Dr. Howard Elkin and Dr. Ben Weitz defend the Therapeutic Use of Niacin.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.]

 

Podcast Highlights

0:39  Niacin.  Niacin is vitamin B3 and it is found in many foods and most multivitamins and we know that not having enough niacin can lead to a life-threatening condition–Pellagra. Today we want to comment about a new study in Nature by Dr. Stanley Hazen and colleagues that questions whether the therapeutic use of niacin is safe or effective because a downstream metabolite of niacin–4PY–promotes vascular inflammation and contributes to cardiovascular disease risk.  The paper, which was published in February 19, 2024 is called A Terminal Metabolite of Niacin Promotes Vascular Inflammation and Contributes of Cardiovascular Disease Risk.

2:12  Niacin has been a very effective therapeutic tool to reduce cardiovascular disease risk and it has many unique properties, including that it reduces small, dense LDL, increases LDL particle size, reduces triglycerides, increases HDL, improves HDL functionality, and is pretty much the only effective therapy to reduce Lp(a).

4:14  Statins. Niacin was a very popular treatment for high cholesterol until statins came out and then everything changed and statins became the go to drugs for reducing cholesterol.  Statins do a good job of lowering LDL but they don’t increase the size of the LDL particles and particle size is more important than LDL, which is why you should do advanced lipid testing. Small, dense LDL is more dangerous than large buoyant LDL.  In fact, LDL is less of a culprit than oxidized LDL and small, dense LDL particles are more likely to be oxidized. Lp(a) is a fragment of LDL that sticky and inflammatory. Niacin can help in both of these situations where statins do not.

7:23  A large number of studies over the years that have shown significant benefit with using niacin.  Dr. Hazen points out in this paper that because patients who are taking very strong medications like PSK9 inhibitors to reduce cardiovascular risk still have have heart attacks, so there must be some additional markers to screen for this risk.  This is why he searched for new biomarkers and found this downstream metabolite of niacin–4PY that appears to be associated with inflammation. He points out that 4PY is associated with vascular adhesion molecule one, VCAM1.  This is quite ironic, since a study in 2010 found that niacin reduces VCAM1 (Wu BJ, Yan L, Charlton F, et al. Evidence that niacin inhibits acute vascular inflammation and improves endothelial dysfunction independent of changes in plasma lipids. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2010;30:968-975.).  But if Dr. Hazen wanted additional biomarkers outside of a basic lipid profile, he does not need to look any further than the markers in an advanced lipid profile, such as the one developed by Cleveland Clinic, where Dr. Hazen works.

10:48  If Dr. Hazen is saying that niacin is unsafe because it leads to 4PY, since none of these patients were taking therapeutic niacin, then we should all stop eating salmon, sardines, nuts, and avocados, and a bunch of other healthy foods that naturally contain niacin. 

 



Dr. Howard Elkin is an Integrative Cardiologist with offices in Whittier and in Santa Monica, California and he has been in practice since 1986.  While Dr. Elkin does utilize medications and he performs angioplasty and stent placement and other surgical procedures, his focus in his practice is employing natural strategies for helping patients, including recommendations for diet, lifestyle changes, and targeted nutritional supplements to improve their condition.  Dr. Elkin has written an excellent new book, From Both Sides of the Table: When Doctor Becomes Patient.  His website is Heartwise.com and his office number is 562-945-3753.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for Functional Nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure.  Dr. Weitz has also successfully helped many patients with managing their weight and improving their athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111.

 



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:  Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com.  Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast. Hello, Rational Wellness Podcasters.

I’m very excited to be speaking with one of my favorite guests, Integrative Cardiologist, Dr. Howard Elkin again. And today the topic is niacin. Niacin is vitamin B3. It is found in many foods.  It’s found in most multivitamins.  We know that not having significant amounts of niacin in the diet leads to pellagra, which is a life threatening disease.  And so we have known about the benefits of niacin, but today we really want to talk about the Therapeutic use of niacin in higher dosages, which has been used by cardiologists and now very commonly by integrative and functional cardiologists to decrease cardiovascular risk.  And it has been used safely, has a lot of unique properties and benefits, and It seems to be periodically under attack and now it seems to be under attack again. And the Dr. Elkin and I thought it was important to comment about a new study which was published in Nature by Dr. Stanley Hazen of Cleveland Clinic and colleagues.  The name of the paper is A Terminal Metabolite of Niacin Promotes Vascular Inflammation and Contributes to Cardiovascular Disease risk.  Dr. Hazen argues that a metabolite of niacin, or PY, is associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events.

But we also know that niacin has proven to be a very effective tool for decades in reducing cardiovascular disease risk.  And it’s unique in many of its properties, and I’m just going to mention a couple, and Dr. Elkin and, and I will go into more details, but it’s pretty much the only substance we know that can reduce small dense LDL and increase LDL particle size. It reduces triglycerides. It’s, it’s pretty much the only effective tool for increasing HDL and improving HDL functionality.  And it’s really, at this time, the only effective therapy for reducing LP little a.

Dr. Howard Elkin is an integrative cardiologist with offices in Whittier and in Santa Monica, and he’s been in practice since 1986. While Dr. Elkin does utilize medications and performs angioplasty and stent placement and other surgical procedures, his focus is really On employing natural strategies for helping patients, including recommendations for diet lifestyle and targeted nutritional supplements like niacin to improve their condition.  Dr. Elkin has also written an excellent book From Both Sides of the Table: When doctor becomes patient that’s available on Amazon, Dr. Elkin, Thanks for joining me again.

Dr. Elkin: Thank you, thank you Ben so much, and I appreciate being here. This is a topic that’s very dear to my heart because, pun intended, because it’s like every so often, like every few years, they come up with another say that disses or throws niacin under the bus and my [00:04:00] niacin, if you look historically, has been around, first of all, it doesn’t bite, like you say, it’s vitamin B3, it’s been around forever.  I mean, in the 60s and 70s, that was one of the few things we had to even lower cholesterol. And it did it pretty, you know, pretty okay, did a good job of it. And then everything kind of changed when statins came about, and I was actually a fellow at Northwestern when the first one, Mevacor, came out. I remember that Time magazine with the, with the cover was like, you know, fried egg with, I think it was bacon for eyes or a mouth or something.  And really, statins became very popular because they do something very well. They lower LDL, and they lower it quite nicely, and more potently than niacin. Well, but you’ve already mentioned what niacin does, but that, I mean, I could give someone 80 milligrams of Lipitor and it’s not going to increase the size of the LDL particle.  So, why do I care about that?  Because particle size is really more important than the LDL by itself, and you have to do really advanced lipid testing to test for that. So, small dense is less preferred than large fluffy or large buoyant, and because of the fact that small dense is like, you know, almost 30 percent more likely to get oxidized.  So LDL isn’t so much the culprit, it’s oxidized LDL. And we know that small dense particles have a predilection for that. Same thing with LP little A. LP little A is a fragment of LDL. It’s sticky. It’s inflammatory. We don’t like it. And so it’s, and it promotes inflammation. It does oxidation of LDL, so those, those are two components right there where niacin comes in in handy.

It will decrease triglycerides, it can increase HDL, it can increase HDL functionality, which is important because you can have a high HDL number yet it’s dysfunctional, and you don’t know that unless you test for it, and Cleveland Heart Lab does that. Um, so, I mean, definitely in accordance with you, this article did not talk about any benefits of niacin.  It just said, well, if you happen to have one of these horrible toxic metabolites, you know, you’re more likely to have toxic effects in a way called MACE, which is, you know, major Adverse cardiovascular events, that’s the term we use, and they looked at mace over three years. But there’s a lot of, you know, fallacies of the study.

First of all, you have to have a certain polymorphism or single nuclear polymorphism to even have the, this, this, these, to break down to these toxic metabolites. So probably at the most, one out of four, I mean, we don’t even know the number of people that are affected by this, but I can promise you in 37, almost 38 years of practice, I’ve never had a problem with niacin such as this–someone developing a heart attack or stroke. So I think it’s been taken way out of context.  I’m not saying there’s no validity in toxic metabolites. I mean, every drug, or every substance will break down. It’s how it breaks down.  And so we found these, the 2PY and 4PY, but you have to have the SNP in order to break it down. So it’s, it’s really taken out of context because I think most people really are not affected by this. And therefore the study is really not nearly, it’s important. It’s, I mean, they call it the Niacin paradox.  It’s supposed to help, but it doesn’t. Why? I beg to differ with that.

Dr. Weitz:  Right.  And there’s been a large number of studies over the years that have shown significant benefit with using niacin, including reducing blockages in the arteries, including reducing cardiovascular risk. And one of the things that Dr. Hazen points out in this article at the beginning is that patients who were taking these PSK9 inhibitors, which are the most potent drugs we have to reduce LDL, that some of the patients still have heart attacks. So his conclusion is if LDL is not enough to understand why people are having heart attacks, let’s see what else we can find.  And so he’s searching through the blood of patients who have cardiovascular disease, none of whom, by the way, were being prescribed niacin. So none of the patients in this study were prescribed therapeutic niacin. So there’s nothing that can be said on the basis of this study that applies to the therapeutic use of niacin.  And he found that a certain percentage of patients had these Toxic metabolites.  And the one that was the most significant is the 4PY. And he also found that that 4PY was associated with with inflammation.  And he correlated in some in-vivo studies that it’s associated with vascular adhesion molecule one, VCAM1.

First of all, I want to point out that I think the main message I would like everybody to get from this discussion is that if Dr. Hazen realized that patients who were taking effective lipid lowering drugs were still having heart attacks. Instead of searching for some obscure downstream metabolite that only occurs in a percentage of patients with a certain genetic SNP, all he needed to do was look at an advanced lipid profile to get information about what other factors are important in lowering cardiovascular risk. And unfortunately, statins and PSK9 inhibitors, don’t do anything about addressing LDL particle size. They don’t increase particle size. They don’t increase HDL functionality.  They don’t significantly lower Lp(a).  PSK9 inhibitors do a little bit, but actually not as effectively as niacin does.  And so I think the answer is look at an advanced lipid profile. Look at homocysteine, look at metabolic factors. When you put that whole picture together, I think we do have a much better assessment of understanding cardiovascular risk because LDL C alone is not enough.  And I think he’s absolutely right about that. He, we just don’t need to look for this obscure, downstream metabolite of niacin. And so if what Dr. Hazen is saying that niacin is unsafe because it leads to 4PY and none of these patients were taking therapeutic niacin. Then what he’s saying is, is that we should all stop eating salmon, sardines, nuts, and avocados, and a bunch of other healthy foods that naturally contain niacin.  As well as avoiding niacin supplements and taking multivitamins. And I think that goes against everything we know about nutrition and… 

Dr. Elkin:   Interesting. I think the real paradox, the niacin paradox, the real paradox is that this guy is from the Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland Clinic has premier, I mean, Boston and Cleveland Clinic have the best advanced lipid testing out there. 

Dr. Weitz:  Exactly.

Dr. Elkin:   It’s right available at their fingertips.

Dr. Weitz:  Look at your own testing, dude!

Dr. Elkin:   Look at your own testing, because you’re going to find answers there. And potentially all my patients that have elevated cholesterol, which is, as you can imagine, a hell of a lot, I always do advance the testing. If the baseline is abnormal, I’m going to go test it.  To, [00:12:00] and most, in many cases, I go straight to advanced testing, but that’s where I’m going to get answers. That’s where I’m going to find out about risk factors and inflammation and metabolic aberrations, not by l, not by this study. It doesn’t help me at all.

Dr. Weitz:  By the way, interestingly, I looked into some of the literature and this association, the reason why I mentioned this technical name, vascular adhesion molecule one, VCAM one is because there’s a study in 2010, (Wu BJ, Yan L, Charlton F, et al. Evidence that niacin inhibits acute vascular inflammation and improves endothelial dysfunction independent of changes in plasma lipids. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2010;30:968-975.), that shows that one of the benefits of niacin is that it reduces inflammation by reducing VCAM one. So interestingly, therapeutic higher dosages of niacin reduced VCAM1.  However, patients who are found to have 4PY were patients who, as far as we know, had probably relatively lower levels of niacin because none of them were taking niacin. So we don’t know this, but maybe, maybe there is a J shaped curve and he’s measuring people with low levels of niacin, and maybe people who had higher levels actually have lower level of vascular adhesion molecule and lower levels of inflammation and atherogenesis.

Dr. Elkin: And I think one of the reasons why we’re doing this is that the day after the study came out, I kid you not, I got four phone calls from my patients. Should I be should I be taking the shot to stop my niacin?  I’m, really worried about this study. It went viral in a matter of hours, of course

Dr. Weitz:  And that’s what happens with the press, unfortunately so now um this paper in order to bolster their findings also Mention two previous other trials That have been used.  In fact, 10 years ago they were used and it was all over the news. Um, that niacin’s not good to take. And these were the HPS Two Thrive study and the AIM High trial. [00:14:00] So why don’t we take a quick look at these two trials and why don’t we start with the HPS two Thrive trial that gave patients who had a history of heart disease 40 milligrams of simvastatin, along with high dose extended release niacin, along with an investigational drug from Merck called lariparipant, which decreased the flushing effect of niacin.  And this study did not show a reduction in cardiovascular benefits after approximately four years.

Dr. Elkin:  You know, first of all, it was a non flushed, right? That was the compound they used.

Dr. Weitz:  Well, they used this additional drug to reduce the flushing. So they used extended release niacin, which does flush, along with this other investigational drug.

Dr. Elkin: First of all, my problem with that is that you’re not talking apples and apples anymore. You’re not just talking about niacin. Pure niacin, which is the only thing that I recommend. I use supplemental form. I don’t use the pharmaceutical brand because you take it once at night with your evening meal and then you wake up at 2 am with flushing.  The flushing is extended and it also has liver abnormalities. I use regular supplemental niacin. There’s several good companies out there that make it. But it’s the non flushed, first of all, It, it doesn’t, it’s not the same thing and it doesn’t work. It simply doesn’t work.

Dr. Weitz: So the reality is this additional drug, lariparipirant, which is not on the market, is associated with a lot of the side effects that they attributed to niacin.

Dr. Elkin: Exactly, exactly. So, again, this is another example. You know, this study was, that’s 2014, if I’m not correct. Correct, right? 2014, 10 years ago. And, by that time, statins had their main, I mean, statins were, it was right before PSK9 inhibitors came out. PSK, PSK9 inhibitors came out, I believe, about 8 years ago.  And that changed things a bit, but and there’s another argument they had about niacin, if I’m not mistaken, right? 

Dr. Weitz: Yeah. So there was, there was there was also the aim high trial and this used a time release niacin added to statin therapy. And, you know, another problem with both of these studies is.  Niacin, a lot of its benefits will be most profound with patients, um, who have higher levels of, of cholesterol and triglycerides, et cetera. So when you already start out by pre treating the patient for a while, um, with, um, statins, you’re going to [00:17:00] decrease some of the benefits. Even this aim high trial, which found that there was no additional reduction in heart attacks.  Um, uh, it, it, it actually did show significant improvements in several cardiovascular disease risk factors, including increased HDL from 35 to 42. Lowering of triglycerides from 1 64 to 1 22.  Further lowering LDL cholesterol and lowering LP little a.  And so I, I think both of these trials are  flawed and really don’t refute the benefits of niacin.

Dr. Elkin: I think one benefit, you already mentioned it, when you increase HDL and decrease triglycerides, you are affecting the metabolic milieu, because almost 95 percent of the population in this country is metabolically unhealthy, and that’s a major culprit in coronary disease and heart disease in general.  And these parameters are not affected by statins or even PCS can inhibitors to a certain extent. So there is benefit to niacin, which was never mentioned in these studies. Um, yeah, it’s like, it’s easy to do something. And, and, but I certainly, I was a physician treating lots of patients with lipid disorders for over, really, I worked with Robert Sperko in Berkeley Heart Lab 25 years ago.  That’s when I learned about particle size. No one was even talking about that back then, and that’s when I started using, but niacin, it’s, you know, and I still use it and I have not stopped it in any of my patients, despite all the phone calls I got. And so I just think it, this study was just really.  It was taken out of context, and [00:19:00] our job is to teach the public that, you know, you have to know both sides of the story.

Dr. Weitz: Yeah, it was a basic science study. It was not a study that tested therapeutic use of niacin. And then, further, part of a message from doctors like you and myself who practice integrative functional approaches are that when you treat the whole patient and you address their diet, their exercise, their stress component, and then you layer in some of these additional therapies like niacin and possibly statins or other medications.  The overall therapeutic benefit you’re going to get from these patients improving their metabolic profile, reducing overall levels of inflammation is going to be far superior than just taking people following the standard American diet, leading a sedentary lifestyle, and just throwing in some pharmaceuticals.

Dr. Elkin: Exactly, exactly. So as Ross said, so I mean this is a great, there’s a lot of other studies that we can talk about, but I think the niacin issue is a big one and I think not stopping a niacin just because of this one study is uncalled for.

Dr. Weitz: And niacin has these unique benefits that we’ve mentioned, like, for example, improving HDL functionality.  Interestingly HDL has sort of been the forgotten cardiovascular risk marker. And, and, and unfortunately, a lot of the data around some, some medicine has to do with whether or not we have a pharmaceutical to treat it. So most doctors are, they, they’re waiting, conventional medical doctors, primary care doctors, cardiologists, They don’t measure these other things.  They don’t measure HDL functionality. They don’t measure LpA. Why? There’s no drug to treat it. In a couple of years, there’s going to be one or several drugs that are on the market that effectively lower HP, LpA, and you’re going to see everybody testing LpA. But right now, they don’t care because They don’t have any means to reduce it, but we know that niacin can produce, uh, a 30 to 70 percent reduction in Lp(a).

Dr. Elkin: exactly.  I think, yeah, once the medic, the pharmaceuticals come out, it’ll be, it’ll go viral, you know, they may be treating it.

Dr. Weitz: Right. And the same thing about HDL is they’ve tried to come out with several drugs to raise HDL and they haven’t been effective in reducing risk. Right. And so, you know, one of the [00:22:00] morals of the story is there is different ways to accomplish the same thing.  And we see this also with trying to control metabolic syndrome and controlling blood sugar and insulin. And if you do it with very aggressive drug therapy And and you just keep increasing the medications to lower Hemoglobin A1C.  We actually have negative effects on people’s health and and and some Some doctors have concluded, well, you shouldn’t try to reduce your blood sugar and your hemoglobin A1c too aggressively.  Well, no, that’s not the answer. The answer is if you do it naturally, if you get people to change your diet, stop eating ultra processed foods, start eating a lower glycemic diet, start exercising appropriately, manage your stress, get proper sleep. [00:23:00] You’re going to find that. They’re going to significantly lower their risk of death and, and all cause mortality and everything else.  But if you just do it with drugs, that’s not the answer.

Dr. Elkin: I concur a hundred percent. And that’s it.

Dr. Weitz: That’s it. So I there’s another study that just came out, but I know we’re short on time. So you and I are going to get together in a few weeks and discuss this other trial that seemed to show that LDL is completely irrelevant.  Right. Exactly. Okay. So, so Howard, how can our listeners, get ahold of you and contact you if they want you to help them?

Dr. Elkin: Okay. Very good. So my website is Heartwise.com. That’s one word Heartwise. And I also, my book is Be Your Own Medical Advocate. com, but you can see me on Instagram under DocHElkin. or Facebook, uh, Heart Wise Fitness and Longevity Center.  But I’m pretty connected to social media, so I’m glad you had to answer your questions and so forth. But, uh, you know, I love doing this, not that I’m into much dissecting studies, but doctors, so they just look at a study at face value and then the pharmaceutical reps come in there and push meds. And, you know, and I understand because we’re really limited in time, but there’s no substitute for interpreting a study and diving into it like we just did.

Dr. Weitz: I just want to point out again that we’re not trying to bash medications. Medications can be very beneficial, but if they’re integrated into a full care program where you’re helping patients to improve their diet, improve their lifestyle, exercise regularly, get proper sleep, manage their stress, and then you add in the proper nutritional supplements to meet all their nutritional needs and then add in the proper medications to top it off.  That’s a completely different picture than taking a metabolically unhealthy a sedentary American eating the standard American diet, eating ultra processed foods and try to lower their risk just with medications.

Dr. Elkin: 100 percent agreed. You know, that’s why in integrative medicine, we integrate lifestyle.  Lifestyle was always number one in my book. Yeah, I use a lot of medicines. I have sick cardiac patients, but I always vouch for that. I did a YouTube live on hypertension and may it’s also blood pressure awareness month. And you know, with With weight loss and exercise in that order, we could probably wipe out stage one, you know, mild hypertension.  But by the time people are diagnosed, they’re stage two already. They’re, you know, they have advanced disease because no one’s talked about lifestyle.

Dr. Weitz:  Diet and exercise for weight loss?  I thought weight gain was caused by a deficiency of Ozembic.  Thank you, Howard.

 


 

Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. For those of you who enjoy listening to the Rational Wellness Podcast. I would appreciate it if you could go to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and give us a five star ratings and review. If you would like to work with me personally to help you improve your health, I do accept a limited number of new patients per month for a functional medicine consultation.  Some of the areas I specialize in include helping patients with specific health issues like gut problems. neurodegenerative conditions, autoimmune diseases, cardiometabolic conditions, or for an executive health screen. And to help you promote longevity. And take a deeper dive into some of those factors that can lead to chronic diseases along the way.  Please call my Santa Monica Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition office at 310-395-3111. And we’ll set you up for a new consultation for functional medicine. And I look forward to speaking to everybody next week.

Dr. Maggie Ney discusses Bioidentical Hormone Therapy at the Functional Medicine Discussion Group meeting on April 25, 2024 with moderator Dr. Ben Weitz.  

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

5:49  Women go through four basic hormonal stages: 1. Premenopause, 2. Perimenopause, 3. Menopause, and 4. Post-menopause.  Premenopause is from when you get your first period until you start perimenopause.  Perimenopause is the time when our higher quality eggs start to decline and we begin to experience fluctuating hormonal levels. Women can have a regular period, but the regular rhythmic flow that women are used to experiencing with the regular upping of estrogen and decline and the production of progesterone that occurs during the second half of the cycle, doesn’t happen as predictably.  Menopause, technically is one day, the one day anniversary since your last menstrual period.  Everything after menopause is Post-menopause and you will have low hormones till the day you die, though symptoms can change over time.

7:08  Perimenopause.  Perimenopause is not a constant, symptomatic phase.  Symptoms can flare, usually with various stressors, such as lack of sleep, poor diet, and if our body is under stress, so how you treat your body during this period matters more for how you will feel.  This phase can last from four to ten years.  This talk focuses on hormones, but the lifestyle piece that includes diet, sleep, and vitamins, minerals, herbs, and homeopathy is also very important.  A lot of women can benefit from extra hormone support during perimenopause.  Today only 4-5% of women are on hormone therapy but 80-90% would be excellent candidates. Women are experiencing hormonal fluctuations that are affecting their mood, brain health, energy, and their ability to manage stressors.  And this is a time when many women are at the peak of their careers, while also taking care of their children and their aging parents.  Women at this point in their lives need to focus on lifting weights to build muscle and promote better bone density, as well as balance and stretching. For nutrition, women need to focus on keeping a stable blood sugar, optimizing protein intake, and metabolic flexibility.  They also need to get morning sunlight, have quality relationships, joy, stress management, address gut health, support detox pathways, take targeted supplements, and hormone therapy.

 

 



Dr. Maggie Ney is a licensed naturopathic doctor and a Menopause Society certified practitioner. She’s the director of the Women’s Clinic at the Akasha Center for Integrative Medicine in Santa Monica, California, where she has been supporting women through perimenopause and menopause since 2006. Dr. Ney is co-founder of HelloPeri, (TheHelloPeri.com) an online resource for women going through perimenopause, and she’s been featured on The Doctors show and Goop for expertise on women’s health and hormones.  Her website is DrMaggieNey.com.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for Functional Nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure.  Dr. Weitz has also successfully helped many patients with managing their weight and improving their athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111.

 



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz: Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates and to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.


Our two sponsors are Integrative Therapeutics and DUTCH Testing. And if you’re not aware, Integrative Therapeutics is one of the premier,, professional brands of supplements available.  we use a lot of their products in our office. One of their,  most exciting products is their specialized form of curcumin called Theracumin, Theracurmin.  And now they have an even more specialized, more highly absorbable form called Curalieve. They have many other products that can be helpful for hormonal balance as well.

