acids, acetate and propionate as well?

Dr. Fabian:          Exactly. Butyrate definitely is the best studied as far as on promoting immune tolerance, et cetera. The other ones are a little bit more of a mixed picture, but propionate would probably be a close second, a lot of research does show that, that can have similar effects to butyrate. There’s a little bit of concern about overdoing propionate just due to some early research on possible links with things like autism. I don’t know where that research has headed in the last few years. That was earlier research from five to 10 years ago. But there are quite a few studies showing that propionate does have beneficial effects under certain circumstances, especially on metabolism and things like glucose regulation.

Dr. Weitz:            And then what about probiotics, prebiotics?

Dr. Fabian:          Absolutely. Yes, so there are quite a few that have been studied that have been shown to have key beneficial effects. So we know that things that can predispose are involved in food reactions. Of course, we mentioned leaky gut, we mentioned overactivity of the immune system, we mentioned dysbiosis and there’s other factors as well. So a lot of different probiotic species, Lactobacillus and also some of the Bifidobacterium species are known to promote a healthy intestinal lining, part of that might be through cross-feeding. So Bifidobacterium tends to promote acetate and the butyrate bacteria can then take the acetate and make butyrate. Also Lactobacillus, of course, produced lactate, and then some of the butyrate producing bacteria can take the lactate and produce butyrate. So that might be one of the ways in which they can help promote a healthy gut environment, healthy intestinal lining. But they also have a positive effect on the immune system as well.

Dr. Weitz:            How important is it that we take specific probiotic strains versus just blends of probiotics? Because right now there seems to be quite a bit of confusion in the probiotic market and there are some prominent practitioners out there who simply group probiotics in a few different categories and we basically just talk about Lactobacillus-Bifido blends as though we can’t really distinguish. On the other hand, there’s a lot of promotion of specific strains, some strains that we know are more specific for being butyrate producers. How important do you think it is that we take specific strains of probiotics?

Dr. Fabian:          That’s a really great question, I think that leads to a lot of confusion in the field. So on the surface that’s the ideal scenario to be able to use a particular strain that has a lot of research backing up that it has these particular demonstrated positive effects. So generally, that would be the recommendation is it has to be as much as possible evidence based, but the challenge there is, once again, the individual scenario where based on the patient’s microbiome, based on how they would react to that particular strain. And of course, any bacteria produces multiple products, so just because they produce certain beneficial things for some patients, they may produce things that don’t work well for them. The classic example for Lactobacillus species is some produce a form of lactate called D-lactate. So even though they might be anti-inflammatory, for example, some of them might also produce D-lactate that some patients may have some issues with.

So I think that’s part of the picture. So a lot of clinicians that have tried to do the targeted approach by using well researched strains, they found that in some cases those don’t work, of course, for all patients, so they end up having to still go back to the drawing board and try other probiotics. So you’ll hear that a lot in our field that some clinicians feel it’s more of a trial and error type of approach where you try to go with the well researched products first, because they have good evidence basis, but if they don’t work for a patient, ideally, you have some backup products that you can try, and hopefully they respond well to one of those products. So it’s still a bit of not a full science yet, you still often involves a lot of trial and error to see what works.

Dr. Weitz:            Has Diagnostic Solutions considered adding butyrate and short chain fatty acid levels to the test results?

Dr. Fabian:          That’s a great question. So I’m not aware of an immediate upgrade to the test that will include those. We do have some of the key butyrate producers currently on the test. We do get great results in terms of scenarios where you expect those to be low inflammatory conditions, they’re low, et cetera. So what we see with our existing markers does reflect well what we see in the research. And there are some concerns about measuring butyrate in stool. So generally, it can be useful information, but just keep in mind that short chain fatty acids, the vast majority of them, estimates are more than 95% are already absorbed by the colon before they reach the stool. So what you’re seeing is just a small remnant, so you have to know how to interpret that properly and then even the techniques that are used to measure those can be important. So it’s a little bit less straightforward than I think we assume, it’s not always directly measuring production, because there’s that absorption aspect that can affect the results.

Dr. Weitz:            So what would be the recommendation for which probiotics we should recommend to patients if we want to try to reduce food sensitivities?

Dr. Fabian:          Great question. So among the best studied species, as I mentioned, is Lactobacillus reuteri.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          Now, I think that at least some strains of that species may produce D-lactate, so it may not be something that works for everyone.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          But there is good evidence indicating that, that can help reduce. And there are specific strains that have been studied that I’m aware of in certain products, so there are products that reflect the specific strains that have been studied.

Dr. Weitz:            So there’s a specific strain of Lactobacillus reuteri that we know is more likely to be beneficial?

Dr. Fabian:          Probably more than one strain, yes, because different studies have used different strains. And I’m not aware of all the ones that are commercially available, but that would be one that I would say is well study, plus a number of the Bifido bacteria strains also, so at least a few within the Bifidobacterium longum species, those have also been studied for helping to improve aspects of food sensitivities. And again, you’d have to really drill down into the specific evidence, some of those are, for example, just studied in the context of gluten, doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll help with other food sensitivities. So it really depends on what you’re targeting there.

Dr. Weitz:            And now, I think I mentioned here earlier, I just interviewed Colleen Cutcliffe from Pendulum Therapeutics, and they’ve just been able to develop the first commercially available anaerobic probiotic supplement that contains Akkermansia muciniphila, and we know this is a type of bacteria that produces a lot of butyrate.

Dr. Fabian:          It actually primarily produces propionate, but it can help with the butyrate scenario.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          So the research indicates there’s potential cooperation between Akkermansia and some of the butyrate producers. And especially one of the more proposed … I mean, again, this isn’t necessarily something that’s completely proven yet in research, but supporting evidence is out there suggesting that Akkermansia is also a keystone species, which means it’s plays an outsized really important role for the ecosystem. So one of the proposed ways in which it does that, so it consumes mucus as its main food source, and mucus basically is a protein that has sugars attached to it, sugar chains, so there’s-

Dr. Weitz:            So it consumes mucus, interesting.

Dr. Fabian:          Yes.

Dr. Weitz:            So it helps break up mucus layer?

Dr. Fabian:          Right, but it produces factors that can in turn stimulate mucus production, which makes sense because that helps it grow in the gut.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, interesting, because when I was talking to Dr. Pimentel a few weeks ago, I was asking him if he thought that taking Akkermansia might be beneficial for SIBO. And he said that since some of the organisms involved in SIBO live in the mucus, anything that increased the mucus might be make it more difficult to get rid of them?

Dr. Fabian:          Well, I think it depends on the detail. So Akkermansia is mostly known to be a resident of the colon.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          The colon has two layers of mucus, the outer mucus layer is a thinner mucus layer that actually is where most of the mucus consuming bacteria in the colon live.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Fabian:          So some of them break down the mucus sugars and release the sugars, and so it’s thought that, that’s actually how Akkermansia helps support the ecosystem. So in between meals, for example, when you don’t have fiber available to the fiber degraders, they have to exist on something, so it’s known and really well established and research that mucus actually serves as that interim food source directly for the mucus degraders like Akkermansia, but indirectly because they’re releasing the sugars and essentially sharing them with the ecosystem. And so it’s thought that, that’s one of the ways in which they help support the butyrate producers.

Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. Boy, it’s such a complicated picture.

Dr. Fabian:          It is, but that is my main area of study.

Dr. Weitz:            [crosstalk 00:58:32] And then what about specific prebiotics that facilitate the growth of the butyrate producers?

Dr. Fabian:          So those again would be the things like inulin-FOS.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay, the fibers. Yes.

Dr. Fabian:          But then you have to think of it in the bigger picture of cross-feeding, that’s a big aspect of how the ecosystem works. So even though you may not be necessarily supplying directly what the butyrate producers need, you can supply that potentially indirectly, and as I mentioned, that’s where the probiotics can come into play because they produce factors that then can be used by the butyrate producers to produce butyrate.

Dr. Weitz:            Is there a role for some of the other typical nutritional products that are included in gut healing supplements like L-glutamine, and mucilaginous, herbs and things like that? Do they play a role in this or could they?

Dr. Fabian:          Yes. I mean, so I’m less familiar with the research around the mucilaginous herbs and their effects, but glutamine certainly is thought to be pretty beneficial for the small intestine, the cells align the small intestine because that’s one of their key energy sources. And I’d like to promote the idea which is emerging from research but also it’s really how we operate in functional medicines, is to take the bigger picture, the integrated picture into account when you think of the gut as this domino effect. So if you’re promoting health of the upper GI, so the small intestine, for example, by gut supporting supplements and include L-glutamine, for example, then you can help support these brush border enzymes in the overall digestion absorption process, so then you’re going to have less undigested food getting into the colon and throwing things off. So everything is interlinked as you can imagine. There’s even a lot of research now on oral dysbiosis that then contributes to dysbiosis downstream.

Dr. Weitz:            Right.

Dr. Fabian:          But again, it complicates the picture a bit but I think the good news out of all that is there’s ways that we can intervene that we hadn’t thought of before, that actually making sure oral health is where it should be might actually help have a positive impact on gut health.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. Well, that was a very thought provoking, Tom, you gave us a lot of useful information about the microbiome and the more we learn about this, the more we’ll be able to develop effective strategies to help our patients.

Dr. Fabian:          Absolutely.

Dr. Weitz:            So any final thoughts for our listeners or viewers?

Dr. Fabian:          I think some of the key take homes in this topic of food sensitivities, allergies and intolerances are definitely think, as I just talked about, more the big picture integrative. And we do know a lot now about dysbiosis in the small intestine, for example, or in the stomach with H. pylori overgrowth that can affect digestion and absorption, which then can cause dysbiosis downstream and can affect the balance of butyrate producers, for example. So really thinking big picture. And I would say, probably one of the key take homes just based on both the research and what we’ve seen clinically with stool testing is that reduced digestion does seem to play a really big role in dysbiosis and then symptoms across a pretty broad range of conditions, not just the food allergies, sensitivities and tolerances, but other conditions as well. So really focusing on that as being a key component.

I think that’s often overlooked when clinicians see dysbiosis and their first thought is, antimicrobials, which certainly can be helpful, but that may not be the full picture. I think, we all deal with situations where there’s a lot of complexities, complex patients that aren’t really responding the way we expect, and when we have those scenarios where we’re clinicians have gone down those paths and then they do a stool test to see, what does digestion look like? What does the dysbiosis look like? What does the immune system look like? Then you can start to piece that picture together a bit more and see that maybe we haven’t really addressed the digestion picture fully yet, or we haven’t looked at H. pylori, we were looking at something else.  So I think that’s where the whole precision medicine idea comes from as well, that you’re trying to look at all the different factors and see, which ones are likely playing a role for that patient? And then you can target it more specifically to what’s likely causing the problem or in a root cause type picture. So that would be my overall take home on how to take this complicated information and put it back together.

Dr. Weitz:            Great. Thanks, Tom.

Dr. Fabian:          All right. Thank you so much, Dr. Ben. It was a pleasure.

Dr. Weitz:            Same here. Talk to you soon.

 


 

Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness podcast. And if you enjoyed this podcast, please go to Apple podcasts and give us a five star ratings and review, that way more people will be able to find this Rational Wellness podcast when they’re searching for health podcasts. And I wanted to let everybody know that I do now have a few openings for new nutritional consultations for patients at my Santa Monica Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition clinic. So if you’re interested please call my office, 310-395-3111, and sign up for one of the few remaining slots for a comprehensive nutritional consultation with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you, and see you next week.

 

Mark Newman of Precision Analytical speaks about Cortisol and the HPA Axis with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

2:04   The adrenal glands release cortisol, which is your stress response.  This is directed by the brain. The hypothalamus in the brain releases Cortisol Releasing Hormone (CRH) that goes to the pituitary gland, which releases ACTH and both the hypothalamus and the pituitary are in the brain.  ACTH then finds your adrenal gland and it stimulates the release cortisol, as well as aldosterone, DHEA, and your catecholamines like adrenaline.  Cortisol secretion is an important component of our normal circadian rhythm along with melatonin. ACTH starts going up before you wake up and when you wake up and the light hits the back of your eye, that is the signal to make ACTH, which make cortisol. Waking up is is a stress event, so you get the stress hormones secreted.

5:17  When testing the salivary cortisol upon awakening and throughout the day, if you are not making enough cortisol, it could be related to COVID. The antibodies for COVID can cross react and attack your ACTH and make it more difficult to produce cortisol.   And this could persist for a long period of time, which could be one factors in the symptoms that long haulers with COVID have, such as fatigue and brain fog.

8:47  Supporting the adrenal glands could be an important component of helping people recover from COVID.  We know now that the adrenal glands never actually become fatigued and unable to produce cortisol. The problem has to do with the signaling from the brain to the adrenal glands that gets disrupted.  This has led the conventional medical community to dismiss this concept of adrenal fatigue caused by long term stress, first described by Dr. James Wilson in his book Adrenal Fatigue. Allopathic medicine tends to see Addison’s Disease if you don’t make any cortisol and Cushing’s Disease if you make excessive levels of cortisol and nothing in between, but this is not true and this dysfunctional stress response is what those of us in the Functional Medicine community are helping patients deal with.

13:11  Salivary cortisol testing. To test for adrenal function, serum testing is not very helpful. This is why salivary testing for cortisol that can be done at various parts of the day is much more accurate and helpful.  The comprehensive DUTCH complete test includes not only cortisol testing at various parts of the day, but it also looks at the sex hormones, since if a guy has low testosterone, that can cause fatigue. And this test also looks at a marker for B12, and a B12 deficiency will cause fatigue. 