 


And now we have our other sponsor for this evening is, Dutch Testing, Precision Analytical Labs. And so we have Noah Reed here to tell us a little bit about Dried Urine Testing:

Noah Reed: Yeah, thanks for having me.  I came down from Oregon, so glad to be here with you today.  DUTCH stands for Dried Urine Testing for Comprehensive Hormones, so that’s what the acronym DUTCH stands for.  It’s a four spot dry urine test, so waking two hours later, dinner, and bedtime.  It gives you the average of the sex hormones throughout the day, so it can mirror 24 hour urine, but it’s a little bit easier to collect, because it’s just on a little filter paper. that the patient takes at home, gives you the metabolites, so how the body is detoxing the hormones. You also get adrenal health with that, so you can be able to see the four points of the cortisol curve throughout the day land you see the metabolites of cortisol, how much cortisol is being made and how the body is processing it.  It gives you a little bit of an interesting view there, and then a very small organic acid panel, , gives you melatonin production through the night and 8 hydroxy 2 deoxyguanosine, or 8 OHTG, which is the oxidative stress marker, all in one, easy to use, test that the patient does at home.  We do have doctors on staff, 12 doctors that can walk you through the interpretation as well, so that you can become the hormone expert for your patients.  So that’s a little bit about the DUTCH test. If you have any questions, I’ll be here.  I’d love to answer any more questions for you.  We do kind of pride ourselves on the three things that make us unique.  Our comprehensive, a comprehensive report that’s visually appealing for you to be able to understand your patient’s story. , the support from our clinical clinicians on staff. , and then everything that we do is backed in peer reviewed journals. , so every analyte that we have on our test is actually put in a peer reviewed journal.  Our most recent one that we’re proud of is we were published in the journal Menopause, so we were the first functional test, , to actually be published in the journal Menopause, , showing the efficacy of testing and monitoring, , hormone replacement therapy, , as a part of your patient, , experience.  So, that was a big feather in our cap to be a part of that, and we’d love to talk more about it if you have any questions. 


Dr. Weitz: Thank you so much, Noah. Our speaker for this evening is Dr. Maggie Nay. She’s a licensed Naturopathic doctor… Unless you want to introduce yourself?  That’s fine. Yeah. Okay. Okay.

Dr. Maggie Ney:  Hi, everybody.  Hi. I’m so excited to be here.  I’m really passionate about women’s health and perimenopause in particular. I find it a very underserved area in the market. So I love to educate women and practitioners, and would love for this to be interactive if you guys have questions, but, I’ll start a little bit about introducing myself.  I’m a naturopathic doctor. I graduated from Bastyr University in Seattle in 2006. I currently co direct the women’s clinic at the Akasha Center for Integrative Medicine, which is like a few blocks away. Thanks I recently co-founded Hello Peri, which is an online resource really devoted to educating women about perimenopause.  I’m a certified practitioner by the Menopause Society. And again, I just really like to help women thrive through the perimenopausal period with a sense of empowerment. I’d like to provide the resources, tools, strategies needed to support hormones and for women to truly feel incredible because I do think this is the time when women can absolutely get after all their dreams, right?  This is the week in Chinese medicine, right? The second coming. You can choose your own path, write your own script, but gosh, it helps to feel really good to be able to do that.

Speaker: Yeah, I don’t think so. You know what? I’ll, I’ll, and she’s like, well,

Dr. Weitz: I can do it. I’ll, I’ll do it. I got it. I got it. I’ll do it. I’ll do it for you.

Dr. Maggie Ney:  Thank you.  I use so many pronouns, so I do just want to just really quickly say however you identify your patient. I do, I do use she/her to identify women, but I know that, you know, everyone identifies a little differently.  But just for the sake of being clear and not too wordy, as you can know, I chat a lot. So. We’re going to, everyone is included. However you or your patients identify yourself. Just want to put that out there. Alright, we can move on. Okay.

So really briefly, let’s just review the four basic hormonal stages that women go through.  So first we have the pre menopause time, which is basically from when you get your first period up until when you start perimenopause. Perimenopause is this time when our higher quality eggs start to decline, and we begin to experience more fluctuating hormonal levels. So women can start to have, , women can have the regular period, but start to have these symptoms, which we’ll get into, and you can still get pregnant.

But the regular rhythmic flow that women used to experience with the regular upping of the estrogen, the decline, progesterone being produced during the second half of the cycle, doesn’t happen as predictably. Menopause, technically, it’s one day, it’s the one year anniversary since your last menstrual period.  And then everything after is the post is post-menopause. I prefer to use post-menopausal years because we get a little hung up on, I’m after menopause, it’s done, it’s over, I’m through it.  But really, once you’re in post-menopause, the hormones are low and you’re going to have low hormones till the day you die.  So it’s not like you’re through with it, you’re in it, really. Symptoms can absolutely change, though, throughout that time.

Okay, so let’s talk a little bit about the unique needs of perimenopausal women. So, again, this is the period of time leading up to menopause. Hormones can start to fluctuate and symptoms can occur in your 30s. For some, sometimes late 40s, and perimenopause is not always a con Do you guys hear me okay?

Perimenopause is not always a constant symptomatic phase. Symptoms can flare with times of higher stress, and this is a hallmark, is that during this perimenopausal time, hormones become even more sensitive to stressors. Right? So if you’re Whatever could be situational, lack of sleep, poor diet, if our body’s at all under stress, our hormones are more easily affected.  Symptoms can last really on average between four and ten years. And I just want to just highlight that. If you’re feeling like crap, I mean that’s a very long time. And once a woman has gone a full year without a period, they’re in menopause. And again, it’s the one year anniversary without a period and patients that are post menopause.

And lifestyle changes become more important than ever during this time, right? Sleeping, hydration, nutrition, movement, dress management, quality relationships, can dramatically affect how a woman experiences perimenopause, right? I always say to my patients, Yeah, in college you can stay up all late, you can drink beer, eat pizza at midnight, wake up and like, go to classes and feel like, happy on your A game, but that just doesn’t happen.

How are you? It’s not like, I would say again, like, you can continue to age with the same level of energy and vitality, even more so than when you were younger, but how we treat our body matters, and it matters more now.  Okay, so I didn’t really say this, but I am going to focus here mostly on hormone therapy, because this is an area that is really not understood most of the time.  Practitioners and women don’t feel like this is an option during the perimenopausal period, so I like to educate on this. But again, if you have questions about some of the other treatments, please ask me.  okay, so, yeah, so, again, we focus on the lifestyle piece. There are vitamins, there’s minerals, there’s herbs, there’s homeopathy.  I know you guys are well trained in this area. That can be helpful. But a lot of women do need that extra hormone support during this time to really feel their best. And most important, all women need to have a conversation. Right, I, this is what fuels me, is that women are denied the option. Women aren’t given the full amount of choices that they can use during this time.

So the benefits of HRT really is greater than the risk for most [00:10:00] symptomatic women. Currently, I think the most recent numbers is like 4-5 percent of women are on hormone therapy, when really upwards to 80 90 percent would be excellent candidates. Doctors and other healthcare practitioners are not getting good training in their schooling to be able to recognize and how to use hormone therapy safely and comfortably. I talk to a lot of doctor colleagues, they just don’t, they know it’s okay, but they don’t feel comfortable.  Okay, so, again, just again to speak about the unique needs of a perimenopausal woman, I’d just like everyone just to be aware of, perimenopausal women are usually in the sandwich generation, right?  They’re at a time in their life where they’re experiencing these hormonal fluctuations that can affect all aspects of our body, mood, brain health, energy, and the ability to manage stressors. At the same time that our lives are often more demanding and stressful. Many women are at the key of their career while also taking care of their own children and aging parents.

And this is a time for patients really to focus on lifestyle more than ever and prioritize personal health and hormone education so they can really show up As their best version of themselves. And for many women, it’s simply a perfect storm. That the hormones and life stressors are happening at this exact time that hormones are shifting.  So, a comprehensive approach to perimenopause. We’re looking at, well, we definitely want to get a very good past medical history. A thorough understanding of their current symptoms, family history, lifestyle. So important to know our patient’s health goals. Because that can help individualize our treatment plan.  And focusing on things like nutrition, hydration, movement. And for the perimenopausal women, it’s really about getting good cardio resistance, right? Lifting weights is more important to build that muscle because we lose more bone mineral density as we go through the perimenopausal journey, so we need to focus on building muscle because it’s good for muscle, it’s good for bones.  Women need to focus on balance and stretching. For nutrition, keeping blood sugar stable, metabolic flexibility, optimizing protein intake, but again, all the other things, morning sunlight, quality relationship, joy, stress management, addressing gut health, supporting detoxification pathways, targeted supplements, and hormone therapy, and if you can include all this in your plan, you’re doing comprehensive, perimenopausal care.

So, I, a few points I want to make that come up to me as a naturopathic doctor. Gosh, I, I’m a natural, I like to call it naturally, they do things naturally. I want to support the natural process of my body and I’m supposed to go through menopause. Why don’t I just honor that and accept it? It makes sense, but we all need to question what is natural these days.

Like, are we supposed to live to 80 and 90? Are we supposed to be? You know, super physical and active mentally and physically. I mean, I know I want to be. I want to be super active and having fun and hiking up until the day I die and, and we’re living longer than ever. We used to die just past menopause and now we’re living, you know, up to half of our life after menopause and to have an expectation that we can do that with the same level of energy and vitality As we did when we were younger, it’s not realistic for most people if they’re not using phones.

For some, yes, again, it’s individualized, but we just need to be aware of this. And there are risks, I’m not quite done, there are risks to not addressing our patient’s health as well. Hot flashes and night sweats aren’t just annoying. They’re not just something you need to embrace and move through. There are consequences to it.  We know that it obviously can disrupt sleep, which can affect every aspect of our life. But there’s also more vascular inflammation when women experience hot flashes and night sweats, which does put them at higher risk of heart disease and dementia.  also for women, Depression and suicide rates are skyrocketing for mid life women.

It is true that [00:14:00] suicide rates for mid life women is, it peaks then. And if a woman is presenting for the first time during this time period with new onset depression or reoccurrence, then it really truly needs to be taken very seriously and we need to recognize and, and discuss the hormonal component as well.

So what’s happening hormonally specifically during perimenopause? So, basically, our estrogen starts to behave a little bit more erratically. So, during the pre menopause years, our estrogen in the follicular phase basically starts off low and basically steadily increases. It gets to a certain point where it signals to the brain to release luteinizing hormone, which triggers the egg to be released, so we ovulate, there’s a little dip in estrogen, and then it boosts back up again, and then it drops.  And then,  during perimenopause, that estrogen just doesn’t really have rhyme or reason. I mean, some months it can [00:15:00] go regularly just like that, and other months the estrogen is just up and down and up and down and up and down throughout the cycle. And women feel it because our brains like stable hormones.

They just do. We do better. That’s why women, have a little mood issue. Sometimes we’re out of population and obviously during the premenstrual time when we’re PMSing, it’s because of these drops in hormones that trigger changes in our neurotransmitters that can affect our mood. So, again, these estrogen fluctuations can lead to more unpredictable mood changes.

70 percent of women in period menopause have mood changes. Anxiety, depression, irritability, moodiness, less able to manage day to day life and depression. And stressors feeling less resilient. So, the stressors that we used to be able to handle with ease can just feel too much. Estrogen fluctuations can also be a trigger for headaches, more aches and pains, and night sweats and hot flashes.

And then, as [00:16:00] progesterone starts to decline, so often during early period menopause, it’s progesterone, which is the first hormone to drop. That will show up in our clients and our patients as difficulty sleeping, difficulty turning our brains off at night, feeling more anxiety on edge, and then having shorter cycles.

So, if you were a 28 day girl, maybe you’re more 27, 26. Which is why it’s really helpful for our patients to track their cycles so we can begin to recognize those subtle shifts.  heavier cycles and more spotting between periods. So these are separating a hormone and getting an idea of what symptoms can be related to what hormones.

And because perimenopause can really be a decade, I do think of it as early versus late perimenopause. Where the earliest symptoms really are the symptoms of that lower progesterone, which we just spoke about, where periods can start to come a little early, sometimes you’ll have two periods in one month, you have heavier periods, [00:17:00] clottier, heavier flow, lower libido, ruminating thoughts, anxiety, depression, less resilient, sleep issues.

And then the later period menopause, you were really starting to see women skip their cycles. You just know you’re kind of later in the transition, you know, maybe go three months, four months.  and then you’ll have more likely women will experience those typical symptoms that we think about. Palm flashes and night sweats that don’t dryness.

So why, I think this is important just to highlight, why? Why are we not talking about this? Well, first, there’s just a lack of training. As I said earlier, there was a recent study that a lot of OBs said that they got maybe an hour of training on how to support menopause, not even perivenopause. So, I always tell my patients who come in, they’re so upset because they feel so ignored and not heard by their doctor that their doctors are probably pretty well intentioned.

They’re just not educated.  there’s certainly a [00:18:00] lack of research and there’s an under representation of women in medical studies.  due to historical biases and also a lot of women have been excluded from studies simply because their hormonal fluctuations are just too hard to control. So let’s just not include them at all because men are much more stable.

And I think it was only in, up until, I might be butchering this, it’s like the early 90s when women had to be included in studies for,  medications to be approved. So that’s all very recent. What doctor do you see? Seriously, if you, if you’re depressed, you’re anxious, you’re having heart palpitations.

You’re irritable, you have headaches, I mean, who do you schedule with? There’s not really one central hub of a person. So that’s why so many people see their therapist, a nutritionist, their primary, a neurologist because they’re getting headaches and tingling, a cardiologist because they’re getting heart palpitations.

And women don’t feel heard or answered. And then there’s simply a shifting narrative. Our narrative of aging has changed. We are not [00:19:00] just going to slow down, right? It’s the 50s, it’s the new 20s, like we, we’re not slowing down, we are active. And our, so our expectations of ourselves We’re not willing to slow down, but there’s just no support, really, in the medical, conventional medical community of how to keep up with that changing narrative.

I just think this is really important because there’s so many symptoms associated with perimenopause. So the most common one are period changes. It’s one thing you can ask from your clients, like, have your periods changed? Some people don’t know, which is why it’s important to track your cycle so you can begin to see mood changes.

Over 70 percent of women experience mood changes during perimenopause. And there was a study that came out a few years ago. They actually studied the term I don’t feel like myself. I mean, how many times have we heard that from our patients and clients? I don’t feel like myself. This was actually studied, I think it was published in Menopause.

I don’t actually know what exactly it was, but it was studied, I mean published, but they studied that and over 70 percent of women [00:20:00] said I don’t feel like myself more than 60 percent of the time over a 12 week period. So, it’s really common. And then so we have the period changes, the mood changes, And then the menopausal symptoms like hot flashes and night sweats and vaginal dryness.

But these other ones are important, and we’ve touched upon them, but less resilient, more irritable, mood swings, heavier menstrual cycle, irregular cycles, tender breasts, headaches, fatigue, brain fog, we, I know we’ve heard that, right? Lack of focus, forgetting where you put things, decreased libido, anxiety, weight gain, worsening PMS, hot flashes, dry skin, changes in body odors, bloating, insomnia, night sweats.  Burping, constipation, worsening allergies, ringing in the ear has been associated.

Dr. Weitz: I thought weight gain was caused by Ozembic deficiency. Ha ha.

Dr. Maggie Ney: Rowdy nose, post nasal drip, hair thinning.  hair loss, more facial hair, heart palpitations, achy joints, [00:21:00] frozen shoulder, right, things that come up in, you see it more in menopausal period, menopausal women, burning tongue is another one, more frequent vaginal infections like yeast or vector vaginosis, not recovering as well after exercise, itchy skin, problems in skin sensations, dizziness, and electric shock sensations.

I list them out because there’s so many. And I always say, like, you need to go get worked up and other things ruled out, but once you do, then you focus on the peri.  and so perimenopause is a clinical diagnosis based on symptoms alone and ruling out other causes. It’s really important because I see people come in, they say, my doctor took my blood and it’s normal, so I’m not in peri.

How often have we heard that, right?  our hormones just fluctuate too much throughout the cycle and cycle to cycle to really be, it’s just, it’s just not based on labs. So we can do a [00:22:00] blood test and rule out peri. You can certainly do a blood test and I think there’s a later slide and it’s suggestive of perimenopause.

We’ll get into that. But, it’s really based on how are you feeling, tracking your cycles, recording your symptoms, and then labs to rule out other causes of your patient’s symptoms. So the main ones, right, that overlap most of the ones, of the symptoms I talked about, are your thyroid, anemia, and autoimmune disorder, vitamin D, B12 deficiency.

So conventional guidelines, true, perimenopause. Hormones change throughout the month and throughout the day, and this is all true, and I share that with my patients. But! There’s really no controversy about testing hormones for fertility, right? Our patients go day two, day three of their cycle, get their FSH tested, maybe get an AMH, get an estradiol, and that speaks to their egg quality, right?

If you do fertility, you’re familiar with it. If, like, this third day of your cycle, your FSH is high, that’s saying low, poor egg [00:23:00] quality. So Anyway, you can kind of extrapolate from that, that maybe you’re more in, in the period zone. But, normal hormones, normal other labs do not exclude perimenopause. They simply provide a little bit more information.

Okay, so, basically, things that are suggestive of perimenopause, but not diagnostic.  and again, I, day 2 or 3, if your FSH is above 10, it could be suggestive. Estradiol above 60 with an FSH could be suggestive of perimenopause. And AMH under 1, suggestive of perimenopause. And then as long as you’re getting those basic, you might as well get a baseline of your other hormones too.

And this is through blood.  Okay, I think I said that. So, oh, so what hap This is important. The definition of menopause is, is, I think, horrific. Right? It’s based upon if you’re getting your period. There are so many women who don’t get their period. Either they have an [00:24:00] IUD, or they don’t have an IUD. They have a hysterectomy.

They have an ablation. So how do you know if you’re in menopause? Well, it really doesn’t matter, right? Menopause is just that one day. But what are some, what are some suggestive? So an FSH above 35 and an estradiol less than 20 on two separate occasions is suggestive of menopause. An AMH less than 0. 2 is suggestive of menopause.

Speaker 6: The slide before, you said it was FSH above 10, but an estrogen above

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, so basically, it used to be that we just checked FSH. And so, if your FSH was a seven, that would be great, you’re good, you’re not impaired, you shouldn’t get pregnant, you know, from a fertility perspective. But, because estradiol, which is released by our ovaries, is the, is the hormone that the brain picks up, To say it doesn’t need to make FSH.  So FSH is the hormone the brain releases to tell the follicles of the ovaries to grow to make [00:25:00] estrogen. So during perimenopause, when things are a little erratic, our estrogen can actually be high on the second day of our period when it really should be low. And if it’s high because of just being in perimenopause and lower egg quality, then it can falsely lower that FSH.  Does that make sense? Yeah. Okay. That’s true.  I mean, this is just comprehensive blood work that I will do if someone’s in, you know, who’s seen me, who’s not, I don’t feel like myself. So, basics. And then we have the Dutch test, which,  I wanted just to give a shout out to. And again, just another way to assess hormones and how you’re metabolizing hormones.

Speaker 7: Yeah, we didn’t quite get that. Oh, sure. Okay.

Dr. Maggie Ney: So basically,  I can talk [00:26:00] about this for a second, but CDC, you want to look at ruling out anemia, your metabolic panel, that’s the basics, your glucose, your electrolyte, your liver, kidney function, basic lipid panel, maybe you guys know, in functional medicine, we’re often doing more of the detailed lipoprotein particle size, but just the basic lipid panel.

Inflammation with your HsCRP, your SED rate, homocysteine is, again, a marker for vascular inflammation. I like always to get a fasting insulin for a metabolic health marker. Your hemoglobin A1c, which is that three month average of blood sugar. TSH is the overall thyroid health marker.  Free T3, Free T4. Sometimes I’ll order the antibodies.  Sometimes I’ll order the reverse T3. Not every single person gets that. A vitamin D, a magnesium, maybe 12, a folate, ANA if you’re presenting with more of those joint pains, and,  fatigue even, and then the hormone testing that we’ve spoken about. I didn’t mention this, but progesterone is a hormone that’s only produced when we [00:27:00] ovulate, so it’s always going to be really low that first few days of your cycle.

You know, if you get your hormones done day two, three, your progesterone’s always going to be low. So, you only produce progesterone after you ovulate, so just the last two weeks of your cycle. So, if you want to get an idea of where your progesterone is, you would time your Dutch test, you know, a week before you expect to get your period, or a week after you ovulate, or you would do your blood test, again, a week after you ovulate, or a week before you expect to get your period.

Dr. Weitz:  I just wanted to point out, for patients where you’re not sure where they’re at, their hormones are fluctuating, Dutch offers a cycle mapping, so you can test your hormones every day, during the course of a month, and kind of see what’s going on.

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, so if you’re a period, you can see some of that more erratic estrogen.

Speaker 7: Yeah? How about if someone is already in their menopause and you want to talk to tweak their hormones? I mean,

Dr. Maggie Ney: personally, I don’t, I go by symptoms. I go by symptoms. If they’re in menopause, they’re not bleeding, I [00:28:00] go by symptoms, I see how you’re feeling, and I might do a blood test to make sure your number’s, number’s not too high, or if they’re not feeling optimal and their levels are very low, then I’ll increase.

Speaker 6: For the Dutch panel, do you order that at the beginning of treatment or is it like, throughout treatment? I don’t,

Dr. Maggie Ney: I mean, I think the Dutch panel is amazing. I don’t necessarily order on every single person, to be honest. It’s not mandatory.  I do discuss it with my patients if they’re curious to dive a little deeper or if they’re having any of the symptoms that I think I would need further support with looking at the,   Metabolizing hormones.

But I would say I like to, when I, I, I think if I’m going to like choose a time to do it after they’re on the hormones. ’cause I want to see how they’re metabolizing the hormones and make sure they’re going down the good pathways because you can feel amazing. It’s true. And still be maybe pushing it down before pathway, right?

For hydroxy estro pathway where you would want to do some more antioxidant work and try to push more towards the two pathway. So [00:29:00] I, if I get them stable on a good dose of hormones and I then I really want to dial in on.  for their support of how they’re metabolized, because it’s not just about how much hormones you make that control how you feel, but it’s also how you metabolize and clear hormones.

So let’s talk a little bit about hormone therapy, because there’s so much confusion. So let’s just get really clear on a few things. HRT stands for hormone replacement therapy, and it’s an umbrella term. It includes bioidentical hormones and synthetic hormones. And so, bioidentical hormones, I mean, I think it’s, it, it has been considered now kind of a marketing term.  That’s what a lot of the conventional doctors will say. It’s marketing, and, and I sort of agree, but it does, it does have a meaning. It means that the hormones have the same molecular structures as our own hormones. And they

Speaker: don’t come from

Dr. Maggie Ney: horses. They don’t come from horses, right, like primarians, and we’re going to talk about that.

But, oh, I mean, I need to, no, that’s a legal question.[00:30:00]

So HRT is the umbrella term in cough. It stands for hormone replacement therapy. Technically, when you’re talking about using hormone therapy for perimenopausal women and menopausal women, the correct terminology is MHT, menopause hormone therapy. Hormone therapy is another term that is kind of the correct usage and the reason usage because HRT technically is about replacing lost hormones.

So if you’re 27 and you’ve gone through early menopause, premature menopause, then you would be on HRT. You would be on a much higher dose of estrogen to replace it. But we’re really using low dose hormone therapy, and it’s a technicality like tomato tomatoes, but I want you to be aware of it because it’s slowly changing.

when people are talking about hormone therapy. So HT is used a lot, like hormone therapy,  ET, EPT is estrogen and progestin gin. So progestin gin is another umbrella term that includes [00:31:00] bioidentical progesterone or,  progestin. So it’s an umbrella term. And then BHRT is bioidentical and then, you know, HT, HRT, MHT are often used interchangeably.

So synthetic hormones, they’ve just been chemically older. They’re not identical. To human hormones.  so let’s just talk about what are some examples of the synthetic hormones. So there’s Premarin, which is what Ben was just talking about, conjugated equine estrogen.

Speaker: Come about? Let’s give, , horses hormones to women.

Dr. Maggie Ney: Well, okay, it actually came about because they used to,  grind up human ovaries to start, and then they would use pregnant women’s urine. And that was got, like, you can’t produce so much of it, so then they, the horses were the next one, so.  Oral birth control pills, it has ethanol, estradiol, which is a synthetic estrogen.

[00:32:00] A marine IUD contains a synthetic progestin, right, it has the levonorgestrel. And, I mean, this is nitpicky, but it’s true, just because something’s synthetic doesn’t make it natural, right? Horse urine is, it’s still natural. I just, I’m just putting, it definitely elicits the ick factor, but as we were talking about correct terminology, it just means that it’s chemically altered.

It’s not identical to our own hormones. And then bioidentical has the same molecular structure as our own hormones. So, bioidentical hormones are plant derived, so they’re made from soy or Mexican wild yams. They’re converted into hormones in a laboratory that have the same molecular structure as our own hormones.

There is no soy or yam in the final product. But because bioidentical hormones look and behave like our own hormones, They can naturally integrate into our own body’s physiology to help restore hormones balance better.  and then there’s, and this is important. There are [00:33:00] FDA approved bioidentical options, meaning you can get them at CVS and RiteAid bioidentical hormones or compounded hormones.

So let’s talk about the FDA approved bioidentical hormones. This is an area, I’m telling you, people are really confused. They want to talk so much about, I want to go bioidentical, I want bioidentical. I see patients come to see me. Asking for bioidenticals, and I say, what are you on? I’m on the patch. I’m on the estradiol patch.

That is a bioidentical hormone. So, again, it’s about just clearing up the misinformation, educating our patients, and together coming up with the best choice for them. So FDA approved means the hormones are evaluated for safety and effectiveness. All the FDA approved bioidentical hormones are dispensed with package inserts, containing extensive product information with detailed risks, potential side effects, they’re commercially available, you can get them at any pharmacy.

And so, some examples of FDA approved bioidentical hormones that are available right now are the estradiol [00:34:00] patch, the gel, there’s a spray, there’s a ring, there’s an oral tablet, there’s vaginal estradiol cream that works locally, not systemically, there’s progesterone capsules, and there’s DHEA vaginal inserts.

So those are all the bioidentical, FDA approved. So let’s talk about the compounding hormones. So the advantages of using compounded, they allow for different routes, dose, formulations. They’re just not available through a regular pharmacy. You can,  allows for products with the fewest ingredients. So commercial products tend to have more inactive ingredients.

I will say, like, vaginal estrogen is so important for women, like, everyone should be on it as they go through menopause because most, I think, 100 percent of women have some sort of vaginal dryness that can affect the genitive urinary syndrome, right? More frequent urination, more prone to UTIs. [00:35:00] And I prescribe vaginal estrogen all the time.

It’s definitely underutilized, but the commercially available one has parabens in it. It just does. And I I don’t, it’s one of those things when I talk to people or I’m out in the medical community, it’s like, it’s so underutilized. It’s like taking food away from starving children and saying, oh, but it’s not organic.

It’s, it’s kind of like that in my mind, so I want it out to everyone. I, but to savvy functional medicine practitioners, like, that’s just something to be aware of, that the vaginocin does have parabens. So I will let my patients know. I mean, some of them don’t care, you know, that’s fine. And some are like, I do everything I can to avoid parabens in my skincare, so can we get this calm?

 and then if you have like,  mast cell sensitivity patients, people who have really reacted just to everything, then I go towards the compounding pharmacies. So what are the common compounded hormones? So we’re going to talk a little bit more about testosterone, but there is no FDA approved testosterone hormone for women.[00:36:00]

So you can get a compounded. Estriol is a weaker form of estrogen. It’s great for vaginal dryness and there’s some great studies on it. Sometimes I’ll get compounded estrogen and testosterone. We talked about how everyone should be on estrogen cream, but there’s a boatload of androgen receptors in the vaginal tissue that respond very well to testosterone.

 there’s VIAS, which was really popular after the Women’s Health Initiative study, if you remember all that study that came out in 2002. We can talk more about that if you’re curious. And then progesterone capsules, the pharmaceutical ones, have peanut oil, so you can get it compacted without peanut oil.

You can get a sustained release, because it helps with sleep. So, you know, some people are like, I’ve been sleeping better, but gosh, it’s not lasting through the night. Then I’ll think about using the sustained release. So what are the FDA approved indications for hormonal therapy? That means there is no controversy.

Like, you can just go ahead and do this. You don’t have to, you don’t need a consent form. You don’t have to be worried about anything. If you’re [00:37:00] struggling with any of these symptoms, this these are FDA approved reasons for using it. If you’re having hot flashes and night sweats, low bone density, so if you’ve been diagnosed with osteopenia, the hormones are FDA approved for that.

Premature hypoestrogenism, that’s just if you go through menopause before age 50, everyone should be on hormones. And then genitourinary symptoms, so vaginal dryness, painful sex. Urinary frequency, frequent urinary tract infections these are all the FDA approved indications. But, hold on, we know from a lot of studies that hormone therapy can, these are studies to support it, can help with your mood, sleep, brain health, joint health, quality of life, and prevention of heart disease.

That is well known, and heart disease is the number one killer of women. So if we’re talking about FDA approved indications, do you know what’s most prescribed for hot flashes and night sweats? Do you guys know? SSRIs. And it’s an off label use of [00:38:00] SSRIs is to treat it for hot flashes and night sweats.

Depression that comes up during perimenopause. What’s the root cause? Probably the hormones, right? Oh, wait, wait, I just complained. So during perimenopause, as your depression, anxiety, more likely to happen, what’s most likely prescribed?  SSRIs. But, but, the root cause is hormones. But the thought of using hormones to address depression or anxiety during perimenopause is like the craziest thing.

Reckless thing because it’s an off label use. We use off label use of medications

Speaker: all the time. It’s being used for IBS. Yes,

Dr. Maggie Ney: yes Okay,

Speaker: so

Dr. Maggie Ney: These are symptoms where you think, maybe I’ll use some estrogen. Hot flashes, night sweats, depression, anxiety, irritability, brain fog, low libido, joint pain, menstrual migraine, super common. If someone gets a headache right around [00:39:00] ovulation, because we said there’s that little dip of estrogen, right before the period, on the first few days of your cycle, A little bit of estrogen can just kind of buffer that dip and can be, , make a profound difference for people.

 any skin changes. Oh, I’m so itchy, burning tongue, ear ringing, or any of the genital urinary syndrome, like any of the vaginal dryness. or urinary tract symptoms, you would think estrogen.

Speaker: Why is it known as atrophic vaginitis? This is a horrific

Dr. Maggie Ney: name.

Speaker: Oh,

Dr. Maggie Ney: okay. Atrophy. I’m sorry, can we just say men get ED as their rebranding?  From impotence to ED, right? Did you? That was like the most brilliant marketing campaign. But we got the suits, we got ED, right? No longer impotent. Like, that sounds horrible. Women go from atrophy, like they, I mean, to vaginitis. GSCAB, basically. It’s not quite as great as, like, Impotent to eat, but anyway.  So [00:40:00] again, these are things we’re thinking of using estrogen therapy for.  If you have a uterus, you always need to have a progesterone to be with it to,  protect the uterine lining. Yes?

Speaker 6:  for as far as, was there something that changed last year where insurances can cover, like, different diagnosis codes for, like, just primarily hormone deficiency or no?

Dr. Maggie Ney:  you mean to cover HRT?

Mm hmm.  HRT is usually covered by insurance. Like, it depends on your insurance if you use the commercially available ones.

Speaker 6: We’re a cash pay program, but, like, for patients that are applying for reimbursement, we’re just curious about doing that. If we gave them, like, a diagnosis code, could they

Dr. Maggie Ney: use that?

Oh, for hmm.  to get it through what, like, CVS?

Speaker 6: , so they pay, they pay us a membership fee for it, and we do, we do repellent screens, injections, and then all the labs, it’s like all included in the membership, the physician visits and stuff.  but I didn’t know if there was like a go [00:41:00] to ICD 10 code that you could use for them to submit that for insurance.

Dr. Maggie Ney:  I don’t know for sure. I think, yeah, I don’t, I don’t know actually to be honest with you. I think,  yeah, it’s a, it’s a subtle question. I know what you’re asking, but I don’t know. You can get

Speaker 6: to the fillable codes

Dr. Maggie Ney: to get it covered,

Speaker 6: just for the hormone deficiency, rather than

Dr. Maggie Ney: like those specific ones.  I mean, there are for office visits, but as far as medications, yeah, I’ve never had like a prior authorization for hormonal therapy. It’s just, it’s just covered. Okay. Not through compounding, but through, okay. So, progesterone, Progesterone. We know that the function, it helps prepare the uterus to accept an embryo, it protects the uterine lining from this unopposed estrogen, which can increase risk of getting,  dysplasia and initial cancer.

Progesterone is anti inflammatory, it’s [00:42:00] immunomodulatory, it inhibits urine contractions, it has a calming effect in the mind. You take it orally, it’s converted into the liver, into allopregnenol, which binds to the GABA receptors, so it does have that calming effect. And it does slow the gut, it can help with sleep,  causes of low levels, well, perimenopause and menopause.  And then the symptoms, we said it a little earlier, but really when you’re thinking perimenopause, you’re thinking your periods are coming a little closer together, multiple in a month, heavier cycles, spotting, insomnia, and anxiety.

Speaker: Do you ever just use progesterone for when you don’t want to take estrogen?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yes. I do.  There are actually studies that say higher amounts of progesterone can help with cough flashes at night’s wise, like upwards of 300 milligrams.  but sure,  definitely for like the anxiety and the sleep, progesterone can be great. Sometimes I’ll use progesterone on testosterone and not the estrogen.  But let’s talk about testosterone. Testosterone is the most abundant hormone in women. We have more testosterone than estrogen. Plays a key role in muscle mass. Bone [00:43:00] health, confidence, and burning fat keeps our metabolism strong, our libido high. It does start to decline in our 30s, and 50 percent of women’s testosterone levels have been lost by menopause.  So some symptoms of having lower testosterone, low libido, lower confidence, difficulty with orgasms, fatigue, less muscle mass, and difficulty building muscle.  So testosterone therapy. So it’s not FDA approved for women, which is crazy, but it’s just not. Even though there is supporting evidence, we do need more research, but there’s supporting evidence for sexual desire, mood, confidence, energy, vitality, muscle health, possible adverse effects with testosterone. It is too much for your patient’s body.  You can have some acne, hair thinning, increased body hair, anger, irritability. for listening. But it is endorsed by a number of organizations to treat women who [00:44:00] experience, and this is the clinical diagnosis, is hypoactive sexual desire disorder,  in postmenopausal women, which is basically low libido that bothers you.  Alright, so if you have low libido, but it’s not really bothering you, and it’s not bothering your relationship, that doesn’t, you get the definition because it has to be upsetting to you.

Dr. Weitz: Let me just ask, progesterone is available as a supplement. What do you think about women who use something like that?

Dr. Maggie Ney:  yeah, it’s available as a cream, topical. Yeah. I think if you’re using it during perimenopause, that’s fine to see if it helps you, but I would not use cream to protect the uterine lining if you’re postmenopausal on extra due.   So DHEA, it’s also a hormone. It’s a bioidentical hormone, DHEA.  it’s produced by the adrenal glands. It starts to decline in [00:45:00] our 30s. It decreases by an average of 60 percent by the time of menopause. And DHEA is a precursor hormone. Our body turns it into testosterone and estrogen. Our vaginal and vulva tissues are loaded with estrogen and testosterone receptors.  Thanks. So, giving DHEA vaginally can be really effective, because then intracellularly, it’s converted into testosterone and estrogen. And again, there is one FDA approved, it’s called IntraRosa, DHEA that you can get through the pharmacy, but again, you can get it compounded as a DHEA. You can even take DHEA capsule at low dose and insert it vaginally.

Dr. Weitz: Do you like that Bezwecken cube?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I just, I learned that from you. I don’t have much clinical experience, but it sounds good.

Speaker 7: What do you define as low dose?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Like for, okay, so the studies say 6. 5 mg, so that’s like the commercially available one, so you either get it compounded, you can’t really, you can’t find 6.

5 mg, which are, you know, you just have to [00:46:00] see. Just a capsule, like the gel capsule you just A little gel capsule, I don’t, it’s more than dissolved. Instead of swallowing it. Yeah, instead of swallowing it, you can do it vaginally.  you just have to make sure it dissolves, so I would think a capsule may be better than a gel, but I could be wrong.

Just, as long as it stays in you, it doesn’t fall out.  so, yeah, there’s not a tremendous amount of studies, but there are some, and it’s safe to try, it is. I usually test women, and if they’re lower than 100, then I’ll start them on like 5 or 10 milligrams, just to see if they, they get a little better, and I have seen an increase in testosterone levels in the blood.

 So, bioidentical, I mean, I’ve said some of this, but,  here are the treatment options for estrogen that are bioidentical. You can get the patches, estradiol patches, estradiol gels, there’s estradiol tablets, there’s a vagal cream, a vagal tablet, there’s rings, and then you can get a compounded estradiol cream.

 and then we talked about estriol, which has, in the past, been paired with [00:47:00] estradiol in a form of bias. I really don’t do that much anymore. That really came out when we were scared of estrogen. We were scared of estrogen after the Women’s Health Initiative. So we came out with this bias because you can have estrogen and estriol, and estriol has a little estrogen effect.

So you can maybe reduce the estradiol and have more estriol, but estriol doesn’t have the studies to support the heart health and the bone health. So,  I just don’t think it’s needed. Our liver converts estradiol to estriol, so if you’re doing the estradiol, which has the potent effect, and give liver support, then your body’s turning it into estriol.

And then again for progesterone options the commercially available is oral micronized progesterone, also known as Prometrium.  again, you can get it compounded without the peanut oil, sustained release, and then there’s crinum gel, which is an FDA approved bioidentical progesterone gel that is used for fertility and has been looked at a little bit for uterine protection too.

 you, like I said, during, when you’re [00:48:00] menopausal and not bleeding anymore and you’re on estrogen, you have to be on progesterone. Most women love their progesterone. It’s like, helps them sleep, it’s calming, they feel like a warm, cozy blanket’s covering them. Some women feel nothing, they just have to be on it if you’re uterine infected.  And a small percentage of women do not like progesterone. It makes them depressed, weepy, bloated. It’s a small percent, but it’s always good to educate our patients on that. And if that’s the case, and I say, put it internally, you can get your progesterone, just do it vaginally.  the other options are like the Mirena IUD can be used if you can’t take it.  and then there’s other hormone options as well. So, it’s always just, there’s always options, right? There’s always options.  okay, so for

Dr. Weitz: By the way, do you cycle the progesterone or do you give it every day?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I give women the choice. I do educate. There’s really no studies that say cycling is better or safer. I know intuitively that maybe for some people this feels right. Okay. To take,  progesterone to match your cycle, so I fully support [00:49:00] that.  But some women love their progesterone so much, why would I deny it for them the first two weeks, right? If it really helps with sleep and mood and anxiety. So, I educate people. Like, I teach them. You get, progesterone is produced during the second half of the cycle, so if you wanted to mimic the cycle, which some people really are, that feels right to them, I get it.  Then I’ll support them with that.

Speaker 7: How about the impossible?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I don’t routinely do it, but I give women the choice. Same thing. I do give women the choice. I don’t say you have to do it one way or one way is better. I know people have, feel strongly about that, but I see people love their progesterone, so I don’t want to be like, you can’t take it.

It’s better. I’m not, I don’t feel like there’s enough research to support that it is better. In fact, most studies are done, well there’s been some cyclical studies, but it’s really just what the patient wants. I educate. I do. So for testosterone if you wanted to use an FDA approved form of testosterone, then you would prescribe a [00:50:00] man’s testosterone that is FDA approved.

 they come in like 50 milligram tubes, and you would make that tube or packet last 10 days. It’s one tenth the dose. That comes to about a pea sized amount. Or you can put it in a 5cc syringe and use half a cc a day. I don’t usually do that, to be honest with you. I have, like, done it once for someone who really wanted it.

So I usually get it compounded for women. And so, like, the average dose for menopausal women is five milligrams of testosterone, but I’ll usually start, like, at one and work up to see how people feel. So these are all your options.  like, if you’re getting in the weeds of prescribing or helping women through this, It is important to know, like, all the different options, because I’ve had patients who can’t tolerate bioidentical progestin.

They just feel awful, and they need it, and they can’t do it vaginally. And I will then look at some of the combination patches, which [00:51:00] is a bioidentical estradiol with a progestin.  so I’ll try that, or if I do,  a tablet. I mean, there’s just options for people. You just need to, there’s pros and cons.

That’s good. And if anyone has any like specific questions about the pros and cons of any of these options, I’m happy to go through them. But it’s just being familiar, and I don’t think we should label things as good and bad. It’s just the pros and cons, and what’s

Speaker: right for people. But from a functional medicine perspective, which one would you prefer the most of the synthetic progesterone?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Oh, okay, so from a sexual medicine perspective, I think the IUD is great, you know, like at the levonorgestrel, IUDs, localized progestin therapy is wonderful. That’s what I would say. And then you can be on any dose of estrogen and you’re getting the uterine protection. That’s what I would say.  yeah, so you can move on.

 I’m looking at time. So, [00:52:00] I, we can talk about this if you guys are curious about how did we end up to a place when. There used to be, like, 80 percent of women were on hormones and then it dropped to, like, 2%, now it’s, like, currently at, like, 4%, less than 10%. And it’s the Women’s Health Initiative. So, this was the biggest,  study that was done to look at hormone replacement therapy, because prior to this study, which started in the late 1990s, Most women would put on hormones because they saw that, you know, during perimenopause and menopause, women just felt so good, and women seemed to be living longer, and it seemed to, they had all these assumptions from observational studies.

Women lived longer, had less heart disease, they were doing great. So they’re like, alright, well, can we endorse this as like,  preventative medicine? Can we just say all women should go on hormones? I mean, that’s a lofty statement. So they, , put up this study, the Women’s Health Initiative, mainly to see, not a normal example of hot flashes or night sweats, but to see, do women live longer?

And can, is heart disease preventive? [00:53:00] So, this was the first, you know, double blind, randomized, controlled study that looked at two different groups. It had women with a uterus and women without a uterus. So women with a uterus, right, we said you need to take that progestogen to protect the uterine lining, so they used Prempra, which was Premarin, that’s the horse, the estrogen from the horse urine.

And Provera, which was a synthetic progestin, which,  We, we, well, I’ll talk about it a little later, but it’s just, it’s not the best, it’s like the worst progestin to be honest. It’s not metabolically friendly, it’s not breast friendly. But hey, they were doing, I always give people the benefit of the doubt, maybe to a fault, but they were doing the best they can with the knowledge they had at the time.

And then women without a uterus just were put on Pramerane. And then each one of those groups had a placebo. Well, in 2002,  I’m like, was that, was any, was everyone here alive then? No, I think so. Okay.  2002, [00:54:00] I mean, it was huge. The study was stopped short because of, I mean, the daytime television was interrupted.

The NIH president came out and said, you know, we’re stopping this study, sure, women on hormone therapy need to get off of it, there’s an increased risk of breast cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Holy, I mean people were so scared, this is how everyone learned about it. No one looked at the study, there was no, no doctor looked at the study.

Patients heard it at the same time healthcare practitioners heard it, and it caused such a media frenzy. Every newspaper, every news outlet, this was all over the world, the world, everywhere. And this was, I would say, well, many other people say it, in fact,  I’m blanking on his name, but a little bit later,  the greatest tragedy to women’s health was this, because it got women who were doing very well off their hormones.[00:55:00]

And, like I said, before anyone could really look at the data, and we’ll talk about some of the flaws, people that were excellent candidates were taken off their hormones. Women that were 37 who went through premature menopause were taken off their hormones. It was very sad. So,  I’m just going to say what we found, and this is with the PrenPro group.

The women who just took estrogen actually did very well, but this is the PrenPro group. So this is where the, all the fear that came out was based on these numbers. So there were 47 additional cases of gallstones and gallbladder disease and I’m going to just, I put in parentheses the reason why we saw that and that was because of the oral estrogen that was used.

 there were 9 additional diagnoses of breast cancer at year 5. I’m going to just reiterate this because that’s what everyone is so scared of is the breast cancer piece. This was what was found just in the PrEP program. And the women who took PrEP aren’t alone, so just the estrogen. There was 18 percent less risk of breast [00:56:00] cancer.

So there was a decrease, a clinically significant decrease risk of breast cancer in the woman who took estrogen alone. Yet, we are so scared of estrogen.  so it was, if you look at it like this, it was the progestin, the provera part that may have been the trigger for the breast cancer. But anyway, not to say that those nine additional diagnoses aren’t significant, they are, but that’s, that’s the way the media came out, made it seem like every woman had risk, like you were putting yourself at such huge risk.

And again, it’s diagnoses. They had better, the women who were diagnosed had better prognoses. They did not die anymore. No one died. They just had these incidents, I should say. There were eight additional cases of pulmonary embolism. That’s because of the oral estrogen that was used. There’s eight additional strokes.

That’s again has to do with oral intrusion and the timing. That’s another important piece. Seven additional heart attacks. That was due to timing. Six fewer cases of colorectal cancer, five fewer hip fractures, and zero additional deaths.[00:57:00]

Okay, so let’s talk about, let’s break down what was the problems with the study. Well, the age and health of the women study, so 70 percent of the women study. were over 60. Well, that’s not when we usually start women on hormone therapy past 60. We usually start when women are having symptoms, you know, 40s, 50s, early 50s.

The average age was 63. 10 percent of the women were between ages of 50 and 55. We know now, through all the retrospective analysis,  that timing matters when you start hormone therapy. Only oral estrogen was used. We know that oral estrogen is more inflammatory, so there’s higher risk of POTS. strokes, and gallstones.

And then the type of progestin used. So only Provera was used, which is a synthetic progesterone. It’s not metabolically or breast friendly. Women who took Premarin alone had 18 less, 18, 18 percent less breast cancer incidence. So that’s like the [00:58:00] breakdown.

Not if you start within that first 10 years. So if you start within the first 10 years of menopause, much higher chance of getting You get all the benefits, and you can continue taking it to the day you die, and you don’t increase your risk. There’s a slight increase if you start hormone therapy past that 10 year mark.

So you can still start hormone therapy, but the conversation’s a little different.

Speaker: Are you aware of this new study that came out in the Metapod’s Journal? Women over the age of 65 taking hormones, women who were taking estrogen, lower risk of not only breast cancer, but other forms of cancer, lower risk of heart disease, lower risk of all cause mortality.

Speaker 6: Would you say anyone who has a hysterectomy should be on just estrogen? Like, is there a reason why someone would not want to be on just estrogen?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Oh, they, [00:59:00]  yes. If you have a history of like endometriosis, progesterone is really anti inflammatory. If you have endo, it’s really not just a hormone thing or a uterus thing.

It’s really systemic. There’s more inflammation. There’s immune modulatory issues. So I would like to get. progesterone for that. Anyone who has insomnia, anxiety, they would benefit from that. Even if they don’t have a uterus. I don’t, I don’t necessarily put everyone without a uterus on progesterone, but it’s like, why don’t they have a uterus?

And then looking at that as a complete picture, because if it’s like very estrogen driven and, like I said, like endo, a progesterone can be really helpful. So basically, HRT is safe and effective for the vast majority of symptomatic women when starting within the first 10 years of menopause. I’ve given it to people past that 10 year mark.

It’s just a different conversation. All the benefits of heart disease prevention,  is a little different. Ok, so, ok, the study came out in 2002, [01:00:00] and then there was all these retrospective post hoc analysis done that did not make the news, right? There was no, no, nothing written up about this really important finding.

In 2007, it was declared that, when you started, within the first 10 years of menopause, women lived longer, decreased mortality, so less likely to die from all causes. There was improvement in hot flashes in the 90s, reduced incidence of osteoporosis, reduction in diabetes. In 2013, there was another post hoc analysis.

30 percent reduction in mortality. Women who started 60s, no effect with regards to heart disease and mortality, but women who started HRT in their 70s, there was a little slight increased risk of heart disease. And then in 2017, there was a follow up post hoc analysis. There was reduction in heart disease, decreased mortality, decreased osteoporosis, and decrease in reduction in diabetes.

This was, yes, they were looking at the same people, and they were looking at the data. [01:01:00] They, remember the data, the results came out in 2002. They just said it as it applied to everyone. Now they’re like, let’s take a look at this study. Who are these people that had higher rates of strokes? Well, oh my gosh, they were all 72.

Wow, in fact, no one in the 50 year range had a stroke. So that’s what they were doing. They were re analyzing the data through a different lens. Also,

Speaker 5: too, it could be other factors as they’ve aged. Totally. If they’re not overall,

Dr. Maggie Ney: you

Speaker 5: know.

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, I mean big argument is also that women who are on hormones get their mammograms more often too.

So you’re more likely to diagnose a breast cancer as well. Anytime

Speaker 9: you’re in a better mood,

Dr. Maggie Ney: you just do things better.

Speaker 9: You do things better. Absolutely. You remember stuff. Yes, you remember to schedule those appointments.

Dr. Maggie Ney:  So, timing hypothesis. So when you start HRT within the first 10 years of menopause, the benefits outweigh the risks.

We already went through all the benefits. But when it comes to heart disease and dementia, it’s timing [01:02:00] that matters.  so again, why are we afraid of HRT? When you start, hormones matter. The form of hormones matter. So again, oral, more likely to get a clot, the stroke, the gallbladder issue. And really, it’s come down to this is the current reasoning, argument is timing.

The timing hypothesis, estrogen gives the greatest benefit, the most cardiac and cognitive benefits when given early in the menopause transition. And the healthy cell bias hypothesis, estrogen offers the most cognitive and cardiac benefits when the cells are healthy to start, not when disease has already set in.

Speaker 7: Question between the pill versus the patch.  is it true that you get more protection when you take the pill For the heart and the osteoporosis, compared to the patch?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Not with osteoporosis, and then when it comes to the pill, there’s like a little bit more of a reduction in, I think, an LDL, but when it comes to heart disease, same outcome.[01:03:00]

Same outcome. Mm hmm.  this is just a little bit of a summary. Ideally, you can start hormones within the first ten years of menopause, but the sooner the better. I mean, why wait until you’re like eight years post, unless someone’s come to you. But like, most of the time, these symptoms, you Start early and just straight.