 

 

 



Mark Newman, MS is a recognized expert and international speaker in the field of hormone testing. Mark spent nearly 25 years developing and directing urine, blood, and saliva-based hormone testing along with other biomarkers like organic acids. His unique experience led him to pursue a revolutionary way to test hormones; so Mark began his own lab, Precision Analytical Inc., to create the latest innovation in hormone testing, the DUTCH Test® (a Dried Urine Test for Comprehensive Hormones).  The website is DUTCHtest.com. 

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.

Hello, Rational Wellness Podcasters. Today, I’m excited that we’re going to have an interview with Mark Newman about cortisol and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. I know that’s a mouthful of words, but we’re going to put some meaning to that and explain it a bit better once we get started. Mark Newman, Masters of Science, is a recognized expert and international speaker in the field of hormone testing. Mark spent 25 years developing and directing urine, blood, and saliva-based hormone testing, along with other biomarkers like organic acids.

His unique experience led him to pursue a new revolutionary way to test hormones, so Mark began his lab, Precision Analytical, which offers the Dutch Tests, which stands for Dried Urine Testing for Comprehensive Hormones. In order to develop the most accurate evidence-based testing practices, Mark has written multiple peer-reviewed research papers highlighting the accuracy and clinical utility of dried urine hormone testing. Mark’s primary educational goal is to find and communicate truths about hormone replacement therapy monitoring to help providers care for their patients. He understands why each form of testing has its own strengths and weaknesses, which is why he encourages clinicians to follow the evidence, even when lab testing isn’t clinically helpful. Thank you so much for joining us, Mark.

Mark:                    Thanks for having me. Good to be here.

Dr. Weitz:            Great. So to set up the discussion for listeners who are not really familiar with what the adrenal glands are and do and what would be the point of testing for cortisol as a measure of adrenal function, perhaps you can give us a little information about that.

Mark:                    Sure. My area of expertise is really limited to reproductive and adrenal hormones, and when we focus in on the adrenal hormones, a lot of what we’re talking about is just your stress response. You’ve got stuff that goes on in your brain, CRH getting released from the hypothalamus, which goes to the pituitary, which we’re still in the brain there, which releases ACTH. And ACTH, is that stimulating hormone that cruises around in your blood, and when it finds most tissues, they don’t care. But when it finds your adrenal gland, it stimulates the release of among other things, cortisol. So it’s also involved in aldosterone and DHEA, and your catecholamines like adrenaline. But that’s a big part of the story is getting cortisol to do what it’s supposed to do, which is you want to make a whole bunch of it, but not too much in the morning, and then it comes down fairly rapidly. So you get this up and down, up and down pattern from day to day if things are functioning properly, and-

Dr. Weitz:            So, let me just stop you for a second. So what you’re saying is, is that this cortisol secretion is a really important component of our normal circadian rhythms, our wake/sleep cycle, along with say melatonin?

Mark:                    Yeah, so yin and yang for cortisol and melatonin. So, we want to make melatonin when it’s dark and we want to make cortisol when it’s light. And it’s literally the light is involved in when the light hits the back of your eye, that is the signal. And it’s a pretty amazingly complex system that I’m still learning about where you’ve got ACTH that stimulates the adrenal gland, but ACTH starts going up before you wake up.

Dr. Weitz:            So what is ACTH?

Mark:                   ACTH is the stimulating hormone that I’d have to spell it out to actually get the name exactly right.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Mark:                   It’s the hormone that your brain makes that is the signal to the adrenal gland that it is time to make cortisol. So when you get stressed you make ACTH, and that helps you make cortisol. And when you wake up in the morning, waking up is actually the same biochemistry goes on when you wake up as when you get stressed. So essentially, like awakening and arousal for the day is your first stress event of the day so that your brain starts making ACTH. It’s this really fascinating biochemistry where the brain is making the ACTH, so you say, “Well, make cortisol.” Well, not yet. There’s this sort of braking mechanism that the body has to wear the ACTH builds up. And as soon as the light hits the back of your eye, it sort of releases the brake, and boom, you make a whole bunch of cortisol right when you wake up so that you’re moving from being awake to being alert. And light, actually, is the mechanism or the trigger that sends that on its way.

And that’s a lot of what we do is measuring cortisol at those different time points to say, “Hey, is this functioning the way that it’s supposed to?” And if it’s overfunctioning and you’re making too much, you’re going to have issues. And if it’s not functioning enough, which we’re starting to see a lot of, interesting little fact that I just learned from reading some papers on COVID is that the antibodies for COVID can recognize ACTH and sort of steal that from you, which can become part of this issue of not making enough cortisol as you’re recovering from COVID. So it’s pretty relevant to our lives every day and-

Dr. Weitz:            Well, hold it. Explain that quickly.

Mark:                    So the antibodies for the COVID virus can actually reduce your ACTH. So your brain says, “Time to make cortisol.” ACTH gets released. It’ll have to find its way to the adrenal gland. And this hasn’t actually been proven yet. It’s been shown with the other SARS. So, SARS-CoV-2 is COVID. With the other SARS viruses, we know that those antibodies actually recognize ACTH, and they can sort of steal that away from your cortisol production biochemistry.

Dr. Weitz:            So this is like a cross-reactivity phenomenon.

Mark:                    Yeah. Right. Right. And so one of the things that we see sometimes in COVID cases where they’re recovering and struggling to do so is a lack of cortisol production. And part of that story, which it’s early for COVID, right? There’s still research going on all over the place to try to figure out exactly why do some people become long haulers? Why do some people not? But part of that story can be a lack of cortisol production. And part of that story, is this interesting interaction between the antibodies from a SARS virus, and how much ACTH you have to stimulate cortisol production, so-

Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. So this could account for the fatigue and maybe the brain fog and some of the other symptoms related to long COVID symptoms?

Mark:                    Yeah. And it’s I don’t want to overstate that because it is a complex story that is still being told, and it’s they have to piece it together. Some of it’s old research from other SARS viruses, and some of it’s more specific to COVID, where we do see a fraction of those people even up to a year later are still struggling to make cortisol, and the why of that probably has something to do with that, but that’s still being kind of worked out by people who are knee-deep in COVID data.

Dr. Weitz:            So, but that might indicate that part of a workup for a patient with long COVID would be to do cortisol stress testing as offered by Precision Analytical or other labs.

Mark:                    Yeah, I just went back through a handful, couple dozen patients now that we’re getting beyond COVID for people by number of months, and just looked at people eight months out and 12 months out, and then looking at what the literature is saying. And yeah, there’s a subset of those people that’s pretty sizable, that struggle to regain their normal stress response, their normal cortisol production. So if you have people struggling with COVID, it’s not that well defined yet what the causal factors there are, and goodness knows it’s probably more than one thing, but not making cortisol as they used to.

Dr. Weitz:            Supporting the adrenal glands. Yes, supporting the adrenal glands could be an important component in helping people recover faster.

Mark:                    Well, yeah, and I think that’s as we were talking about before, I think the language that we use it depends if we want to speak very generally for the sake of our patient to make it simple, but when we’re studying it from a scientific standpoint it’s brain signaling is probably the bigger factor than… And that’s been this long going sort of, I don’t know if it’s a debate, but in our industry that we’re both in is that there’s this catchy phrase, adrenal fatigue, that really well describes what patients feel, which is that they don’t have enough of the hormone that their adrenal gland makes. And for years, our industry, I think without discriminating very well, used the phrase adrenal fatigue, but as we’ve really gotten into the biochemistry and figured out, “Okay, adrenal fatigue tells me a story about a gland that’s on top of my kidney that is really tired of making cortisol and it cannot.”  And when you really get in and look at it, what’s going on in most of those cases is that their adrenal gland works just fine, but it’s that brain chemistry that gets messed with in terms of your negative feedback and all of that, that is typically sort of at fault when the stress response gets screwed up is that it’s more of a brain issue and less of a… Adrenal gland is a little bit more like your knee when you hit the patella tendon there, it responds. And usually when you hit the adrenal gland with ACTH, which is its go signal, it goes. Making that cortisol…

Dr. Weitz:            But I think that concept maybe comes from diabetes and the pancreas and constant consumption of sugar and other things that stimulate the pancreas to produce insulin. Over time, the pancreas gets burned out, the cells can’t produce it, and then at some point, diabetics end up needing injections of insulin. And I think that concept has been applied to the adrenal glands.

Mark:                    Yeah. And I think not rightly so. I mean, it’s a reasonable theory, but I think when people went in and really looked at the biochemistry, it’s not actually what’s going on. The challenge is in on the scientific side you start talking about things like allostatic load, and all of these, resilience and some of these words that, let’s be honest, they’re just not as interesting to Google in terms of like being sticky. And that phrase, adrenal fatigue, it was sticky.  And Dr. Wilson, who’s a good friend of mine wrote the book on adrenal fatigue, and it really got the concept that if your cortisol is low because of long term stress, that’s an issue and we should deal with it, right? Because allopathic medicine tends to say, “Listen, you have Addison’s disease if you don’t make any cortisol. You have Cushing’s disease if you’re making gargantuan levels of cortisol that never come down. And everyone in between, you’re fine, have a nice day.” Right? Which is that’s why you’re in business, right? Because it’s not true. And so-

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, yeah. Absolutely.

Mark:                    …dysfunction in the cortisol space outside of disease is an issue. And the phrase, adrenal fatigue, brought that to the forefront. The problem is when you want to go and have credibility with what you’re doing to allopathic peers, and just generally, right? We want to be right. The phrase is actually it’s not correct in terms of what’s going on. And it does matter because when you look at Dr. Wilson’s work, who I have a lot of respect for, one of just the random things you’ll find is that the adrenal gland needs a lot of vitamin C.  So part of the solution for adrenal fatigue is a lot of vitamin C.  And I’m not saying you do or don’t need a lot of vitamin C, but if you’re fixing the wrong problem, you’re probably not going to have a lot of success.  And when you really look at the biochemistry, the stress response and the things that go on in your brain that help regulate that, that is where your dysfunction lies in most people who have a cortisol issue. And if we’re going to fix that problem… And fixing the problem is not my expertise. When you start talking about adaptogens and things, hopefully we’re starting with lifestyle, but fixing a problem, I’m more on the analytical side of how do we well-define this problem? And that’s why we developed our testing, is to say, “Listen, this is a complex problem. And if we want to well-define the patient’s dysfunction, we need more data than just…” And then that depends on how you fill in that blank. If you go all the way back to a serum test, I mean, serum works really well for a lot of hormones. It’s the default, right? But for cortisol, it’s not a great tool.

Dr. Weitz:            Right. Which is why we’ve been using salivary cortisol testing.

Mark:                   Right.  And a lot of traditional doctors will just sort of shrug and be like, “Well…”  Actually I spent last week at NAMS, which is a very conventional group, and we were talking to them about some of our research as it relates to hormone replacement.  But when you talk to those types of people about cortisol, it’s just like, “You know what, I look at the patient, I see what’s wrong with them.  I know what’s going on.”  And I’ll tell you what, when you do that and then you start testing, and you see how often that story that’s going on with their stress response does or doesn’t match up, there you can guess wrong a lot because there’s such an overlap, right?  That’s why we’re in the game of comprehensive testing with what we do is if you take something like fatigue.  Well, we have a number of stories that intersect with that, right? As a guy, if your testosterone is low, that’s going to be an issue. We’ve got a B12 marker on our DUTCH Complete and our DUTCH Plus. If you have an overt B12 deficiency, you’re going to have some fatigue. And but also, if your cortisol is low, you’re going to have fatigue, and certainly if you have a combination of those things. But we want a well-define what’s going on with that patient. And with cortisol, you really can’t do that with blood testing. The best example I always give people is that if you look at the studies where people are healthy, like a woman’s healthy and then she gets on birth control. The cortisol and serum will double as women get on birth control without anything happening to their stress response, because the birth control happens to stimulate the binding protein that gobbles up cortisol. Your body responds by making more cortisol. But the free cortisol that’s able to do something, those levels just hang out in the same level.

So when you’re looking at urine-free cortisol like with our DUTCH Complete, or salivary cortisol like with our DUTCH Plus, those things don’t change unless your stress response changes, unless your cortisol truly changes. But the serum cortisol, you can double it, again, just by putting a woman on birth control and then letting things resettle. So stress will double your cortisol, and that doubles your cortisol, but it’s not a meaningful change, right? Then what we’re looking for, the words I like to use with lab testing is we’re looking for meaningful differentiation. And serum does not meaningfully differentiate people with cortisol dysfunction and people without. And then beyond that, we want to look at the up and down patterns-

Dr. Weitz:            Because you’re seeing total cortisol levels versus free cortisol levels, correct?

Mark:                   Right. And when you look at things like estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, it’s not as important of a distinction. But when you look at cortisol, that up and down pattern of free cortisol is so much more differentiating between function and dysfunction. And so, for us, we look at that up and down pattern. So we can look at that in urine, and we can look at that in saliva. The reason that saliva is the king of cortisol when it comes to free cortisol is that you can measure the cortisol awakening response, which is something we all ignored until I don’t know, six or seven years ago, when the data just became overwhelming that that is another variable that’s important for us to look at, which is that rise you see in the early morning. And you can really only see that from looking at saliva.

 



Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. I’ve really been enjoying this discussion, but I’d like to take a minute to tell you about a new product that I’m very excited about. I’d like to tell you about a new wearable called the Apollo. This is a device that can be worn on the wrist or the ankle, and it uses vibrations to stimulate your parasympathetic nervous system. This device has amazing benefits in terms of getting you out of that stressed out sympathetic nervous system and stimulating the parasympathetic nervous system. It has a number of different functions, especially helping you to relax, to focus, to concentrate, get into a deeper meditative state, even to help you sleep, and there’s even a mode to help you wake up. This all occurs through the scientific use of subtle vibrations.

                                For those of you who might be interested in getting the Apollo for yourself to help you reset your nervous system, go to apolloneuro.com and use the affiliate code, Weitz10. That’s my last name, WEITZ10. Now, back to the discussion.

 



 

Dr. Weitz:            What you’re talking about is for a number of years, the way we would measure the salivary cortisol is we would measure it in the morning, noon, afternoon and evening. And was not necessarily right when they got up, it was sometime in the morning. And then the cortisol awakening response is that response that occurs in the first 30 minutes after waking up, right?

Mark:                   Right. I’ve got an interesting… For those of you that are actually viewing maybe I’ll show you this here. Let me share it.

Dr. Weitz:            Mark’s going to show us a slide to illustrate this, the cortisol when you’re waking.

Mark:                   We did a really neat test on this with our assistant medical director, bless her heart. So when we look at… So I’m showing you now the data we published that shows that the up and down pattern in urine from our dried urine samples and from saliva are statistically very similar. The up and down pattern that you see. But when you look at urine, the first two samples that we measure, that’s not a cortisol awakening response, because cortisol awakening response is right when you wake up and 30 minutes later. And right when you wake up in saliva is right when you wake up, but right when you wake up in urine is of course what you’ve been collecting all night.  So it’s an interesting measurement. It’s a good measurement, but it doesn’t help you with the CAR. So the CAR is saliva right when you wake up, right? And then 30 minutes later. So let me show you. This is called a mini-stress test a lot of times. So, what you’d like to have in your office is a bear, right? You could test your patients’ cortisol and then let the bear chase them, and then you could test them 30 minutes later and you’d know their response to a stress, right? But that obviously doesn’t work very well. So here’s what we did is my-

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, it turns out that feeding the bear is very expensive, and you got security issues.

Mark:                   That’s the whole reason why we don’t do that, right? Is that’s too expensive. So, but this is the thing, waking and a stress response are the same biochemistry. So what I had Dr. Rice do is we went to the IFM Conference, and they have this slide where I’m showing a picture of it here, where you stand and the floor drops out from under you, right? And so if you don’t like heights, it’s sort of an unpleasant experience.  So I had her do a cortisol panel throughout the day. So what I’m showing now is when she woke up, her cortisol went up by about five, and then it comes back down. So then on this alternate day, in the middle of the afternoon when her cortisol has already gone down, she collected a saliva sample, she bravely got up on the death-defying water slide apparatus, and down the slide she went. And then she collected another saliva, and then another one a half an hour after that, and so on and so forth. What you can see is that the response to stress for her, it doesn’t always work out exactly this well. But her response to stress was five, and her response to waking was five.

So basically, when we freaked her out, her stress response kicked in, and that’s just not a practical test to do, right? But that’s the whole magic, if you will, of the cortisol awakening response is testing within five minutes of waking, catches you before you rise. And then catching you at 30 minutes says how dynamic is that stress response? And the word resiliency is used a lot when we talk about this is… And I’ll stop sharing my screen. I just wanted to show you that. I thought it was kind of fun data.

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, can I just ask a quick question?

Mark:                   Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:            The question has come up from patients doing this test, “I hit the snooze on my alarm. So I rolled over, I hit the snooze, and then I went back to bed. Does that mess it all up?”

Mark:                   I think it’s important that your waking time is normal-ish, because you got to remember, your cortisol starts to go up around 2:00 or 3:00 AM, right? So if for example, you wake up at 3:30, and you normally wake up at 7:00, then your CAR can be exaggerated because it’s got to makeup that ground a little bit, right? So you want to wake up at a normal time, but it really is the light that is the trigger for the cortisol awakening response. So you can get away with that. It’s probably better to just get up and do it, but what happens is the light hits the back of your eye, the change is rather instantaneous, but it takes five minutes for that change to find its way into your saliva. So you’ve got this five minute window.

So what’s best to do is I mean, if you can spend some money and get the test, I’d get your butt out of bed and get the light on, get your sample collected within five minutes, and then get the other one right around half an hour. And that’s going to give you some really good data. And I think you don’t have to do it perfectly, but the more you screw around with the collection, then the more sort of ambiguity can come into those results. So we do want it to be as precise as we can, but it is the light. So that would be why you also wouldn’t want to collect your sample, and then sit up in bed in the darkness and then wait half an hour. You want to get up and be active and get up and see what happens to my chemistry as I move again, from awake to alertness? That’s that whole point of that going on in our chemistry is to get us ready for the day.

Dr. Weitz:            And we should point out that the way your company tests the saliva is beneficial because other labs you have to spit into this tube, and sometimes when you first get up in the morning that alone can be a stressful event.

Mark:                   Well, it’s honestly it’s people asking too much of what you’re trying to do. So here’s the challenge is we test all the sex hormones in urine because I think they’re more accurate that way. We’ve published data that shows the serum correlation is really nice with estrogen and progesterone, et cetera, right? The challenge is if we use cotton swabs for cortisol because you can get a collection easily within two minutes.

Dr. Weitz:            So, in other words for those who don’t know, you just put this cotton swab in your mouth, get it wet, and then you stick it in a tube?

Mark:                   Yeah, you chew on it lightly a little bit. When I do it it takes me about 60 seconds, but it would never take you more than two minutes, right?

Dr. Weitz:            As opposed to spitting, because spitting can be-

Mark:                   Right. The challenge is if I want cortisol, and I want my sex hormones out of saliva, I have to give you a whole bunch. The problem is those cotton swabs absorb progesterone. So if you try to have a test that does cortisol and progesterone at the same time, you cannot use the cotton swabs. And as soon as you can’t use the cotton swab, then I have to ask you for two to three milliliters of saliva before you’ve even had any water to drink. And it just becomes a little bit of a nightmare, because if it takes you 15 minutes, guess what? Those second five and third chunk of five minutes, your cortisol has already doubled, right? Potentially. So you’ve just sort of screwed up the mechanism of how it works.  So it’s better to get the cortisol out of saliva. And then for us, we get all the sex hormones and their metabolites out of urine, where it’s a lot easier to measure accurately. I mean, measuring that’s a whole nother story, but measuring estrogen in saliva is just not a very good idea because it’s hard to do analytically, and then you can’t look at the metabolites. So for us, we’re using saliva for the cortisol. And then in the urine we’re measuring sort of everything else. So if you want just a urine only test, you can do the cortisol in urine also, you just don’t get the CAR, but you get everything else.

But for us, the reason we want to use the urine is A, it’s better for sex hormones. But the other thing is getting back to the adrenal picture is… And this was actually what led to our entire company is realizing that measuring cortisol without looking at its metabolites can really lead you in the wrong direction a lot of times. So we’re measuring cortisol, which is free, active, the most important thing you can measure, but then we’re also measuring the metabolites, which is essentially like it’s the bucket that catches all the cortisol you make so that you know how much glandular output you have. Which at first glance sounds like, “Well, I already know cortisol because I have free cortisol,” but as we’ve looked at the research, and looked at so many cases, it adds a dimension of understanding that really is helpful in a lot of cases.

Dr. Weitz:            When I hear that only 5% of the cortisol that’s produced is free, meaning not bound to proteins like cortisol binding protein. Why would the body produce all this cortisol and only leave a small percentage of it to be active?

Mark:                   That’s an interesting question. Because 5% is probably the highest quote you’ll find.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, okay.

Mark:                   Most of them are around one to 2%. And some will say as high as five. I mean, that’s on the high end. So you’re right, most of it is free. And then there’s the whole hormone cascade that comes after that. So it’s a complex system and it’s fascinatingly complex, but it makes it difficult because it’s sort of like we want easy two dimensional pictures, but it’s this three-dimensional thing where you’ve got this up and down pattern of free cortisol. But then if you say, “Okay, that tells me my stress response,” true. But then when you say, “That tells me how much cortisol I quote, produce,” that’s actually not true. Well, in some cases, it’s not true, right? You need the metabolites to tell that part of the story.

The place I found that first that was so interesting is in obese people. In obese people you’ve got this, essentially, this organ of fat or gland or whatever. It’s this whole thing. It’s a whole system, and it loves hormones. And so cortisol, as you make it is going to get sucked up by fat. And then it gets metabolized and ends up in a toilet and your adrenal gland’s like, “Oh, well, I guess I’ll make a little bit more.” And as you get into obesity, the difference there is massive. So you’re making literally, to keep your stress response and that salivary cortisol in the same place, a skinny person and an obese person will make three times, like three times more cortisol in an obese person to sort of keep up with that sequestering metabolism excretion. And that’s where the story gets kind of complicated, and you can go in a lot of different directions with that, but we want to tell that story well.

And so there are a number of factors that can impact how the cortisol is cleared. So thyroid is probably the biggest space where we see that, where… And I’ve got a nice example of a patient who had low free cortisol, and then high metabolites. But see, that doesn’t finish the conversation because you have to ask why? Because usually that’s because they’re obese. And you say, “Oh, that makes sense. You have your free cortisol just is what it is, and the metabolites are going to move as you gain weight, and so that’s interesting.” But in this case, the person wasn’t obese and you continue to ask questions and say, “Okay, well what else makes me get rid of my cortisol at a fast rate?” Well, hyperthyroidism. Well, this person’s hypothyroid. Well, okay, that doesn’t make sense.  And then you keep digging and realize, “Oh, hold on now. We have our blood testing that shows the thyroid results are high. So this patient’s being overdosed. Oh, okay.” Now you keep digging at the problem and you realize that hyperthyroidism makes your body just zip through cortisol. So you get this gargantuan amount of metabolites and low free cortisol, and this story starts to make sense. So before you go fix a cortisol problem, obviously, you don’t want a patient hyperthyroid on accident, right? So with this patient, they said, “Oh, well drop the dose.”

I had a friend who had that same exact scenario, and it turned out the doctor said, “Here’s your medicine, take it once a day.” And she heard, “Here’s your medicine, take it morning and tonight.” And so she was inducing hyperthyroidism just by not following instructions. And so once they tapered that dose back, the thyroid results came where they belong. And now there’s no longer this imbalance of essentially burning through your cortisol faster than you’re supposed to. And the free cortisol went from low to high. So it’s like all this cortisol she was trying to make that her body was just zipping through. And she actually had a stress response, a stress situation that was hyper, but because of this concurrent thyroid problem, it just created this really complex situation. And that’s kind of our mantra is that complex problems need comprehensive solutions.

And so for cortisol, we want to see the up and down pattern, yes, but we also want to see the metabolites because we really don’t know the full story until we see both of those things so that we know what’s your stress response? And then but also, what is your cortisol production? When they tell the same story, it’s boring. You got a guy who’s on fire, he’s inflamed, whatever. His free cortisol is high, his metabolites are high, and you say, “Yeah, well, the metabolites didn’t help anything, but to confirm,” right?  And I can look at another case where a person has low cortisol, low metabolites, all it’s doing is confirming. And in that sense, you have more confidence, but it hasn’t really told you anything new. But when those things tell opposite stories where free cortisol is low, metabolites are high, that’s interesting. When it’s the opposite, that was actually one of the early cases I found in the literature, is that when you look at cortisol and anorexia in the literature, you get opposite stories depending if you’re looking on a urine story or a saliva story, right?

So there’s a nice paper where they show that the metabolites of cortisol are half in an anorexic patient. You say, “Okay, half the metabolites means half the production.” And then there’s a paper published the next year that evidently didn’t read that paper that looked at salivary cortisol, and the saliva was the opposite. The saliva was elevated for cortisol in anorexic patients, which was a problem for them, right?  But there’s a paper clear back the year I was born in like 77, that says that anorexic patients don’t clear their cortisol very well because they end up with a thyroid problem. So you end up with this really complex situation where you have high free cortisol. So now you’re going to struggle with things like depression because of high cortisol. But if you tell yourself anorexic patients make too much cortisol, you’re wrong. What’s going on is they have sluggish clearance of cortisol because of a concurrent, likely a concurrent thyroid issue because of the anorexia, and so they don’t get rid of their cortisol very well to the degree that their free cortisol is high.

So if you want to go in and fix that problem, the first thing is understanding it well. If all you’re thinking is, “I’m making too much cortisol,” you’re barking up the wrong tree in terms of solving that problem. It’s just more complex than that. And we see those types of cases all the time where it’s just there’s a complex thing. And you’ve got to get as much information as you can before you start shooting bullets at your problem. You want to define it really well because you really can run confidently in the wrong direction so easily when you’re just basing it off of a simple serum cortisol or even when it’s just salivary cortisol. There’s a broader story there, and that’s what we’re all about is digging into those complex stories and trying to figure out as much as we can about them so that you go to the right solution for those patients.

Dr. Weitz:            I know that treatment’s you’re not a treating doctor and that’s not one of your specialties, but still to just think through some of the potential treatments that might be effective for patients with cortisol abnormalities or adrenal dysfunction. So, and I have two thoughts. One is even though the brain may be what’s not telling the adrenal glands to produce enough cortisol in the case of hypocortisolemia, it still might be beneficial to nutritionally support the adrenal gland to make more cortisol even if the problem is not that… Even if the problem is that it’s not getting the signal from the brain, because that may be easier than fixing the brain. I don’t know if we know yet exactly how to fix the brain, except maybe to work on the gut. And that may validate some of the treatment approaches that functional medicine doctors have done where they support the adrenal glands.