It’s the, it’s the best for the vasculature. If you have a uterus, you have to be on progesterone, and  consider transdermal estradiol first if tolerated because it’s less inflammatory, less risk of clots, and she may be on, be on it for the rest of her life. A lot of people are like, I like the, I like Aurora, I want to just take a capsule, and honestly, if they were on it for five years, ten years, I mean, most people are fine.

Less risk of a clot than if you take birth control pills. It’s less of a risk. But because women, and now ACOG, menopause society, say that you can be on hormones until the day you die, and we know clot risk already increases as you get older, why not just start transdermally if you’re open to it?

Speaker 7: How about

Dr. Maggie Ney: Let me finish and then I’ll…I just want to say here, [01:04:00] there’s not a This is true.

There’s no family history that’s a contradication to starting hormones. So, someone could be like, I can’t be on hormones Aunt Sally, Grandma Sue, and my cousin Beatrice had breast cancer. That’s not true.

Speaker 5: Yeah, I’ve had an aunt who had breast cancer, and as soon as I mentioned hormones, all my credibility is gone.

Because their MD has terrified them. He factored on some kind of estrogen suppression. But they won’t talk, they won’t even

Dr. Maggie Ney: know. That’s a little different. I was talking about family history, like mom. But personal history, that’s where things are shifting though. It’s true because, you know, so, so often now breast cancer is caught so early, you know, you get it younger and it is, it is considered a contraindication, you know, I’m, I’m telling you with a date, like, non controversial, like, I mean, this is just the facts now, there’s no family history, but breast cancer is still [01:05:00] traditionally, like, a contraindication, but You know, so much is caught early, and what?

So women are getting breast cancer and cured, let’s say, in their 50s, and then dying from heart disease earlier. Having painful sex, they can’t urinate, they’re seriously depressed. So, again, and I, I come back to, it’s shared decision making, it’s informed consent, it’s patients, if you give them the right information, in a safe place, can make the best decision for themselves.

So things that it would be helpful if you have a family that has heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, colon cancer, we know hormone therapy has. Helps to reduce that.  failing history of Alzheimer’s. So there’s been a study that if you have the ApoE gene allele starting estrogen early, the menopause transition seems to be neuroprotective.

But yes, we need more. There wasn’t a lot of research there. Who should not go? I’m just, this is like, we could talk about the nuances, but this is just the facts. Personal history of a lung clot or pulmonary embolism. A personal history of an unprovoked blood clot. So, unprovoked meaning you’re watching TV and [01:06:00] out of nowhere you get a clot.

Where it’s provoked, like you’ve had surgery or you’re in a car accident, that’s provoked.  if you’re homozygous or factor V laden, if you have a personal history of a heart attack, stroke, or if it’s stemmed in place, obviously if you’re pregnant, if you have any unexplained vaginal bleeding or untreated endometrial hyperplasia, if you’re actively undergoing chemo, if you have active breast cancer, and then that’s where I said the prior history of breast cancer.

It is a contraindication, but the conversation is changing.

Speaker 10: Is that lung clot due to oral estrogens? I mean, is, is Is, is that where that comes from, or?

Dr. Maggie Ney: It comes from, yeah, that you already have, like, you have to figure out why you had that in the first place, but, yes, if you have had a history of a clot, then, then hormone therapy is usually contraindicated.

If it’s not, if it was unprovoked, meaning, right, like, the clot that travels from the leg, like, what, what caused that to happen in the first place? Okay, I think this is the final slide. It’s the most important one, and I’ve said it a few times, but The patient and healthcare practitioner, their [01:07:00] team. And patients really should be the CEO of their own health.

Not everything is black and white, especially when it comes to period menopause and menopause care.  there’s nuances. And risk and benefits of hormonal therapy need to be weighed against quality of life. All of this needs to be discussed openly with the patient to make them feel supported and heard.

Is there anything else?

Speaker 9: That’s it. I

Dr. Maggie Ney: can take questions I can ask. This is where you can find me.  you asked about all this, I have to answer your pellets. So, they’re very popular. I don’t recommend them. We have a new practitioner in my office who does do them. We just had, I just presented with her,  kind of like comparing, contrasting, but honestly it’s not, it’s, it’s, it’s important that patients know there’s safe options, like there’s FDA approved insurance covered options.

They need to know all their options. A lot of times women choose a pellet because they didn’t get any answers from their healthcare practitioner [01:08:00] and they’re searching and searching. Someone mentioned pellets. They have it. It’s, it tends to give, like, more super, super physiological doses. There’s benefits to it.

I know women feel amazing on them, many do. I haven’t found that I’m lacking anything in my toolkit with therapies that I talked to you about. They’re

Speaker 5: bioidentical. So

Dr. Maggie Ney: they

Speaker 5: could have a

Dr. Maggie Ney: free Yes, and the downside, yeah, they’re, they’re no creams. You don’t have to worry about transferring a cream to someone else.

If you’re working with a very skilled practitioner, side effects are very little, but I’ve seen in my practice women who have super physiologically high doses of testosterone, I’ve seen voice changes, clitoral enlargement that are permanent, and I’ve seen people feel horrible and I can’t do anything to help them.

Because it’s,  it stays in you. You support them, you can help with liver detox, you can do all those things, but I don’t like a therapy [01:09:00] I cannot take back if someone’s having a side effect.

Speaker 5: They

Dr. Maggie Ney: have to write it out. Why, why do, I mean, there’s arguments. I have my, like I said, my new doctor in our office is doing them.

I just, why? I don’t know. I have safe, effective insurance cover options. My patients feel amazing. Like, I don’t, I don’t need to go there, personally.

Speaker: Yeah, I think that’s, that’s one of the complaints about pellets. You get them in, they’re, it’s too high a dosage. You have to wait for them rather than, you know, using other forms.

So you can slowly titrate up the dosage to get the desired effect.

Speaker 7: Right. Two questions. I’m sorry. So there are standard doses you can’t

Dr. Maggie Ney: For pellets, I mean, you have like one pellet has a certain milligram of dose, and you can, and so titrate up. Basically, yeah. So

Speaker 7: there is that option. Yeah, you can have

Dr. Maggie Ney: a low dose, you can have a [01:10:00] high dose, but even a low dose is, can be high.

Speaker: Or if you start with a low dose, now you’ve got to wait 90 days to increase the dosage

Speaker 6: Versus like cream, do you have a little more flexibility in the dressing? Because you

Dr. Maggie Ney: can, yeah. Totally, I just like to have a little, my patients have a little bit more control. Ooh, a lot. A lot more control. Oh wait, I, you had a question, yeah.

Speaker 7:  how often do you do mammograms on your patients that are on hormones?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I mean, generally once a year, one to two, every, every one to two years. And I like the Sonocini too, that, that’s out of network, but,  it’s a really detailed breast ultrasound, basically. Mm hmm. It’s a nice thing to pair with the Mammos.

Speaker 9: Yes? Are there, , like nutrient depletions to consider with hormone replacement, or like, lifestyle? How do you support your patients going through with lifestyle and nutrition, basically?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, I mean, that’s a huge part. And sometimes it can help just to get their hormones down so that they’re feeling better and more motivated.

But,  I mean, I do individualize it, but the [01:11:00] overall thing is like, real whole foods first. Get rid of the old processes, and then you can more tweak it. So I do work on upping protein,   upping fiber, metabolic flexibility, meaning if someone, someone should be able to fast a little bit, you know, and not feel dizzy and lightheaded.

And when you incorporate the higher protein, the less processed carbs, you can do that better. More easily switch from burning fat for fuel to burning sugar for fuel. So metabolic flexibility, blood sugar stability, and increasing protein are the three pillars. to supporting women during this time.

Speaker 9: Okay.

There’s not the same, like, you know, oral contraceptives we see, like, you know, B vitamin depletion. Oh, no, there is not

Dr. Maggie Ney: that seen. Yeah. Right. Okay.

I like to test with,  Dutch test to see. Sometimes I’ll go off by simping because they’re having a lot of breast tenderness and clots, but, you know, the tests don’t get, like, not everyone benefits from DIMM because it does lower serum estradiol [01:12:00] levels Boo! So, but if I see someone who is not pushing down the 2 pathway for phase 1 liver detoxification, and they’re heavily in the 16 or 4, I’d like to give it to them.

Implant?

I haven’t seen that a lot, I just don’t have a lot of patients that have been on that. So, but I would say really just to support gut health and liver detoxification would be huge.

 I know people really love it. I, I, I just haven’t gone there. I just, I don’t feel too comfortable with all the safety data. I just, I always say like, I’d like to learn about it. I’d love to get more studies. My patients feel so good. I don’t feel like I’m missing, that doesn’t [01:13:00] appeal to me to like add in my toolkit right now,  because my patients are just doing so great with everything else and, and there is some concern with using it.

And I am a little bit more conservative than maybe some other functional medicine doctors.  but I, , the principles of functional medicine like addressing root cause, gut health, liver correction deficiencies, I mean, I’m so passionate about that. But then I do, I am also a research junkie and I do need to, like, see some safety data before doing some of these other therapies to feel comfortable doing it.

Speaker 7: What is your therapeutic dose for, to start, for esrivalin for testosterone?

Dr. Maggie Ney:  it depends who I’m treating, but if it’s peri, like early peri, the depression, the irritability, they’re still getting their period, I do tend to start at the lowest of. So generally, like, if you’re doing a patch, it’s the 0. 025 milligram patch.

If you’re doing a cream or a gel, it’s the 0. 25. So I start low with the, with the early peri, and then menopausal or late [01:14:00] peri, I do typically start at 0. 375. Sometimes 0. 05, 100mg, but I’ll go up to 300mg sometimes.

Speaker 7: When you go up, can you go down afterwards? Yeah. There’s no

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, go by how you feel,

Speaker 7: yeah. Do you give menopausal women a higher

Dr. Maggie Ney: dose?

Speaker 6: Typically, yes. Of estrogast?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I do.

Speaker 6: What is the conversation you have with your like mid 60 patients that come in wanting to start HRT? You said the conversation was a little bit different.

Dr. Maggie Ney: Conversation’s different with regards to benefits and risks. You’re not going to get this. It doesn’t seem to get the same cardiac benefits or cognitive benefits.

Your risk of getting a clot is higher,  in the first six months. Not forever. Really, it’s that first six months. We’re,  because our, like, the vasculature, our blood vessels do better when they haven’t taken a break from seeing estrogen. So if there’s any, like, plaque that’s developed, estrogen, which is normally anti inflammatory, can be a little bit more [01:15:00] pro inflammatory when given, you know, after that 10 year mark.

The risk isn’t huge. It’s just the, the, you’re going to have heart disease, the prevention of heart disease, the number one killer of women, I cannot say if you’re in their 60s.

Speaker 6: Probably no studies on this, but like, aesthetics wise, like, we have so many female patients that want to, like, improve, obviously, their skin, their elasticity, like, does that improve?

Is that a reason that, like, a 65 year old woman would want to go on it versus

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, better to start younger before all the sagging and, I mean, there’s such a dramatic drop in collagen and elastin as we go through perimenopause and menopause.  yes, hormones are great for the skin, even topical estrogen, you know, if you use what you use for your vaginal area, just put a little bit under your eye, that’s been great.

There are some of those, like, telemed companies need that are now giving estriol face cream. Compounding pharmacies are making estriol face cream. But anyway, that wasn’t really your question, but yes, even just hormone therapy is good for your skin. Again, not FDA approved, but, you know, we can, something, it does help.

Speaker: And Dr. Del Rizzi [01:16:00] now is giving women in their 60s It’s in 70s or, you know, it’s protocol for patients with dementia or Alzheimer’s.

Speaker 6: Replacing that.

Speaker: What about for

Speaker 6: the osteoporosis? ,

Speaker: estrogen and progesterone.

Speaker 6: For osteoporosis, is it, would you have to have testosterone to see if it’s like a significant benefit with reversing osteoporosis?

Oh, estradiol

Dr. Maggie Ney: is only with, not osteoporosis actually,  to be honest, it’s, it’s, it’s osteopenia. Like, it’s not, once you have osteoporosis, maybe estrogen’s helpful, but it’s, it’s most helpful if you can catch it before osteoporosis. When you’re in osteopenia.

Speaker 6: What about testosterone? There’s

Dr. Maggie Ney: been no studies.

But, we know it’s good for muscle, and what’s good for muscle is good for bone, so, yes, we need that. But it is good for musculoskeletal, for sure, testosterone. It’s just

Speaker 6: like most women take estrogen [01:17:00] Left out to dry or like just left off? It’s horrible. We

Dr. Maggie Ney: forget about testosterone. It’s so important. You

Speaker 6: would put, like, recommend to all of them?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I mean, I never like to, I’m never like black and white like that. But yes, testosterone would be a nice thing to add to support bone health if you’re like osteopenic. But I always, with testosterone, it is a controlled substance, so you do need to do a lab test. Unlike estrogen or progesterone where you can really go by symptoms.

If you’re going to prescribe testosterone, you need a blood test.  you need to, and then you need to check again six months after, and then every six months thereafter. You can’t, you can’t prescribe it if your numbers are already high. That’s not right. For

Speaker 7: testing, so you start off with a block, and then do you do the dutch test every six months to see where they’re at?

Dr. Maggie Ney: I mean, I don’t. I think that’s a personal preference. I, I go, I really, again, I really meet the patient where they’re at and what they want.  I don’t know, my patients, some of them are very data driven and want the, lots of testing done. I go by how they feel, [01:18:00] I go and make sure their numbers are safe, you know, maybe a, a Dutch test at one point, I mean, some people say every year,  just to make sure they’re metabolizing everything well, but,  I don’t do a lot of recurrent testing if they’re feeling good.

Speaker 7: And, and when they’re on progesterone and estrogen, they shouldn’t be bleeding at all? No. So if they’re spotty, then

Dr. Maggie Ney: So if you start hormone therapy and you haven’t bled, you know, if you’re, and you haven’t been,  if you’re kind of post menopausal, anything can happen when you’re still peri, right? So let’s say you’re post menopausal, you start on hormone therapy, the first six months, you can bleed, it’s not a red flag, you know, we’ve always been taught post menopausal bleeding is a huge red flag.

You can bleed within the first six months, you don’t have to get nervous or anything like that, but,  that can just happen. But after that, then after that, you would want to work it up. And in which case, yes, sometimes lowering the estrogen or increasing the progesterone would help with that.

Speaker 10: Would you comment on testing topical [01:19:00] hormones during salivary testing?

Dr. Maggie Ney: Yeah, I mean, listen, you could talk to a number of different doctors and get a different response. I, I don’t do a lot of saliva. I mean, I rarely, I just don’t. That’s not what I do, but doctors do do it in love and independence. You kind of do what you’re used to doing. I don’t do the saliva. I tend to, well, use mostly blood.

Okay. I, I get the pros and cons of all of it.  I like the dutch test to add in to see how people are metabolizing and I go by how people feel. I haven’t found that I needed to do like a saliva test to tweak a dose or this or that. I, I haven’t had that issue. I hear my patient, I listen to their symptoms, I look at all their other markers, we do all the lifestyle stuff, so.

I don’t know, I think it’s a tough, you gotta be careful. There’s practitioners out there that really like, I don’t know, do all this testing, all this saliva testing, then I’m going to tweak your dose based on this and come in every three months. I just, I feel bad for the patients. Like, I don’t think it’s always necessary.

It’s like a money maker for the labs, for clinicians, but I don’t [01:20:00] really think it’s necessary. I feel bad. Patients need to know there’s options, right? You know, if a patient wants it, great, they don’t need

Speaker 7: it. How about women with hyperlipidemia? Yeah. Is there any contraindication that you No, in fact it can

Speaker 8: help, can reduce it.

Speaker 5: But my lipid numbers went up and in fact, had nothing to do with my food or eating. Oh sure, it’s genetics mostly. Yeah.

Dr. Maggie Ney: So I do like to have, especially for women like in her 60s and want to start a tournament, I’ll get a coronary calcium score. Let’s get a look and see the artery, the, any calcification.  Make sure that’s okay. You know, that, that’s what I would look at as we individualize and discuss risk. And so if someone has high, really high cholesterol it’s usually genetic and you know I like to look at the arteries of the heart to see if there’s any plaque deposits.

Speaker 7: Is that a,  that’s a,  scanning?  It’s a CT scan. It’s a CT scanning, right? [01:21:00]

Speaker 9: Yes? So I guess this is going off the same type of question but let’s say someone is over 60, you know, 10 years past. menopause coming in, would you personally say the benefits still outweigh the risks, or is it kind of dependent on the person? Yeah, I think they usually do what the patient’s

Dr. Maggie Ney: experiencing, but yeah, the risks are very still slim.

 


 

Dr. Weitz: Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. For those of you who enjoy listening to the Rational Wellness Podcast. I would appreciate it if you could go to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and give us a five star ratings and review. If you would like to work with me personally to help you improve your health, I do accept a limited number of new patients per month for a functional medicine consultation.  Some of the areas I specialize in include helping patients with specific health issues like gut problems. neurodegenerative conditions, autoimmune diseases, cardiometabolic conditions, or for an executive health screen and to help you promote longevity and take a deeper dive into some of those factors that can lead to chronic diseases along the way.  Please call my Santa Monica Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition office at 310-395-3111. And we’ll set you up for a new consultation for functional medicine. And I look forward to speaking to everybody next week.

Dr. Christy Sutton discusses How to Manage High and Low Iron with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

2:40  In part I of this interview with Dr. Christy Sutton, which was episode 347, we discussed the consequences of either high or low iron levels, the genes that increase the risk of high iron, and how to test for iron status.  Today we will focus on how to manage patients with either high or low iron.

3:09  Iron deficiency anemia.  There are quite a number of negative health consequences related to low iron or to anemia, including compromising brain function and development if it occurs during pregnancy or infancy.  In fact, lower iron during pregnancy is linked to ADHD, lower IQ, and autism risk.  Anemia technically means low red blood cells or low hemoglobin, of which iron deficiency is only the most common cause.  Iron deficient anemia can create fatigue. It can create cardiovascular problems because the heart’s having to work harder to get enough oxygen to your brain and the rest of your body because there are not enough red blood cells. It can lead to depression, which then gets treated with antidepressants.  If you have a patient with iron-deficient anemia, the first question to ask is why?  Do they have a malabsorption issue, a GI bleed, are they over-exercising, or are they simply not eating enough absorbable iron, which is the heme iron found in animal foods like red meat?  Do they have the celiac gene, which could cause malabsorption, or do they have some other digestive issue, such as SIBO or IBD or H. pylori or having had part of their digestive tract removed surgically, such as with gastric bypass surgery for weight loss of part of their intestines removed because they have severe Crohn’s disease?  Do they have low iron or low copper or low minerals or do they have heavy periods or uterine fibroids that are leading to blood loss or are they taking a bile sequestrant or a proton pump inhibitor like Prilosec? 

9:39  Pregnancy.  Women usually need extra iron during pregnancy, which doesn’t just create low iron, but low everything.  OBGYNs seem to be focused on the need for folate, but they often overlook the need for iron and many other nutrients. And just taking a modest supplement may not be enough for you. Ideally, doctors should test for nutrient status and then test again during the pregnancy to see if the supplementation is adequate, though this often doesn’t happen.  Dr. Sutton was told to take 30 mg of iron, but for her during pregnancy, she need to take 150-180 mg of iron per day for most of her pregnancy to keep her ferritin at a decent level.  Sometimes iron levels can go down fast into a dangerous zone and some women may need an iron infusion or a blood transfusion.  But while this may be necessary, this is not that great for your body, since such iron is unbound iron that is damaging because it will oxidize things and steal electrons.  The type of iron–ferrous peptonate–that Dr. Sutton likes is Hemo-Lyph from Nutri-West, which is very absorbable and doesn’t create as many GI issues.  This product also contains vitamin C, which increases iron absorption.  Dr. Sutton also believes that taking NAC with iron will increase iron absorption, though she does not find adding copper is helpful.  And to maximize iron absorption, do not take iron at the same time as calcium, alpha-lipoic acid, silymarin, vitamin E, or curcumin at the same time, and also don’t take your iron at the same time as drinking tea or coffee, since these can all interfere with iron.

23:25  High Iron.  At least 31% of people have at least one of the hemochromatosis genes that leads to them being more likely to store iron.  And there are also patients with hemolytic anemia or thalassemia who have red blood cells breaking apart and spilling iron and these patients have high iron but should not remove blood, because while they have high iron, they already have low red blood cells.  When clinicians start looking at complete iron panels and start looking for iron status, it is common to find that there are many more patients having problematic high iron levels from hemochromatosis.

27:24  Treating high iron.  If you have a patient with high iron and who does not have thalassemia or hemolytic anemia, then you want to remove blood by either donating blood or going to a hematologist and having a therapeutic phlebotomy.  The hematologist can remove as much or as little blood as is needed for that patient, but it can take a while to get to see a hematologist and it can cost more, depending upon insurance coverage.  If the ferritin is very high, such as over 1000 or 2000, then you may need to have blood removed several times to get it down, so going to a hematologist may be more effective, than a blood donation center that can only remove blood every six weeks unless your doctor signs a form.

35:30  Diet and Supplements. Curcumin.  Blood donation ideally should be used in tandem with changes in diet, nutritional supplements, and lifestyle.  Of course they should avoid taking supplements with iron and should also avoid high dosages of vitamin C, which increases iron absorption.  There are several nutritional supplements that can help to remove iron and they also have the benefit of being anti-inflammatory and helping to promote your health.  The most powerful supplement is curcumin, which lowers iron by binding to it and curcumin is not only anti-inflammatory but it is anti-cancer, brain protective, and heart protective. Dr. Sutton noted that many of her patients with hemochromatosis also have a lot of joint pain and curcumin helps with this by reducing inflammation.  Dr. Sutton usually uses a higher dosage of curcumin, such as 3 grams per day.  She likes a product from Epigenozyme called Inflam-Redux Turmero and she uses six pills a day of that taken with meals, spread through the day. 

41:25  Silymarin.  Silymarin from milk thistle also binds to iron and has been shown to reduce stored iron in the brain, the liver, and the spleen. In particular, silymarin is known to protect the liver health and it can also reduce benign prostatic hypertrophy and it can also increase sperm count.

44:32  Quercetin.  Quercetin does not bind to iron but it increases hepcidin, which lowers iron absorption.  And quercetin has lots of other antioxidant and health promoting properties, including lowering histamine, which helps with allergies and some gut problems. And since one of the negative consequences of high iron is high histamine and mast cell activation, then this can be helpful. And of course quercetin helps get zinc into cells for antiviral properties.

 

 

 



Dr. Christy Sutton is a doctor of chiropractic who published her first book in 2018 on genomics: Genetic Testing: Defining Your Path to a Personalized Health Plan.  She then diagnosed her husband with hereditary hemochromatosis, and high cortisol from a pituitary tumor, which she believes high iron contributed to.  Her new book is  The Iron Curse: Is your doctor letting high iron destroy your health, about the risk of high iron or hemochromatosis and the health consequences that can result from it.  Her website is DrChristySutton.com.

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for Functional Nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure.  Dr. Weitz has also successfully helped many patients with managing their weight and improving their athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111.

 



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates. And to learn more, check out my website. drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me and let’s jump into the podcast.

                                Hello, Rational Wellness Podcasters. Today I am excited to be having a second interview with Dr. Christy Sutton on the importance of iron and iron overload. Part 1 was episode 347, and we focused mainly on the importance of iron, the problems with having too much iron as well as how to do the proper detail testing to be able to diagnose either low iron or high iron with an emphasis on the hemochromatosis or high iron. But we didn’t have time for treatment. So today we’re going to focus on how to treat patients with low or high iron.

                                Dr. Sutton is a doctor of chiropractic who’s an expert at genetics. Her first book was on genomics, Genetic Testing: Defining Your Path to a Personalized Health Plan. Dr. Sutton is also an expert at diagnosing and treating iron problems, especially high iron or hemochromatosis as well as anemia. Her new book is The Iron Curse: Is Your Doctor Letting High Iron Destroy Your Health?  Dr. Sutton finds that hemochromatosis or high iron is more common than most people think, and it’s often undiagnosed. High iron is also a topic that is really discussed in the functional medicine world and may be an underlying problem with patients suffering from liver, cardiovascular, or neurological problems. On the other hand, iron is an absolutely essential mineral is needed by nearly every organ in the body, nearly all the cells. In fact, I was just listening to a podcast by Dr. Peter Attia on my drive in here, and he mentioned that 2% of the human genome encodes for iron-related proteins, which is staggering amount, and that 6.5% of all enzymes in the human body are iron-dependent.  Dr. Sutton, thank you so much for joining us again today.