Mark:                   Right. Well, I mean I think, look, if you have an overt nutrient deficiency, the odds of success are probably low. So I think if you’ve got basic nutrient deficiencies, those are definitely worth fixing. And there is some good research on some of the adaptogens that people use working in the brain. Pregnenolone is a really interesting one because pregnenolone is this neurosteroid, right? And if you take it for HPA axis dysfunction, people have had success. But some people have had success with that for let’s see, how would you say this? Mistaken, it’s sort of lucky that they got it right kind of a thing, because part of this thing that goes along with adrenal fatigue in terms of this nomenclature that we use, is there’s also this concept of progesterone steal and pregnenolone steal. And if you-

Dr. Weitz:            For those who are not really familiar when you look at the whole cascade of the production of male and female hormones, at the top of the chart is pregnenolone, and it’s often considered the mother of all hormones.

Mark:                   Yeah, let me just pull that steroid pathway up. And then that way, if people want to stare at it, they can. Oh, shoot, I didn’t advance my slides here. Because this has led to a lot of confusion in our industry.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah.

Mark:                   Let’s see. Are you seeing that there?

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. Yep, steroid biochemistry.

Mark:                   Okay. Okay, so if you look at this, you’ve got cholesterol and then pregnenolone. And then downstream, you have progesterone. And then you take a right hand turn and then another right hand turn and you get cortisol, right? So, people will assume that then if you’re stressed, the cortisol is made from the circulating hormones that sit above that. And this, I’ll show this, but I’ll describe it for those of you that are just listening. So ACTH is made in the brain, right? It circulates, and then it find its way into the adrenal gland, into the cells in a particular location in the adrenal gland.  Then ACTH knocks the StAR hormone into cholesterol within the cell. Now cholesterol can go into the mitochondria inside the adrenal cortex cell. The cholesterol right there then gets turned into pregnenolone. That pregnenolone is your substrate. That goes outside the mitochondria and into the endoplasmic reticulum, and it gets turned into progesterone. That progesterone is your substrate for making cortisol. So now if you pause right here, and say, “Okay, I’ve taken ACTH. I’ve taken cholesterol into my mitochondria. I’ve made both pregnenolone and progesterone.” At this point, if you start taking supplements: progesterone, or you start ovulating, or you get pregnant… And do pregnant people make more cortisol because they have all this progesterone? No, because it isn’t in the adrenal cell.

So the steroid cascade is really helpful for us, but it also has been misleading for people because they see it as this sort of, “If I just get the precursor.” So for example, if you give a woman DHEA. Yeah, she’ll make a little testosterone out of it. And a guy? Yeah, he’ll make a little testosterone out of it. You will never rival testicular production of testosterone by shoveling precursors at men, because it’s the same thing. Cholesterol because of LH gets pulled into those cells within the testes, right? And in that little cell, they have the machinery to make testosterone out of cholesterol. You will never rival that by giving supplements of upstream hormones.

The same thing with cortisol is progesterone. And just to finish this animation if you’re watching it. Progesterone then turns into deoxycortisol. It’s so complex. It then goes back into the mitochondria. Turns into cortisol. Now I have cortisol which can leave my adrenal gland, right? And then it’s going to go out and circulate. So the point is when you look at the steroid cascade, and you look at what’s upstream, and we think, “Oh, that’s what I make it out of.” So if I steal cortisol because I’m stressed, my woman will no longer make progesterone. Yes, there’s a relationship between stress and reproduction, right? When you’re getting invaded by the northern invaders, it’s not time to make a baby, right? So your body is smart in that when you’re stressed you might stop ovulating, you might become anovulatory, you might not reproduce when you otherwise would. But it’s not this simple biochemistry mechanism of thinking that there’s a cortisol drain that gets opened, and all your pregnenolone and other hormones just filter into it.

So here’s what happened in our industry is people looked at that steroid cascade and said, “You’re stressed. Oh, my gosh, you don’t have enough cortisol, I’m going to give you pregnenolone, and it will go where your body needs it.” And that is not true. But what pregnenolone was doing, was going into the brain and acting as a neurosteroid and actually helping the HPA axis from a neurohormone standpoint and helping people in their cortisol dysfunction. So that’s why I say people succeeded by accident.  But we can’t stay there. We have to move forward in understanding why these things are working, which is why doctors will use things like ashwagandha, rhodiola, like some of these adaptogens that people package into supplements and sell them. I’m not telling you which ones you should buy, but there is good research that shows that those things can actually help modulate that stress response at a brain level. And that’s where our further advancement is, is understanding that chemistry and what’s going on. And in order to do that, my point being that concept of adrenal fatigue, and that concept of cortisol steal, or if you want to call it pregnenolone steal, or progesterone steal, people call it different things. But the idea that making one hormone is at the expense of another does not work the way that story was sort of originally told.  Now, it pushed us in a good direction, right? Because people need to explore this, but we have to follow the literature and follow the science to where it’s going, which is to a more I think full understanding of that. And again, our whole thing is the more of that data you’re looking at, the more of that picture you have visibility on, then you understand what’s going on a little bit better, and then your solutions you’re going to pick are going to be more likely to be the right ones.

Dr. Weitz:            Another follow up question on potential treatment strategies is when it comes to say male hormones, if I have a male patient, and his testosterone’s a bit lower, and maybe has some issues with libido, and his sex hormone binding globulin is high. We know that’s tying up some of his testosterone.

Mark:                   For sure.

Dr. Weitz:            And so there’re certain strategies we’ll use, herbal and otherwise, to try to lower the sex hormone binding globulin. And I wonder if there’s strategies to manipulate the cortisol binding globulins to free up free cortisol?

Mark:                   Well, we know some things that induce them, like birth control, right? If you take birth control you end up with a lot more binding proteins, which is the same binding protein I believe that binds progesterone. But I could not speak intelligently to how that works because I think when you look at the birth control literature, your body for cortisol adjusts to that pretty well. But it’s possible that in a subset of patients, that it sort of overwhelms their ability to continue to make cortisol, but I couldn’t speak to specifically how that could be done. But I do know there are good strategies with SBG that do impact your sex hormones. And birth control is another good example. I mean, one of the reasons birth control is… One minor reason that it’s effective is because it increases sex hormone binding globulin, and now girls no longer have their testosterone and they’re really not interested in making babies. So to manipulate that can definitely be part of your practice.

Dr. Weitz:            And that’s because testosterone plays a significant role in women’s sex drive?

Mark:                   Right, exactly. Exactly.

Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. Interesting. So, talk a little more about cortisol and thyroid and how they’re related. You talked about having higher levels of thyroid, either taking too much thyroid or having hyperthyroid increases the clearance of cortisol, right?

Mark:                   Yeah, there’s a direct relationship between… I can show you the data here. I’ll just do it that way. So you can see on the X-axis on that left graph is thyroid, like three to four, right? And on the Y-axis is cortisol metabolites. And the reason that I show you that is just to show you how strong that relationship can be, that thyroid essentially helps you get rid of cortisol. So when you have a picture of someone not getting rid of their cortisol, that’s something to think about. I mean, I think if you’re going to be comprehensive in someone’s hormones, you’re definitely going to want to look at a thyroid panel. And thyroid and cortisol, the adrenals, they talk to each other at multiple levels. TSH and cortisol and T3. There’s a lot of crosstalk between those. And one of those is that the thyroid helps cortisol to clear the way that it’s supposed to.  So you definitely want to look at those things in concert, which is why for our testing, it isn’t everything, right? This urine-saliva combo that we do is a lot of information on reproductive and adrenal hormones, but serum testing is still really necessary to get some of those staples of thyroid panels and blood chemistries, and all of those things, as well as things like as SHBG. So I think those don’t necessarily compete with each other, but complement each other really well. But it also points out the fact that if you want to know how the relationship between those is working, you need to see not just…  This is that case I was showing you where if you’re looking at your screens, fix the thyroid problem. Now, boom, the free cortisol bounced back like crazy. And for me, it’s not about teaching about thyroid and adrenals, and all of that, that would be someone else could speak more clearly to that. My point is if you want to define what’s going on in the patient really well, that you need to see this three-dimensional picture. Free cortisol all up and down, that’s two-dimensions. And the metabolites is this third dimension. And if you work without one of those dimensions, you can get it right some of the time, but it’s significantly easier to get the story wrong.

Dr. Weitz:            Right. So that metabolites cortisol that you collect through urine is essentially a way to tell the total cortisol levels?

Mark:                    Glandular output, yeah. And again, when it tells the same story as the free cortisol, you just move along because it confirms your story. And when it’s really different, then you slow your thinking and go, “Okay.” This is the functional medicine thing, right? You start asking why questions, like why would this pattern be in this patient? And you think about those things that are related. Some of the chronic fatigue literature shows a story of getting rid of your cortisol very rapidly, meaning you have higher levels of metabolites that says, “You’re actually making cortisol here, but your free cortisol that hits the brain and does what cortisol’s supposed to do is relatively low.” So in some of those cases, seeing that full picture can be really helpful.

 



Dr. Weitz:                            I’d like to interrupt this fascinating discussion we’re having for another few minutes to tell you about another really exciting product that has changed my life and the life of my family, especially as it pertains to getting good quality sleep. It’s something called the chiliPAD, C-H-I-L-I-P-A-D. It can be found at the website chilisleep.com, which is C-H-I-L-I-S-L-E-E-P dot com.

So, this product involves a water-cooled mattress pad that goes underneath your sheets and helps you maintain a constant temperature at night. If you’ve ever gotten woken up because temperature has changed, typically gets warmer, this product will maintain your body at a very even temperature, and it tends to promote uninterrupted quality deep and REM sleep, which is super important for healing and for overall health.

If you go to chilisleep.com and you use the affiliate code, Weitz20, that’s my last name, W-E-I-T-Z, 20. You’ll get 20% off a chiliPAD. So, check it out and let’s get back to this discussion.



 

Dr. Weitz:            How does cortisol interact with melatonin which is a hormone that tends to get produced when it gets dark and helps us get ready for bedtime? And then I wonder if the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-thyroid axis should be expanded to include the pineal gland as well?

Mark:                    Right. Right. Because those cortisol and melatonin are going to oppose each other. So in an ideal world, as soon as the lights go out, you make melatonin and it helps you sleep. And we know your gut makes a lot of melatonin as well. And then when you wake up, if your melatonin hangs and stays up when you’re supposed to be awake, you’re going to have issues and that does correlate with issues. But ideally, it’s going to drop down as you reach your waking time, and then cortisol is going to rise up. So you get this up and down natural rhythm between the two.

And that’s why for us… So for us, for melatonin what we do is we take the… This is why we collect four samples throughout the day. One, we can see that cortisol pattern if you want to get it out of urine, but I don’t really want to know your 24-hour melatonin, I want to know what you make at night. And so they did this nice little study where they measured people’s serum melatonin while they slept. They added all those numbers up, and then they collected a urine sample right when they woke up. And adding all of those up or just looking at a waking urine measurement of the melatonin metabolite correlates really nicely.

And it’s good to note that it’s completely useless when you’re on melatonin therapy, because you just get big stupid numbers in urine when you take melatonin orally. But to get a baseline value on asking the question, do you make sufficient amounts of melatonin? That’s included in our DUTCH panels, so that you can look at the big cortisol picture, melatonin, and all the other things that are related there. Again, the name of the game for us is comprehensiveness when it comes to those hormones.

Dr. Weitz:            I wonder if you have some insight as to normally when we think about hormones, if you take an exogenous hormone, if you take testosterone or any other hormone, your natural production will tend to decrease? And it’s often said that that doesn’t happen with melatonin. Is that really true?

Mark:                    That is definitely true for testosterone. So we have on our… Our panel’s got this kind of fun marker. Fun if you’re a hormone nerd like me, called epitestosterone, which is that so your testes make testosterone, and its, let’s call it its impotent twin epitestosterone. So they’re both up here, and then but your testosterone level’s lower, so your gonads aren’t making testosterone anymore. And then you go, “Okay, I’m going to take some testosterone.” So let’s say you take an injection, so testosterone is going to bounce up. And then you say, “Well, how much is that for my testosterone that I took? And how much am I making?” You don’t really know, right?

Well, this other cousin of testosterone is also made by the gonads, so it will drop to zero if you take an injection. So it’s a marker of endogenous gonadol androgen production. And so we measure both of those so that you can see… So for example, if you take a 50 milligram gel, testosterone will go up a little, and the epitestosterone will only go down a little. But if you take 200 milligrams or you take an injection that’s really big, you’ll see that complete suppression of LH from the brain, and then the testicles stop making testosterone. And of course, long term your testes will shrink up because they’re not doing anything.

With melatonin, it’s a more complex thing than that, and I’m not entirely sure, I don’t know how you’d ask the question of whether you still make a little melatonin when you take it. The question of whether long term production of melatonin is suppressed by exogenous melatonin is a really good question. I couldn’t speak to what the literature says about that. I’ve always had a little bit of hesitancy with my kids of if we’re traveling or something, giving them some melatonin, great idea. But because that’s that same pathway that makes serotonin and all of that, I’ve always been a little hesitant to give it to them long term because I don’t understand how that pathway continues to function in the presence of exogenous melatonin. It’s a very good question, but I wish I had a better answer, but I don’t know what the literature has to say about that.

Dr. Weitz:            Do we know anything about potential negative effects of high levels of melatonin?

Mark:                    Gosh, there are people who’ve studied that at a higher level than I have. And some people take doses that make my jaw drop.

Dr. Weitz:            I know one doctor, and he takes 50 milligrams every night, and he takes it for longevity purposes. There was one study that seemed to show some benefits. He says he feels great from it.

Mark:                    Yeah, I mean, I think the safety profile for melatonin is good, but I couldn’t speak specifically to if you’re taking two milligrams versus five, versus 50, that’s a boat load of melatonin. And especially in this COVID world, it’s got that… It’s a powerful antioxidant. And when you get that inflammatory response from COVID, I think there’s probably some use for it there. But I wouldn’t want to give medical advice to the masses on that because that’s a specific area of expertise, and it’s not mine, so I wouldn’t say too much about that.

Dr. Weitz:            Interesting. I was just wondering if that’s-

Mark:                    Yeah, it is. It is.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, great. So I think that’s the questions I had prepared. Great discussion. A lot of interesting information. Tell us about how practitioners or patients can access the Precision Analytical DUTCH Testing.

Mark:                    So you can go to dutchtest.com to get some information from us. We do encourage patients to work through providers. This stuff is complex, the solutions. We love lifestyle, but oftentimes, there might be some sort of pharmaceutical hormone-type intervention that requires a doctor’s help. But we definitely encourage people to get a doctor’s help in terms of understanding it. We have a Find a Provider on our website, but you can get a test as a patient through our website at dutchtest.com.

As a provider, if you go to our website and just sign up to become a provider, it takes a little while to really integrate this into your practice. So we always offer new providers to us up to five kits at half price. So you can take advantage of that as a new provider. What I always encourage providers to do is just get a couple of those, try it out. And then we have a team of 12 doctors on staff that can help you understand this because there is a… This sort of intellectual bridge to get over in terms of understanding not just the hormones, but their metabolites and how they interplay between those.

So we have a team of really good clinicians that use the testing themselves in their own personal practices that can help sort of mentor you to figure out where this fits in your practice. For me, I think it’s the best all around HRT monitoring tool. And we have some videos on our website that can speak to different scenarios. But because all tests have their advantages and their limitations, and we try to be really upfront with where DUTCH really works well, and where you might need other tools. And serum testing isn’t going anywhere, you’re still going to need that in your practice, but this can be a pretty powerful tool, particularly in those complex cases. So, if you just go to dutchtest.com there’s lots of information there about the testing.

Dr. Weitz:            Great. Thank you so much, Mark.

Mark:                    I appreciate your time.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:            Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. And if you enjoyed this podcast, please go to Apple Podcasts and give us a five star ratings and review, that way more people will be able to find this Rational Wellness Podcast when they’re searching for health podcasts. And I wanted to let everybody know that I do now have a few openings for new nutritional consultations for patients at my Santa Monica Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition Clinic. So if you’re interested, please call my office, 310-395-3111 and sign up for one of the few remaining slots for a comprehensive nutritional consultation with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you and see you next week.

 

Dr. Joe Pizzorno speaks about the Environmental Toxins with Dr. Ben Weitz at the Functional Medicine Discussion Group meeting on October 28, 2021.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

2:53  GGT (gamma-glutamyltransferase) is an inexpensive lab test that used to be run to monitor for hepatitis, but it is a good way to monitor for toxins. GGT is the enzyme that recycles glutathione, so our bodies will elevate GGT to recycle glutathione faster as a way to protect us against a toxic load.  The normal range is 10 to 50, depending upon the lab and for women the range should be a bit lower, and the average of the people they surveyed was 30, but a GGT of 30 carries with it an eight fold risk of diabetes. And one third of the US population has arsenic levels that are high enough to cause disease.

5:31  When Dr. Pizzorno was in private practice in the 1970s he did not see many patients with diabetes because it was not that prevalent. Now, diabetes is very prevalent and the primary cause is not sugar but toxins, though high fructose corn syrup might be a contributor. 

11:03  Unimportant molecules.  Dr. Pizzorno gave a lecture at the IFM annual meeting this year and his thesis was that we decided that food contained about 42 or 43 vitamins and minerals and everything else was unimportant.  But now we know that there are perhaps 50,000 phytonutrients that are actually very important, but when you grow foods chemically, you have less of these unimportant molecules, these phytonutrients.  Arsenic contributes to up to one third of all cancers and the consumption of floratin has decreased dramatically and floratin is a phytonutrient that helps protect the DNA from the arsenic damage that leads to cancer. 

14:09  The arsenic gets into the water both naturally and from industrial sources such as arsenic in treated wood and from arsenic compounds in pesticides and arsenic until recently was fed to the chickens both to kill parasites and to make the chickens plumper. 

16:33  Testing for heavy metals and metalloids like arsenic.  Serum testing is accurate but it doesn’t tell you what’s in the bones or stored in other tissues in the body. The best way to measure heavy metals that may be stored in the body are to do a chelation challenge by having the patient take 500 mg DMSA and 300 mg DMPS and then collect urine for 6 hours.

20:25  Rice.  Rice has been shown to contain arsenic and people who eat rice have twice as much arsenic as people who don’t.  You should wash the rice thoroughly to remove arsenic and if you cook it for a minute and then throw out the water and then resume cooking, you can get rid of the majority of the arsenic. 

21:13  Besides arsenic, the other most problematic heavy metals are lead, mercury, and cadmium.  Dr. Pizzorno stated that while chemical toxins are a problem as well, these four metals are causing the majority of the disease in the country.  Did you know that there is a correlation between your arsenic levels and getting shingles?  Half of the myocardial infarctions in the US are from arsenic and lead. 

25:03  The upper limit for GGT should be between 15 and 20.  Disease correlations start around 20.

28:09  To reduce arsenic levels, you want to reduce exposure. One way is to filter the water in your house.  A whole house filter is best. If not, then filter the water you use for drinking and cooking. There’s a filter called ZeroWater that gets rid of most of the arsenic. Reverse osmosis and ion exchange both work well.  Berkey water filters do not get rid of arsenic.

29:39  Arsenic toxicity is difficult to diagnose without testing, but one clinical sign is a brownish pigmentation on the palms of the hands. 

30:52  To reduce arsenic, you should rinse your rice thoroughly in water and you can also cook it for one minute, pour the water off, and then resume cooking, which works well. 

31:27  Competing Minerals, Fiber, and DMSA. Besides avoiding arsenic exposure, the best strategies for promoting detoxification of heavy metals like arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and lead include supporting methylation, taking competing minerals such as calcium for lead and selenium for mercury, oral chelators like DMSA which can be taken 250 mg every third day, and increasing fiber intake.  Taking 500 mg NAC will increase red blood cell glutathione by about 30%.  Patients who have trouble metabolizing sulfur may have trouble taking too large a dosage of NAC, though for most people taking 2000-3000 mg of NAC per day has been shown to be safe.  For those who have trouble with sulfur, it would be better to give liposomal glutathione.

37:59  There are also problems with environmental toxins other than metals and one of the most significant are the bisphenols. While bisphenol A (BPA) is being used a lot less frequently, bisphenol S, F, AF, and Z are being used in its place and bisphenol S is the most toxic of these and it can affect fertility among other affects.

 



Dr. Joe Pizzorno is a transformational leader in natural medicine, one of the founding members of the Functional Medicine movement, and the founding president of Bastyr University, which was the first accredited institution in the field of natural medicine.  He is a Naturopathic Doctor, researcher, and educator, who has written or co-authored more than 12 books including, The Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine, which has now sold over two million copies, and The Toxin Solution, and his textbook Clinical Environmental Medicine, his two newest books.  Here’s the website to learn more about his The Toxin Solution book: http://www.thetoxinsolution.com/  You can also learn more about Dr. Pizzorno from his website: http://drpizzorno.com/ 

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also specializing in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure and also weight loss and also athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111. Dr. Weitz is also available for video or phone consultations.



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:                            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field, to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me, and let’s jump into the podcast. Hello, I’m Dr. Ben Weitz and thank you for joining our functional medicine discussion group meeting tonight. And we are very honored to be joined by Dr. Joe Pizzorno who’ll be speaking with us about environmental toxins. I hope you’ll consider joining some of our other upcoming meetings, including November 18th, with Dr. Peter Bongiorno on an integrative approach to depression and anxiety. I encourage everybody to participate in discussion by typing questions into the chat box, and if you are not aware, we have a closed Facebook page, the Functional Medicine Discussion Group of Santa Monica, so you should join so we can continue the conversation.

I am recording this event and I’ll post it on my YouTube page, include it in my weekly Rational Wellness Podcast. And if you have not listened to it, please check out the Rational Wellness Podcast and subscribe on Apple Podcasts. And if you enjoy listening to this, please go to Apple Podcasts and give me a ratings and review. And now I want to thank our sponsor for this evening, Integrative Therapeutics. And so Integrative Therapeutics is one of the few professional brands of supplements that we carry in our office, and they have a number of products that can be helpful in detoxifying toxins.

Dr. Joseph Pizzorno is one of the most important naturopathic doctors, educators, researchers, and one of the founding members of the Functional Medicine movement. Dr. Pizzorno has written or co-authored more than 12 books, including The Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine, which has now sold over two million copies. And I dare say, almost everybody who’s involved in the world of natural medicine has a copy of that book in their bookshelf. The Textbook of Natural Medicine, Natural Medicine for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer, The Toxin Solution, Clinical Environmental Medicine, and his newest book written with his wife, Lara Pizzorno, Healthy Bones Healthy You. And now we’re honored to be joined by Dr. Pizzorno. Unfortunately, I didn’t record the first couple of minutes of the discussion so we’re going to jump right into this conversation with Dr. Joe Pizzorno.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Think about the GGT, which is so interesting. It was one of the enzymes we used to be as a standard measure for hepatitis. Because when the liver gets damaged, it starts leaking liver enzymes and high liver enzymes lead to hepatitis of some sort. So we stopped doing GGT because it just wasn’t as good and not necessary.  But the technology is all there, it’s a cheap test. What’s interesting about it, when you think about clicking an enzyme into the blood, what’s that enzyme doing?  Well, that enzyme recycles glutathione, and so our smart bodies when we’re supposed to toxic load starts recycling glutathione faster as a way to protect ourselves from the toxic load.  So it’s a nice indirect measure.  So not only does it directly correlate with toxic load, it also directly correlates with many diseases, particularly diabetes but also risk of death.  So the normal range depending on the lab is 10 to 60 or 10 to 50, just in that range, and women tend to be a little lower than men.  Anyway, so anything in that range is considered okay.  So the average for this particular group of people was about 30. Now, you might say, “Well, that’s fine.” But a GGT of 30 carries with it an eight fold increased risk for diabetes.  So as you might expect, I found a lot of insulin resistance in this particular group of people.  By the way, they’re mainly supposedly healthy men aged about 30 to 50.  Most of them were in that group, but we have some office workers and some women. So not people expected to have a lot of disease.  So I’m trying to figure out, why they have these high GGTs.  And I started talking to them.  One of the things we did was not to give people the advice, but then they fly us out into the field to meet with them.  So had one to one interactions with the real people we’re working with, not just numbers from a laboratory.  So it was a really good experience.  So I learned that a big chunk of them were working in the oil fields as a way to subsidize the family farms which weren’t commercially viable anymore because of mega farming.  So what do you think they were doing on their farms to compete with the mega farmers?

Speaker 3:                         Herbicides and pesticides.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      All those herbicides and pesticides I heard?

Speaker 3:                         Yes.

Dr. Pizzorno:                     I had this group of people were clearly going the direction of diabetes because of all these herbicides and pesticides. So I said, “Well, that’s interesting.” About five years ago I started diving into the research, just looking at, well, what are the correlations with these various environmental toxins and incidence of disease? And the first one I looked at was diabetes, because… I see some more gray hairs in here like myself, but when I was in private practice, way back in the 70s, you didn’t see a diabetic patient.  So obviously, I’m a bright guy, I was fully booked all the time.  I didn’t see my first diabetic patient until I was in practice for six months of full-time practice.  They just weren’t that common.  And now 10% of people are diabetic and one third will become diabetic. What happened?  Well, we didn’t change our genetics, and you might say, “Well, how about people eat too much sugar.”  Yes, people eat too much sugar.  It’s no correlation between sugar consumption and the diabetes epidemic. Although maybe the high fructose corn syrup might contribute.  I’m looking at that as another environmental toxin I should consider. But what does correlate with diabetes is the level herbicides, the level of pesticides, the level of bisphenols, the levels of pthalates, and things like that. So then a group of Bastyr grads to help me answer the question, if we can determine how much a particular toxin is increasing risk of disease, we know what portion of that toxin is in the general population, can we figure out what percent of that disease is due to that toxin? And we did that.  And by way, we weren’t making it up. That’s the standard Public Health math we used for figuring that all out.  We did all the standard stuff, it’s all referenced and best as I could tell 90% of the diabetes epidemic was due to environmental toxins.  And that’s why the researchers call them diabetogens.

Dr. Weitz:                           Which were the most significant diabetogens?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      No big surprises here. PCBs, phthalates, arsenic.  Is everybody aware that one third of the US population has arsenic levels that are high enough to cause disease?  One third.