Dr. Sutton:          Thanks for having me.

Dr. Weitz:            Good. So as I mentioned, in part 1 we discussed the consequences of low or high iron. We talked about the genes that increase the risk of high iron and how to test for iron status. So today I’d like to focus on how do we manage patients with either high or low iron and perhaps maybe go through a few examples.

Dr. Sutton:          Okay.

Dr. Weitz:            Great. Why don’t we start with iron deficiency anemia? And we’ll spend most of the time on high iron. So iron deficient anemia is too little iron which can compromise brain health. Women often will have problems with not having enough iron during pregnancy, and this can lead to higher risk of developmental brain issues with children including ADHD, lower IQ, autism.

Dr. Sutton:          Yes, so there’s certainly a plethora of negative health consequences related to low iron, anemia. So technically, anemia doesn’t mean just low iron. It means you just don’t have enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin. There’s multiple different types of anemias. You could have adequate iron but still be anemic because you have low red blood cells or low hemoglobin. But if we’re just going to talk about iron deficient anemia, that is a common problem and it can look like fatigue. It can create cardiovascular issues because your heart’s having to work harder. Any anemia can make your heart have to work harder because now your heart has to pump faster basically to get enough oxygen to your brain and your arms and legs and your whole body because there’s not enough healthy red blood cells, not enough oxygen being carried. And so it can really just wreck your life, long-term health consequences and short-term.  And unfortunately, it’s I think being also misdiagnosed a lot. It could create a depression-type problem, and then maybe your doctor treats you with an antidepressant rather than… Just like low thyroid could create a depression-type problem and then you get mistreated. These are common issues that slight tangent of subject here, but in my opinion, psychiatric medicine could maybe have some room for improvement with ruling out other diagnostic issues rather than just using SSRIs or antidepressants, but that’s a tangent. But low iron is one of those things that can create a lot of neurological issues.

                                And if we want to focus on the treatment piece of that, then the hardest part of that piece is figuring out why you’re anemic. If you have iron-deficient anemia, why? And then ultimately you have to fix that and then increase, change your environment so that you fix the why on top of getting your iron levels back up. And so the why is the wild card.  And the most common reasons for low iron are blood loss, which is one reason that females tend to become anemic. So much more common than men. Although men can become anemic. If a man’s anemic, especially if they’re eating red meat, then you have to rule out do they have a malabsorption issue, a GI bleed, are they over-exercising? Even over-exercising in men doesn’t tend to create anemia type issues if they’re eating iron, but certainly vegan vegetarian diet will cause iron deficient anemia because the most absorbable iron is heme iron, which is only found in animal products. So this is why I could eat a pound of spinach and not get as much iron as I would and a couple bites of a steak because it has more iron in the steak and it’s more absorbable. That’s key.

                                So it’s not just the absorption. And you have to look at does somebody have… A big one now, it’s people that are taking PPIs, like proton pump inhibitors and they’re not absorbing iron or really other nutrients, period, because it’s all the acids being depleted in their stomach. That’s a big problem that causes low iron and low copper and other minerals and low protein and just malabsorption period. And then having any type of a GI bleed will cause low iron, whether it’s in your stomach. Do you have an H. pylori infection in your stomach that can cause it? Do you have a GI bleed anywhere in your digestive system, which is common? Do you have maybe a malabsorption issue from celiac disease that’s undiagnosed and untreated? That’s a common issue as well, which is one reason that I talk about the celiac gene and celiac disease in my book and talk about that. And then-

Dr. Weitz:            Even dysbiosis and SIBO will decrease absorption of nutrients?

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, just I mean any digestive issue. Having part of your bowels removed or having the… It’s not as common now that people are losing weight other ways, but in the past when a lot of people were getting the bypass surgery to lose weight where they just kind of bypass the first part of your small intestine, that will cause low iron, low copper, low minerals because minerals are absorbed largely in the first foot of your small. So if you bypass that part, you’re going to have a lot of problems, which is one reason that they have so many issues.  And then certain medications like bile sequestering. Not a lot of people take those, but they will bind to iron. So there’s just a lot of factors. But probably the most common reason that I see low iron is because of heavy periods, malabsorption, fibroids. Women that just, they have uterine fibroids and they’re bleeding heavily. It’s just really hard to get enough iron to make up for this chronic blood loss that you’re experiencing.

Pregnancy is a great way to become low in iron because making a human being is very nutrient dependent, including iron and pretty much every other nutrient, which is why pregnancy doesn’t just create low iron but creates low everything. And then that low everything ultimately is a big part of the pregnancy complications and postpartum issues and even developmental problems in the baby.  Another side tangent. I wish that OBGYNs did a better job with the nutritional part of pregnant women. And I experienced that firsthand. I’ve seen that countless times in my own patient population. And they seem really focused on, are you getting enough folate? Which is important, but it’s like, “Well, there’s a lot of other nutrients that we need here too.” And me personally, when I was pregnant, I did become anemic and I went into pregnancy with, I think my ferritin was maybe in the 60s or 70s, which for me is a solid ferritin because I kind of have fought a low iron issue. So 60s or 70s is pretty good going into pregnancy. I knew it was going to go down. I didn’t know how fast.  So I took iron throughout my whole pregnancy, but around, I want to say week eight or week nine, I just did some labs on myself and I was like, “Oh, I’m getting lower. I need to take more iron.” And then a couple weeks later, the doctor did some labs on me and I was even lower, and they said, “Okay, you need to start taking 30 milligrams of iron now.” And I’m like, “I’m already taking 90 milligrams of iron.” So I think I ended up taking 150 or 180 milligrams of iron a day for most of my pregnancy, and my husband would have to just sit there and force me to swallow these pills because I was like… Because these iron pills smell so bad and I just couldn’t make myself do it. But his job was, I had this bag of vitamins I had to swallow every day. And it literally took another human being making me to do it because I was not otherwise going to do it. So anyways, but I’ve seen that time and time again with pregnant women.

Dr. Weitz:            One of the important things you just highlighted there is it’s often that a patient may be going into pregnancy, she might get tested once for iron and then just told to take iron as part of a prenatal, but rarely will they get tested again to see if it’s actually working or to what extent it’s working. So as we know in the functional medicine world, we’re big on testing. And the reason is because we need to see exactly what’s going on. We need to see the underlying cause. And then if we make an intervention, we need to see if it’s actually working, is it working too much, is it not working enough. And in order to try to save money, doctors tend not to retest.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. And unfortunately with iron in pregnancy, it can go down fast into a dangerous zone. And that’s where often women end up needing iron infusions, which an iron infusion is where they just inject iron into your blood, which is different than a blood transfusion. So a blood transfusion is where you get somebody else’s blood, there are red blood cells, hemoglobin. There’s iron in there, but you’re also getting the red blood cells and everything and the blood rather than just iron. And so a lot of pregnant women, they’ll need either an iron infusion or a blood transfusion depending on their situation. And there’s side effects to both of these, right?

                                So with a blood transfusion, you’re at risk for getting whatever. If somebody was taking a medicine or has a disease or toxic in something, then you just got their blood and now you have that in you. That’s obvious. We know about that. With the iron infusion, there’s side effects that are a little bit less known. People that have gotten iron infusions, some of them, they don’t feel a problem, but often they’ll have a bad reaction and they’ll feel really bad. And iron infusions always cause a lot of oxidative stress in the body because it’s unbound iron, it’s just free iron. And unbound iron is particularly damaging because iron is very reactive and it will go out and oxidize things and steal electrons. And it doesn’t do that if you absorb iron through your digestive system and then your digestive system binds that iron to a protein so that it’s protecting you from this potentially problematic iron that we need, but the body has figured out how to use it in a protective way.

                                And so the iron in the body without being bound to that protein is very reactive and creates a lot of rust oxidative stress in the body. So one thing that people need to do for the treatment part of this talk is if they are going to get an iron infusion, they really need to do a lot of antioxidants, vitamin C, glutathione, in my opinion, if you’re giving somebody a iron infusion, then give them some glutathione too or vitamin C later or before or whatever. Just vitamin E. All of these antioxidants have been shown to be protective from iron-induced damage. But circling back to other causes of low iron, we talked about-

Dr. Weitz:            So we’re talking about adding iron to somebody who’s low in iron. Is there a form of iron you like and then what other nutrients can be added or what can be done to increase their likelihood of absorbing the iron?

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, that’s a good idea. So there’s lots of different types of iron. The one that I use in my practice the most is a ferrous peptonate form. The company that makes it is a company called Nutri-West. It’s called Hemo-Lyph. Why I like it is that it’s very absorbable and patients feel better. We’re using it. It doesn’t create as many GI issues. It doesn’t create the stomach pain and constipation like a lot of the other ones. And part of that is because of the form and because it’s highly absorbable.

Dr. Weitz:            What about the ferrous bisglycinate?

Dr. Sutton:          Hold on. I have to tell you the cons of the Hemo-Lyph first.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, okay.

Dr. Sutton:          The cons of the Hemo-Lyph is that they do put folic acid in there, so you’ll want to take some methylfolate with it just to protect yourself from that folic acid.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, okay.

Dr. Sutton:          But that’s kind of a side note. I don’t know why they do that. It’s weird, but you know. I have looked for and not found another one that I like more. And if I find one I like more, I’ll change to that. I don’t profit at all from that Nutri-West, like whatever. I think it’s a good company. It’s a family-owned company that makes good products, but I’m more than happy to change to another company if I find a better product. I just haven’t yet.  Now the ferrous bisglycinate, I’ve seen ferrous bisglycinate and used it in patients because sometimes people will want a non-animal source of iron. And the hemolyte does have some animal source in there, and that’s probably why so absorbable. So there is a ferrous bisglycinate product that I have used in some hardcore vegan vegetarians, and they do not do as well with it. So I have used it. It’s not my preferred. My preferred is the ferrous peptonate Hemo-Lyph. What I don’t like, which is most commonly found on the shelves and prescribed, is ferrous sulfate, which is not very absorbable. But okay, so-

Dr. Weitz:            That’s the one most often prescribed I think by AMDs.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, exactly. And so that’s the type. Okay, so then the second part of it, this question is, “Well, how do you take it?” Okay, the biggest problem people encounter when taking iron is it causes them either constipation or stomach pain. And then that is the number one reason that they don’t follow instructions for taking iron. So if you take iron with food, it is less likely to create that stomach pain. If you start getting constipated, then just lower to a lower dose. Sometimes people start getting constipated even with a really good iron source just because they’re getting too much of it, okay?  And if you’re going to take iron, then don’t take it around the same time as things that are going to bind to iron like calcium. Calcium binds to iron, this is one reason that young kids eat a lot of calcium tend to be anemic. But don’t take calcium around the same type of iron. Don’t take curcumin around the same time as iron. Any supplements that bind to in lower iron, alpha-lipoic acid, silymarin, don’t take those at the same time as the iron. Even vitamin E can do that to some extent because it can bind to the iron and render it less absorbable.

                                Don’t drink coffee or tea around the time that you’re consuming iron supplements or an iron rich meal because that will decrease iron absorption. If you’re taking a medication to lower acid or a bile sequester or something that’s going to lower iron absorption, try to take that medication away from your iron supplements, iron rich meal, that type of thing if possible. Or better yet, if you can fix the underlying problem, fix it. Why are you on a PPI for 20 years? Maybe that’s something that needs to be looked into.  So the when you take it and how you take it is very important. And then fixing the underlying problem, like are you a celiac patient that is going to chronically be low in nutrients if you don’t just get on a gluten-free diet or whatever? So that’s crucial. Was there anything that I left out there? Oh, some people get low in copper and that copper deficient anemia can cause iron deficient anemia too, which is becoming more well-known as people talk about it more. But in some cases people will need to take some copper with or in lieu of iron to help absorb iron better because if you’re low in copper, you’ll become low in iron.

Dr. Weitz:            Which is why I think you see some combination iron products designed to help improve red blood cell production. Include copper. Usually they throw in some vitamin C. Usually they throw in-

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, I forgot to talk about vitamin C. But yeah, vitamin C will increase iron absorption. You’re totally right. That’s a great point. I have tried the products that have copper in them that Hemo-Lyph doesn’t have it in it, and they caused more problems in people. And then I tried it on myself and I had problems and I was like, “Forget about it.” But you have to find what works for you. And then taking vitamin C around the same time or eating vitamin C-rich foods, that’s a well-known way to increase iron. And then NAC can also do that, so N-acetylcysteine. If you take NAC around the same time as iron, then that can increase iron absorption as well.  And then just, I mean, I think really eating as much iron-rich food as possible. The best way to get your iron levels up is through your diet, you’re going to absorb that the best. And then it’s just a matter of if you’re a vegan or a vegetarian, are you willing and able to eat more iron in your diet that’s absorbable, which is probably going to mean veering away from that vegan vegetarian diet? And some people do that and other people are not willing to, and then you just try to walk the line. But it’s certainly can be a challenge for a lot of people, mostly women, mostly women in childbearing years because they’re menstruating. Postmenopausal women tend to not have as many issues with high low iron. And that’s where you see a lot of hemochromatosis women that say, “I have been low in iron. I can’t be high in iron.” I was like, “Well, yep, you’re not menstruating anymore. Sorry.”

Dr. Weitz:            So let’s go into high iron, which is I think fascinating topic. I had no idea there were as many people who have problems with high iron. And you mentioned in your book that at least 31% of people have at least one of these hemochromatosis genes, and that’s only referring to two of the genes, and there’s a third gene that’s usually not even mentioned. So we probably have more than 30% of the population as a propensity to absorb and store more iron.

Dr. Sutton:          Yes. Yeah. Have you started looking for high iron more or looking iron labs more?

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah. In fact, I just recently had a woman and her daughter and the mother is a vegan. She’s not a lifelong vegan, and her iron was sky-high, so were her hematocrit and hemoglobin. She was shocked and nobody even looked at that for her.

Dr. Sutton:          As a vegan, so does she have those genes?

Dr. Weitz:            We didn’t check the genes. I asked her to send me her 23andMe, and she was having a tough time getting the raw data because 23andMe is having all these problems with being hacked. Everybody’s getting hacked. So I don’t know, but her daughter also has a propensity for storing iron.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. Then statistically speaking, there’s a good chance. And you have to rule that out because the question is, why is this happening? And so yeah, that’s interesting. But yeah, as clinicians really start looking more, I think their eyes open to like, “Oh, this is a common problem that maybe hasn’t been on my radar and I haven’t really been looking at it properly.” And so as a clinician, it’s kind of like to me an easy fun thing because this is easy. And we get to catch something that could really damage your health and even your family’s health if you have that gene. And we get to catch it hopefully before it does. Or if it has already created issues like, “Well, we get to work on the steps to help support your health so that you get better” and you don’t have to actually find answers rather than just more diagnostic codes and more medications.

Dr. Weitz:            You [inaudible 00:26:02] complex the problem is this. I have an eighty-year-old woman who was having fatigue and her red blood cells and hematocrit were low. So the doctor right away said she needed iron, but he couldn’t put her on any iron because he had to send her to a hematologist. And that took months to get an appointment. And so I just put her on some iron and her iron came up, and then I realized her iron shot up really high. I looked back and I had her bring in her labs. For a while, she had a keratin level of 1,200 and nobody was seeing anything. So this is somebody who has a propensity to store iron. And now she’s had lower iron and nobody asked why. So we just did a stool test and she’s losing iron in her stool. So there’s an underlying problem. And this is, I think, the real message of functional medicine. Let’s search for the underlying cause and not just treat the symptom.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, totally. It would be interesting that ferritin could also be high from inflammation. That’s where you have to look at the full iron panel. I think we talked about that last time, but I’ve slept since then, so I will not go back to that. I’ll focus on the task.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay. Yeah, so let’s talk about… so we have a patient with high iron, and so the options of things to do involve therapeutic phlebotomy, changing the way they eat. And then you go through a bunch of supplements. And some of those supplements, you also have some great clinical pearls that I want to mention when we go through them.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. Do you want to start with the therapeutic phlebotomy or do you want start-

Dr. Weitz:            Sure.

Dr. Sutton:          Okay. So in the Iron Curse, I have the Iron Curse protocols, which is basically like five steps that you can learn about and use to help lower iron regardless of if it’s hereditary hemochromatosis or iron loading anemia, like a hemolytic anemia or a thalassemic anemia. If you have high iron and you want to lower it-

Dr. Weitz:            By the way, for anybody who doesn’t know what Dr. Sutton just said, that thalassemia or hemolytic anemia means you have some condition where your red blood cells are breaking apart and spilling iron.

Dr. Sutton:          Exactly. Exactly. And so those people can have low red blood cells, but be high in iron, and that’s called an iron loading anemia. So thank you for clarifying that.  So step one of the Iron Curse protocols is remove blood if you can. Not everybody can remove blood. So for example, if you have low red blood cells, low hemoglobin, you don’t want to remove blood because you’re anemic and you will only become more anemic if you remove blood.  By the way, I’m seeing this a lot. People are coming to me and they have low ferritin and their person they’re working with is telling them to go donate blood to help mobilize the iron, and then their health crashes afterwards. I don’t think it’s a good idea to be donating blood if you have a low ferritin. I think that’s counterintuitive. And there’s a reason that people’s health crashes after that because now you were already struggling and now you just made it worse. So as long as we’re talking about donating blood, I just felt like I needed to put that little pearl in there. There is a school of thought out there.

Dr. Weitz:            [inaudible 00:29:45]-

Dr. Sutton:          There is a school of thought out there that… And I’m having more people coming and asking me about this, and I’m like, “I have no idea why you would donate blood when you’re low in iron. That doesn’t make sense to me.” And the proof is in the pudding, tasting of the pudding, and you felt worse afterwards. So there you go. It wasn’t a good idea.  Okay. But donating blood for people with hemochromatosis or not even donating blood, just removing blood. So if you have hemochromatosis hereditary hemochromatosis-

Dr. Weitz:            What’s the difference between removing blood and donating blood?

Dr. Sutton:          Okay. So if you go to a hematologist and have a blood removal, it’s basically the same thing as if you go to the blood donation center and have a blood removal if you donate whole blood. The difference is the advantage to the hematologist is that they can remove as much as they want, they can remove more or less. The hematologists are also much more specific about testing the full iron panel and the CBC before removing blood. Whereas if you go to the blood donation center, they’re not looking at the full iron panel, they’re just making sure like, do you have enough red blood cells in hemoglobin? If you don’t, they won’t let you donate blood. So the hematologist is just looking at it more specifically for hemochromatosis patients, which is why it’s really a better option.  The downside is, as you mentioned, it’s hard sometimes to get into a hematologist, especially if it’s your first visit. It’s also much more expensive. If you don’t have a great healthcare plan or haven’t met your deductible, it’s going to cost a lot more. Whereas if you can donate blood, that’s free. But if you have some type of an STD or you’re taking a blood thinner or there’s some reason you cannot donate blood, then you can have blood removed to lower iron either by going to the hematologist and having them do it and then disposing of the blood, or getting a doctor to sign a form called a therapeutic blood phlebotomy form. And that allows the blood donation center to remove blood, and then they just dispose of it rather than give it to somebody else.  So it’s basically the same thing. It’s just if you go to the hematologist, it’s going to be more specific for hemochromatosis patients. Whereas the blood donation center, they’re not treating you, you’re a good Samaritan removing blood unless you go with that signed therapeutic phlebotomy and then they’ll remove the blood and throw it away. But you have to have a doctor sign that. They also-

Dr. Weitz:            What if you have a vampire doing it?

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, I haven’t researched that. I’ll have to look up vampire on PubMed and hemochromatosis.

Dr. Weitz:            Sorry to throw you off.

Dr. Sutton:          But I bet it would work really well. But then you have the risk of an infection in your neck and you might have to take antibiotics because of the wound from the fangs.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, yeah, there you go. Thanks.

Dr. Sutton:          So donating blood, removing blood, whatever, that’s going to quickly lower iron because there’s a lot of iron in your blood. And so when people first get diagnosed with hemochromatosis, whether it’s hereditary or non-hereditary, because diagnosis is so poor, they often are really sick. Their ferritin is over a 1,000, sometimes over 2,000 or 3,000. And then they go to the hematologist, which unfortunately it takes forever to get in. And usually, they’ll have blood removed if possible and they’ll try to remove blood as frequently as possible. So if you go to the hematologist, they can remove blood more frequently. Whereas if you go to the blood donation center as just a donator, you can only remove blood like every six weeks unless they sign a form. Your doctor signs a form that says you can go more often in a two-week interval or whatever.

                                But regardless of how you’re getting that blood removed, at some point in time, if your iron’s really, really high, you will be limited by getting the lower iron by not being able to remove more blood. Because at some point in time your iron’s still going to be high, but you’re going to become anemic because you just removed so many red blood cells and hemoglobin, but you still have so much iron stored in your body. And then you have to wait, well, this is without step 2, 3, 4, 5, you have to wait for your hemoglobin and red blood cells to come back up before you can remove blood again. And so because blood donation is like the primary tool used by hematology and they’re not using these supplements, they talk about don’t take vitamin C, don’t take iron, things like that, but they don’t really dig into using the supplements, which I think is a huge disadvantage to their patient population. And I hope that my book helps to change that.  So anyways, blood donation is a very useful way. I think it always needs to be used in tandem with diet, supplements, lifestyle. If you go to the hematologist, they’re probably just going to be using the blood donation. In some rare cases, they might use a pharmaceutical chelation, which they have a lot of side effects. And the research that I put in my book shows that the nutrients actually work better without the side effects and have positive health promoting side effects, health promoting benefits. So-

Dr. Weitz:            Let’s go through some of those nutrients.

Dr. Sutton:          Okay. So the nutrients are, the most common one that I use is curcumin because it’s anti-inflammatory. I’m a chiropractor like you. A lot of people, my hemochromatosis patients, have a lot of joint pain from high iron and other reasons too, but part of it is the inflammation from the iron. And so the nice thing about the curcumin is that it can lower iron, but it also decreases inflammation and can help with some joint pain related to that. And then the patient feels better. That gives them… Because some of these people-

Dr. Weitz:            Curcumin is an amazing supplement. If you look at the anti-cancer properties, the brain protective, heart protective, curcumin is an amazing supplement. So it’s definitely one of my favorites.

Dr. Sutton:          It is one of my favorites. As a low iron person, I wish somebody would invent a curcumin that lowered inflammation without lowering iron. But I don’t think that exists. Because I have Crohn’s and even I’ve had a gastroenterologist say, “Curcumin is great for that.” In fact, I remember the conversation vividly, it was years ago before I wrote the book, he was like, “Curcumin is great for inflammatory bowel disease. For some reason it lowers iron, but we don’t know why.” I’m like, “Well, actually we don’t know why it binds iron, but that’s okay. It’s still good information.” So yeah, curcumin is a great one.

Dr. Weitz:            And one of the clinical pearls, actually, I’m going to mention two clinical pearls that you just happen to mention that I’m not sure everybody’s aware of that is really interesting is turmeric can cause kidney damage, but curcumin does not. So the patients who come in and say, “Well, I’m taking turmeric,” I usually inform them that turmeric is very poorly absorbed and even curcumin is not absorbed so we have to use a specialized form of curcumin. But that’s interesting that turmeric can have some possible other side effects, especially if you’re trying to use it at a high therapeutic dosage. And number two, you mentioned that curcumin interacts with tamoxifen and can increase its efficacy in the treatment of breast cancer and can even prevent, tamoxifen, cancers from growing and reduce the toxicity of tamoxifen. And tamoxifen is an estrogen-blocking drug often used as part of a protocol for patients being treated for breast cancer. So extra benefit of curcumin.

Dr. Sutton:          Yes. Yeah, that’s great. I forgot about those little things. Good job.

Dr. Weitz:            And to reduce iron, we have to use a relatively high dosage of curcumin, correct?

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. I mean, I feel like the most common dosage I see for that type of an equation is a 3 gram a day, which most the curcumin that I use is 500 milligrams per pill, which is a-

Dr. Weitz:            Which one?

Dr. Sutton:          I use… So it’s Epigenozyme, which full disclosure is my brand, but that’s Epigenozyme Inflam-Redux Turmero. And I use six pills a day of that for if it’s like an acute situation. Whether it’s acute pain. I really like to have an iron panel on anybody I’m putting curcumin on because I don’t want to cause them to be anemic. If they’re anemic, I’m probably not going to give them curcumin even if they’re in pain and it’s inflammatory pain because I don’t want to create a problem. Let’s figure out how to fix this without causing another problem. But for a high iron person, 3 grams a day, which is about six pills a day. Now one limiting factor is in some people it can cause some loose stools. And so sometimes you just have to dose up to your bowel tolerance. Spreading it out throughout the day helps and taking it with meals can help as well.

Dr. Weitz:            Do you take it after the meal, with the meal, before the meal?

Dr. Sutton:          I would say with, with the meal, because the meal is where the iron is, and so it’s going to have the biggest effect there. It’s also less likely to create gastric issues, if so.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Sutton:          So taking it with a meal is a good idea. And then I just wanted to add, the reason that turmeric causes kidney issues in some people is because it’s high in oxalates, whereas the curcumin is not high in oxalates. When you’re doing something therapeutically, it’s really important to make sure that you are consistent and you’re able to measure what you’re doing to know if it is or is not working. And so while if a patient just wants to do turmeric, it’s like, “I don’t know how much turmeric you’re taking on a daily basis in your diet.” I’m not saying don’t eat turmeric. There’s a lot of good things about turmeric. I just don’t think if you’re going to be using curcumin therapeutically to turmeric as a good option, just for the same reasons you mentioned, so yeah.

Dr. Weitz:            And the next nutrient you mentioned in your book is silymarin from milk thistle.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, silymarin’s great too. So before I say anything about silymarin, I think it’s worth mentioning that there is some research that shows that silymarin, curcumin, some alpha-lipoic acid, some of these iron binders, they have been shown to decrease stored iron in the brain, the liver, the spleen. I think that’s really valuable information. I don’t really have this problem with my hemochromatosis patients, but I have seen on a lot of the Facebook groups, like people that say, “Oh, I have this joint pain and my iron levels are normal.” And it’s like, “Well, either you’re not fixing the underlying cause of the joint pain. It could be something else. It could be rheumatoid arthritis. I don’t know. You’re not my patient. I don’t know what’s going on with you.” But really adding that curcumin helps with a lot of unresolved joint pain in these hemochromatosis patients because I think it’s getting the iron out of the joint.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s fascinating. And we also know that amyloid plaque, one of the reasons why it’s laid down in the brain, which is related to Alzheimer’s disease, is to protect the brain, the neurons, against heavy metals. And too much iron can be a heavy metal that can damage the brain, so…

Dr. Sutton:          Mm-hmm. Yeah. Yeah. So that’s worth knowing. And then silymarin, it also binds to iron. Well, curcumin is very good for the liver. silymarin is particularly one of its better attributes if an herb can have an attribute, is that it’s really good for the liver. So silymarin is the extract from milk thistle. So because hemochromatosis is quite ruthless and unrelentless to the liver, it is very nice to have something that will both lower iron and protect your liver. It is in the ragweed family, so if you’re super allergic to ragweed, then it might not be your best option.

Dr. Weitz:            You also point out, another clinical pearl, that silymarin, this is for men, can increase the number of sperm, and we know sperm counts are going down. And it can reduce BPH, benign prostatic hypertrophy. I didn’t know that. So that’s another…

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. Yeah, that’s good. I forgot a lot about these clinical pearls honestly. There’s a lot in this-

Dr. Weitz:            There’s a lot of them.

Dr. Sutton:          There is a lot in this book.

Dr. Weitz:            You threw in there and I was like, “Whoa!” 

Dr. Sutton:          I know. I need to go back and read it, but honestly I never want to read it. I’m so tired of looking at it, so thank you for helping me remember.  Okay. And then the next one is quercetin. I do use a lot of quercetin. Quercetin does not bind to iron, but rather it increases hepcidin, which lowers iron absorption. The problem with people that have hereditary hemochromatosis is that they do not have enough hepcidin. They’re naturally low in hepcidin. That’s what the genetic change does to their body. That enzyme that makes hepcidin, it just makes less hepcidin. So if you take quercetin, it can boost the hepcidin production and decrease iron absorption. And then quercetin just has a lot of other wonderful antioxidant health-promoting effects as well. Lowers histamines, so it can help with allergies. Quercetin-

Dr. Weitz:            You mentioned also in your book that one of the side effects of high iron can be mast cell activation and high histamine.

Dr. Sutton:          Right. Yeah. Yeah. So that’s a good one. And then of course with the pandemic, quercetin kind of got its heyday with it being a… It can help drive zinc into the cell.

Dr. Weitz:            Exactly.

Dr. Sutton:          And then there’s berberine. I don’t use as much berberine because we will talk about what berberine does. It also increases hepcidin. And there’s a lot of good research that shows berberine’s great for the liver and lowering cholesterol and the heart. However, I had one patient that she took berberine and her liver enzymes went high. And it kind of made me uncomfortable using the… I had to rethink berberine because if you have a hemochromatosis patient, their liver enzymes might already be high. Maybe you need to hold off on the berberine because if somebody has high liver enzymes already because hemochromatosis and you give them berberine, you might not know if their liver enzymes are going high because of the hemochromatosis or the berberine. So in my opinion, and this is a newer opinion, is if you have hemochromatosis and you want to lower iron, wait until your liver enzymes are in a normal range and you’re in a more managed range before you consider adding the berberine.

Dr. Weitz:            Just my clinical experience, whatever that’s worth, I use a lot of berberine. I love berberine, I use it for blood sugar lowering. It’s one of the few things that’s been able to reverse atherosclerotic plaque. Berberine is… I’ve not seen any patients who had an increase in the liver enzymes from taking berberine. Berberine is like a natural form of metformin.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. No, I love berberine. I’m not willing to take it off the table, but I feel like I needed to tell that story so that maybe berberine is not used at the very beginning. Maybe you wait until the liver enzymes are normal because then if it does cause them to go high… And I think this lady just had something else going on that was like-

Dr. Weitz:            Well, a lot of times patients are doing multiple things, you know?

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, I mean she was pretty certain it was berberine and I couldn’t say otherwise. But there is some research that shows that berberine can increase liver enzymes, but then there’s other research that shows that it lowers it. So berberine is a great thing.

Dr. Weitz:            [inaudible 00:48:06]. Another clinical pearl in your book you mentioned berberine is useful for autoimmune patients because it suppresses pro-inflammatory responses to Th1 and Th17 and increases T-regulatory cells.

Dr. Sutton:          Oh, that’s great. Can you just read that chapter to me?

Dr. Weitz:            I always listen to my own podcast and my wife goes, “Why are you listening to yourself? “It’s because sometimes I find out stuff that we forgot to edit, and so it’s important.

Dr. Sutton:          Uh-huh. Yeah. It is good. I cannot listen to myself. And apparently I cannot read my own writing.  Okay. And then the next one is glutathione. Glutathione does not lower iron, however, it’s essential for everybody, particularly hemochromatosis patients because it protects the whole body, liver, brain, heart, spleen, pancreas, joints, everything from high iron and iron-induced damage. And it protects from ferroptosis, which is where high iron causes damage to the cells and then the cells die. So you know if you have high iron, you’re going to be low in glutathione. And then the best thing to do is to just supplement with extra glutathione. And I like the liposomal glutathione. That is liquid. So if you’re a pill person, the S-Acetyl L-Glutathione is a good option as well. What you don’t want to do is you don’t want to do N-acetylcysteine while your iron levels are high because that can increase iron absorption.

Dr. Weitz:            You mentioned a really high dosage of glutathione. I know the form of liposomal glutathione that I like, which is the Quicksilver one comes in 100 milligrams strength, and you mentioned taking 1,000 milligrams. So with that one it might be hard to get it up to that level.

Dr. Sutton:          10 pumps a day.

Dr. Weitz:            Oh, okay.

Dr. Sutton:          It’s not that hard.

Dr. Weitz:            Okay.

Dr. Sutton:          It might be expensive, but it’s not that hard.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:            Good.

Dr. Sutton:          And in acute situations is where you need the higher dosage. As somebody gets into a more managed range, you can adjust and lower or remove as you desire. But if somebody has a high ferritin, their iron ranges are out of range, then that’s an acute situation and you are definitely protecting yourself from damage by taking extra glutathione.

Dr. Weitz:            That’s great. You mentioned CoQ10 and resveratrol as well.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, so CoQ10 does not lower iron. However, it’s analogous to glutathione and that it helps to protect from iron induced damage. People that have high iron tend to be low in CoQ10. And low CoQ10 not only make you feel bad, but it is really bad for your heart and your health. So that’s an important way to protect.

Dr. Weitz:            And there’s two forms of CoQ10 on the market, ubiquinone and the ubiquinol. Ubiquinol is much more expensive and is marketed as more highly absorbed. You mentioned that, another clinical pearl, is that the ubiquinol is actually better absorbed.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. In my opinion, and I think if you really ask some of these supplement companies and they’ll give you an honest answer, they’ll agree with me. Ubiquinol is a scam. It’s a scam. It’s a way to get people to pay more for the “activated form.” And the reason it’s a scam is because it’s, one, it’s not shelf stable. So they might put ubiquinol in that supplement, but it has converted to ubiquinone usually by the time you take it, okay? And if it is ubiquinol, then it will convert to ubiquinone in your digestive system because ubiquinol is not absorbed well in the digestive system. Ubiquinone, the cheaper stuff, is well absorbed. And once you absorb it, it will get converted into ubiquinol.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. And you mentioned resveratrol. You mentioned in your book that it suppresses iron overload, induced heart fibrosis and improves cardiac function. I didn’t know that about resveratrol.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. Resveratrol for the heart and people with any heart issue. It’s also really good for the brain. But because if you have high iron, you’re more likely to have fibrotic heart, heart disease, heart failure, heart issues, resveratrol is very protective against that. It does not lower the iron, but it’s very protective against the iron-induced damage in the heart, which is valuable.

Dr. Weitz:            Cool. Great. Maybe you can give us one example of a patient that you were managing with higher iron and then we can wrap.

Dr. Sutton:          Okay. Well, yesterday I talked to a lady who I’ve had maybe four visits with her. She found me. She did, I think the Iron Curse workshop because I think she kind of knew she had some high iron issues that the doctors were not looking at. I don’t know how she found me or the workshop, but she took the workshop and she started using some of that information to make some changes. And what she did was really valuable is she got the genetic testing and the labs. She did the best she could. And then she made a couple appointments with me.

                                So she has one C282Y gene. The first appointment with her, she was still pretty high in ferritin. I might be on the numbers here, but I think her ferritin was in the 500s, but had come down from the 700s with the work that she had done, and she basically diagnosed herself. She wanted to talk to me for confirmation. Yes, she had a high iron saturation, like 55, and then she had a high ferritin, but nobody else cared. She figured out herself. And then she came to me and we just talked about it and she wanted my confirmation. I’m like, “Yeah, you do have a problem. You really do need a hematologist.” And she is in the process of trying to get one, but their finances are pretty rough right now for multiple reasons, and I don’t know if it’s going to happen.

                                So anyways, so what we did was she had kind of started a couple supplements, but you know what I’m talking about. People come in and they hear about something, and then they start it and then they hear about something else and they start it. And they’re just, by the time they come in, they have 30 different things and they have this bag, and it’s like, “Well, these are good in theory, but this isn’t what you need. If you just want to wing it, and a lot of these things, they’re kind of working against each other and the quality might not be there.” And so what we did was we just-

Dr. Weitz:            [inaudible 00:56:00] just combination products that have things that are good and things that aren’t.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah, exactly. And so what we did was we tailored down her supplement list to more specifically her needs, which her biggest problem was not just the high iron, but she has an Alzheimer’s gene too and was dealing with a lot of brain fog. And so what we did, what she started taking was she started taking… I just saw her yesterday, so this is all fresh in my head, but I’m not looking at it so I might be wrong a little bit. She started taking a higher dose of curcumin. So I think she was taking two. We tried to put her on six, but she could only tolerate four. And then she couldn’t do the silymarin and she did not tolerate the resveratrol at all. It caused digestive issues, so we couldn’t do that. We put her on the quercetin and she got on a good DHA fish oil for her brain. She got on something called cognitive complete, which has a lot of vinpocetine and huperzine and ginkgo biloba. And that is really what fixed her brain fog, because that got more blood to her brain.

                                And then we did follow up labs, and she had come down to 150 on her ferritin using just the supplements. No, she donated blood once. She donated blood once and she took those supplements. And then she couldn’t donate blood again after that because her red blood cells were not in a range. That was really a good idea. And then she stayed on the supplements and on the lower iron diet as well. And the next time she did the labs, I think her ferritin was like 112, so it continued to come down. And we’re going to get another one. I just ordered more labs on her yesterday, so we’re going to get another one here soon. But-

Dr. Weitz:            Your goal for her ferritin, you want to see it where?

Dr. Sutton:          Well, she’s got one of those hemachromatosis genes and she’s postmenopausal. So ideally I’d like it to be probably below 60 so that she’s got a buffer to protect her from it going high. But 112 is exponentially better than 700.

Dr. Weitz:            Of course.

Dr. Sutton:          And it was going in the wrong direction. What we talked about yesterday, I guess this is why I wanted to tell this story now I’m realizing, is she was so appreciative because yesterday we talked about her granddaughter who is six years old and we were looking at her granddaughter’s genes in labs. Her granddaughter has a celiac gene, has a hemochromatosis gene, is having a lot of health problems. Her iron levels were actually normal, but she was low on vitamin D and low on B vitamins and had a high inflammatory CRP. So we talked about we really need to either get more labs to see if this girl’s a celiac, gluten-sensitive child or put her on a diet. She couldn’t afford the labs, and so they’re going to put her on the gluten-free diet. But here’s the reason that this is so important, is she was like, “I think God sent me to you because I needed to get better to take care of my granddaughter because her mother is an alcoholic that has a 40% chance of surviving the next year.”

Dr. Weitz:            Wow.

Dr. Sutton:          And now she feels good now. Her granddaughter hopefully will start feeling better soon, but she now feels good. She has energy, she’s clear-headed. She’s going to hopefully live a longer, healthier life and be able to take care of her granddaughter who desperately needs her. And so I guess that sometimes it’s not like that one person we’re helping, but the circle around them that is so meaningful.

Dr. Weitz:            Yeah, that’s great. That’s a great story.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:            So tell listeners how they can find out about getting you books. You have some courses that are available.

Dr. Sutton:          Yeah. So the Iron Curse workshop is at ironcurse.com. And then if you go to christysutton.com, pretty much everything I have is there. And I have that Iron Curse workshop, which is me verbally going through everything as far as hemochromatosis, anemias, everything that’s in the book, and then just more kind of discussion.  And then I have other workshops. I have one on brain health, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, cognitive decline. I have one on celiac, gut issues, one on age-related macular degeneration. I have one coming up on heart health. And then I have another one, oh, the MTHFR one, which is just methylation. And then I think I have another one, but I can’t remember. Anyways, they’re all at that website.

                                And then my books, I have my first book, the Genetic Testing: Defining Your Past to Personalized Health Plan, which is a decent book and a lot of people love it and my greatest critic, and I will call it decent. But if you’re looking into the hemochromatosis part, don’t go there. Go to The Iron Curse. The Iron Curse is, I would say, a really good resource for iron related issues. The first book has a lot of different genes. I wrote that a long time ago, and I think it’s an important piece of information. But if you’re interested in the iron piece, don’t go there. Go here to The Iron Curse book.

Dr. Weitz:            Awesome. Thank you, Christy.

Dr. Sutton:          Thank you.


Dr. Weitz:            Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. For those of you who enjoy listening to the Rational Wellness Podcast, I would appreciate it if you could go to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and give us a 5-star ratings and review.  If you would like to work with me personally to help you improve your health, I do accept a limited number of new patients per month for a functional medicine consultation. So many areas I specialize in include helping patients with specific health issues like gut problems, neurodegenerative conditions, autoimmune diseases, cardiometabolic conditions, or for an executive health screen and to help you promote longevity and take a deeper dive into some of those factors that can lead to chronic diseases along the way. Please call my Santa Monica White Sports Chiropractic and nutrition office at 310-395-3111, and we’ll set you up for a new consultation for functional medicine. And I look forward to speaking to everybody next week.

 

Dr. Allison Siebecker discusses Controversies in SIBO Testing and Treatment with Dr. Ben Weitz.

[If you enjoy this podcast, please give us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, so more people will find The Rational Wellness Podcast. Also check out the video version on my WeitzChiro YouTube page.] 

 

Podcast Highlights

1:28  Testing for SIBO.  Dr. Siebecker still prefers the SIBO breath test that measures hydrogen and methane that has been around for years and she prefers the version where they do it for three hours.  She also likes the Gemelli Labs Trio-Smart test that measure hydrogen, methane, and also hydrogen sulfide gases, which is the newer SIBO breath test.  Dr. Siebecker has a hydrogen sulfide SIBO study group and the consensus in the group is that Trio-Smart under-reports methane.  On the other hand, the studies used to validate the Trio-Smart test were really good.  Using the older SIBO breath test, if there is a flat line for hydrogen, this is often used to indicate hydrogen sulfide SIBO. Dr. Josh Goldberg and Dr. Siebecker and others have found that if patient did both the older SIBO test and the Trio-Smart, there was not a good correlation between the flat line and a positive result for hydrogen sulfide.  On the other hand, Dr. Siebecker pointed out that when patients with a flat line get tested with treatments for hydrogen sulfide, they often improve and feel better.   

7:37  Three hour SIBO breath test.  While it is more common to do the SIBO breath test for two hours, Dr. Siebecker prefers that the test be done for a three hour period of time.  For one thing, while excess hydrogen production is known to occur only in the small intestine, the organisms that cause excess methane and hydrogen sulfide are known to overgrow in the large intestine as well as in the small intestine.  Therefore, doing the SIBO test for 180 minutes instead of only 120 minutes can help, with the assumption that after 120 minutes the lactulose is in the large intestine.

11:50  Fructose as the substrate.  The use of fructose and glucose as well as lactulose as the substrate for the SIBO breath test. While the SIBO breath test is most commonly done with lactulose, some doctors, such as Dr. Jason Hawrelak from Australia, often has patients perform the test with lactulose, glucose, and also fructose. In fact, Dr. Hawrelak has found that fructose is actually more accurate than lactulose for diagnosing SIBO.  If you have a patient who tests negative with lactulose, you might consider having them repeat the test with fructose.

17:57  The Food Marble.  The FoodMarble is a portable SIBO breath testing device that the patient can buy and use at home over and over as needed and this device it threatens to upend the SIBO testing industry.  It can help you to figure out your dietary triggers.  Once you buy one for about the cost of a breath test, it allows you to be able to retest regularly, which otherwise can cost a lot.  And the validation studies on its accuracy seem to be pretty good.

 



Dr. Allison Siebecker is a Naturopathic Doctor and Acupuncturist specializes in the treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth and she teaches advanced gastroenterology at the National University of Natural Medicine. She has the most incredible resource of research articles and information about SIBO, siboinfo.com

Dr. Ben Weitz is available for Functional Nutrition consultations specializing in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders like IBS/SIBO and Reflux and also Cardiometabolic Risk Factors like elevated lipids, high blood sugar, and high blood pressure.  Dr. Weitz has also successfully helped many patients with managing their weight and improving their athletic performance, as well as sports chiropractic work by calling his Santa Monica office 310-395-3111.

 



 

Podcast Transcript

Dr. Weitz:                            Hey, this is Dr. Ben Weitz, host of the Rational Wellness Podcast. I talk to the leading health and nutrition experts and researchers in the field to bring you the latest in cutting edge health information. Subscribe to the Rational Wellness Podcast for weekly updates, and to learn more, check out my website, drweitz.com. Thanks for joining me, and let’s jump into the podcast. Hello, Rational Wellness Podcasters. Today, we’ll be speaking with Dr. Allison Siebecker, one of my favorite people, about controversies in testing and treatment for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.   Dr. Allison Siebecker is the Queen of SIBO. She’s a naturopathic doctor and acupuncturist specializing in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. She teaches advanced gastroenterology at the National University of Natural Medicine. She has the most incredible resource of research articles and information about SIBO at her website, siboinfo.com. Dr. Siebecker has been participating in the SIBO SOS program, which is another incredible resource of courses and information about SIBO. Allison, thank you so much for joining us.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Thank you so much for having me.

Dr. Weitz:                           So let’s start off with testing for SIBO. So which SIBO tests do you currently recommend?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Right, because we have some new additions in here.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yes.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Well, I still like the standard test that most of us have been using, which is a test for hydrogen and methane and uses lactulose. I like it three hour, and I like it when it has… The most samples that it can come with typically on the market is 10, meaning 10 tubes or bags or collection items. So that’s the standard for a very long time, and I still really, really like that. But we do have some newbies. Gemelli Labs has Trio-Smart. That’s been out about three years now, I think, but it still feels new, right? For a lot of us.

Dr. Weitz:                           It’s only available in the United States I think at this point, right?

Dr. Siebecker:                    I think so. Yeah. That one tests for hydrogen sulfide. We were all really excited, waiting for that. I like that test too because it tests for hydrogen sulfide. Then I feel a little bit bad to share this just with the public but I will is that I have a hydrogen sulfide study group that we assembled a bunch of practitioners to basically study when the Trio-Smart came out and help each other with what we were all seeing. From that group, many of the doctors in there, they shared that and basically they saw when they would compare the test against the standard hydrogen methane test because they would run too often on one person that the methane sometimes was lower on the Trio-Smart than on the traditional test.  So some of the docs there, they just felt that it may be under-reported methane, the Trio-Smart. Now when the studies are done, studies were done to validate Trio-Smart against the standard machinery. The studies were great, so it doesn’t line up. This is more of like a clinical happenstance. Studies are great. So just passing that along. Because of that, it’s really hard to explain why I haven’t switched fully over to Trio-Smart, because I’m always very concerned about missing anybody with SIBO. I want to be sure that I find it when it’s really there. By SIBO, I mean the methane type of SIBO as well.

Dr. Weitz:                           How valid do you think the flat line is as a way to diagnose hydrogen sulfide?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Well, this is really interesting. So for years, that’s what we use. We still use it. I found it very effective in that when you treat people with treatments for hydrogen sulfide and they have a flat line, they respond. They get better. You can often see the next, the retest perform like you’ve seen, they’ve gotten better. Meaning it won’t be a flat line anymore. Also, one of the directors of one of the breath testing labs, for years, I had been gathering symptoms that my patients had that they told me they had when they had a flat line. I was able to come up with this little group of symptoms that to me indicated hydrogen sulfide. I shared that with anyone who wanted to know in all my lectures and things.  So the director of this lab started using that and he got back to me and said he found an excellent correlation with this and that people would really respond to treatment. So here’s this clinical data that seems good. But then my friend who’s does a lot of research, Dr. Josh Goldenberg, he and I and several others, he really led the effort, did a survey. In that survey, so this is low quality evidence, but here it is. We actually found that when people compared the flat line with the Trio-Smart. So do people with a flat line actually have hydrogen sulfide gas? There was a very poor relation. What is a flat line then if it’s not actually hydrogen sulfide? I don’t know. Is this definitive? No, because this is just a survey. It’s not good quality evidence.  But it made us think, “Huh, maybe the flatline isn’t what we always thought it was,” except I don’t care. Because when we treat it like it’s hydrogen sulfide, people get better. But that is an interesting thing that we don’t often see. I’m sure other people will have their own evidence, but someone with a flat line testing positive for hydrogen sulfide on our Trio-Smart. I don’t know why.

Dr. Weitz:                           Have you found that the Trio-Smart also has a relatively small number of positive hydrogen sulfides?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, I mean that makes sense. Hydrogen sulfide is going to be the least common type of SIBO, the least common gas. Never expected.

Dr. Weitz:                           I’ve heard 10 to 15%.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, I think so. Maybe less. I mean, it’d be interesting to hear what Dr. Pimentel says, who’s probably got the most experience at saying what the percent is, but that makes sense to me. Pretty low, right? So yes, but the thing is it can be this tricky thing. I think where we want to bring in for sure testing and make sure we’re not missing it is in cases that are challenging. If everything’s going great and you’re treating and there’s no issue, you don’t have to think about it.  But what if somebody still has symptoms and you don’t know why and their test looks negative or things like that or the treatments you’re giving for hydrogen or methane aren’t quite working? Geez, maybe they have some hydrogen sulfide there you don’t know about because clearly there can be hydrogen sulfide without there being a flat line. Then you would need to shift your treatments.

Dr. Weitz:                           Now explain why you feel it’s important to do three hours. Because if on average after 100 minutes or certainly 120 minutes, you’re now in the colon. How are we diagnosing a small bowel issue with a three-hour test?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Because we have these three types of SIBO, hydrogen, methane, and hydrogen sulfide. Methane even now is not really considered a type of SIBO, though I still consider it that way because that’s so long I’ve thought of it that way. So it’s intestinal methanogen overgrowth. Well, it’s only the hydrogen that is small intestine only. So both methane and hydrogen sulfide, those organisms overgrow in the large intestine as well. On our breath test interpretation, we use the whole three hours for the interpretation. So this is why it’s so important. I mean, I have example after example where we could miss somebody’s methane or hydrogen sulfide if we only had 90 minutes or two hours.