Dr. Weitz:                           Wow.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      And that’s the whole population. You can probably assume most people in your offices are going to have too much arsenic.  First off, the basic idea number one is, wow, we have an incredibly toxic environment and it is really poisoning people.  It is the primary cause of chronic disease right now.  Well, by way might be saying, “Wait a minute, we all know obese people have way more diabetes than non obese people.”  Very true.  Here’s the kicker, this work done by Becky Lee in South Korea.  If you look at the amount of environmental diabetogens in their fat stores, and then you compare them to diabetes, it turns out those obese people with low levels obesogens don’t have an increased risk for diabetes.  It’s not the fat, it’s what’s in the fat that’s causing trouble.  Some people even hypothesized that some people are unconsciously overweight as a way of diluting these environmental toxins.  Because not all they calling them diabetogens, they’re calling them obesogens.  So for example, as a backdrop correlation between Bisphenol A levels and a person’s body waste, both men and women. Its just stuff everybody knows, or is it interesting? I need feedback.

Speaker 4:                          I’m very interested.

Speaker 3:                          Yeah, we’re just listening to you, so we’re enjoying it.

Dr. Weitz:                           By the way, I don’t know if this is appropriate time, but what’s the best way to test for heavy metals like arsenic?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Okay, so let me talk about arsenic for a second and I’ll answer that question at the end, and give you an inducement for following me for a few seconds. Okay, so-

Dr. Weitz:                           We’ll follow you as long as you want to speak to us.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Thanks.  Anyway, so one of the things I was wondering about is, everybody’s getting really excited about lead toxicity.  They did that quite some time ago and the good news is, we’ve decreased the body load of lead.  So congratulations to us, but nobody’s paying attention to arsenic.  And turns out, looks like arsenic is actually worse than lead.  So I’m working on a project right now in Flint, Michigan, where I wanted to bring natural medicine to an underserved population.  I was tired of all the politics and so, I don’t know about the politics, what I do know is how to help people be healthy.  And there’s a group of people that everybody knows about needs help because there’s a lead problem I said, “Let me go and see if I can help out.”  So here’s what’s really fascinating.  They have a bigger arsenic problem than they have lead problem, and nobody knows it.

So we got a sample from the state of the actual measurements of the drinking water people are drinking, 43% of them were above 10 micrograms of arsenic per liter of water. That’s the standard threshold, is 10. And by the way, I’m giving a lecture tomorrow on the latest research on arsenic for AIHM, that’s Academy of Integrated Health Medicines can start tomorrow, but you haven’t done it so you just consider it, and the lecture tomorrow on the latest arsenic research. I’m going to be making a really strong case that it has to be seven. But just using 10 as a cut off, 43% we’re above that cut off. So I was wondering, if there’s so much arsenic and 35% of the US population is about 10 micrograms per liter of urine, which is the arsenic cutoff, if it’s that much, why aren’t people paying more attention to it? So I’m curious, did any of you hear my lecture on unimportant molecules at this year’s IFM? I’m just curious if anybody heard that lecture.

Speaker 3:                          No.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Okay. I’m not hearing anybody who heard it.

Dr. Weitz:                           I did.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Let me tell you what my thesis was. So my thesis was that the research we did a hundred years ago to determine what nutrients were necessary for health, was limited to the research techniques and technology that was available at the time, and our understanding of physiology and of medicine. So we pretty much had to do primarily animal studies and we had to look at what made them die or live or not suffer some really severe disease, and to figure out these vitamins and minerals necessary for health, amino acids and fats and things like that.  Add them all together it’s about 43 molecules or 42 molecules.  Somebody correct my math on that one, I’ll go with 42 for now.  Okay, yeah and sometimes there’s obligate needs and add two, or three, or four, maybe even five, but it’s a small number. The next question is then, well, have you ever thought, how many molecules are there in food? We started looking at how many molecules in food, and it looks like around 50,000. So we decided that 0.1% of the food supply was important and everything else was unimportant.

Now, guess what happens when you grow foods chemically.  Now they call it conventional growing, let’s call it what it is, it’s chemically growing foods.  When you grow foods chemically, you can manage to almost maintain the vitamins and known minerals but when you then look at those other molecules, they’re either dramatically lower or they’re gone.  So I think, well, that’s interesting.  So one of the fun things about being associated with Bastyr is I sometimes get students say, “Hey, Dr. Pizzorno, can I work with you on something?”  So I said, “Yeah, I’ve got this idea.”  So I’m wondering, it looks like we’re seeing more arsenic toxicity now than we did in the past, and I’m also noticing that we have less flavonoids in the diet than we had in the past.  Would you look and see if there’s any use of flavonoids in protectants from arsenic?  And guess what, she did.  So it’s a situation, not only are we adding toxins to the environment, we’re removing many of our protective mechanisms without realizing.  So for example, I’ve got the study that shows one quarter or one third of all cancers are due to… Is or are, whichever, arsenic.  It turns out, the more arsenic a person has, the more cancer they have.  One quarter to one third of the major cancers that kill people are arsenic.  And guess what?  One of the flavonoids called floratin does, it helps protect the DNA from the arsenic damage that leads to cancer.  And if you look at the dietary consumption of that, it’s decreased dramatically.  The same thing with tomatoes where they grew tomatoes chemically, and they grow tomatoes organically, and organic tomatoes had 10 times as much of the floratin than the chemically grown tomatoes. They had just enough of the flavonoids to keep enough of their color, people recognize they were ripe food enough of the taste, but all the other stuff is gone. Okay, so that’s my thesis for today.

Dr. Weitz:                           So now, where’s the arsenic? Where’s it coming from? How’s it getting into the water?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So there are two primary sources.  There was a third in the past, but they since have stopped.  Number one is, it naturally occurs in many water supplies.  So it turns out we humans are actually pretty good to get rid of arsenic. Half-life of arsenic in the body is only two to four days.  So as we evolved as a species, we came across arsenic and we’re good getting rid of it.. The problem is, we’re sitting one place and that one place has arsenic in the water, guess what? Now you overload the systems, now you start seeing all this disease pop up. So traditionally, the water supply is primary, but there’s two problems that have also happened. Number one is, we have had a fair amount of industrial exposure, and that to some degree continues to happen but it’s been decreased, but we have intentionally put arsenic compounds throughout our environment. So remember those old wooden climbing toys? They use arsenic compounds to keep them from rotting.  Remember that gypsy moth problem, when they’re spraying the environment, guess what they’re spraying the environment with?  It was an arsenical compound.  So we have intentionally put in a lot of our arsenical compounds into the environment.  So the environment is really quite contaminated.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. And they used to feed it to chickens as well, right?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      They used to feed it to chickens. And actually I was just looking at some research on that, and it does looks like the arsenic levels of chicken have gone down. Now they’re not gone, but from…, and I’m not going at the farmers as they say, I saw one study say it was 50% lower now than it was 2015.

Dr. Weitz:                           Now why would they feed arsenic to chickens?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Maybe have a farmer here who can tell us more about it. But my understanding is they give it to them to kill off the parasites and also makes them plumper?

Speaker 5:                          How is bottled water?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I don’t have any information on that. Can’t answer that. So what do people think about my idea?  I mean it looks to me like we’re having so much disease.  I mean, realize we have the highest burden of chronic disease in every age group ever in human history, looks to me like it’s not just the environmental toxins. We’ve removed a bunch of protective mechanisms, which make these environmental toxins even more important, because when use natural medicines, if their systems are already poisoned, it’s hard for natural medicines to work. I’m sorry, I’ll stop talking. What people think?

Dr. Weitz:                           What it’s the best way to test for heavy metals like arsenic?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So arsenic is not a heavy metal, it’s technically called a metalloid. With that, all you need to do is get… The standard the first morning urine, but they have to be in the normal environment. So you can’t have, for example I live in Seattle, you can’t have somebody who’s working on a farm in Eastern Washington where there’s arsenic contamination, decides to come to the big city to see this naturopathic doctor, and while he’s here they go for a movie and go for dinner, et cetera, et cetera, by the time he sees me, he’s been here for two or three days. Well, most of the arsenic’s gone.  So it’s got to be in the real environment. You use toenail arsenic, it’s a little trickier, that’s all.

Dr. Weitz:                           So what do you think about serum testing for metals?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So the current standard accepted by conventional medicine is that blood and urine are accurate measures for heavy metal testing. And they are accurate for acute testing and I don’t think anybody disagrees with that. Where this community disagrees is yeah, that’s great tell us what’s in the blood, but it doesn’t tell us necessarily what’s in the bones, what’s in the deep tissue. So and everybody knows that for example, there’s way more lead in the bone than in the blood. And the kidneys are really good at getting rid of cadmium, but they can’t take cadmium out of blood, it just sticks right there in the kidneys at times higher. Half-life of cadmium in the blood is a couple of days, half-life cadmium in the kidneys is like 16 years.

Dr. Weitz:                           So is urine a better way to capture?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      There’s a better way of doing this with challenge testing. So you get people a chelating agent and collect the urine for several hours and see what happens. And just to be clear, it’s more accurate, but it has plenty of error in it. I actually did a study where I actually counted the number fillings in people’s mouths, measured the blood levels of mercury, measured urinary levels of mercury, game challenge testing and to see which correlate best. Because you expect the best test would be the one that correlated with the amount of mercury in their mouth the best. And what I’ll tell you is that the only one that correlated very well was the challenge testing. But the R value is 0.35. So it wasn’t very good, but was better than the blood or the unchallenged urine.

Dr. Weitz:                            So we used to do that DMSA and then collect six hour urine, but of course DMSA now is a prescription.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      That’s what I’ve done. I’ve done that in thousands of people. Again, 500 milligrams of DMSA and 300 milligrams of DMPS orally. Now the first one urine tells you the current exposure, given that this cocktail and they collect urine for six hours and determine what the body load is. And I found it’s worked for me really well over the years, and it’s directly correlates with clinical outcomes as well. Doesn’t mean it’s a great test. It doesn’t mean it’s perfect, just the best that seems to be available right now.

Dr. Weitz:                            But given the difficulty with getting DMSA, especially since those of us who are not medical doctors can’t write prescriptions, so what’s the second best alternative and then also-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Just do the first morning urine, but just recognize you want to make your standards a little lower. Remember the standards not that lead anymore, I don’t know about the other ones exactly but the way the lead standard was set was the 95% rule. And that was, if you’re within 95% of the population, your level’s fine, if you’re the top 5% it’s toxic. You know what that level was when they said it, it was 60. So as research became available the number went from 60, to 50, to 40, to 30, and now it’s 10 and it’s down to five for children and they’re considering making it down to five for adults. So there’s no safe level of lead. So just cut your level levels down.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. 

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Ben, you keep asking great questions, but please give other people a chance to talk. I want to hear what people think about what I’m saying.

Dr. Wasserman:                 What about rice, doctor? A lot of the world consumes a lot of rice and with the brown rice versus the whole around it causing with the arsenic ingestion.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah. So if you look at the research on rice consumption, people consume rice, have about twice as much arsenic to people who don’t. Now the good news is that if you wash it properly, there’s techniques, you can look for on the internet. If you wash it, you can actually get rid of… You just cook for like a minute and then throw out the water and start cooking again, you can get rid of the majority of the arsenic that way. So there’s techniques available on the internet.

Dr. Wasserman:                  Thank you.

Speaker 3:                           Good one, thank you.

Speaker 4:                           There’s a lot of arsenic in the water in Sedona, Arizona we discovered, so we put a whole house water filter on our second house there.

Speaker 3:                           Smart, very smart.

Speaker 5:                           Besides arsenic what’s the next one, two or three minerals or metalloids that are dangerous?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So you catch me at a good time because just before this lecture, this talk, I was finishing my lecture for Australia, where my lecture this year for them is going to be four worst metal toxins. So if you look at the EPA, they have a center there that looks at what are the worst toxins in the country and they’ll list them in order, and four of the top seven are metals.  Arsenic number one, lead, mercury and cadmium.  So those things by themselves… The chemical toxins are a problem too, no question about that, but those four by themselves are causing most majority of disease in the country as nearest as I can tell. By the way, that’s the first time I’ve said that. Maybe because I just finished reviewing all the research. And what I’m finding was stunning. Okay, for example, herpes zoster, shingles. Did you know there’s a direct correlation with the probability of getting shingles in the level of arsenic in a person’s body?

Speaker 3:                           Oh, wow.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I had never seen that before. Anyway, so I’m just finding this correlation after correlation. 15% of MIs, according one study I literally read this morning, 15% of MIs are from arsenic.

Speaker 4:                          What’s an MI?  [A MI is a myocardial infarction, aka, heart attack]

Dr. Pizzorno:                      And by the way, one third are from lead. So right there, half of your MIs the, MIs that kill people, half of them are from arsenic and lead as near as I can tell from the research.  Now maybe I’m wrong a little bit, but I’ll tell you not by much because I’m not making the numbers up. I’m just looking at those two studies and that study says 15% and that study says 33%. Pretty easy to add it up.

Dr. Weitz:                           So somebody asked about hair mineral analysis for heavy metals. Hair versus urine versus serum?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So the hair ought to be good. There’s a couple of problems with it. Number one is, some people have a big problem getting rid of methyl mercury. And a primary way that one gets rid of methyl mercury is through the hair. I’m starting to research deeply so I’m just repeating what I’ve heard from people I trust. So apparently in autism, one of the things happens to these kids is they have trouble getting rid of mercury. So it doesn’t doesn’t show up on their hair. My own experience with that is I don’t use it as my primary diagnostic tool, but I find it useful to monitor what’s happening. And that’s why I really like GGT. Because with GGT, you can just monitor how well it’s going. Maybe it’s not perfect measure of what exactly is happening, but the good measure becomes the total picture. And you want the total picture to improve.  So I’m actually happy myself. When I first was aware of this research on GGT, I was testing on people in Canada, I did on myself too, and mine was 27. At the time I thought look, 27 is fine. But then as I looked more and more research, I realize it’s actually higher than I want it to be. So I started getting more serious about avoiding toxins and I did it again three years ago, I was down to 26, and I just did a couple months ago, I was down to 17. So that tells me that all this effort I’m going to in terms of avoiding these toxins is working it show up on my blood work. It’s got to be good for me.