Dr. Weitz:                            So if you see a dramatic rise after 120 minutes, you would still consider that positive in either methane or hydrogen.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Not hydrogen, methane or hydrogen sulfide. That’s the thing. That’s the thing. It’s only hydrogen that we’re using the first two hours. But for methane and hydrogen sulfide, we need that third hour, because it’s not just yes or no because the level of the gas influences our treatment choices. Because amongst our different choices, we may choose a treatment that is better at reducing more gas more quickly. Also, it informs our prognosis because we know most people will need multiple rounds. We know on average how much each treatment lowers gas on average.  So we can calculate how many rounds might be needed by seeing how high the gas goes. So we need that information. The other thing is why wouldn’t you just get all the information that would help you if the person’s going through the test? So it really irritates me when manufacturers only offer two hours or less. It’s like you’re shorting us out here. I mean, the person is going through the effort. They did the prep diet, they’re doing this whole thing. What is one more hour? Let’s get all the information we need.

Dr. Weitz:                            Now, isn’t another argument though that the issue about SIBO is that if this bacterial overgrowth occurs in the small intestine and gas is produced, you’re going to have all these symptoms? But if that same gas is produced in the colon, you’re not necessarily going to get those same symptoms because the colon is this very extensible tube and it easily expands. There’s always bacteria producing gases in there, and that doesn’t typically create symptoms.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I don’t think that’s true. I don’t know. I haven’t read studies to prove this one way or the other.

Dr. Weitz:                           But isn’t fermentation very common in colon and isn’t that good, actually healthy?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yes, at a certain amount. So I think it’s about the amount. It’s about how rapidly the gas is created and how much. Actually, this is the whole basis of the FODMAP diet is just that rapid and excessive gas creation in the larger intestine leads to a lot of symptoms. It is completely my understanding that you would not escape symptoms if there was a lot of gas in the large intestine.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay. I thought the purpose of the low-FODMAP diet was not to feed the bacteria in the small.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, they did have SIBO or the small intestine in mind in some of their early papers but barely. Their main target was the large intestine actually, believe it or not. Also, inflammatory bowel disease. Now it’s changed since then. They’ve morphed, but that was the original intention. What I love about that diet is they’re like, “We don’t know what’s causing it. We’re not even going to try and think about it. We’re just trying to help symptoms.”

Dr. Weitz:                            Some doctors, for example, Dr. Hawrelak likes to use different substrates for the SIBO prep test. He told me that he regularly will have his patients do a test with lactulose, a test with glucose, and a test with fructose.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, I love this. So this is great. This all came out of a conversation he and I had at a conference when we were lecturing. Because long ago, he was a fan of glucose, and I was never a fan of glucose as a substrate because I knew it absorbed pretty quickly, pretty high up in the small intestine. So it couldn’t test the whole rest of the small or the large intestine. We were just talking about how important that is. So I said to him, I said, “Could you give me more information about the comparison between glucose and lactulose? Tell me what you think.” Well, he’s a researcher. So he’s fabulous. He went in his office and he did this in-office study over years. He didn’t publish it, but then as soon as it was ready, we came and I featured him giving out a class on this.  He’s been telling everybody. He came out with the most fascinating information. He found that, well, glucose was the worst at finding SIBO in somebody who had it. So he ran, like you said, each one of these substrate tests on the same person. Lactulose was second best. Fructose was the best and best of all was lactulose and fructose. He ran these on different days. So I brought up the statistics so I could tell you from a study. So glucose was 67% of a diagnostic rate, lactulose, 73%, and fructose, 85%. When we did the fructose and the lactulose together on separate days, it was 96.5%. So this just blew me away and has changed my mind about a lot of things. So what I’ve been doing is recommending to practitioners who are having trouble getting a lactulose test.

                                                There are companies where you can get the lactulose test, but not everybody knows that or wants to do it. So they can order fructose. This made me feel comfortable, recommending fructose as a substrate. It’s interesting, because in my early testing, I did test people with different substrates. This is like 14 years ago or whatever. I didn’t do as many as Dr. Hawrelak. He did 130. I have it written down here, 130. I didn’t do that many. So you need a lot to figure things out, but I often found that people were not positive on a fructose test who were positive on lactulose. So this really surprised me, and that’s the value of doing a bunch of these. Now I have something else to tell you. Dr. Nirala Jacobi, another one of our colleagues, she has a lab in Australia also.  She is now checking this out for herself, and she is running a lot of these lactulose and fructose. She’s only in preliminary data, so it is too early to speak. Please keep that in mind, but she isn’t finding fructose to be better than lactulose. She didn’t tell me if it was the same or worse, just not better at this point. She’ll come out her with her findings, but I still feel confident based on the data from Dr. Hawrelak. So I think it’s a wonderful thing to think about. Something else that he discussed is that he found people who would be negative on lactulose but positive on fructose. I mean, obviously, that’s the difference between that 73% and 85%. So it’s something to keep in mind if you really feel like somebody, you really suspect SIBO and you test them and they’re negative.  You could run a fructose just to see. That’s also the place where you might want to test with the trio if you weren’t to see if there was hydrogen sulfide, if something’s in your mind going, “But I really feel like they have it.” So I’m generally in favor of it. I haven’t switched over to it.

Dr. Weitz:                           Interesting. So one of the issues for some patients and some practitioners is that… I don’t know if this is across the whole country, but lactulose is considered a prescription drug. I know in California-

Dr. Siebecker:                    It’s so irritating. Oh, no, the whole country.

Dr. Weitz:                           The whole country, okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    It’s a mistake that it’s on there. I’ve talked to so many people about this, but the problem is it would cost a lot of money to get it off the formulary. So it’s going to stay there and it’s a terrible mistake. It shouldn’t be. So then non-prescribing practitioners technically can’t order it, but there are labs you can order it from. Basically, I can just speak about labs because there’s no CE. So Genova offers it and that you can get that also through Rupa Labs, True Health Labs, direct labs.  So they’re the main way. The other thing is that a lot of times, a patient’s primary care, they can give them a prescription for lactulose as a laxative. It’s often used in veterinary medicine. So you could get it and then you could buy a no substrate or a glucose test kit and then substitute it. But here’s now the fructose as a potential option.

Dr. Weitz:                           Is it the same amount as lactulose?

Dr. Siebecker:                    No, it’s 25 grams. Let me just make positively sure that I got that right. I have a little note. Yeah, 25 grams for fructose, 10 grams for lactulose

Dr. Weitz:                           Mixed in eight ounces of water?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Mixed in eight ounces of water. It has to be diluted. Same with lactulose. Isn’t that fascinating?

Dr. Weitz:                           That is fascinating.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Did you have him on to speak about it?

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, we did speak about it.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, fascinating to me.

Dr. Weitz:                           He continues to use all three.

Dr. Siebecker:                    He says sometimes he uses just two, unless he’s changed. Last I heard he had dropped glucose, but he might. Who knows?  He might’ve brought it back because he’s like, “That’s out.”

Dr. Weitz:                           So what do you think about the new SIBO testing device, the FoodMarble?  Is this threatening to disrupt the whole SIBO testing industry?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Right. I forgot. This is the other newbie on the block here, so I have so many thoughts.

Dr. Weitz:                           For those listening, you might not be aware. There’s a home SIBO testing device. It’s known as the FoodMarble, and you can use it over and over again at home. You can test yourself in whatever way you want exactly. You just breathe into that. It measures hydrogen and methane. I think they’re working on a version that’s going to include hydrogen sulfide, and you could duplicate a SIBO breath test. You could do lactulose or fructose and then do it every 15 or 20 minutes, or you can just see how you react to different foods.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Exactly. Yeah. I think that the original intention was just to help you figure out your dietary triggers really. People love it for that. They just test after eating various types of meals and they see where their gas levels are. The gas report comes as a fermentation score, which goes as high as 10. They’ve now broken out the different hydrogen or methane, and they let you know. So it’s not parts per million like it is in a breath test. It’s just to give you a sense of what’s going on, but it works with an app and it’s very user-friendly. On the app, the challenge function is how you do a formal breath test and then you choose whatever substrate you’re going to use. Like you said, you could just buy glucose or fructose or if you can get a prescription for lactose.

                                                So I think it’s amazing because it’s inexpensive and I love that. So because they claim that this device is able to do accurately many, many, many breath tests, I think 40 or more. I think it’s more than that. So that’s for the price of one. It costs about the same as doing a breath test, and then you can run multiple, multiple tests. That’s just incredible because the budgetary concerns are sometimes the biggest impediment in the whole treatment process with SIBO. I mean the treatments can cost a lot too, but I’m a physician who likes to retest a lot. Otherwise, I just feel blinded. You can’t really judge my symptoms very well. What the heck is actually going on with the overgrowth levels? Because they don’t correlate perfectly.

                                                So this can solve the budgetary issues, the retesting issues. So that’s incredible. It’s also so user-friendly. Anyone who’s ever tried it or used it, they love it. I’ve tried it. I think it’s great. It’s so easy to use. Now the issue is what about the validity? This is what everybody wants to know. Just like Trio-Smart, they have done studies that are great and show excellent validation against our standard testing machinery. A colleague of mine, the one who I did that hydrogen sulfide study with, he said he likes the studies. He feels good about the studies. Everyone has to decide for themselves, but I like that a colleague who was a researcher felt good about the study. So that’s good. So that’s good. Now, what about in real life, right?

                                                So in practice, sometimes we see some odd things like an occasional really high level of gas that just blips up. That’s hard to make sense of. Is it correct? It has an opportunity to potentially be more sensitive and more accurate because it’s analyzing the breath instantly, instead of being shipped off for a week in transit and then being analyzed. Because of that, the FoodMarble has a trend I think to have slightly higher gas levels, probably because it’s being analyzed immediately, although there could be other reasons for that. But a number of us have done side-by-side testing. Whenever we do that, by the way, Dr. Pimentel has recommended giving five minutes apart when you’re breathing into two different devices.

                                                The technicians and the scientists at FoodMarble say even two minutes might be enough, just letting you know for anyone who wants to do this, because you need the gases to be able to equilibrate again. You don’t want to have them completely blown off from one test to the next. So anyway, when we’ve done comparison side-by-sides, people are finding different things. I find in the ones I’ve done only I think one or two of them lined up correctly perfectly. Then I’ve seen it all different ways where hydrogen or methane was higher or lower in my side-by-side tests. I haven’t really quite decided what that means and what I think about it. I can say that I have colleagues who don’t feel good about it because of that, because it’s not perfectly lining up.

                                                So they want to stick with what they’re used to. I have other colleagues that love it and they don’t care if it lines up or not. They feel like the advantages are so great, the studies where they’re validating it, that they’re just using it and they’re recalibrating their clinical sensibilities to the device, to the new data. For me, I’m used to just a lot of data, because as a SIBO specialist, I ran tests all day long every day. I need to see a lot more of their tests until I decide fully what I think of it, but I’m favorable towards the advantages that it has to offer. So what do you think, Ben? Have you tried it?

Dr. Weitz:                            I’ve got one now and I just started fooling around with it. I don’t know yet. I have a couple of patients that are going to be doing side-by-side and I’m curious.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Me too. The other thing that people should note is that to get the parts per million, practitioners can get that. You just have to ask them and sign up for the clinician’s dashboard, I think it’s called. So that’s a website you can go to that’s connected where you immediately see the results in parts per million. They have graphs and things like that, because otherwise, you’ll get the fermentation score. So that’s the one drawback for patients who are using it. If they do a formal SIBO test, they’re only going to see a fermentation score. Someone needs to be a practitioner to get that clinical dashboard and see the parts per million. That’s a limitation that I’m not fond of but they know that, and I’m sure they’re doing whatever they need to do legally. Who knows? Maybe it’ll change.

Dr. Weitz:                           Do you often order a stool test as well to look at the microbiome with your SIBO patients?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Well, I’m not in practice now, but when I was, I wasn’t running microbiome tests. It was like before that became a big hot thing. But I did run functional stool tests a lot, but not microbiome once. Tell me where you’re heading with this one. Have you been doing it? Are you correlating things?

Dr. Weitz:                           Yes, I do. I regularly do a stool test and I like to see what else is going on in their gut. It seems to me a lot of patients with SIBO also have other issues.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Well, that’s for sure. I mean, personally, I think when someone comes in and you suspect that they would have SIBO, you should run expanded screening blood work, the SIBO test, and a stool test. To me, that’s just the fundamentals. It would be sure great if you could also run a really good hormone test.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right, absolutely.

Dr. Siebecker:                    But for certainly stool and breath, because yeah, we have to see what’s happening in the large intestine as well.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yes, exactly. So I talked to several practitioners who feel that the bacteria that caused SIBO are migrating up from the colon. It’s my understanding that Dr. Pimentel originally felt that that was the case, but that current data doesn’t really indicate that that’s the case. What do you think about that?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yes, that’s my understanding. Ben, I just have to say for anyone watching, I don’t know why my face looks so red. I see it on the screen, and Ben was saying he looks orange. We tried to adjust our light beforehand. I don’t know what’s happening. So sorry about that.

Dr. Weitz:                           It’s okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Because I just looked over and saw myself. I’m like, “Literally, I have a sunburn.” I don’t know what’s happening. Totally, that’s my understanding. I was never of that belief that it was a back migration. Even though so many articles and studies said it, that just didn’t make sense to me. Then as Pimentel’s research continued, he came to the same conclusion just as you said. At one of our SIBO symposiums, we used to have SIBO symposiums each year at NUNM where I teach. He said that. He said, “Now I think the majority is it’s there in the small intestine already at low levels and then it overgrows.” So I was thrilled because I felt validated. That is my understanding. It is possible some could come up, but I don’t think that’s the majority of what’s happening. So yeah, I think it’s just overgrowing. It’s already there.

Dr. Weitz:                            There seems to be some studies correlating some of the bacteria that appear in the mouth with the bacteria that end up that caused SIBO.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, that’s interesting. I’m so sorry. I forget the main researcher’s name. There’s one researcher that’s been working on that premise the whole time I’ve known about SIBO like 15 years or more, and now others have been following in his footsteps. So there’s some little group that is into that thinking. They like to separate oral-like bacteria SIBO from small intestine bacteria SIBO. I don’t think Dr. Pimentel is on that train. I don’t think he’s thinking that way. So that’s like an offshoot of a different thinking. Think it’s Dr. Bohm. We had him come speak at one of our conferences one time. So very, very interesting.

Dr. Weitz:                            Currently, what are the best ways to stimulate GI motility? Do you have any experience with Dr. Satish Rao’s vibrating device?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh yeah, that is the coolest thing. The vibrant capsule is just so amazing.

Dr. Weitz:                           Which I don’t think is on the market yet.

Dr. Siebecker:                    It is.

Dr. Weitz:                           It is on the market.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, it is on the market. I can’t remember exactly when, but it’s been out for a good while now. I haven’t used it, but I’ve talked to a couple colleagues who have. As with anything, some people have amazing results and other people it just didn’t do the job. For anyone who doesn’t quite know about this, this is a non-drug treatment for chronic constipation, really meant for the patient where typical treatments don’t work. Actually, laxatives don’t work. Various medicines don’t work. Prosecretory agents, Amitiza, they’re just not doing the job and you’re at your wits end. You could bring this in. Now, I think you could bring it in even before that. If somebody really has chronic constipation, how nice for them not to have to swallow anything.  So this little pill, it’s timed and it’s timed to just give this very gentle vibration when it would be hitting the large intestine. So anyway, in one patient for a colleague of mine, it was an absolute miracle game changer, insane constipation that nothing would do anything about. This gave her the urge and she goes naturally now normally. Another colleague, it just didn’t work for them. So I guess you have to find the person it’s going to be right for, but I think it’s so great we have this option. So that’s a wonderful thing for stimulating large intestine motility. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                           How long does it work for?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh, I think you take it five. There’s five capsules you take in a week.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    So it’s almost like a daily thing.

Dr. Weitz:                           I see. Okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah. It’s not inexpensive either. I know they had an introductory price. Since it’s new, it hadn’t yet been covered by insurances. So I know that I think in both these cases they were paying out of pocket. So let’s hope it gets covered by insurance and the price becomes better, but in a certain situation, it’s going to be the right fit for some people.

Dr. Weitz:                           What would you say is the most effective drug for motility and nutritional product for motility?

Dr. Siebecker:                    I guess it depends on what kind of motility we’re talking about.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    If we’re talking about large intestine motility meant to create a bowel movement, in essence, a laxative, I have my favorites, my favorite supplement. It’s not a stimulant laxative. So it’s not actually creating movement. That would be magnesium oxide or magnesium citrate. I like osmotic laxatives for actually stimulating movement in the large intestine. Many people like the prosecretory agents, Trulance, Ametiza, Linzess. They’re tricky. So magnesium can be tricky too. You have to make sure you’re getting the right dose at the right time or it could be too strong, but some people, that’s a game changer for them. I’m not the hugest fan of stimulant laxatives that are natural, but many people do like them, senna, cascara, aloe, rhubarb, things like that.  But then we could move to the class of drugs that are prokinetics and they’re really aimed more at and natural agents, the upper GI. So more like the esophagus, the stomach, and the small intestine. So those are used more for achalasia, gastroparesis, and for the migrating motor complex in the small intestine. I mean it’s hard to say a favorite, but I would say probably the most effective would be prucalopride, which is still this Motegrity in the US. Amongst all the gastroenterologists I’ve spoken to, they say it’s the best they’ve ever used. Almost no side effects. I mean, people can have reactions, but no adverse concerning side effects.

Dr. Weitz:                           It certainly seems to be Pimentel’s favorite.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, many, many gastroenterologists I’ve spoken to. Yeah, because many of our prokinetics that were available had cardiac risks and extrapyramidal symptoms, all sorts of awful things. There’s so many practitioners that think prokinetics as a category is dangerous and that’s not so. There are safe options, but that’s really probably the best there. Naturally, the main things we have is Iberogast, which is like a combo herbal product. Actually, there’s like a dupe now for that because it can sometimes be hard to get.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, very hard. Yeah.

Dr. Siebecker:                    That’s by Heron Botanicals, which is a company from fantastic herbalist and naturopathic doctor. They have a product called Gut Motivator, and it uses pretty much all the same ingredients, except I think there’s fennel instead of something else. I can’t remember.

Dr. Weitz:                           Oh, interesting. Gut motivator.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Gut motivator. It’s in glycerin base, which is nice because it’s easier to take straight from the dropper and it tastes a little sweeter. The only problem with it is that they’re still ramping up. They grow a lot of their own herbs and they’re so ramping up their supply of Iberis amara, the main ingredient that gives its name. So they’re only selling to practitioners at this time. So it’s not ready for the general public, but it will be eventually.

Dr. Weitz:                           Is that available through Fullscript?

Dr. Siebecker:                    No, not yet. I’ve asked them to carry it, but you have to get it from Heron Botanicals right now. So just so people know there’s another option. Some of my colleagues are reporting very good results with it, so I’m glad to hear that. But the other really nice prokinetic is for the upper GI’s ginger. So many studies on that. By the way, so many studies on Iberogast. I mean, it’s been around for a long time, amazing studies where head to head against Cisapride and metoclopramide, other prokinetics where it did just as good, if not even better. So amazing. But then ginger also has excellent prokinetic ability, and we have all of these companies now that put it in their formulas. I call them the ginger-containing prokinetic formulas. There’s six of them.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, we use motility activator a lot.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, that’s a good one. There’s a lot of good ones. So those are some options. I mean, there’s probably other options, but that is generally good.

Dr. Weitz:                           So we know that patients with IBS, 60 to 70% have SIBO. Then the question is what about the other 30 or 40%? So how often do you think patients have SIFO or fungal overgrowth, and what’s the best way to diagnose that?

Dr. Siebecker:                    I think a good amount do. I can’t remember the statistics from Dr. Rao’s studies on this, but I think it was at least a third also have it, if not more. It depends on your patient population, but I think a lot of us see that a lot. When I was first practicing for SIBO, for years and years, I was looking for yeast and a majority of my patients did not have it at the same time as SIBO.

Dr. Weitz:                           How were you trying to look for it?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Okay, so I don’t think the testing options are great. The gold standard is going to be endoscopy, which is impractical.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, but I was honestly running three tests because people were coming to me as a specialist. I was running the urine organic acid test. That can’t distinguish between small or large intestine, but it can show indicated and overgrowth by metabolites. Then I would run a functional stool test and look for actual overgrowth in the stool, and then I would run a blood test. The Candida Immune Complex and Antibody test, Quest and LabCorp have that. So I would run all three. Then with the blood test, it doesn’t really tell you whether there’s an overgrowth. It more so tells you if there’s a hypersensitivity. There could be an overgrowth, but it could also be that there’s a normal amount of yeast and their immune system has decided to react against it.  So you are telling different things from this, but I lost confidence in doing those tests. I never felt very sure about what was the best and right way. I can say that you recently had Dr. Morstein, I know. She likes to use the questionnaire from The Yeast Connection, the old Yeast Connection book by Dr. Crook, which I think you can see the questionnaire online. She likes to say that it has been shortened. That questionnaire has been shortened to five questions or seven questions, and she doesn’t think that’s adequate. So she likes just use the questionnaire. I always like to ask other practitioners what do they feel confident with in testing. I don’t think we have a perfect way to test.

Dr. Weitz:                            Well, I feel like with the stool test, since it usually does not come positive that when it is positive, I feel pretty confident that there is candida there if it comes up on the stool test.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I would agree.

Dr. Weitz:                            Organic acids seems to come up too often positive potentially. I’m a little skeptical. I haven’t used … I know Dr. Ilana Gurevich, she loves the candida antibodies test.

Dr. Siebecker:                    The blood one. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. I haven’t done that test though.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, I mean, I used to run them all. I can’t remember what happened, but I think I had somebody with a yeast overgrowth infection vaginally and the organic acid test, maybe it wouldn’t because maybe that’s only telling you the intestinal situation. I don’t know. Then the blood test didn’t come positive and I just thought, “Oh, this is hard.” Maybe it wouldn’t, but I don’t know. Just somewhere along the line, I lost confidence and I stopped doing them all. But I do think that to your point, what are the other things that can be IBS that aren’t SIBO?  A lot of times people have other things at the same time. Yeast is really common. I mean, I’m saying that without having a proper way to diagnose it, but it’s like because then you treat it and they get better. Then parasites also I think are very common. I mean, I’ve written differential diagnosis charts on this, and you just get tired of including things. It’s like 40-

Dr. Weitz:                           By the way, I just saw or listened to your podcast that you did with Nirala Jacobi.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Is it out? I didn’t even know.

Dr. Weitz:                           It’s out. I listened to it this morning and it was great podcast. Nirala Jacobi was really good too.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh, good. I really enjoyed that.

Dr. Weitz:                           You guys went through all of these different possibilities, and you made a really profound statement, which was that you find that practitioners often find what they look for.

Dr. Siebecker:                    That’s exactly right. It’s like, “Well, what are we testing for? And then what do we know?”

Dr. Weitz:                            I’m a mold expert. I’m looking for mold and I’m finding mold.

Dr. Siebecker:                    That’s right, because it’s what we choose to test for. But then, of course, what if our tests don’t turn anything up? Well, then we got to look over in the area we don’t normally look, but I mean, what are you supposed to do? Also, you can’t test for everything. People can choose their own path where they want to put their attention first. If that works out, great, and if it doesn’t, then we have to look other places.

Dr. Weitz:                            A similar question, which is it’s known that so many patients who get treated with rifaximin or herbal antimicrobials don’t get completely better after one round. Why do they need multiple rounds? Is it because we haven’t effectively reduced the microbes, we haven’t killed enough of them, or is it that they grow back? Is it because there’s biofilms and we can’t get to them? Is it because there’s layers of problems like you’re mentioning other things? So maybe they have SIBO and they have dysbiosis, and we have to correct both of those. Why do we think it takes repeated rounds?

Dr. Siebecker:                    I mean, all of that can be true. So yes, yes, yes. But I think predominantly, what my experience has been is it’s just that it’s different when we have an overgrowth versus an acute infection that we’re used to thinking of where there’s a prescribed acute infection and we know 10 or 14 days of an antibiotic is going to take care of it. Because here in SIBO, we have these levels of which the overgrowth can be and we can see the gas can be 150 or something. In another person, it’s 20. So it seems to correlate the amount of rounds with the overgrowth amount. The gas is a representation of how many bacteria are grown. So I think it just takes time. Basically, it’s thinking of a chronic infection, even though it’s not technically an infection. We treat until we get effects.

                                                We just have to keep going and going at it. So then the question is why can’t we just use one treatment and then just treat for however long it takes until it goes down? For some people, that does work, but unfortunately, what I found happens so often was the treatment would peter out. Its effect would peter out and it would stop working. You’d know because they would have had some improvement and then their symptoms would come back while they’re even taking it. So it’s like it just couldn’t do anymore. It did all it could do. So then you just stop. At that point, I would retest, but you have to switch. You use something else. Thank gosh, we have a lot of tools in our toolbox.

                                                So then that’s the next round. If a patient is sensitive enough to pay attention to these things, some people are, some people aren’t. I think great. If they’re still getting effects, you can keep them on something until it’s not working anymore. But not everyone is paying attention like that or wants to. So that’s why we need, I think, the multiple rounds. Now, what about the biofilms, anti-biofilms? I think that that’s another thing to think about for sure. My experience was that I used a lot of anti-biofilm products for a long time treating SIBO, and then I wouldn’t use them in other people. So I had a good comparison and I was only using the enzyme-based anti-biofilms and the EDTA type of products. I could detect no difference at all in anything at all.