Speaker 5:                          What does GGT stand for?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase.  I may have missed one symbol there somewhere.

Speaker 3:                          That’d be great if you could spell that out or type it in the chat so we could research that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      May I say, just go to the internet and just put in GGTP.

Speaker 3:                          Oh, okay. Got you.

Dr. Weitz:                           Somebody asked if you could report what you think is the upper limit for the GGT?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah, that’s a very, very good question. I’ve been trying to figure that out. Right now my guess is between 15 and 20. I don’t think I want it too low because that would imply to me your body’s not able to get the job done. And I see the disease correlations all started around 20. So I’m thinking between 15 and 20 but that might change as more research becomes available.

Dr. Weitz:                           By the way, since we’re talking about liver enzymes, what do you think is the optimal level for ALT and AST?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Good question. I don’t know the answer to that yet. It’s okay, but yes, both ALT and AST are useful, not as good as GGTP, it’s definitely more reactive, but they are useful. Also uric acid, uric acid goes up with PFAS exposure.

Dr. Weitz:                           So I’m assuming there’s probably a high likelihood that there’s going to be a correlation with non alcoholic fatty liver as well and toxins, right?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I’ve been in medicine for literally over 50 years. So I’m seeing diseases now we never saw before. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, we never saw that before. ADHD, we never saw that before. I mean, all these diseases we’re having, we never saw them before. You all know about that. I mean, everybody knows about type two diabetes in children, but for people like me, it’s almost a disease we didn’t have before. Okay, anybody want to say anything, anyone want to ask a question, where would you like to go from here?

Speaker 5:                          Exactly what does these toxic minerals do in the body that causes the disease? I missed that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Great question. So there are a number of ways in which they cause trouble. And it depends upon which particular one. So we look at arsenic for example, it directly damages the DNA and it poisons the beta cells in the pancreas so pancreas can’t produce insulin as easily and it poisons some of the cell signaling mechanisms that the cells use to tell it wants to let sugar into the cells. So arsenic correlation about 25% of diabetes as near as I can tell, maybe as low as 20%, but that’s the rate 20-25% of diabetes due to arsenic. And those look like the three primary mechanisms.

Speaker 5:                          And what about the relation to cancer incidence?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      What I’m aware of at this point is the DNA damage. That’s very clear. But as I’ve studied cancer more thoroughly, and I’m actually working with state group right now, we’re looking at all the natural medicines for cancer. As I said it more thoroughly, more and more, it’s just a mitochondria. So mitochondria, they’re screening up more than it’s the DNA. Not that the DNA is not important, but there’s something, it may just be the mitochondrial DNA damage is the one that’s most important. But there’s something pretty important there yet. And I don’t know how arsenic fits into that. I would not be surprised. I would bet you that’s exactly the arsenic causing trouble, I just haven’t seen that research yet.

Dr. Weitz:                           So what are the best ways to reduce arsenic? What would be your recommendations?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Avoidance.

Dr. Weitz:                           So how do we avoid it?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So you can get a filter in your house. And so a whole house filter is the best way to do it. If you can’t do that, you can filter from your drinking and cooking water. There’s a product called ZeroWater. I have no commercial relationship with them. I found out about them because I was visiting some friends of mine in the mountains, they have a cabin in the mountains, and I always just really disliked the taste of their water. And they both got cancer, by the way, interestingly, and they got this filter called ZeroWater and all the bad case was gone. So I went look into research and sure enough, it gets rid of everything including arsenic.

Speaker 3:                          Good to know.

Dr. Weitz:                           What about reverse osmosis?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Reverse osmosis works. Carbon block filters will get rid of some of it, but not all of it. I don’t recommend it because I don’t think they are [inaudible 00:29:01] enough for it. Reverse osmosis works, there’s ion exchange that works as well.

Speaker 6:                          How about Berkey Water Filters.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      In this particular study, they did not get rid of the arsenic. Now, maybe they fixed something since then, I don’t know but this particular study, ZeroWater was the only one of the eight that they tested actually got rid of the arsenic. And not surprising because arsenic’s to get rid of. It takes-

Speaker 5:                          So we don’t know if bottled water in restaurants for example is any better, right? You don’t have the research?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      No idea, I haven’t looked at that. Interesting question though.

Speaker 4:                         And it depends on where the bottler got the water from.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Exactly.

Dr. Weitz:                          So somebody asked, what would make you see clinically, what would be some of the clinical signs and symptoms you might see if the person has high arsenic?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      See, that’s the big challenge. It’s not obvious. Looking back on my practice, I’m really pissed off because I remember seeing some patients who had it. So one of the early signs is some pigmentation that inexplicably pigmentation on the hands. I’ve had patients come to me with that not knowing-

Dr. Weitz:                           What kind of pigmentation?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      It’s kind of a brownish pigmentation. It looks like a really early sign of excess arsenic. Now everybody knows about the really severe ones, because you can get peripheral neuropathy and such, then you get this really peripheral rash. But just these brownish unexpected discolorations on the palms of the hands had a really strong correlation with arsenic, kind of interesting. So what I say is, I wrote an editorial in IMCJ about three years ago, where I recommended that the standard of care for all primary care practice, everybody should have their blood measured for lead and everybody should have their urine measured for arsenic. 

Dr. Weitz:                           Rice tends to be high in arsenic. Do you do you have any recommendations with regard to that?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right, so wash the rice. You got to wash the arsenic off.

Dr. Weitz:                           Will it wash off?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes, most of it will wash off. So there’s a protocol on the internet with research supporting that. As I recall, you cook for cook it for like a minute, throw away the water and cook again the rest of the normal amount of time.

Dr. Weitz:                           Interesting.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Now [inaudible 00:31:18] rice find only throwing away the arsenic, if there’s any other soluble minerals on that skin, they’re going to go too.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. So besides avoiding ingesting arsenic, how do we get rid of arsenic from our bodies? What your favorite arsenic detox?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      It’s through methylation.  So support methylation, that speeds it up.  So for example, if you have somebody who has high homocysteine levels, well guess what? They’re to be more susceptible to arsenic toxicity. So get the methylation going well, so avoidance is what you got to do, make sure methylation is working well, and N-Acetyl Cysteine will help decrease some inflammatory activity. But those two things that–do just to stop the exposure and just get what’s left out.

Dr. Weitz:                           Is that the same recommendation you would make for other heavy metals like mercury?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      No, [inaudible 00:32:08]. Half-life of arsenic is only two to four days. Mercury, depends on your age, 30 to 90 days. Lead, about two years in the blood, about seven years in the bone. Cadmium, couple few days in the blood, 16 years half-life in the bone and the kidneys. So you got to work to get rid of those things.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay. So what would be your recommendations for patients who have high levels of mercury or lead?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So there’s two things. One is, you want promote the competing minerals. So lead after calcium for example, Mercury goes after selenium for example. So just look at what else competing minerals and make sure they’re at high levels. And then you want to make sure that they’re stopping their exposure. And if you want to get aggressive at it, what I use is fiber plus DMSA. Oral DMSA, I do 250 milligrams every third day, and it’s really good at getting rid of lead and mercury. A lot of people that works great.

Dr. Weitz:                           What about binders?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I think there’s other binders that should be usable, but when I started looking for the research on them it’s hard to find. I just looked at a study on chlorella and mercury in mice, and that was pretty impressive. But they’re giving them 5% of their dietary consumption with chlorella. I don’t think a patient want to consume 5% chlorella.

Dr. Weitz:                           Other popular binders include activated charcoal, zeolite, modified citrus pectin. What do you think about some of these other binders?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So here’s the key factor. Our bodies, let’s say our smart bodies secrete 1% of the bioload of mercury into the gut, through the liver every day. But then through intrahepatic recirculation, reabsorb 99% of what we just dumped. Okay, so why would our smart bodies do something so stupid? Well, because those systems evolve, when we’re consuming 150 grams of fiber a day. Now we consume 15 to 20 grams of fiber a day. Not enough fiber there to bind the crap that will dump it into the stools.  So I would expect virtually any kind of fiber is going to help.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Now of course some are more effective than others, certain kinds of minerals and such. I find getting lost in minutia not that critical. The big factor is, people need to eat more fiber and fiber should come from the diet. Pills are great, for sure, should come from the diet. Remember those foods rich in fiber have all these other flavonoids and things that protect our bodies from damage.

Dr. Weitz:                           You mentioned NAC, what would be the dosage for NAC and what about liposomal glutathione instead of NAC?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So the NAC about 500 milligrams of NAC will increase red blood cell glutathione by about 30%. So that does work. Now we do have some people who have trouble assisting into glutathione and they are the people who are very susceptible to environmental toxins. So those people getting things like liposomal glutathione where it’s already pre formed, it’s a good idea.

Dr. Weitz:                           But if you’re going to use NAC would you recommend 500 milligrams three times a day or once a day or more [crosstalk 00:35:22].

Dr. Pizzorno:                      As part of my healthy aging strategy, I take five hundred milligrams of NAC every night.

Dr. Weitz:                           What about somebody with heavy metal toxicity?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So you can increase it.  There’s some long term-

I’m sorry, turn off the microphone. There’s the long term research on NAC is particularly used and people with cystic fibrosis. So the typical dose is 2000 to 3000 milligrams a day, and there have been multi year studies. They don’t seem to have trouble. Now having said that, I have seen some patients who have suffered metabolism problems run into when you give them NAC plus DMSA. And probably it was easy to recognize them because I did it to myself. So even though I was taking very reasonable dosages, my body’s always had trouble metabolizing sulfur compounds. So for example, garlic makes me sick. Now I’m Italian nature but garlic makes me sick. So I have a lot of trouble metabolizing sulfur compounds, so I overload myself by taking too much NAC and DMSA. That won’t happen very often, but you have to be aware it when it does happen. And by the way, taking molybdenum, which is a trace mineral will help, which is required for those enzymes that work better will help. So I’ve been taking molybdenum, and after taking molybdenum for about a year, I noticed I’m not susceptible to suffer overload.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay. What about strategies to stimulate bile flow since a lot of these toxins end up in the bile before they get excreted? Such as bitter herbs.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Right? [inaudible 00:37:01] and things like that. So let me be very honest. I’m aware of the research of those herbs for increasing cholesterol excretion.  I’m not aware of the research of increasing environmental toxins.  Now, almost anything that increases excretion of cholesterol should get rid of toxins as well, but I haven’t seen research that says that, so I don’t know if it is true. [inaudible 00:37:23] but I don’t know.

Dr. Weitz:                           What about infrared sauna?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So the best I can tell from sauna is from talking to Dr. Steven [inaudible 00:37:31] who’s brilliant in this area, what counts as sweating. So whether it’s infrared saunas, Swedish sauna, running, doesn’t matter what it is, you just got to be sweating. You’ve got to be taking the sweat away from the body. And research is clear, sweat is full of toxins. What was so amazed about the research he did is he said, there’s toxins in the sweat that aren’t even in the blood or the urine. They’re so hard for the body to get rid of, they’re just stuffed into the sweat. It helps them to stay and not cause so much trouble.

Dr. Weitz:                           Now what about environmental toxins other than metals? What do you think is some of the most significant ones that we should be concerned about?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Now, the big one I’m concerned about right now are the bisphenols. So you see all the study about bisphenol A3, good idea. But what they’ve done is they just substitute the other bisphenols. So bisphenol S, bisphenol F, bisphenol AF, and bisphenol Z, the ones I’ve written about the most, well, they’re just as toxic. Okay, they just have different kinds of toxicity, and particularly bisphenol S. If you have a male who’s infertile, you better look at his bisphenol S levels. Cause it turns out there’s a pretty strong correlation with bisphenol S levels and male infertility.

Dr. Weitz:                            Wow, is bisphenol S actually measured? Is that in any of the panels?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      No, that’s a frustrating part. We’re putting pressure on the labs to measure all the bisphenols. But they have not been able to do so so far, I don’t know why. Now, I’ve got a suspicion. My suspicion is that the plastic tubing in their equipment is probably contaminated. Now this is total speculation on my part, but my background happened to be analytical chemistry. So I’m thinking, why aren’t they analyzing that? Because I could see how you do it. I said, “Oh, I bet their equipment’s contaminated already.”

Dr. Weitz:                           Interesting.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      We’ll see what happens. I did not accuse them of that everybody, I’m just speculating why might that be happening. Maybe the promise is overlapping with another molecule. It makes it too hard to differentiate. I don’t know.

Dr. Weitz:                           Dr. Rabar who’s on the line, he does a lot of testing for environmental toxins through Vibrant America. Sam, do they include bisphenol s? Okay, well, at least he was on the phone.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      By way, if you find somebody who’s doing those other bisphenols please let us know because the environment medicine community really wants them.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right, yeah. We started using Vibrant America. They have a really good combination. You can do an environmental toxins, heavy metal toxins and mycotoxins and they’ll do all three of those panels for 400 bucks.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Okay. Somebody said, let’s hear about the new book and have you come back, please. Oh, thank you. It erased before I saw the rest of it. So my wife Lara has been quite an instruction for me in many ways. Of course, all men know about that. But anyway, so every woman in her family died from complications of osteoporosis. So we assumed that since we’re living so much more healthfully than all the rest of them, that she would not have a problem. So in her early forties there was an inexpensive test available being shown at one of the conventions that showed bone ankle density.  So we looked at it, she was osteopenic. We were so surprised.  So then we went and got a more sophisticated DEXA test, and sure enough, she was osteopenic.  And so we said, “Okay, we better start doing something about that.”  So at that point, I applied my body knowledge on what to do about it and she kept losing bone.

Now remember, this was a while ago. And so at that point, I thought I was being really brave giving her 1500 units of vitamin D a day. But none of the things I was doing, giving her 2000 units of calcium, we made sure her hormones were balanced properly, we did everything we could think of. And then at one convention, there was the first testing available for DNA SNPs related to the VDR receptor sites. So it turns out Lara had every abnormal VDR receptor site that had tests for. So it turns out that in order to have vitamin D levels up to where they really needed to be, should take 14,000 units of vitamin D a day for two years before we got her vitamin D levels up. So we had her DEXAs going down, down, down, down, Ah, vitamin D three receptor sites her DEXAs started going back up. And then once she was doing some research, and what else you could do, she ran across a company called AlgaeCal. So Pardon me, I’m not paid by them but Lara is. She’s their science writer. Anyway, so she found this company and she said, “Well, I like the idea of all these trace minerals that you get in AlgaeCal.” She started taking that product, and she was going to hop up and then she shot up. And now, 30 years later, Lara has normal bones.  She now does not have osteoporosis and dying like her mother and her grandmother did, but she doesn’t have osteopenia anymore. So basically, that book is about her journey by figuring this out. Now the interesting thing for me was that whenever Lara would find some biochemical pathway that was important for bone health I said, “Well wait, well that biochemical pathway is important for the kidneys. That one’s important for the heart, that one’s important for the brain.” I was realizing everything necessary for the bones to work healthfully is necessary for the whole body. Which why we ended up naming it, Healthy Bones Healthy You, because is true. If you do what’s necessary for the bones, everything else starts working properly. Working better, I should say.

Speaker 5:                          I hate to ask a question of the subject at the moment, but do you see any relationship in the data about Parkinson’s with any of these toxins?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Oh, of course. [inaudible 00:43:31]. So there’s two kinds of data I’ve seen. Unfortunately I haven’t looked at it deeply enough because I haven’t had a Parkinson’s patient lately, so I just haven’t doven into it. And so I saw two patterns. One is a direct correlation between neurotoxic pesticide exposure and Parkinson’s, no question about it. So if anybody’s living near, I hate to say it folks, if you’re living on a golf course, have your levels checked. That’s a little worried. You do a lot of travel, a lot of travel on airplanes, better check your levels. Had some friends of mine who are literally international globetrotters, they had the highest levels organophosphate pesticides I’ve seen anywhere. So now there’s another thing, and turns out if people who, when they’re detoxifying the organophosphates go through phase one too fast and phase two too slowly, they have an even more toxic reaction to the pesticides. So it looks there’s both the exposure component and a susceptibility component to it. And I haven’t finished going through the research figure that out yet. But there’s-

Speaker 5:                          About the airplane, I missed the airplanes. Why the airplanes?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Airplanes?

Speaker 5:                          You said that flying a lot on airplanes, why-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Oh, I’m sorry. People flying on airplanes. Well, so I’ll tell you this from personal experience. They heavily spray those airplanes for arachnoids and rodents and things like that. And particularly flying internationally like I was flying, those things are always sprayed before they get to a location or when they leave one country to another.

Speaker 5:                          And golf courses for all the pesticides, correct doctor?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah. All the pesticides being used.

Speaker 4:                          Wow, thank you so much. Gosh.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So it looks like you’re mostly all still here. Do you like these ideas? Am I going wrong in some direction?

Dr. Weitz:                           Oh no, absolutely. We’re all very aware of the role of toxins and we just want more details as to exactly which ones to focus on, how do we-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Start with arsenic. Seriously folks. Now [inaudible 00:45:42] where I get my book, clinical Environmental Medicine, gets you a lot of information about arsenic. But the good news is, once you detect it, all you got to do is stop the exposure and the body will take care of it. And one of the things I’ve noticed in my book for consumers I wrote called The Toxin Solution. I differentiate between persistent toxins and non-persistent toxins. So persistent toxins are those that have really long half-lives. They’re hard to get rid out of the body. Like perfluronates, they’re two to four year half-life to get those things out of the body. So yeah, great, you stopped using Teflon stuff, but stuff is still in the body, if you want to get rid of it. Anyway, so got those persistent ones, the PCBs half-lives 10 to 20 years. Really hard to get rid of lead long it years. Then you have the non persistence. The phthalates, arsenic, bisphenol A, things like the various kinds of solvents and things like that. Most of them have short half-lives, hours to days. To stop the exposure, get rid of them. To engage your patient to religiously stop their exposure to everything possible, they will feel better within two weeks. And that gets them engaged for the months to years-long process to do the rest of the job.

Dr. Weitz:                            Any clinical pearls for getting rid of lead?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      DMSA is still the best that I know. So actually, DMSA is actually better for lead than it is for mercury. And so what I find with my patients, I see mercury toxicity way more lead toxicity, but I may have to reconsider that. But anyway, it takes out the lead as well as the mercury. So you see mercury levels go down, the lead levels go down too. Works great. And very rare adverse events. I only see adverse events for people with [inaudible 00:47:23] sensitive, and that’s very, very rare.

Dr. Weitz:                           Have you found benefits to using EDTA for lead?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      I haven’t. Jerry Gordon did an interesting job digging up some research showing that five grams orally a day of EDTA was good at getting rid of lead from the body. And it was some pretty interesting research. That was on lead exposed people so that can skew the research, but it was pretty interesting.

Dr. Weitz:                           And any clinical pearls about Mercury? Because that’s a really common one.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So you got to watch with the fish that you eat. The amount of mercury in fish is in general proportion to the size of the fish. So the smaller the fish, the better. And of course, cold water since it’s higher omega threes, and should be healthier. But yeah, eat small fish because there’s no question direct correlation between amount of fish eating and none of the mercury in the brain are shown in the urine and blood, but also deficits in psychomoter tests. Okay, so no question about it. More fish people eat, the more psychoneuro test deficits.

Dr. Weitz:                           But how many people are eating fish in place of other animal proteins because they think it’s healthier and the fish has plastic and-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Smaller wild cod fish doesn’t. But it’s going to be hard for the world to sustain that. And unfortunately farm fish, not as bad as cows, corn-fed cows, but farm fish is not very good either. It’s got a very high toxic load as well.

Dr. Weitz:                           And if you eat out at restaurants, there’s very few restaurants that serve wild fish and there’s a lot of restaurants-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Order wild fish salmon and order farm salmon right next to each other, eat them next to each other, and you know immediately which is which.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. I know in LA a lot of restaurants are selling this Scottish wild salmon which is actually farmed.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well, and even if it’s wild caught, because the Ireland salmon is so polluted, it pollutes the Scottish salmon as well. So even the salmon wild caught is as bad as the salmon farm in the US.

Dr. Weitz:                           My understanding is the Scottish salmon that’s being sold, it’s in pens in the ocean and they’re saying that it’s wild because it they’re big pens or something like that.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah. Well, if they fed them the right food that’s fine, but it turns out the primary driver of the high toxic load in the fish is actually what they’re fed.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right, of course.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      [crosstalk 00:50:03].

Speaker 3:                          I have a question.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Sure.

Speaker 3:                          Can I ask a question?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yeah.

Speaker 3:                          I’ve read a lot about detox baths that use Epsom salts, baking soda, bentonite, do those do anything?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      That’s a good question and I actually have not looked into that research. Now I am a person who likes soaking in a magnesium bath. I think it’s good for me, but I haven’t actually looked at the Iron exchange with environmental toxins. Good question, I will look into that.

Speaker 3:                          Okay, thank you.

Dr. Weitz:                           What is the toxicity of farmed trout?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Well again, it depends entirely upon what they’re fed. They’re fed healthy food they’re okay. But if they’re fed the processed mass produced food them no, they’re not going to be okay.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. Any thoughts on charcoal hemo filtration?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      It ought to be pretty effective. But now I’m not necessarily saying the whole procedure is totally validated, but conceptually I could see how it could work. That’s all I can say at this point.

Dr. Weitz:                           Somebody asked about homocysteine as a possible marker for arsenic toxicity.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      So the thing with homocysteine, as the homocysteine levels go up, and that’s indication of impaired methylation capability. So if you have an impaired methylation capability, it makes arsenic more toxic. When arsenic is detoxified, it goes through a two step process. It’s first methylated, just like arsenous acid anyway, it’s called methyl arsenic one methyl arsenic, which is actually way more toxic than inorganic arsenic, then goes through a second methylation stage and a second methyl, which makes it like four times less toxic than metal arsenic. Some people have a fast first phase, sound familiar? And a slow second phase. And those people actually get toxicity to arsenic more easily. Now, it’s only about 1% of population as near as I can tell has that. I’m not sure I’m confident about the GenX yet, but I saw that pattern and actually just had a patient with that pattern. So it’s going to be every interesting to see what happens.

Dr. Weitz:                           Somebody asked about homocysteine being too low, as far as I know, the lower the better for homocysteine.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      It’s a very good question. So I wrote an editorial on homocysteine entitled Homocysteine Friend Or Foe about six years ago, and actually looked at that question. And it turns out you can have too low homocysteine. When we think about it, we think about homocysteine as being evil molecule. Remember, the body produces all homocystine in the body, it’s not an evil molecule, body has a purpose for it. It becomes an evil molecule when we screw things up. So we think about, what does homocysteine do? Well, it’s a storage site for cystine, to go into good glutathione production as we need it. It transports methyl groups around. So homocysteine is actually a very useful molecule. So it turns out, we get below around four with some neurological dysfunction that starts showing up. So I look at homocysteine, I would guess the ideal is probably between six and eight would be my best guess at this point. But that’s subject to changes as I see more research.

Dr. Weitz:                           So when you say support methylation, for a lot of people that just means give methyl B vitamins and of story, but there’s more to it, right?

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Yes. So if you had a chance to listen to my lecture on unimportant molecules, there’s a fascinating. Now I have to give an hour and a half lecture tomorrow morning. I may be run out of voice. One more thing, I’m going to have to call it quits.

Dr. Weitz:                           That’s okay. We’re honored for you to have joined us this evening.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Oh, you’re very kind. I actually just forgot your question. Sorry, it’s getting late for me. What was your question again?

Dr. Weitz:                           It was just about some of the details about how to deal with methylation issues besides simply recommending-

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Oh, thank you. [crosstalk 00:53:58]. So everybody’s aware of the MTHFR polymorphisms and how the that’s really unfortunate because folic acid can’t be metabolized for these people. So they have more higher homocystine and direct correlations with cancer and heart disease and dementia. I mean, the data is pretty clear. But here’s the kicker, there’s no folic acid in food, right? You have natural folates or what are they? They’re methylated folates. So they go right into the methylation function with homocysteine, they don’t need MTHFR. This whole MTHFR bugaboo that we’ve created, is only because we screw up our diet and lost one of the standard molecules from the diet which is folates. So good news is, have people eat real folates.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Could it be one of the reasons why all this research on fermented foods always seems to find a negative correlation with virtually every fermented food in every disease? Well guess what? Fermented foods have lots of natural folates. So I think I put people on a diet now is a high arsenic, but now people don’t have much folates in their diet, so now we’re dependent upon folic acid. And for those who can convert folic acid to the methylated folates, well okay. A substantial portion of population doesn’t do that very well if at all. Well okay for them, but how about everybody else? Well, if you get a natural diet, it doesn’t matter. I’m going so much back to the old time ways. Eat real food, just uncontaminated and your body is remarkable, things will work out pretty well.

Dr. Weitz:                           Eat real food.

Dr. Pizzorno:                      Eat real food, and make sure it’s not contaminated. Remember these new denatured molecules and all these halogenated hydrocarbons, we’ve never seen them. We don’t know what to do with them. They just poison us. And yes, lead and cadmium and mercury were around, but they’re buried pretty deep. We didn’t get much experience with them. Got some experience with mercury, so we’re fairly going to get rid of mercury. Remember we’re talking about half-lives in months rather half-lives in years, and actually we came across all the time. So try to avoid that. But without those toxins, our bodies work just great. But with those toxins, they screw things up because our body doesn’t know how to deal with them. Remember we’re intentionally designed to be difficult to break down by biological systems. So of course they saturate the environment, saturate us. DDT was banned almost 50 years ago. Every fetus today has DDT in him or her. Okay, and that DDT is causing neurological damage. Okay, I got to call quits.

Dr. Weitz:                            Thank you, Dr. Pizzorno, thank you so much.

Speaker 3:                           Thank you so much.

Speaker 6:                           Thank you.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:                            And thank you to everybody. Look forward to seeing you next month. Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. And if you enjoyed this podcast, please go to Apple Podcasts and give us a five star ratings and review that way, more people will be able to find this Rational Wellness Podcast when they’re searching for health podcasts. And I wanted to let everybody know that I do now have a few openings for new nutritional consultations for patients at my Santa Monica weight sports chiropractic and nutrition clinic. So if you’re interested, please call my office 310-395-3111 and sign up for one of the few remaining slots for a comprehensive nutritional consultation with Dr. Ben Weitz. Thank you and see you next week.