                                                Really, my intention in using them was to try to prevent as much relapse. That’s what I was hoping for, and that was a bust. But I can tell you that Dr. Ruscio did an in-office study on that and presented this at one of our SIBO symposiums. He found that statistically on paper when using the anti-biofilms, it reduced hydrogen gas a little, but he could not detect that clinically at all. There was no clinical representation of that. It was a statistical on paper thing. So just continuing down with this story, I was just very disappointed in anti-biofilms. But then I spoke to Dr. Paul Anderson, this was years and years ago, and he’s an anti-biofilm expert.

                                                He had treated a lot of conditions with very serious infections, and he had done a lot of research and found that bismuth thiol products were very good anti-biofilms and he thought the best. Now, he has an over-the-counter option, but at that time, he just had a prescription formula. So I used that in some of my patients and I found it made a difference. Where it made the difference was in relapse. I didn’t necessarily see as much of a difference in not needing multiple rounds. I think theoretically, it could make a difference. I just didn’t observe that at the time. So I like to recommend if you’re going to use anti-biofilm in SIBO that you use the bismuth thiol. I just couldn’t see any effect for three years of using the other products.  Maybe other people have different experience, but it was a dud for me. So I would say it is definitely worth an option and maybe it could reduce. I know when you’ve had Pimentel on your show in the past, he’s talked about, and even just recently I was doing a Q&A with him, finding that some of the overgrown microbes live in a biofilm along the lining. I know you’ve asked him and I’ve asked him, “Well, then what about anti-biofilms?” I think he’s waiting until he would present research whether it would be truly effective or not.

Dr. Weitz:                            I know particularly the methanogens seem to live in this mucus layer, which is a biofilm that it’s got to be hard to get to those. We know that treating methane seems to be more difficult than hydrogen.

Dr. Siebecker:                    What has your experience been with anti-biofilms?

Dr. Weitz:                            Sometimes I think we get a benefit and other times we don’t. So I haven’t done any systematic analysis of it, but I get the impression that we get some benefit from it.

Dr. Siebecker:                    That’s good. Do you use all the different types or just the bismuth ones?

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah, no, I use the enzymes. I often start with the enzymes and then use the bismuth ones depending upon exactly what’s going on. I’m a little nervous about using bismuth for long because it is heavy metal.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, that’s right. We talked about that before. The good news with the bismuth thiol is… Well, this is in the context of treating hydrogen sulfide SIBO is bismuth helps with that, but the bismuth thiol are a much lower dose than what has been studied bismuth for hydrogen sulfide. So I like that we can use a much lower dose with those bismuth thiol ones.

Dr. Weitz:                            Speaking of treating hydrogen sulfide, in fact, any new treatments for especially herbal nutritional for treating SIBO? The traditional antimicrobials that are used are berberine, oregano, allicin. Any new guys on the block that seem to be hitting the radar?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Well, I’d say that bismuth. I mean, that’s not really that new, but it’s worth really mentioning. Other than that, well, Atrantil, we’ve been using that for years. That’s a combo product for methane. I did a bunch of before and afters. That’s not really new, but just mentioning it, right?

Dr. Weitz:                            Correct.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I haven’t really been using anything new, but Dr. Hawrelak has reported using perilla and tincture of oregano, which we already were using oregano, but he actually was reporting that he found that that worked on methane. I had used oregano for methane. I thought it was going to give me a result, and then in the end, it didn’t pan out. So I just wonder, “Huh? Could the tincture be the difference?” Because I really never did see much of an effect from oregano for methane, but perilla is a new one for me. I haven’t used it. So he’s using that one too, but he’s using that only when the standard things aren’t doing the job.

Dr. Weitz:                            Then some of the products have oregano and they also have thyme. The thyme oil seems to be… I find sometimes very beneficial.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, I mean, that’s a potent.

Dr. Weitz:                            It’s potent. Yeah.

Dr. Siebecker:                    The one problem with that is like what’s in the CandiBactin AR, but the one problem with that is if you’re using CandiBactin AR and BR, that’s great. You’re using berberine and oregano, which is our classic thing that we always use for hydrogen, but there’s nothing in there for methane. So always remember you have to add something in for methane, which would be the allicin-

Dr. Weitz:                            Like allicin.

Dr. Siebecker:                    … or the atrantil. Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right, absolutely.

Dr. Siebecker:                    If you have hydrogen sulfide, you add in bismuth. We also found high-dose oregano works good for hydrogen sulfide, but you’d probably want that separate then.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. There are so many patients in this country right now taking GLP-I agonists like Ozempic for weight loss. We know that the way this works is by slowing GI motility. So when all these patients are done, when they’re now suffering with POS, that’s what I call post-Ozempic syndrome. Now their weight is ballooning up because they never changed their diet. Are we going to have a tsunami of patients with SIBO? By the way, I asked Dr. Pimentel about testing patients with Ozempic, and he said, “It’s just a nightmare. Their microbiome is so messed up.”

Dr. Siebecker:                    He said the same thing the other day when I was interviewing him also, I asked him the same question. I wanted to know what he thought. What is he seeing? Yeah, he said, it’s really hard to test it because nothing leaves the stomach. Dr. Morstein had said she is testing… Because she’s a diabetes expert, and she had said she’s testing patients the morning of the day they were going to do their next dose. So it’s like it’s been a week since they’ve taken their dose and on that morning, and she says it’s going fine. I asked Dr. Pimentel about that, because when you look at the studies, it takes weeks before the medicine becomes steady state or leaves the body.

Dr. Weitz:                            So Mona is giving him a SIBO test?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yes.

Dr. Weitz:                            Okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, yeah, a SIBO test. Yeah. So my concern is, is that enough time? She said, “That’s working for her,” but Pimentel said, “Well, no, the reason you give the dose on seven days before it gets too low, you don’t want people bottoming out.” So he has a very hard time getting accurate results testing anyone on Ozempic. To your point, yeah, there’s a real concern that people could develop SIBO. Of course, we have no data on us at this time, but it’s a real concern. The thing that it seems to do is slow the stomach. Does it also slow the small intestine?  I think so. But the stomach itself, the migrating motor complex, one of the forms or I guess one of the types of migrating motor complex starts in the stomach and continues through the small intestine. That is, from what I’ve read, the more powerful migrating motor complex. That’s our protective wave. That’s our number one body’s protection against SIBO is the migrating motor complex in the small intestine. So I believe it will turn that off. So it’s a real concern. It’s a real concern.

Dr. Weitz:                            Does the motility come back to normal typically with patients once they stop Ozempic?

Dr. Siebecker:                    I don’t know. I don’t know that. I don’t know if anyone’s looked at that. I bet you there’s people that could report about that just in their sensibilities, but I would think it would. Because when you hear about people’s hunger comes back after they get off.

Dr. Weitz:                            That’s why we tend to gain weight again.

Dr. Siebecker:                    On the other hand, you have to weigh it out against what someone’s facing. I would never want anyone to have SIBO, good lord, but diabetes can be fatal. So it depends on how much it’s needed. I guess also how it’s affecting that person. I know there’s people doing things with compounds where they’re going much lower and still getting good effects on blood sugar and things like that, but these are early days, but it’s a real concern. One thing I want to share that I heard from one doctor who said about the people gaining weight afterwards is that what they’ll do is they’ll just give people a much, much lower dose and help them to hold their weight for… If I’m not mistaken, I think she said one or two years.  It might’ve been two, because that’s how the body sets its set point. So if you could hold that, your goal weight or whatever for one or two years. I’m sorry, I don’t remember exactly. This was an expert on this, a doctor, and then they’ll take people off, but they’ll put them way low. That was a fascinating thing to hear about, just to try to work against that problem.

Dr. Weitz:                            One more question on the treatment, a lot of functional practitioners, some of them will also incorporate an immunoglobulin product as part of their SIBO protocol. Some do it specifically because I tend to use it when I see that the secretory IgA is low on the stool test, but some will use it all the time automatically, something like SBI Protect or MegaMucosa. These are also known to bind with the endotoxins and potentially might help with the eradication.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I think it’s a great idea. I love serum bovine immunoglobulins, or for people who are vegetarian, they can do colostrum that has high IgG. I love it. I spent some time really looking into all the studies and just as you said, excellent for LPS. It has straight antibacterial properties. It can prevent food poisoning. I had an experience where I was traveling in Mexico, my husband and a group. We took it the whole time and we didn’t get food poisoning when the other people in our party did.

Dr. Weitz:                            Oh, interesting, because that question comes up a lot is I’m going to Mexico or wherever I’m going and I want to try to avoid getting food poisoning again. Dr. Pimentel’s answer is just to take antibiotics.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Take a half a pill of Rifaximin is what he recommends. I’m not sure that what I did is enough for everybody. What other colleagues will say is take one Allimed pill or two Allimed pills.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. I’ve had patients take one Biocidin.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, yeah, yeah, things like that. But this worked for me and I was so grateful. It does a lot of amazing things. I mean, it can help with lipids, the IgG. I mean, it’s just so important, anti-inflammatory. It’s expensive is the problem, but I think if someone can afford it, it’s a great thing to have on board for so many reasons. Not just SIBO.

Dr. Weitz:                            What about the use of probiotics for SIBO? A number of practitioners use probiotics. We both know one prominent practitioner who says that’s the first line treatment. Everybody should get three probiotics, Lacto bifido, Saccharomyces boulardii, and a spore based. Some practitioners feel spore based is good because it won’t add to the bacteria in a small intestine. They’re concerned that even giving antimicrobial herbs or antibiotics, we might damage the microbiome. So why don’t we try to beef up the microbiome at the same time? And then we have Dr. Hawrelak who found specific strains like Lactobacillus reuteri, DSM 17938 that reduces methanogens.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah. Okay. So here’s the deal. It’s all good. Then of course, we didn’t mention this. I think still Dr. Pimentel is not a fan of probiotics.

Dr. Weitz:                            Not at all, but part of the reason he’s against probiotics is because of all these meta-analyses that lump in all these different studies on probiotics, and they’re all using different probiotics. They don’t even report on which particular strains. You certainly wouldn’t throw in all antibiotics and say, “Antibiotics are effective for SIBO.” You test a specific one, and here we’re throwing in all these probiotics as if it doesn’t matter which strains and how much of each. Then we go, “Oh, probiotics work.” So he has a problem with that.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I would agree. That is a strange thing, isn’t it?

Dr. Weitz:                            It is.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Okay. So we’re fortunate in that we have a whole bunch of studies on probiotics and SIBO. I mean, right now, I haven’t counted recently, but there should be about 35, maybe even more than 35 studies, which is a surprise to a lot of people that there’s that many. There’s been reviews of these. The most recent one was I think 2017. So this gets quoted a lot, and it’s really astounding what it showed. It showed like a 53%, even with some products, actual eradication rate of SIBO. So this gets everyone excited. Oh, my God. Can I use probiotics for my main treatment of SIBO? The issue with these studies is a lot of them, and let me just preface, here’s the problem, is that clinically, it’s pretty rare for any of us to see those types of results. That’s frustrating.  We want to see these results. Even if you go out and you get the exact same product that was used in a study that had a fantastic decontamination rate, we don’t get those same results. It’s really frustrating. So one thing is that a lot of these studies were small. A lot of them were done on certain conditions with certain age groups. Just as an example, pediatric short bowel syndrome. That may not translate to an adult with IBS SIBO, who doesn’t have an altered anatomy. So maybe that’s what some of the differences, but one way or the other… There haven’t been any duplication studies on any of these.

                                                Maybe that’s why we’re having a clinical difference, but the evidence in the studies is excellent. Certainly, it shows that probiotics can lower gas levels, can lower symptoms, and may even be able to eradicate SIBO. What probiotics? In these studies, just as you said, for the general IBS studies, they use every different type, all different kinds of lactobacillus, all different kinds of bifidus, all different kinds of spore bacterias, and Saccharomyces boulardii. Here’s the thing, all of those different types showed benefits. As you mentioned, Lactobacillus reuteri, everyone says it different. That was amazing for methane. I think it’s like 55% at eliminating methane, but that same strain has been studied to help diarrhea.  So we think of methane with constipation. That same one was also studied, showing reduction of SIBO when you’re on a PPI. So really, really interesting. Bacillus clausii, the spore has excellent studies for hydrogen. Then there’s a lot of studies on combinations where they use yeast and lactobacillus and bifidus or spore and everything. But what are we supposed to do when we try it and then it doesn’t work? So basically, the study also for IBS, they’re pretty good too. I think it’s fine. A good idea to try probiotics, first line, I guess you have to decide where you are in the patient in the journey, because first line, I think that’s a great idea for someone who’s having digestive trouble.  But if they’re suffering with really bad symptoms for really long time, you may not want to do that first. A lot of the studies show that it takes three months to get these results. Well, if someone’s in real acute distress, we may not want to wait that long. So it probably depends on the circumstance. For some people, I think it would be a great first line. I think it’s a great thing to throw in and try at any point. I personally like to try probiotics before I’ve gotten somebody all the way better and they’re all perfect.

                                                I know that what most of our training is the four Rs, and you do the probiotics when you’re done at the end. I did that in the beginning when treating SIBO and I had a lot of problems because of all these multiple rounds that I needed to do, it could sometimes relapse and it would take me a while to get someone all squared away. It might take me a year and then I give them probiotics. It’s like I rock the boat and they would oftentimes have a bad reaction. I don’t want to rock the boat when it’s all good. So I like to start them on probiotics during treatment, or at least before I’m all finished with everything. People have a different ideas about that, but I just think if you do it, then if somebody has a reaction or something’s not right, you have time to fiddle.

                                                You’re in the middle of using antimicrobials. So then which ones? I don’t know. So many different ones seem to have worked in these studies. That’s probably why Dr. Ruscio likes to give those three all three together just in case cover all your bases. The problem also that I didn’t mention is that many people have a bad reaction to probiotics. So that’s where it is probably a good idea to make sure you’re trying the different ones. It might not have a bad reaction to yeast or to spore if they had Lactobacillus.  A lot of people have histamine intolerance and then there’s all people talk about, “Oh, well, there’s some probiotics that are safe for people with low histamine producing,” but then even they can still react. Dr. Hawrelak generally recommends bifidus for people who are sensitive to histamine, but probably that’s going to be very individual. I mean, we know how an individual it is with histamine sensitivities. So that’s an issue too, is that a lot of people can’t handle them, but then they may be able to handle them as they move along in their treatment. So that gets us going on the topic. So tell me what you think.

Dr. Weitz:                            So I was trained with the four R protocol from going all those seminars with Dr. Bland for all those years. I really do miss those. I used to listen to his functional medicine update. We used to get these little cassette tapes and then they were CD of DVDs we would put in the car. Anyway, so I started off doing a four R and then I decided to start adding in probiotics as part of the protocol because I wanted to make sure I didn’t damage a microbiome. That wasn’t really working.  So I went back to the four R program, and it’s a two-phase thing, which is we do the eradication first. Then when we feel like we’ve got the symptoms under control, we start microbiome restoration, rebuilding the gut, rebuilding the gut wall, and use those products. I usually start with the spore-based probiotic. That seems to be the safest. Then gradually expand to other prebiotics, probiotics, and at the same time, we’re slowly expanding the foods that they can eat as well.

Dr. Siebecker:                    That sounds great. So that’s gone well. You haven’t had too many reactions with that.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, that seems to work pretty well, especially when the patients comply.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I mean, my problem is that I saw extremely sensitive patient population, and even the spore ones were… I mean, I used to make a joke about a very popular spore-based combination probiotic, and I said, “It should just be relabeled die off because my patients would react so intensely to it.” But that’s just the sensitive group. So it’s good to hear that your patients are tolerating that well.

Dr. Weitz:                           I know Pimentel had a negative report about lactobacillus.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Well, yeah, they found in one of their studies when they were really assessing what was overgrown in the microbiome, and then they figured out this new assessment for an imbalance or dysbiosis in the small intestine microbiome where they identified disruptors, basically certain bacteria that if they would get too overgrown, they would disrupt the entire ecosystem. They classified lactobacillus one of them. It was just this one little sentence in one of these studies, and we all noticed it. We all started asking about it, and that’s all they can say. They haven’t said anything else.  So all these years following this research as it comes out, I don’t get too excited about one thing or another. I just wait until more information comes out. I mean, look, we’ve been using lactobacillus in our patients forever with good results, unless they have a reaction and then we don’t use it. I’m not worried. We’ll just see what the research shows in the future. Maybe there’ll be some very specific things, but otherwise, I’m not going to worry about it.

Dr. Weitz:                           I was reviewing some of Pimentel’s recent papers, and one of them was the one where he looked at the methanogens and hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria. There’s this interesting information, I wonder if we have anything to do with it, which is that there’s certain bacteria that produce the hydrogen to feed the methanogens. So we have Ruminococcus, Christensenella, and then we have these Enterobacteriaceae that feed the hydrogen sulfide bacteria. It seems like something important, but is there anything we can do with that?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, this is key. These are the syntrophys. So this is basically what is creating the hydrogen for methanogens or hydrogen sulfide. They call them the syntrophys. What’s really amazing about this is that I and they, everyone just assumed it was the overgrown standard hydrogen bacteria, E. coli and Klebsiella. So we thought, “Okay, we’re aiming at that.” So basically, this is a new target for our treatment, and I haven’t actually spent time going through PubMed looking at various articles on what kills those things, what MIP levels. I haven’t done it yet because what we have works. So we’ve been using it for so long of all the before and after tests.

                                                We already know it works, but what I think is going to happen is, well, I know they’re doing research on it, Pimentel and Rezaie and all that. I think they might have something at this DDW, which is the big gastroenterology conference that happens every year in the spring. So 2024, I think they might have, we’ll see, some treatments to reveal aimed at those. If it’s not this year, it’ll probably be next year. I’m so glad you brought it up. I think that this is going to be the wave of the future. We probably get more specific at targeting when we’re treating methane and hydrogen sulfide, what treats, what aims at those syntrophys. Then they had a paper that came out in December and I don’t have all these organisms memorized, but they had this sequence now where it’s like this leads to this leads to this. It was like a further piece.

Dr. Weitz:                            Really?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah. So sorry I didn’t bring it up in front of me or I could read it to you. For anyone who’s interested, I do a quarterly newsletter. You could just sign up at SiboInfo and I put all the research and I put comments. So I put a big thing all about it, because it was really fascinating. I have yet chance to speak to Dr. Pimentel to ask him to publicly to explain this, because that seems like another target actually. They’re just learning more and more of the specifics of what is overgrown. The whole point is this is going to refine our treatments.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. Yeah. I’ll make sure to review that next time before I talk to Pimentel. I think they dropped the statin for methanogen.

Dr. Siebecker:                    He’s still working on it.

Dr. Weitz:                            Oh, he’s still working on it. Okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, he hasn’t fully dropped it. It was a disappointment, but so for anyone who doesn’t know, he was working on enterocoded, not exactly like a statin that wouldn’t absorb into the blood. So that you wouldn’t get all those other effects. Statins, it works like Atrantil. It inhibits methane production. It actually disrupts an enzyme in the methanogen, so they can’t make methane. So this was another way to treat, but it just didn’t give them the results they wanted, but they are still working on it.

Dr. Weitz:                            I wonder if any natural practitioners are using red yeast rice for the same purpose.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh, yeah. We asked Dr. Rezai about that, and then he said that in a few patients it does work and then in others it doesn’t.

Dr. Weitz:                            Oh, interesting.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, exactly. That’s all the first thing we think about. Could we just use red yeast rice for this, like an alternate? Atrantil does the same thing.

Dr. Weitz:                           Okay.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah.

Dr. Weitz:                           Interesting.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Actually, I find Atrantil to be very hit or miss, probably just like red yeast rice. It’s in some people it hits like a miracle.

Dr. Weitz:                           Are you using a recommended dosage or are you using a higher dosage?

Dr. Siebecker:                    Using four to six a day.

Dr. Weitz:                           Oh, I think the recommendation is two a day.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh, yeah. So yeah, two is what we use for maintenance. Once you get your effect, then anywhere from one to three as your maintenance, because you still need to keep inhibiting that enzyme. Keep inhibiting the methane production.

Dr. Weitz:                            So you’re doing two or three twice a day.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, that’s right, for standard treatment round for a month. But here’s the thing, I’ve seen before and afters where that just works like a normal herbal antibiotic lowering methane in the same way you would expect, but there’s also these miracle cases that sometimes happen. The real miracle cases that I see are probably going to either be with Rifaximin or Atrantil and then they don’t work like that for the majority, but you get these miracle cases. You always remember them. But what will happen is for some people within just a few days, usually within four to five days, the Atrantil just has removed all constipation just completely. I mean, people in their 70s constipated for they’re entire lives gone in four days.

Dr. Weitz:                            Wow.

Dr. Siebecker:                    But then I find that the miracle, if it’s going to be a miracle like that, it’s usually pretty quick. My frequent educational cohort, Shivan Sarna, she interviewed Ken Brown. She interviews him a lot. He’s the creator of that. He said that he’s seen miracles happen months on. I haven’t. Usually, when you’re doing it for me, when I see him doing it over months, you’re just getting those incremental reductions in gas like you would anything else. I don’t consider that a miracle.

Dr. Weitz:                            Yeah. I haven’t seen any miracles.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Complete and fast. So maybe red yeast rice is the same. It’s like either it works or it doesn’t. That one particular approach I find is a bit more hit or miss.

Dr. Weitz:                            Right. If it lowers your cholesterol at the same time, probably not a bad idea.

Dr. Siebecker:                    You can get other benefits.

Dr. Weitz:                            Have you used any peptides? Some people use BPC 157 supposedly to help heal the gut lining, to help heal leaky gut.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I haven’t used it in patients, but when I found out about it years ago, I was enthralled and I brought in a whole bunch of people to interview for various summits and educational events, Dr. Bar and others speaking.

Dr. Weitz:                           I know he was using it a lot.

Dr. Siebecker:                    He was, speaking very favorably about it. I mean, when you read about it, it seems like a perfect match. Again, it’s expensive, right? I’ve heard some people say it was wonderful for them and not much for others. So I don’t have a ton of experience with it. I was very interested. Did you try it a whole bunch?

Dr. Weitz:                           No, not a whole bunch because of the expense. If I already have patients on four or five different products and then you throw in a product that’s $150 to $300 for a month’s supply-

Dr. Siebecker:                    It’s a lot.

Dr. Weitz:                           It’s a lot.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah. I haven’t heard enough feedback to make me think that’s worth it full bore for most people.

Dr. Weitz:                           When I’ve used it, I found around four capsules a day was about the right dosage, but that means you’re going to go through a bottle in two weeks, so that’s 300 bucks a month.

Dr. Siebecker:                    I mean, I tried it on myself. I always try everything almost, and it was meh, but that’s one person.

Dr. Weitz:                           Yeah, I know. I use it for healing for musculoskeletal injuries as well. I wouldn’t say I’ve seen a lot of miracles, but there seems to be some benefit.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Yeah, and I guess I’ve heard some cases that responded really well.

Dr. Weitz:                           Right. All right. This has been awesome, Allison.

Dr. Siebecker:                    We talked about a lot of different things.

Dr. Weitz:                           We did. Thank you for being so generous with your time.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh, it’s been such a pleasure.

Dr. Weitz:                           Tell the viewers about some of your courses and how they can sign up for them.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Oh, yeah. I have a bunch of trainings. If anyone’s interested in learning more about SIBO, I have a full length SIBO training, very comprehensive, 22 hours, got mini trainings on SIBO and testing. I’m doing a testing masterclass here soon. You can find all of this on my website, siboinfo.com that has a lot of information. Of course, signing up for my newsletter. I always send my quarterly newsletter has all the studies. If there’s ever any treatment updates, like in the January one, there was different antibiotics that people are using. I put that in there. So anyway, I’d love for anyone to join me for a training.

Dr. Weitz:                           That’s great. Thank you.

Dr. Siebecker:                    Thank you so much, Ben.

 


 

Dr. Weitz:                            Thank you for making it all the way through this episode of the Rational Wellness Podcast. For those of you who enjoy listening to the Rational Wellness Podcast, I would appreciate it if you could go to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and give us a five-star ratings and review. If you would like to work with me personally to help you improve your health, I do accept a limited number of new patients per month for a functional medicine consultation. So many areas I specialize in include helping patients with specific health issues like gut problems, neurodegenerative conditions, autoimmune diseases, cardio metabolic conditions, or for an executive health screen.  To help you promote longevity and take a deeper dive into some of those factors that can lead to chronic diseases along the way, please call my Santa Monica Weitz Sports Chiropractic and Nutrition Office at 310-395-3111. We’ll set you up for a new consultation for functional medicine, and I look forward to speaking to everybody next week.